Metrics

Texas A&MAggies

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004Texas A&M750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 5,141 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 341 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 386.8 yds/g allowed · 4,641 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#43 (of 119 teams · +4.1 /g · +49 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.83 /g)#102 (of 119 teams · 16:47 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 119 teams · -0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 119 teams · 1.076 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#58 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #6–#100. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #8–#102. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #15–#99. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #11–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #9–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #2–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #5–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#52 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #8–#98. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #11–#93. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #5–#94. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #8–#83. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #23–#108. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range #17–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2004Baylor380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 119 teams · 311.8 yds/g · 3,430 yards)#102 (of 119 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 224 points)#99 (of 119 teams · 421.1 yds/g allowed · 4,632 yards)#111 (of 119 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 406 points)#114 (of 119 teams · -16.6 /g · -182 on the season)#116 (of 119 teams · -19 on the season · 10 taken, 29 given · -1.73 /g)#85 (of 119 teams · 17:28 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 119 teams · -0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 119 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#70 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 119 teams · 0.891 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 119 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Colorado850 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 119 teams · 310.2 yds/g · 4,033 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 304 points)#78 (of 119 teams · 393.0 yds/g allowed · 5,109 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 332 points)#69 (of 119 teams · -2.1 /g · -28 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#110 (of 119 teams · 16:26 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 119 teams · -0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 119 teams · -0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#49 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 119 teams · 1.091 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Iowa State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 119 teams · 329.1 yds/g · 3,949 yards)#99 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#32 (of 119 teams · 329.4 yds/g allowed · 3,953 yards)#36 (of 119 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#65 (of 119 teams · -1.1 /g · -13 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.67 /g)#50 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 119 teams · -0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 119 teams · -0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#78 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#27 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 119 teams · 1.004 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Kansas470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 119 teams · 314.4 yds/g · 3,459 yards)#77 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 262 points)#45 (of 119 teams · 345.4 yds/g allowed · 3,800 yards)#35 (of 119 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 235 points)#47 (of 119 teams · +2.5 /g · +27 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 28 taken, 26 given · +0.18 /g)#29 (of 119 teams · 18:48 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 119 teams · -0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 119 teams · -0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#13 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 119 teams · 1.034 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Kansas State470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#87 (of 119 teams · 329.9 yds/g · 3,629 yards)#36 (of 119 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 326 points)#24 (of 119 teams · 314.9 yds/g allowed · 3,464 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#63 (of 119 teams · -1.0 /g · -11 on the season)#66 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.09 /g)#37 (of 119 teams · 18:37 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 119 teams · -0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 119 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#22 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 119 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 119 teams · 1.122 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Missouri560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 119 teams · 372.6 yds/g · 4,098 yards)#83 (of 119 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 256 points)#17 (of 119 teams · 301.4 yds/g allowed · 3,315 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#44 (of 119 teams · +3.7 /g · +41 on the season)#29 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.55 /g)#34 (of 119 teams · 18:42 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 119 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 119 teams · -0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 1.061 average PPA on successful plays)#74 (of 119 teams · 1.018 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Nebraska560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 119 teams · 363.2 yds/g · 3,995 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 275 points)#59 (of 119 teams · 371.6 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yards)#72 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#67 (of 119 teams · -2.1 /g · -23 on the season)#113 (of 119 teams · -14 on the season · 22 taken, 36 given · -1.27 /g)#100 (of 119 teams · 16:59 /g · 3h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 119 teams · -0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 119 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#32 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 119 teams · 1.036 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oklahoma1210 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 462.1 yds/g · 6,007 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 452 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 299.0 yds/g allowed · 3,887 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.9 /g · +233 on the season)#25 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.62 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:12 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 119 teams · -0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.060 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oklahoma State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 380.5 yds/g · 4,566 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 387 points)#83 (of 119 teams · 396.1 yds/g allowed · 4,753 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#31 (of 119 teams · +7.2 /g · +86 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20 on the season · 29 taken, 9 given · +1.67 /g)#13 (of 119 teams · 19:21 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 119 teams · -0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#74 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.962 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 119 teams · 0.979 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 464.4 yds/g · 5,573 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 423 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 320.1 yds/g allowed · 3,841 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#11 (of 119 teams · +17.3 /g · +208 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.42 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:39 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · -0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 1.016 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas Tech840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 5,900 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 434 points)#49 (of 119 teams · 357.0 yds/g allowed · 4,284 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +10.0 /g · +120 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g)#61 (of 119 teams · 18:06 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#64 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 119 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20042004 Texas A&MBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #58
Total offense. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas Tech #6 of 119; 2004 Texas #7 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #50 of 119; 2004 Missouri #58 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #66 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #87 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #88 of 119; 2004 Kansas #96 of 119; 2004 Baylor #98 of 119; 2004 Colorado #100 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 19 of 119. Big 12 median rank 58.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #17 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #36 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #58 of 119; 2004 Kansas #77 of 119; 2004 Colorado #82 of 119; 2004 Missouri #83 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #99 of 119; 2004 Baylor #102 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 43 of 119. Big 12 median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma #15 of 119; 2004 Missouri #17 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #24 of 119; 2004 Texas #27 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #32 of 119; 2004 Kansas #45 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #49 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #59 of 119; 2004 Colorado #78 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #83 of 119; 2004 Baylor #99 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 69 of 119. Big 12 median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma #11 of 119; 2004 Texas #19 of 119; 2004 Missouri #24 of 119; 2004 Kansas #35 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #36 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #57 of 119; 2004 Colorado #62 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #68 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #72 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #85 of 119; 2004 Baylor #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 48 of 119. Big 12 median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #44
Point margin. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma #9 of 119; 2004 Texas #11 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #20 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #31 of 119; 2004 Missouri #44 of 119; 2004 Kansas #47 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #63 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #65 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #67 of 119; 2004 Colorado #69 of 119; 2004 Baylor #114 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 43 of 119. Big 12 median rank 44.
Turnover marginmedian #36
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma State #2 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #20 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #25 of 119; 2004 Missouri #29 of 119; 2004 Texas #36 of 119; 2004 Kansas #48 of 119; 2004 Colorado #61 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #66 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #87 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #113 of 119; 2004 Baylor #116 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 13 of 119. Big 12 median rank 36.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma #5 of 119; 2004 Texas #8 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #13 of 119; 2004 Kansas #29 of 119; 2004 Missouri #34 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #37 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #50 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2004 Baylor #85 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #100 of 119; 2004 Colorado #110 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 102 of 119. Big 12 median rank 37.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #52
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #21 of 119; 2004 Colorado #52 of 119; 2004 Missouri #55 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #57 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #66 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #68 of 119; 2004 Kansas #92 of 119; 2004 Baylor #98 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 15 of 119. Big 12 median rank 52.
Defensive EPAmedian #44
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Iowa State #11 of 119; 2004 Missouri #19 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #26 of 119; 2004 Kansas #27 of 119; 2004 Texas #38 of 119; 2004 Colorado #47 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #54 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #59 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #60 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #76 of 119; 2004 Baylor #93 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 44 of 119. Big 12 median rank 44.
Offensive success ratemedian #42
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2004 Texas #9 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #25 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #42 of 119; 2004 Colorado #55 of 119; 2004 Baylor #60 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #65 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #78 of 119; 2004 Missouri #85 of 119; 2004 Kansas #94 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 19 of 119. Big 12 median rank 42.
Defensive success ratemedian #31
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 Missouri #9 of 119; 2004 Kansas #13 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #22 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #27 of 119; 2004 Texas #31 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #32 of 119; 2004 Colorado #49 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #64 of 119; 2004 Baylor #70 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #74 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 83 of 119. Big 12 median rank 31.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #64
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Missouri #25 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #35 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #43 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #56 of 119; 2004 Colorado #64 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #77 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #88 of 119; 2004 Texas #99 of 119; 2004 Kansas #103 of 119; 2004 Baylor #105 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #108 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 23 of 119. Big 12 median rank 64.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #74
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas Tech #19 of 119; 2004 Iowa State #35 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma State #54 of 119; 2004 Texas #73 of 119; 2004 Missouri #74 of 119; 2004 Kansas #86 of 119; 2004 Nebraska #88 of 119; 2004 Baylor #94 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #100 of 119; 2004 Colorado #105 of 119; 2004 Kansas State #107 of 119. Marked: 2004 Texas A&M, ranked 17 of 119. Big 12 median rank 74.