THIRD AND DATA

Stonehill game log

2023: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 2vs New Hampshire17–51 L653034.736–12515–29–178173–141–223–2025:49——
Sep 9at Central Connecticut33–30 W371764.818–7510–19–101103–80–003–4015:3638%38%
Sep 16at Georgetown23–20 W663485.342–17315–24–175199–162–209–8532:3940%43%
Sep 23at Fordham0–44 L722573.635–15615–37–101153–160–102–1533:3027%42%
Sep 30vs Saint Francis10–15 L652604.038–13710–27–123147–160–137–6028:0333%43%
Oct 7at Merrimack34–45 L733294.536–12021–37–209245–141–207–6430:1133%44%
Oct 21vs Sacred Heart22–19 W733494.844–20312–29–146177–170–227–8527:5438%30%
Oct 28at Wagner17–28 L592594.429–9714–30–162173–120–133–2224:0737%32%
Nov 11at Duquesne33–28 W793724.753–21413–26–158236–160–1016–15435:4038%40%
Nov 18vs Long Island University40–23 W—————————————
Season10 games5–55892,6534.5331–1300125–258–1,35315646–1294–121057–5454:13:2935%39%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Stonehill on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Stonehill's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Stonehill offense 35% (185 of 525)Opponent offense / Stonehill defense 39% (185 of 480)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Central Connecticut: opponent offense 38% of 34Central Connecticut: Stonehill offense 38% of 37Georgetown: opponent offense 43% of 61Georgetown: Stonehill offense 40% of 65Fordham: opponent offense 42% of 60Fordham: Stonehill offense 27% of 75Saint Francis: opponent offense 43% of 68Saint Francis: Stonehill offense 33% of 60Merrimack: opponent offense 44% of 55Merrimack: Stonehill offense 33% of 84Sacred Heart: opponent offense 30% of 64Sacred Heart: Stonehill offense 38% of 63Wagner: opponent offense 32% of 75Wagner: Stonehill offense 37% of 60Duquesne: opponent offense 40% of 63Duquesne: Stonehill offense 38% of 81
New Hampshire@ Central Connecticut@ Georgetown@ FordhamSaint Francis@ MerrimackSacred Heart@ Wagner@ DuquesneLong Island University
Stonehill offenseOpponent offense (Stonehill defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Central Connecticut

33–30 W · 37 plays to 34
Stonehill offense 38% (14/37)Central Conn. offense 38% (13/34)

at Georgetown

23–20 W · 65 plays to 61
Stonehill offense 40% (26/65)Georgetown offense 43% (26/61)

at Fordham

0–44 L · 75 plays to 60
Stonehill offense 27% (20/75)Fordham offense 42% (25/60)

vs Saint Francis

10–15 L · 60 plays to 68
Stonehill offense 33% (20/60)Saint Francis offense 43% (29/68)

at Merrimack

34–45 L · 84 plays to 55
Stonehill offense 33% (28/84)Merrimack offense 44% (24/55)

vs Sacred Heart

22–19 W · 63 plays to 64
Stonehill offense 38% (24/63)Sacred Heart offense 30% (19/64)

at Wagner

17–28 L · 60 plays to 75
Stonehill offense 37% (22/60)Wagner offense 32% (24/75)

at Duquesne

33–28 W · 81 plays to 63
Stonehill offense 38% (31/81)Duquesne offense 40% (25/63)