Metrics

StanfordCardinal

Season
Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Stanford1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 489.3 yds/g · 6,361 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 561 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 337.6 yds/g allowed · 4,389 yards)#30 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21.2 /g · +276 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:29 /g · 4h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.187 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#22 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 120 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #4–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #3–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #27–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #19–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #7–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #5–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#44 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#109. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#95 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #21–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #16–#103. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#15 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #2–#103. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range #40–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Arizona480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 465.3 yds/g · 5,583 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 369 points)#111 (of 120 teams · 460.5 yds/g allowed · 5,526 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#85 (of 120 teams · -4.7 /g · -56 on the season)#89 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#87 (of 120 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#89 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.995 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Arizona State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 445.8 yds/g · 5,795 yards)#28 (of 120 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 431 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 422.1 yds/g allowed · 5,487 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 372 points)#51 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.62 /g)#102 (of 120 teams · 17:15 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#86 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011California760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 401.5 yds/g · 5,219 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 368 points)#27 (of 120 teams · 332.9 yds/g allowed · 4,328 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#53 (of 120 teams · +4.2 /g · +54 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 120 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#16 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.968 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.976 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Colorado3100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 120 teams · 346.3 yds/g · 4,502 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 257 points)#104 (of 120 teams · 439.3 yds/g allowed · 5,711 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 475 points)#114 (of 120 teams · -16.8 /g · -218 on the season)#91 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.46 /g)#17 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 4h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 120 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#93 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Oregon1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 522.8 yds/g · 7,319 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 46.1 pts/g · 645 points)#69 (of 120 teams · 390.1 yds/g allowed · 5,461 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21.4 /g · +300 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.64 /g)#118 (of 120 teams · 15:21 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.975 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Oregon State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 373.7 yds/g · 4,484 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 262 points)#85 (of 120 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 4,935 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#99 (of 120 teams · -9.0 /g · -108 on the season)#111 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 21 taken, 32 given · -0.92 /g)#71 (of 120 teams · 18:03 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#100 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011UCLA681 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 120 teams · 376.6 yds/g · 5,273 yards)#88 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 323 points)#91 (of 120 teams · 417.1 yds/g allowed · 5,840 yards)#92 (of 120 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 439 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -8.3 /g · -116 on the season)#86 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.36 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#96 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 1.001 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011USC1025 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 120 teams · 456.8 yds/g · 5,481 yards)#16 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 429 points)#56 (of 120 teams · 374.8 yds/g allowed · 4,497 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#18 (of 120 teams · +12.2 /g · +146 on the season)#69 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.08 /g)#22 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.116 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#83 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Utah850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 120 teams · 310.9 yds/g · 4,041 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 325 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 350.9 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points)#49 (of 120 teams · +4.8 /g · +62 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 35 taken, 23 given · +0.92 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 120 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#43 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.860 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.952 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Washington760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 120 teams · 409.9 yds/g · 5,328 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 33.4 pts/g · 434 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 453.3 yds/g allowed · 5,893 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 467 points)#79 (of 120 teams · -2.5 /g · -33 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#82 (of 120 teams · 17:51 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 120 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#103 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 120 teams · 1.009 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Washington State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2011. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 120 teams · 422.4 yds/g · 5,069 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 358 points)#83 (of 120 teams · 409.6 yds/g allowed · 4,915 yards)#95 (of 120 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#75 (of 120 teams · -1.9 /g · -23 on the season)#89 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#64 (of 120 teams · 18:15 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#79 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 120 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.971 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20112011 StanfordPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #4 of 120; 2011 Arizona #14 of 120; 2011 USC #18 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #21 of 120; 2011 Washington State #32 of 120; 2011 Washington #38 of 120; 2011 California #43 of 120; 2011 UCLA #67 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #68 of 120; 2011 Colorado #91 of 120; 2011 Utah #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 8 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #3 of 120; 2011 USC #16 of 120; 2011 Washington #25 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #28 of 120; 2011 Arizona #38 of 120; 2011 Washington State #45 of 120; 2011 California #53 of 120; 2011 Utah #74 of 120; 2011 UCLA #88 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #100 of 120; 2011 Colorado #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 7 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #27 of 120; 2011 Utah #38 of 120; 2011 USC #56 of 120; 2011 Oregon #69 of 120; 2011 Washington State #83 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #85 of 120; 2011 UCLA #91 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #93 of 120; 2011 Colorado #104 of 120; 2011 Washington #107 of 120; 2011 Arizona #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 28 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Utah #19 of 120; 2011 USC #45 of 120; 2011 California #48 of 120; 2011 Oregon #52 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #74 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #89 of 120; 2011 UCLA #92 of 120; 2011 Washington State #95 of 120; 2011 Arizona #107 of 120; 2011 Washington #108 of 120; 2011 Colorado #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 30 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #53
Point margin. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #7 of 120; 2011 USC #18 of 120; 2011 Utah #49 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #51 of 120; 2011 California #53 of 120; 2011 Washington State #75 of 120; 2011 Washington #79 of 120; 2011 Arizona #85 of 120; 2011 UCLA #96 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #99 of 120; 2011 Colorado #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 8 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 53.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Utah #5 of 120; 2011 Oregon #19 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #21 of 120; 2011 California #61 of 120; 2011 Washington #61 of 120; 2011 USC #69 of 120; 2011 UCLA #86 of 120; 2011 Arizona #89 of 120; 2011 Washington State #89 of 120; 2011 Colorado #91 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 28 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Colorado #17 of 120; 2011 USC #22 of 120; 2011 California #26 of 120; 2011 Utah #62 of 120; 2011 UCLA #63 of 120; 2011 Washington State #64 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #71 of 120; 2011 Washington #82 of 120; 2011 Arizona #87 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #102 of 120; 2011 Oregon #118 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 10 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 63.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Stanford, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Stanford, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Stanford, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Stanford, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #44
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #7 of 120; 2011 Arizona #10 of 120; 2011 USC #19 of 120; 2011 Washington #25 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #44 of 120; 2011 UCLA #46 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #48 of 120; 2011 Colorado #54 of 120; 2011 California #56 of 120; 2011 Washington State #58 of 120; 2011 Utah #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 2 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Defensive EPAmedian #95
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #21 of 120; 2011 Oregon #27 of 120; 2011 Utah #42 of 120; 2011 Washington State #87 of 120; 2011 UCLA #95 of 120; 2011 USC #97 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #99 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #100 of 120; 2011 Washington #111 of 120; 2011 Arizona #113 of 120; 2011 Colorado #116 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 43 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 95.
Offensive success ratemedian #49
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 USC #13 of 120; 2011 Arizona #19 of 120; 2011 Oregon #23 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #38 of 120; 2011 Washington #49 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #53 of 120; 2011 California #56 of 120; 2011 UCLA #66 of 120; 2011 Washington State #87 of 120; 2011 Utah #100 of 120; 2011 Colorado #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 2 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 49.
Defensive success ratemedian #83
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 California #16 of 120; 2011 Oregon #34 of 120; 2011 Utah #43 of 120; 2011 Washington State #79 of 120; 2011 USC #83 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #86 of 120; 2011 Arizona #89 of 120; 2011 Colorado #93 of 120; 2011 UCLA #96 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #100 of 120; 2011 Washington #103 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 22 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 83.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #15
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Colorado #2 of 120; 2011 Washington #8 of 120; 2011 Arizona #10 of 120; 2011 Washington State #11 of 120; 2011 UCLA #13 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #15 of 120; 2011 Oregon #29 of 120; 2011 California #34 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #37 of 120; 2011 USC #71 of 120; 2011 Utah #103 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 102 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 15.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #79
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Oregon #40 of 120; 2011 UCLA #41 of 120; 2011 Oregon State #43 of 120; 2011 Arizona State #57 of 120; 2011 USC #73 of 120; 2011 Utah #79 of 120; 2011 Washington State #91 of 120; 2011 California #95 of 120; 2011 Arizona #101 of 120; 2011 Washington #103 of 120; 2011 Colorado #112 of 120. Marked: 2011 Stanford, ranked 115 of 120. Pac-12 median rank 79.