Metrics

Texas A&MAggies

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2012

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Texas A&M1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 558.5 yds/g · 7,261 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 44.5 pts/g · 578 points)#60 (of 124 teams · 390.2 yds/g allowed · 5,073 yards)#26 (of 124 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +22.7 /g · +295 on the season)#89 (of 124 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.38 /g)#96 (of 124 teams · 29:06 /g · 6h 18m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 124 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 124 teams · 47% of plays successful)#54 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 124 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 124 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 SEC teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#80 (Total offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #3–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #4–#119. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#47 (Total defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #1–#101. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #1–#107. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Point margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #2–#112. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#56 (Turnover margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #5–#122. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#80 (Possession: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #1–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#53 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #1–#115. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #9–#108. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #5–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #7–#114. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#78 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #1–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range #4–#109. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2012Alabama1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 124 teams · 444.5 yds/g · 6,223 yards)#12 (of 124 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 542 points)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 250.0 yds/g allowed · 3,500 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 10.9 pts/g allowed · 153 points)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +27.8 /g · +389 on the season)#13 (of 124 teams · +14 on the season · 29 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 35:13 /g · 8h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.181 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 124 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 124 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 124 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Arkansas480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 124 teams · 420.2 yds/g · 5,042 yards)#91 (of 124 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 282 points)#75 (of 124 teams · 409.9 yds/g allowed · 4,919 yards)#83 (of 124 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#96 (of 124 teams · -6.9 /g · -83 on the season)#122 (of 124 teams · -19 on the season · 12 taken, 31 given · -1.58 /g)#81 (of 124 teams · 29:40 /g · 5h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 124 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 124 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#55 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 124 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.986 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Auburn393 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#118 (of 124 teams · 305.0 yds/g · 3,660 yards)#114 (of 124 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 224 points)#81 (of 124 teams · 420.5 yds/g allowed · 5,046 yards)#66 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 340 points)#104 (of 124 teams · -9.7 /g · -116 on the season)#110 (of 124 teams · -12 on the season · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.00 /g)#73 (of 124 teams · 30:06 /g · 6h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 124 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 124 teams · 0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#107 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 124 teams · 0.911 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.908 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Florida1124 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#104 (of 124 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 4,342 yards)#78 (of 124 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 344 points)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 286.7 yds/g allowed · 3,727 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 14.5 pts/g allowed · 188 points)#25 (of 124 teams · +12.0 /g · +156 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#25 (of 124 teams · 32:20 /g · 7h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 124 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 124 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#12 (of 124 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 124 teams · 0.851 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 124 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Georgia1224 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 124 teams · 467.6 yds/g · 6,547 yards)#19 (of 124 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 529 points)#33 (of 124 teams · 357.8 yds/g allowed · 5,009 yards)#18 (of 124 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +18.1 /g · +254 on the season)#21 (of 124 teams · +11 on the season · 30 taken, 19 given · +0.79 /g)#100 (of 124 teams · 28:39 /g · 6h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 124 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#35 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 124 teams · 0.998 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 124 teams · 0.970 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Kentucky2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#115 (of 124 teams · 315.0 yds/g · 3,780 yards)#119 (of 124 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 215 points)#61 (of 124 teams · 391.0 yds/g allowed · 4,692 yards)#87 (of 124 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 372 points)#112 (of 124 teams · -13.1 /g · -157 on the season)#85 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.33 /g)#124 (of 124 teams · 25:28 /g · 5h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 124 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 124 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#114 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 124 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 124 teams · 0.865 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012LSU1034 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#87 (of 124 teams · 374.2 yds/g · 4,865 yards)#59 (of 124 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 387 points)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 307.6 yds/g allowed · 3,999 yards)#12 (of 124 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 228 points)#24 (of 124 teams · +12.2 /g · +159 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16 on the season · 33 taken, 17 given · +1.23 /g)#64 (of 124 teams · 30:31 /g · 6h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 124 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 124 teams · 0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#22 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 124 teams · 0.813 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 124 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Mississippi State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#80 (of 124 teams · 381.3 yds/g · 4,957 yards)#61 (of 124 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#55 (of 124 teams · 387.4 yds/g allowed · 5,036 yards)#34 (of 124 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 303 points)#46 (of 124 teams · +6.2 /g · +80 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16 on the season · 33 taken, 17 given · +1.23 /g)#80 (of 124 teams · 29:45 /g · 6h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 124 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 124 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#106 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 124 teams · 0.821 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.803 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Missouri570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 124 teams · 356.4 yds/g · 4,277 yards)#82 (of 124 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points)#58 (of 124 teams · 389.5 yds/g allowed · 4,674 yards)#68 (of 124 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 341 points)#82 (of 124 teams · -2.7 /g · -32 on the season)#56 (of 124 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#82 (of 124 teams · 29:40 /g · 5h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 124 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 124 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#39 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 124 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 124 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Ole Miss760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 124 teams · 423.8 yds/g · 5,509 yards)#47 (of 124 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#47 (of 124 teams · 375.9 yds/g allowed · 4,886 yards)#60 (of 124 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#56 (of 124 teams · +3.9 /g · +50 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 28 taken, 29 given · -0.08 /g)#85 (of 124 teams · 29:34 /g · 6h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 124 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 124 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#66 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 124 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012South Carolina1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 124 teams · 376.5 yds/g · 4,895 yards)#44 (of 124 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points)#12 (of 124 teams · 315.5 yds/g allowed · 4,102 yards)#13 (of 124 teams · 18.2 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#20 (of 124 teams · +13.3 /g · +173 on the season)#45 (of 124 teams · +4 on the season · 24 taken, 20 given · +0.31 /g)#69 (of 124 teams · 30:15 /g · 6h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 124 teams · 0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#30 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.078 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Tennessee573 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 124 teams · 475.9 yds/g · 5,711 yards)#22 (of 124 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 434 points)#101 (of 124 teams · 449.4 yds/g allowed · 5,393 yards)#107 (of 124 teams · 35.7 pts/g allowed · 428 points)#70 (of 124 teams · +0.5 /g · +6 on the season)#97 (of 124 teams · -7 on the season · 15 taken, 22 given · -0.58 /g)#122 (of 124 teams · 26:38 /g · 5h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 124 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 124 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#43 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 124 teams · 0.949 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 124 teams · 0.950 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Vanderbilt940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2012. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 124 teams · 379.7 yds/g · 4,936 yards)#56 (of 124 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 390 points)#20 (of 124 teams · 333.9 yds/g allowed · 4,341 yards)#15 (of 124 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#27 (of 124 teams · +11.3 /g · +147 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 18 taken, 18 given · +0.00 /g)#77 (of 124 teams · 30:01 /g · 6h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 124 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 124 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#27 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 124 teams · 0.931 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 124 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20122012 Texas A&MSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #80
Total offense. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Tennessee #17 of 124; 2012 Georgia #22 of 124; 2012 Alabama #33 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #46 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #49 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #80 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #81 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #84 of 124; 2012 LSU #87 of 124; 2012 Missouri #98 of 124; 2012 Florida #104 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #115 of 124; 2012 Auburn #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 3 of 124. SEC median rank 80.
Scoring offensemedian #56
Scoring offense. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #12 of 124; 2012 Georgia #19 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #22 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #44 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #47 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #56 of 124; 2012 LSU #59 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #61 of 124; 2012 Florida #78 of 124; 2012 Missouri #82 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #91 of 124; 2012 Auburn #114 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 4 of 124. SEC median rank 56.
Total defensemedian #47
Total defense. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #1 of 124; 2012 Florida #5 of 124; 2012 LSU #8 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #12 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #20 of 124; 2012 Georgia #33 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #47 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #55 of 124; 2012 Missouri #58 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #61 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #75 of 124; 2012 Auburn #81 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #101 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 60 of 124. SEC median rank 47.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #1 of 124; 2012 Florida #5 of 124; 2012 LSU #12 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #13 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #15 of 124; 2012 Georgia #18 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #34 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #60 of 124; 2012 Auburn #66 of 124; 2012 Missouri #68 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #83 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #87 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #107 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 26 of 124. SEC median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #27
Point margin. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #2 of 124; 2012 Georgia #7 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #20 of 124; 2012 LSU #24 of 124; 2012 Florida #25 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #27 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #46 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #56 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #70 of 124; 2012 Missouri #82 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #96 of 124; 2012 Auburn #104 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 4 of 124. SEC median rank 27.
Turnover marginmedian #56
Turnover margin. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 LSU #5 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #5 of 124; 2012 Florida #7 of 124; 2012 Alabama #13 of 124; 2012 Georgia #21 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #45 of 124; 2012 Missouri #56 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #60 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #65 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #85 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #97 of 124; 2012 Auburn #110 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 89 of 124. SEC median rank 56.
Possessionmedian #80
Possession. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #1 of 124; 2012 Florida #25 of 124; 2012 LSU #64 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #69 of 124; 2012 Auburn #73 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #77 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #80 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #81 of 124; 2012 Missouri #82 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #85 of 124; 2012 Georgia #100 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #122 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 96 of 124. SEC median rank 80.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #53
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #1 of 124; 2012 Georgia #32 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #42 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #45 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #50 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #53 of 124; 2012 LSU #70 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #76 of 124; 2012 Florida #87 of 124; 2012 Auburn #94 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #101 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #111 of 124; 2012 Missouri #115 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 2 of 124. SEC median rank 53.
Defensive EPAmedian #45
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 South Carolina #9 of 124; 2012 Alabama #11 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #15 of 124; 2012 Florida #22 of 124; 2012 LSU #24 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #45 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #54 of 124; 2012 Georgia #61 of 124; 2012 Missouri #66 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #77 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #78 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #95 of 124; 2012 Auburn #108 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 33 of 124. SEC median rank 45.
Offensive success ratemedian #39
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #5 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #24 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #28 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #29 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #37 of 124; 2012 Georgia #39 of 124; 2012 LSU #53 of 124; 2012 Florida #68 of 124; 2012 Auburn #82 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #92 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #94 of 124; 2012 Missouri #98 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #111 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 14 of 124. SEC median rank 39.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Alabama #7 of 124; 2012 Florida #12 of 124; 2012 LSU #22 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #27 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #30 of 124; 2012 Georgia #35 of 124; 2012 Missouri #39 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #43 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #55 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #66 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #106 of 124; 2012 Auburn #107 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #114 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 54 of 124. SEC median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #78
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 South Carolina #1 of 124; 2012 Georgia #14 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #45 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #59 of 124; 2012 Auburn #77 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #78 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #90 of 124; 2012 Alabama #100 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #101 of 124; 2012 Missouri #104 of 124; 2012 Florida #117 of 124; 2012 Mississippi State #122 of 124; 2012 LSU #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 16 of 124. SEC median rank 78.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Mississippi State #4 of 124; 2012 Kentucky #16 of 124; 2012 LSU #19 of 124; 2012 Vanderbilt #25 of 124; 2012 Ole Miss #27 of 124; 2012 Auburn #40 of 124; 2012 South Carolina #44 of 124; 2012 Florida #46 of 124; 2012 Tennessee #78 of 124; 2012 Georgia #94 of 124; 2012 Arkansas #102 of 124; 2012 Missouri #103 of 124; 2012 Alabama #109 of 124. Marked: 2012 Texas A&M, ranked 15 of 124. SEC median rank 40.