THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

South FloridaBulls

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

American Athletic, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013South Florida2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 255.5 yds/g · 3,066 yds)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 165 points)#21 (of 125 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,209 yds)#74 (of 125 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#110 (of 125 teams · -14.8 /g · -178 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 25 taken, 28 given · -0.25 /g)#105 (of 125 teams · 28:30 /g · 5h 42m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 125 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 32% of plays successful)#74 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 1.048 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 American Athletic teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#55 (Total offense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #23–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Scoring offense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #25–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #1–#110. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Scoring defense: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #2–#100. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#83 (Point margin: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #5–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#81 (Turnover margin: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #1–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#57 (Possession: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #6–#121. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#46 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #3–#113. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #10–#109. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#56 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #4–#124. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #8–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #7–#109. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#66 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range #2–#123. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2013Louisville12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 125 teams · 460.9 yds/g · 5,991 yds)#25 (of 125 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 251.5 yds/g allowed · 3,269 yds)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 12.2 pts/g allowed · 158 points)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +23.0 /g · +299 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +17 on the season · 27 taken, 10 given · +1.31 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:43 /g · 7h 18m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 50% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 125 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays)#121 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Cincinnati9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 125 teams · 472.1 yds/g · 6,137 yds)#47 (of 125 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 315.6 yds/g allowed · 4,103 yds)#14 (of 125 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#32 (of 125 teams · +11.1 /g · +144 on the season)#103 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 21 taken, 28 given · -0.54 /g)#28 (of 125 teams · 32:00 /g · 6h 56m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#19 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#37 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 125 teams · 0.948 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Houston8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 125 teams · 419.5 yds/g · 5,454 yds)#38 (of 125 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 431 points)#80 (of 125 teams · 415.8 yds/g allowed · 5,405 yds)#20 (of 125 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#31 (of 125 teams · +11.4 /g · +148 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +25 on the season · 43 taken, 18 given · +1.92 /g)#121 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 26:21 /g · 5h 43m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 125 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 125 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#87 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#87 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 125 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.811 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013SMU5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 125 teams · 435.2 yds/g · 5,222 yds)#76 (of 125 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 321 points)#73 (of 125 teams · 412.6 yds/g allowed · 4,951 yds)#100 (of 125 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#93 (of 125 teams · -6.6 /g · -79 on the season)#106 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 17 taken, 24 given · -0.58 /g)#94 (of 125 teams · 28:51 /g · 5h 46m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 125 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 125 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#56 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#112 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 125 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 125 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Temple2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 125 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 4,788 yds)#89 (of 125 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 299 points)#110 (of 125 teams · 473.6 yds/g allowed · 5,683 yds)#83 (of 125 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#85 (of 125 teams · -4.9 /g · -59 on the season)#97 (of 125 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.50 /g)#57 (of 125 teams · 30:15 /g · 6h 03m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 125 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#55 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#100 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 125 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 125 teams · 0.949 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013UConn3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 125 teams · 318.6 yds/g · 3,823 yds)#107 (of 125 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 247 points)#52 (of 125 teams · 384.6 yds/g allowed · 4,615 yds)#86 (of 125 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#101 (of 125 teams · -9.7 /g · -116 on the season)#71 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#44 (of 125 teams · 31:02 /g · 6h 12m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 125 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#109 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#27 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 125 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 125 teams · 1.053 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Memphis3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 311.5 yds/g · 3,738 yds)#111 (of 125 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 234 points)#39 (of 125 teams · 370.7 yds/g allowed · 4,448 yds)#44 (of 125 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#86 (of 125 teams · -5.1 /g · -61 on the season)#111 (of 125 teams · -8 on the season · 18 taken, 26 given · -0.67 /g)#68 (of 125 teams · 29:55 /g · 5h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 125 teams · 0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 125 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#89 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 125 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 125 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Rutgers6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 125 teams · 365.1 yds/g · 4,747 yds)#77 (of 125 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 345 points)#74 (of 125 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 5,366 yds)#81 (of 125 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 387 points)#83 (of 125 teams · -3.2 /g · -42 on the season)#121 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -12 on the season · 18 taken, 30 given · -0.92 /g)#90 (of 125 teams · 29:05 /g · 6h 18m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 125 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#82 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#50 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 125 teams · 1.035 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013UCF12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 American Athletic teams in 2013. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 125 teams · 441.5 yds/g · 5,740 yds)#30 (of 125 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#29 (of 125 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yds)#17 (of 125 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#24 (of 125 teams · +13.3 /g · +173 on the season)#32 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.38 /g)#26 (of 125 teams · 32:09 /g · 6h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 125 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 125 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#13 (of 125 teams · 48% of plays successful)#29 (of 125 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.871 average PPA on successful plays)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.130 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20132013 South FloridaAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #55
Total offense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Cincinnati #23 of 125; 2013 Louisville #28 of 125; 2013 UCF #40 of 125; 2013 SMU #41 of 125; 2013 Houston #55 of 125; 2013 Temple #75 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #96 of 125; 2013 UConn #114 of 125; 2013 Memphis #117 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 123 of 125. American Athletic median rank 55.
Scoring offensemedian #76
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #25 of 125; 2013 UCF #30 of 125; 2013 Houston #38 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #47 of 125; 2013 SMU #76 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #77 of 125; 2013 Temple #89 of 125; 2013 UConn #107 of 125; 2013 Memphis #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 122 of 125. American Athletic median rank 76.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #1 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #9 of 125; 2013 UCF #29 of 125; 2013 Memphis #39 of 125; 2013 UConn #52 of 125; 2013 SMU #73 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #74 of 125; 2013 Houston #80 of 125; 2013 Temple #110 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 21 of 125. American Athletic median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #44
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #2 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #14 of 125; 2013 UCF #17 of 125; 2013 Houston #20 of 125; 2013 Memphis #44 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #81 of 125; 2013 Temple #83 of 125; 2013 UConn #86 of 125; 2013 SMU #100 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 74 of 125. American Athletic median rank 44.
Point marginmedian #83
Point margin. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #5 of 125; 2013 UCF #24 of 125; 2013 Houston #31 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #32 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #83 of 125; 2013 Temple #85 of 125; 2013 Memphis #86 of 125; 2013 SMU #93 of 125; 2013 UConn #101 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 110 of 125. American Athletic median rank 83.
Turnover marginmedian #81
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Houston #1 of 125; 2013 Louisville #2 of 125; 2013 UCF #32 of 125; 2013 UConn #71 of 125; 2013 Temple #97 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #103 of 125; 2013 SMU #106 of 125; 2013 Memphis #111 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 81 of 125. American Athletic median rank 81.
Possessionmedian #57
Possession. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #6 of 125; 2013 UCF #26 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #28 of 125; 2013 UConn #44 of 125; 2013 Temple #57 of 125; 2013 Memphis #68 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #90 of 125; 2013 SMU #94 of 125; 2013 Houston #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 105 of 125. American Athletic median rank 57.
Returning passing
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 South Florida, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #46
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #3 of 125; 2013 Temple #30 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #40 of 125; 2013 UCF #41 of 125; 2013 SMU #46 of 125; 2013 Houston #86 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #94 of 125; 2013 Memphis #96 of 125; 2013 UConn #110 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 113 of 125. American Athletic median rank 46.
Defensive EPAmedian #47
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #10 of 125; 2013 UConn #25 of 125; 2013 Memphis #39 of 125; 2013 Houston #47 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #63 of 125; 2013 UCF #74 of 125; 2013 SMU #83 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #105 of 125; 2013 Temple #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 33 of 125. American Athletic median rank 47.
Offensive success ratemedian #56
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #4 of 125; 2013 UCF #13 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #19 of 125; 2013 Temple #55 of 125; 2013 SMU #56 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #82 of 125; 2013 Houston #87 of 125; 2013 Memphis #89 of 125; 2013 UConn #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 124 of 125. American Athletic median rank 56.
Defensive success ratemedian #50
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Louisville #8 of 125; 2013 UConn #27 of 125; 2013 UCF #29 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #37 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #50 of 125; 2013 Memphis #51 of 125; 2013 Houston #87 of 125; 2013 Temple #100 of 125; 2013 SMU #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 74 of 125. American Athletic median rank 50.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Temple #18 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #25 of 125; 2013 Houston #38 of 125; 2013 UConn #41 of 125; 2013 Louisville #51 of 125; 2013 SMU #61 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #63 of 125; 2013 Memphis #73 of 125; 2013 UCF #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 7 of 125. American Athletic median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #66
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Houston #2 of 125; 2013 SMU #14 of 125; 2013 Cincinnati #53 of 125; 2013 Temple #66 of 125; 2013 Memphis #70 of 125; 2013 Rutgers #108 of 125; 2013 UConn #114 of 125; 2013 Louisville #121 of 125; 2013 UCF #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 South Florida, ranked 24 of 125. American Athletic median rank 66.