THIRD AND DATA

Tennessee State game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Jackson State24–26 L743544.833–8923–41–2652212–191–205–4133:0144%45%
Sep 5at #2 Georgia3–63 L581091.932–1015–26–99106–170–101–1031:3330%71%
Sep 12at Alabama A&M3–30 L712513.530–6419–41–187173–142–536–5828:3936%36%
Sep 19at Florida A&M29–26 W733905.346–13118–27–259186–151–108–5536:0440%42%
Oct 3at Western Illinois21–28 L693184.627–7322–42–245185–151–234–3227:0932%37%
Oct 10vs UT Martin28–42 L603916.521–1520–39–376184–110–348–5325:3834%34%
Oct 17vs Morgan State25–16 W673605.432–9018–35–270187–172–203–2033:2836%37%
Oct 24vs Charleston Southern7–20 L541462.724–1716–30–129116–150–137–6025:0232%44%
Oct 31at Lindenwood0–27 L541873.526–3219–28–155114–120–136–8026:2233%45%
Season9 games2–75802,5064.3271–521170–309–1,98514353–1357–181648–4094:26:5636%43%

Success rate

Tennessee State on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game35.5% · 43.2%
44
45
30
71
36
36
40
42
32
37
34
34
36
37
32
44
33
45
Jackson State
@ Georgia
@ Alabama A&M
@ Florida A&M
@ Western Illinois
UT Martin
Morgan State
Charleston Southern
@ Lindenwood
Southeast Missouri State
Eastern Illinois
@ Gardner-Webb

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 29.8%, defense allows 71.2%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Tennessee State on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Tennessee State's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Tennessee State offense 36% (204 of 574)Opponent offense / Tennessee State defense 43% (245 of 567)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Jackson State: opponent offense 45% of 62Jackson State: Tennessee State offense 44% of 73#2 Georgia: opponent offense 71% of 59#2 Georgia: Tennessee State offense 30% of 57Alabama A&M: opponent offense 36% of 67Alabama A&M: Tennessee State offense 36% of 70Florida A&M: opponent offense 42% of 57Florida A&M: Tennessee State offense 40% of 73Western Illinois: opponent offense 37% of 79Western Illinois: Tennessee State offense 32% of 69UT Martin: opponent offense 34% of 62UT Martin: Tennessee State offense 34% of 59Morgan State: opponent offense 37% of 54Morgan State: Tennessee State offense 36% of 66Charleston Southern: opponent offense 44% of 61Charleston Southern: Tennessee State offense 32% of 53Lindenwood: opponent offense 45% of 66Lindenwood: Tennessee State offense 33% of 54
Tennessee State offenseOpponent offense (Tennessee State defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Jackson State

24–26 L · 73 plays to 62
Tennessee State offense 44% (32/73)Jackson State offense 45% (28/62)

at #2 Georgia

3–63 L · 57 plays to 59
Tennessee State offense 30% (17/57)Georgia offense 71% (42/59)

at Alabama A&M

3–30 L · 70 plays to 67
Tennessee State offense 36% (25/70)Alabama A&M offense 36% (24/67)

at Florida A&M

29–26 W · 73 plays to 57
Tennessee State offense 40% (29/73)Florida A&M offense 42% (24/57)

at Western Illinois

21–28 L · 69 plays to 79
Tennessee State offense 32% (22/69)Western Illinois offense 37% (29/79)

vs UT Martin

28–42 L · 59 plays to 62
Tennessee State offense 34% (20/59)UT Martin offense 34% (21/62)

vs Morgan State

25–16 W · 66 plays to 54
Tennessee State offense 36% (24/66)Morgan State offense 37% (20/54)

vs Charleston Southern

7–20 L · 53 plays to 61
Tennessee State offense 32% (17/53)Charleston S. offense 44% (27/61)

at Lindenwood

0–27 L · 54 plays to 66
Tennessee State offense 33% (18/54)Lindenwood offense 45% (30/66)