THIRD AND DATA

Tarleton State game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Prairie View A&M49–30 W655057.838–23120–27–274267–100–103–2229:2760%42%
Sep 5at Bowling Green20–13 W574648.133–25816–24–206191–102–517–6225:0740%38%
Sep 12at McNeese27–24 W705097.322–14628–48–363267–141–105–5624:5050%43%
Sep 19vs Merrimack45–20 W625138.329–10024–33–413213–101–1010–10330:1646%38%
Oct 3vs Chicago State56–21 W715898.340–39215–31–197278–120–208–7028:4653%32%
Oct 10at Austin Peay40–32 W684817.133–13023–35–351236–141–115–4228:5549%41%
Oct 17vs Central Arkansas49–35 W585078.729–22821–29–279253–82–214–3523:0661%51%
Oct 24at West Georgia49–6 W564838.631–18714–25–296205–110–005–5527:5451%36%
Oct 31vs Eastern Kentucky28–24 W635709.031–21918–32–351247–110–235–4724:2451%34%
Season9 games9–05704,6218.1286–1891179–284–2,73021147–1007–15652–4924:02:4551%40%

Success rate

Tarleton State on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game51.2% · 39.7%
60
42
40
38
50
43
46
38
53
32
49
41
61
51
51
36
51
34
Prairie View A&M
@ Bowling Green
@ McNeese
Merrimack
Chicago State
@ Austin Peay
Central Arkansas
@ West Georgia
Eastern Kentucky
Abilene Christian
@ West Florida
@ North Alabama

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Tarleton State on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Tarleton State's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Tarleton State offense 51% (288 of 562)Opponent offense / Tarleton State defense 40% (257 of 647)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Prairie View A&M: opponent offense 42% of 78Prairie View A&M: Tarleton State offense 60% of 67Bowling Green: opponent offense 38% of 66Bowling Green: Tarleton State offense 40% of 57McNeese: opponent offense 43% of 76McNeese: Tarleton State offense 50% of 70Merrimack: opponent offense 38% of 66Merrimack: Tarleton State offense 46% of 59Chicago State: opponent offense 32% of 74Chicago State: Tarleton State offense 53% of 70Austin Peay: opponent offense 41% of 68Austin Peay: Tarleton State offense 49% of 65Central Arkansas: opponent offense 51% of 76Central Arkansas: Tarleton State offense 61% of 56West Georgia: opponent offense 36% of 70West Georgia: Tarleton State offense 51% of 57Eastern Kentucky: opponent offense 34% of 73Eastern Kentucky: Tarleton State offense 51% of 61
Tarleton State offenseOpponent offense (Tarleton State defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Prairie View A&M

49–30 W · 67 plays to 78
Tarleton State offense 60% (40/67)Prairie View A&M offense 42% (33/78)

at Bowling Green

20–13 W · 57 plays to 66
Tarleton State offense 40% (23/57)Bowling Green offense 38% (25/66)

at McNeese

27–24 W · 70 plays to 76
Tarleton State offense 50% (35/70)McNeese offense 43% (33/76)

vs Merrimack

45–20 W · 59 plays to 66
Tarleton State offense 46% (27/59)Merrimack offense 38% (25/66)

vs Chicago State

56–21 W · 70 plays to 74
Tarleton State offense 53% (37/70)Chicago State offense 32% (24/74)

at Austin Peay

40–32 W · 65 plays to 68
Tarleton State offense 49% (32/65)Austin Peay offense 41% (28/68)

vs Central Arkansas

49–35 W · 56 plays to 76
Tarleton State offense 61% (34/56)Central Arkansas offense 51% (39/76)

at West Georgia

49–6 W · 57 plays to 70
Tarleton State offense 51% (29/57)West Georgia offense 36% (25/70)

vs Eastern Kentucky

28–24 W · 61 plays to 73
Tarleton State offense 51% (31/61)Eastern Kentucky offense 34% (25/73)