Metrics

Texas A&MAggies

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006Texas A&M941 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 397.4 yds/g · 5,166 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 322.6 yds/g allowed · 4,194 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +7.3 /g · +95 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.77 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:27 /g · 4h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#61 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big 12 teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#20 (Total offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #6–#100. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#20 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #6–#107. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Total defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #20–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #19–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Point margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #7–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #6–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Possession: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #2–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#32 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #6–#78. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #13–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #8–#91. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #14–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #10–#102. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2006Baylor480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 119 teams · 315.2 yds/g · 3,782 yards)#59 (of 119 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 283 points)#112 (of 119 teams · 408.2 yds/g allowed · 4,898 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 391 points)#100 (of 119 teams · -9.0 /g · -108 on the season)#105 (of 119 teams · -10 on the season · 27 taken, 37 given · -0.83 /g)#105 (of 119 teams · 17:06 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 119 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#108 (of 119 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Colorado2100 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#100 (of 119 teams · 291.0 yds/g · 3,492 yards)#107 (of 119 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 196 points)#70 (of 119 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 4,091 yards)#56 (of 119 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#88 (of 119 teams · -5.9 /g · -71 on the season)#19 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.75 /g)#70 (of 119 teams · 17:57 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 119 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#81 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 119 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 119 teams · 1.030 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Iowa State480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 119 teams · 299.4 yds/g · 3,593 yards)#92 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 226 points)#78 (of 119 teams · 352.7 yds/g allowed · 4,232 yards)#105 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#105 (of 119 teams · -11.9 /g · -143 on the season)#85 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.42 /g)#44 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#109 (of 119 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.868 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Kansas660 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 119 teams · 374.1 yds/g · 4,489 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 348 points)#97 (of 119 teams · 378.1 yds/g allowed · 4,537 yards)#81 (of 119 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#49 (of 119 teams · +3.5 /g · +42 on the season)#78 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 30 taken, 33 given · -0.25 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#27 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 119 teams · 0.962 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Kansas State760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 119 teams · 315.2 yds/g · 4,098 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 296 points)#74 (of 119 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 4,493 yards)#66 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#69 (of 119 teams · -1.0 /g · -13 on the season)#83 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 27 taken, 32 given · -0.38 /g)#112 (of 119 teams · 16:42 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#75 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 119 teams · 1.006 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Missouri850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 425.6 yds/g · 5,533 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 391 points)#45 (of 119 teams · 320.2 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#23 (of 119 teams · +10.5 /g · +137 on the season)#30 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 34 taken, 28 given · +0.46 /g)#96 (of 119 teams · 17:27 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#33 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 119 teams · 1.011 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Nebraska951 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 414.6 yds/g · 5,804 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 428 points)#60 (of 119 teams · 331.9 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#19 (of 119 teams · +12.3 /g · +172 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.07 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:56 /g · 4h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.072 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 119 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oklahoma1132 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 368.7 yds/g · 5,162 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 424 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 287.1 yds/g allowed · 4,020 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +13.0 /g · +182 on the season)#79 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 32 taken, 36 given · -0.29 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 119 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Oklahoma State760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 119 teams · 409.8 yds/g · 5,327 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.2 pts/g · 458 points)#93 (of 119 teams · 364.1 yds/g allowed · 4,733 yards)#82 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#25 (of 119 teams · +9.6 /g · +125 on the season)#22 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 29 taken, 21 given · +0.62 /g)#90 (of 119 teams · 17:39 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#71 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.945 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas1031 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 391.5 yds/g · 5,089 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 467 points)#26 (of 119 teams · 297.4 yds/g allowed · 3,866 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 238 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.6 /g · +229 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +14 on the season · 38 taken, 24 given · +1.08 /g)#26 (of 119 teams · 18:59 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 119 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.985 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Texas Tech850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big 12 teams in 2006. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 119 teams · 411.3 yds/g · 5,347 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#41 (of 119 teams · 316.5 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yards)#76 (of 119 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#36 (of 119 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#83 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 24 taken, 29 given · -0.38 /g)#76 (of 119 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#80 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 119 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.823 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20062006 Texas A&MBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #20
Total offense. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Missouri #6 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #11 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #12 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #13 of 119; 2006 Texas #20 of 119; 2006 Kansas #30 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #38 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #82 of 119; 2006 Baylor #83 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #94 of 119; 2006 Colorado #100 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 15 of 119. Big 12 median rank 20.
Scoring offensemedian #20
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #7 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #13 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #17 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Missouri #20 of 119; 2006 Kansas #29 of 119; 2006 Baylor #59 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #69 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #92 of 119; 2006 Colorado #107 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 34 of 119. Big 12 median rank 20.
Total defensemedian #60
Total defense. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oklahoma #20 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #41 of 119; 2006 Missouri #45 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #60 of 119; 2006 Colorado #70 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #74 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #78 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #93 of 119; 2006 Kansas #97 of 119; 2006 Baylor #112 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 51 of 119. Big 12 median rank 60.
Scoring defensemedian #56
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oklahoma #19 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Missouri #33 of 119; 2006 Colorado #56 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #66 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #76 of 119; 2006 Kansas #81 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #82 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #105 of 119; 2006 Baylor #110 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 44 of 119. Big 12 median rank 56.
Point marginmedian #36
Point margin. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas #7 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #19 of 119; 2006 Missouri #23 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #25 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #36 of 119; 2006 Kansas #49 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #69 of 119; 2006 Colorado #88 of 119; 2006 Baylor #100 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #105 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 37 of 119. Big 12 median rank 36.
Turnover marginmedian #63
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas #6 of 119; 2006 Colorado #19 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #22 of 119; 2006 Missouri #30 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #63 of 119; 2006 Kansas #78 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #79 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #83 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #83 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #85 of 119; 2006 Baylor #105 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 17 of 119. Big 12 median rank 63.
Possessionmedian #44
Possession. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Nebraska #7 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2006 Texas #26 of 119; 2006 Kansas #40 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #44 of 119; 2006 Colorado #70 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #76 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #90 of 119; 2006 Missouri #96 of 119; 2006 Baylor #105 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #112 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 2 of 119. Big 12 median rank 44.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #32
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas Tech #6 of 119; 2006 Missouri #21 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #23 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #24 of 119; 2006 Texas #32 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #50 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #57 of 119; 2006 Baylor #71 of 119; 2006 Kansas #73 of 119; 2006 Colorado #77 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #78 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 16 of 119. Big 12 median rank 32.
Defensive EPAmedian #53
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oklahoma #13 of 119; 2006 Kansas #28 of 119; 2006 Missouri #32 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #50 of 119; 2006 Texas #51 of 119; 2006 Colorado #57 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #62 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #66 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #88 of 119; 2006 Baylor #103 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 53 of 119. Big 12 median rank 53.
Offensive success ratemedian #47
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2006 Texas #18 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #25 of 119; 2006 Missouri #33 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #47 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #48 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #52 of 119; 2006 Baylor #58 of 119; 2006 Kansas #62 of 119; 2006 Colorado #81 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #91 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 21 of 119. Big 12 median rank 47.
Defensive success ratemedian #33
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #18 of 119; 2006 Texas #24 of 119; 2006 Kansas #27 of 119; 2006 Colorado #31 of 119; 2006 Missouri #33 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #71 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #75 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #80 of 119; 2006 Baylor #108 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #109 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 61 of 119. Big 12 median rank 33.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Nebraska #10 of 119; 2006 Missouri #24 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #26 of 119; 2006 Texas Tech #30 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #31 of 119; 2006 Baylor #53 of 119; 2006 Kansas #63 of 119; 2006 Colorado #82 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #91 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #98 of 119; 2006 Texas #102 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 65 of 119. Big 12 median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Texas Tech #10 of 119; 2006 Baylor #24 of 119; 2006 Kansas State #42 of 119; 2006 Missouri #62 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma State #63 of 119; 2006 Iowa State #65 of 119; 2006 Kansas #76 of 119; 2006 Texas #87 of 119; 2006 Oklahoma #92 of 119; 2006 Colorado #106 of 119; 2006 Nebraska #118 of 119. Marked: 2006 Texas A&M, ranked 53 of 119. Big 12 median rank 63.