Metrics

StanfordCardinal

Season
Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Stanford940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#86 (of 130 teams · 379.5 yds/g · 4,934 yards)#73 (of 130 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 369 points)#78 (of 130 teams · 410.0 yds/g allowed · 5,330 yards)#37 (of 130 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#51 (of 130 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.31 /g)#60 (of 130 teams · 29:57 /g · 6h 29m on the season)#72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's passing production returning)#11 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 786.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 130 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 130 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#86 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 130 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 130 teams · 1.127 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #23–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #15–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #12–#129. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #5–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #16–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #11–#121. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #21–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning passing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #1–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #11–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #9–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #4–#68. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #14–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #8–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #11–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #8–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#59 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #6–#128. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range #4–#106. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2018Arizona570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 130 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 5,492 yards)#43 (of 130 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 376 points)#93 (of 130 teams · 432.0 yds/g allowed · 5,184 yards)#98 (of 130 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 391 points)#79 (of 130 teams · -1.3 /g · -15 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.33 /g)#124 (of 130 teams · 26:01 /g · 5h 12m on the season)#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's passing production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 130 teams · 580.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 130 teams · 0.195 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#60 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 130 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 130 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Arizona State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Utah)#49 (of 130 teams · 416.6 yds/g · 5,416 yards)#59 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 389 points)#74 (of 130 teams · 404.3 yds/g allowed · 5,256 yards)#53 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 332 points)#56 (of 130 teams · +4.4 /g · +57 on the season)#11 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 21 taken, 11 given · +0.77 /g)#71 (of 130 teams · 29:26 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#29 (of 130 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 130 teams · 0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 130 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#104 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 130 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 130 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018California760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#116 (of 130 teams · 341.9 yds/g · 4,444 yards)#116 (of 130 teams · 21.5 pts/g · 280 points)#14 (of 130 teams · 316.2 yds/g allowed · 4,111 yards)#22 (of 130 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#68 (of 130 teams · +1.1 /g · +15 on the season)#72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 28 taken, 29 given · -0.08 /g)#61 (of 130 teams · 29:52 /g · 6h 28m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#30 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#70 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning)#45 (of 130 teams · 596.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 130 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#22 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 130 teams · 1.037 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.039 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Colorado570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#74 (of 130 teams · 392.7 yds/g · 4,712 yards)#80 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#49 (of 130 teams · 375.6 yds/g allowed · 4,507 yards)#70 (of 130 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 327 points)#72 (of 130 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season)#102 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.42 /g)#33 (of 130 teams · 30:53 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#53 (of 130 teams · 575.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 130 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 130 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#52 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 130 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Oregon940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)#39 (of 130 teams · 427.5 yds/g · 5,557 yards)#25 (of 130 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 453 points)#55 (of 130 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,017 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#33 (of 130 teams · +9.5 /g · +123 on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.46 /g)#100 (of 130 teams · 27:54 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#46 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#26 (of 130 teams · 695.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 130 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#51 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 130 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 130 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Oregon State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 (of 130 teams · 404.8 yds/g · 4,858 yards)#91 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 313 points)#129 (of 130 teams · 536.6 yds/g allowed · 6,439 yards)#129 (of 130 teams · 45.7 pts/g allowed · 548 points)#128 (of 130 teams · -19.6 /g · -235 on the season)#121 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 8 taken, 18 given · -0.83 /g)#50 (of 130 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#88 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 130 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#129 (of 130 teams · 0.394 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#128 (of 130 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 130 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 130 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UCLA391 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 130 teams · 392.2 yds/g · 4,706 yards)#98 (of 130 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 295 points)#103 (of 130 teams · 442.3 yds/g allowed · 5,307 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 409 points)#109 (of 130 teams · -9.5 /g · -114 on the season)#76 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g)#119 (of 130 teams · 26:54 /g · 5h 23m on the season)#97 (of 130 teams · 15% of last season's passing production returning)#99 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#19 (of 130 teams · 754.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 130 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 130 teams · 0.222 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#114 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 130 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 130 teams · 1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018USC574 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State)#84 (of 130 teams · 382.6 yds/g · 4,591 yards)#91 (of 130 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 313 points)#61 (of 130 teams · 387.8 yds/g allowed · 4,653 yards)#64 (of 130 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#77 (of 130 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#119 (of 130 teams · -9 on the season · 10 taken, 19 given · -0.75 /g)#88 (of 130 teams · 28:46 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#116 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 933.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 130 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 130 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#32 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 130 teams · 1.193 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 130 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Utah950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 (of 130 teams · 395.1 yds/g · 5,532 yards)#76 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 393 points)#15 (of 130 teams · 316.4 yds/g allowed · 4,430 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 272 points)#39 (of 130 teams · +8.6 /g · +121 on the season)#98 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.36 /g)#70 (of 130 teams · 29:28 /g · 6h 53m on the season)#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning)#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#47 (of 130 teams · 594.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 130 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 130 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 130 teams · 1.077 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 130 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Washington1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State, #17 Utah, #17 Utah)#54 (of 130 teams · 414.9 yds/g · 5,809 yards)#89 (of 130 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 369 points)#12 (of 130 teams · 306.2 yds/g allowed · 4,287 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.4 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#30 (of 130 teams · +10.0 /g · +140 on the season)#55 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.14 /g)#22 (of 130 teams · 32:20 /g · 7h 33m on the season)#35 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 772.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 130 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#24 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 130 teams · 1.157 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.061 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Washington State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2018. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Utah · postseason: #24 Iowa State)#26 (of 130 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 5,877 yards)#15 (of 130 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 488 points)#39 (of 130 teams · 356.2 yds/g allowed · 4,631 yards)#42 (of 130 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 303 points)#16 (of 130 teams · +14.2 /g · +185 on the season)#21 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 23 taken, 15 given · +0.62 /g)#21 (of 130 teams · 32:27 /g · 7h 02m on the season)#123 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#45 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 554.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 130 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 130 teams · 0.151 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#61 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 130 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 130 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20182018 StanfordPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Arizona #23 of 130; 2018 Washington State #26 of 130; 2018 Oregon #39 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #49 of 130; 2018 Washington #54 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #68 of 130; 2018 Utah #72 of 130; 2018 Colorado #74 of 130; 2018 UCLA #76 of 130; 2018 USC #84 of 130; 2018 California #116 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 86 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #76
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington State #15 of 130; 2018 Oregon #25 of 130; 2018 Arizona #43 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #59 of 130; 2018 Utah #76 of 130; 2018 Colorado #80 of 130; 2018 Washington #89 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #91 of 130; 2018 USC #91 of 130; 2018 UCLA #98 of 130; 2018 California #116 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 73 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 76.
Total defensemedian #55
Total defense. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington #12 of 130; 2018 California #14 of 130; 2018 Utah #15 of 130; 2018 Washington State #39 of 130; 2018 Colorado #49 of 130; 2018 Oregon #55 of 130; 2018 USC #61 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #74 of 130; 2018 Arizona #93 of 130; 2018 UCLA #103 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 78 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 55.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington #5 of 130; 2018 Utah #17 of 130; 2018 California #22 of 130; 2018 Washington State #42 of 130; 2018 Oregon #48 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #53 of 130; 2018 USC #64 of 130; 2018 Colorado #70 of 130; 2018 Arizona #98 of 130; 2018 UCLA #104 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 37 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #56
Point margin. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington State #16 of 130; 2018 Washington #30 of 130; 2018 Oregon #33 of 130; 2018 Utah #39 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #56 of 130; 2018 California #68 of 130; 2018 Colorado #72 of 130; 2018 USC #77 of 130; 2018 Arizona #79 of 130; 2018 UCLA #109 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 51 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 56.
Turnover marginmedian #72
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Arizona State #11 of 130; 2018 Washington State #21 of 130; 2018 Oregon #30 of 130; 2018 Washington #55 of 130; 2018 California #72 of 130; 2018 UCLA #76 of 130; 2018 Arizona #91 of 130; 2018 Utah #98 of 130; 2018 Colorado #102 of 130; 2018 USC #119 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #121 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 40 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 72.
Possessionmedian #61
Possession. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington State #21 of 130; 2018 Washington #22 of 130; 2018 Colorado #33 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #50 of 130; 2018 California #61 of 130; 2018 Utah #70 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #71 of 130; 2018 USC #88 of 130; 2018 Oregon #100 of 130; 2018 UCLA #119 of 130; 2018 Arizona #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 60 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 61.
Returning passingmedian #58
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 California #1 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #18 of 130; 2018 Colorado #21 of 130; 2018 Washington #35 of 130; 2018 Oregon #46 of 130; 2018 Utah #58 of 130; 2018 Arizona #68 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #88 of 130; 2018 UCLA #97 of 130; 2018 USC #116 of 130; 2018 Washington State #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 72 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 58.
Returning receivingmedian #45
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Arizona State #12 of 130; 2018 Arizona #18 of 130; 2018 California #30 of 130; 2018 Oregon #40 of 130; 2018 Washington State #45 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #69 of 130; 2018 Washington #77 of 130; 2018 UCLA #99 of 130; 2018 USC #101 of 130; 2018 Utah #116 of 130; 2018 Colorado #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 11 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Returning rushingmedian #80
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Utah #24 of 130; 2018 Washington #39 of 130; 2018 UCLA #43 of 130; 2018 California #70 of 130; 2018 Arizona #80 of 130; 2018 Oregon #106 of 130; 2018 Washington State #109 of 130; 2018 USC #114 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #118 of 130; 2018 Colorado #120 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 9 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 80.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 USC #4 of 130; 2018 Washington #18 of 130; 2018 UCLA #19 of 130; 2018 Oregon #26 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #29 of 130; 2018 California #45 of 130; 2018 Utah #47 of 130; 2018 Arizona #50 of 130; 2018 Colorado #53 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #68 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 17 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington State #14 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #30 of 130; 2018 Oregon #32 of 130; 2018 Arizona #41 of 130; 2018 Washington #44 of 130; 2018 UCLA #67 of 130; 2018 USC #76 of 130; 2018 Utah #84 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #86 of 130; 2018 Colorado #108 of 130; 2018 California #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 45 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #62
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 California #8 of 130; 2018 Utah #13 of 130; 2018 Washington #19 of 130; 2018 Oregon #39 of 130; 2018 Colorado #56 of 130; 2018 USC #62 of 130; 2018 Washington State #64 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #79 of 130; 2018 Arizona #88 of 130; 2018 UCLA #105 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 66 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 62.
Offensive success ratemedian #66
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Washington State #11 of 130; 2018 Washington #28 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #38 of 130; 2018 Utah #41 of 130; 2018 Oregon #48 of 130; 2018 USC #70 of 130; 2018 UCLA #73 of 130; 2018 Arizona #79 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #94 of 130; 2018 California #98 of 130; 2018 Colorado #114 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 66 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 66.
Defensive success ratemedian #52
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Utah #8 of 130; 2018 California #22 of 130; 2018 Washington #24 of 130; 2018 USC #32 of 130; 2018 Oregon #51 of 130; 2018 Colorado #52 of 130; 2018 Arizona #60 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #104 of 130; 2018 UCLA #114 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 86 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 52.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #59
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Colorado #6 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #29 of 130; 2018 Arizona #31 of 130; 2018 Oregon #42 of 130; 2018 UCLA #59 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #67 of 130; 2018 Washington State #76 of 130; 2018 USC #80 of 130; 2018 Washington #95 of 130; 2018 Utah #122 of 130; 2018 California #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 48 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 59.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #47
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2018, best rank first: 2018 California #4 of 130; 2018 Washington #9 of 130; 2018 Arizona State #25 of 130; 2018 Oregon #32 of 130; 2018 UCLA #47 of 130; 2018 Colorado #48 of 130; 2018 Washington State #75 of 130; 2018 Utah #89 of 130; 2018 Oregon State #98 of 130; 2018 USC #103 of 130; 2018 Arizona #106 of 130. Marked: 2018 Stanford, ranked 28 of 130. Pac-12 median rank 47.