Metrics

South FloridaBulls

Season
Current

Big East

Big East, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010South Florida850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#105 (of 120 teams · 309.4 yds/g · 4,022 yards)#85 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 313 points)#17 (of 120 teams · 317.9 yds/g allowed · 4,133 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#52 (of 120 teams · +4.1 /g · +53 on the season)#66 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.15 /g)#95 (of 120 teams · 17:36 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 120 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 120 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#18 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 120 teams · 0.829 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Big East teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#72 (Total offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #32–#114. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#67 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #57–#101. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#14 (Total defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #3–#65. 3 of 8 in the top 10.)#18 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #3–#68. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#50 (Point margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #23–#86. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#55 (Turnover margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #7–#119. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#67 (Possession: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #4–#109. 1 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#69 (Offensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #47–#108. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #2–#61. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#66 (Offensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #53–#107. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#23 (Defensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #3–#69. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#81 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #12–#110. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range #16–#74. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)
2010Cincinnati480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 120 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 5,008 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#63 (of 120 teams · 369.4 yds/g allowed · 4,433 yards)#68 (of 120 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#70 (of 120 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#119 (of 120 teams · -15 on the season · 14 taken, 29 given · -1.25 /g)#109 (of 120 teams · 17:15 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#47 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.996 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Louisville760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 120 teams · 369.0 yds/g · 4,797 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 343 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 311.7 yds/g allowed · 4,052 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 252 points)#40 (of 120 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season)#44 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.23 /g)#54 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#23 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.906 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.943 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Pittsburgh850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 120 teams · 366.9 yds/g · 4,770 yards)#67 (of 120 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,966 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 247 points)#36 (of 120 teams · +7.3 /g · +95 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:33 /g · 4h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#69 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.848 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Rutgers480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 120 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 3,539 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 250 points)#65 (of 120 teams · 374.2 yds/g allowed · 4,490 yards)#62 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#86 (of 120 teams · -5.7 /g · -68 on the season)#26 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 22 taken, 15 given · +0.58 /g)#55 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 120 teams · -0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#53 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Syracuse850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 120 teams · 322.9 yds/g · 4,197 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 288 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 301.5 yds/g allowed · 3,919 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.893 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.852 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UConn850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 120 teams · 325.8 yds/g · 4,235 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 343 points)#58 (of 120 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 4,768 yards)#35 (of 120 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#50 (of 120 teams · +4.4 /g · +57 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 32 taken, 19 given · +1.00 /g)#68 (of 120 teams · 18:31 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 120 teams · -0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#55 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010West Virginia940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 120 teams · 372.7 yds/g · 4,845 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 327 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 261.1 yds/g allowed · 3,394 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#23 (of 120 teams · +11.6 /g · +151 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 24 taken, 28 given · -0.31 /g)#67 (of 120 teams · 18:35 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.887 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.915 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big East, 20102010 South FloridaBig East medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #72
Total offense. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Cincinnati #32 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #67 of 120; 2010 Louisville #71 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #72 of 120; 2010 UConn #95 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #97 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 105 of 120. Big East median rank 72.
Scoring offensemedian #67
Scoring offense. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Cincinnati #57 of 120; 2010 Louisville #63 of 120; 2010 UConn #63 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #67 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #78 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #93 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #101 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 85 of 120. Big East median rank 67.
Total defensemedian #14
Total defense. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 West Virginia #3 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #7 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #8 of 120; 2010 Louisville #14 of 120; 2010 UConn #58 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #63 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #65 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 17 of 120. Big East median rank 14.
Scoring defensemedian #18
Scoring defense. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 West Virginia #3 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #15 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #17 of 120; 2010 Louisville #18 of 120; 2010 UConn #35 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #62 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #68 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 22 of 120. Big East median rank 18.
Point marginmedian #50
Point margin. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 West Virginia #23 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #36 of 120; 2010 Louisville #40 of 120; 2010 UConn #50 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #56 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #70 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #86 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 52 of 120. Big East median rank 50.
Turnover marginmedian #55
Turnover margin. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UConn #7 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #26 of 120; 2010 Louisville #44 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #55 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #74 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #74 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 66 of 120. Big East median rank 55.
Possessionmedian #67
Possession. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Pittsburgh #4 of 120; 2010 Louisville #54 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #55 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #67 of 120; 2010 UConn #68 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #106 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 95 of 120. Big East median rank 67.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big East, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big East, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big East, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big East, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #69
Offensive EPA. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Cincinnati #47 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #52 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #62 of 120; 2010 Louisville #69 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #74 of 120; 2010 UConn #102 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 98 of 120. Big East median rank 69.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 West Virginia #2 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #8 of 120; 2010 UConn #35 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #40 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #46 of 120; 2010 Louisville #48 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #61 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 20 of 120. Big East median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #66
Offensive success rate. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Cincinnati #53 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #62 of 120; 2010 Louisville #65 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #66 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #87 of 120; 2010 UConn #100 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 93 of 120. Big East median rank 66.
Defensive success ratemedian #23
Defensive success rate. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 West Virginia #3 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #8 of 120; 2010 Louisville #23 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #47 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #53 of 120; 2010 UConn #55 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #69 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 18 of 120. Big East median rank 23.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #81
Offensive explosiveness. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Cincinnati #12 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #54 of 120; 2010 Louisville #73 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #81 of 120; 2010 Pittsburgh #84 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #86 of 120; 2010 UConn #90 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 110 of 120. Big East median rank 81.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Big East, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Pittsburgh #16 of 120; 2010 Syracuse #18 of 120; 2010 UConn #19 of 120; 2010 Cincinnati #44 of 120; 2010 West Virginia #52 of 120; 2010 Rutgers #63 of 120; 2010 Louisville #74 of 120. Marked: 2010 South Florida, ranked 70 of 120. Big East median rank 44.