THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Texas A&MAggies

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2017’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Texas A&M played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Texas A&M7–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 70 teams · 360.0 yds/g · 3,240 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 249 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 3,873 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · -5.1 /g · -46 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 28:45 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 807.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 70 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.393 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 1.313 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#68. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 13 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#125. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#126. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #4–#128. 4 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #2–#69. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)
2017Alabama13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #17 LSU, #23 Mississippi State · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Georgia)#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 452.3 yds/g · 4,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 331 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 252.0 yds/g allowed · 2,268 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 105 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +25.1 /g · +226 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 30:40 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 997.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.278 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.024 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Georgia13–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Auburn · postseason: #2 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Auburn, #14 Notre Dame, #23 Mississippi State · postseason: #2 Oklahoma)#17 (of 70 teams · 438.9 yds/g · 4,389 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 353 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 273.1 yds/g allowed · 2,731 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 141 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +21.2 /g · +212 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 15 taken, 10 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:23 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 930.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.331 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Auburn10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Georgia, #4 Alabama)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Georgia, #4 Alabama, #23 Mississippi State)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 449.6 yds/g · 4,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.0 pts/g · 333 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 331.7 yds/g allowed · 2,985 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +18.6 /g · +167 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 14 taken, 5 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:21 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 867.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 70 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 1.183 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State · postseason: #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State, #16 Michigan State · postseason: #8 USC)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 5,108 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 433 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 296.0 yds/g allowed · 2,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +22.3 /g · +223 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 959.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Penn State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #11 Washington)#20 (of 70 teams · 434.4 yds/g · 4,344 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 347.3 yds/g allowed · 3,473 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +20.5 /g · +205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 30:47 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 779.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Clemson12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami, #22 Virginia Tech, #24 NC State)#25 (of 70 teams · 416.8 yds/g · 4,168 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 306.3 yds/g allowed · 3,063 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 853.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 70 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017TCU11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #19 Oklahoma State · postseason: #13 Stanford)#36 (of 70 teams · 390.3 yds/g · 3,903 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 328.2 yds/g allowed · 3,282 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.2 pts/g allowed · 152 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.3 /g · +143 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31:38 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 672.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 70 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.400 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Washington10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#28 (of 70 teams · 401.4 yds/g · 4,014 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 332 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 285.3 yds/g allowed · 2,853 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +18.1 /g · +181 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 706.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.092 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wisconsin13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #10 Miami)#34 (of 70 teams · 397.7 yds/g · 3,579 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 288 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 233.2 yds/g allowed · 2,099 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 12.7 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +19.3 /g · +174 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:32 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 639.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 70 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 551.1 yds/g · 5,511 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 4,411 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 312 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oklahoma12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State, #15 TCU, #15 TCU, #19 Oklahoma State)#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 581.5 yds/g · 5,815 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 431 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 422.7 yds/g allowed · 4,227 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.4 /g · +144 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 31:59 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 801.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.424 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 52% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.402 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.440 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #22 Virginia Tech)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 576.3 yds/g · 5,763 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45.2 pts/g · 452 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 419.6 yds/g allowed · 4,196 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · +12.2 /g · +122 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 633.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.310 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.513 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Stanford9–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington, #14 Notre Dame)#39 (of 70 teams · 381.9 yds/g · 3,819 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 309 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 408.9 yds/g allowed · 4,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +8.8 /g · +88 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 22 taken, 7 given · +1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 30:57 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 810.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.516 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)#56 (of 70 teams · 338.5 yds/g · 3,385 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 372.6 yds/g allowed · 3,726 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +6.3 /g · +63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 29:30 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 593.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 70 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 70 teams · 348.6 yds/g · 3,486 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 279.1 yds/g allowed · 2,791 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 874.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.395 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017USC11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Stanford, #13 Stanford)#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 485.6 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 369 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 414.7 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 283 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · +7.8 /g · +86 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 31:01 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 934.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.349 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Washington State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC, #13 Stanford, #25 Boise State)#22 (of 70 teams · 425.7 yds/g · 3,831 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 254 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 3,068 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · +1.3 /g · +12 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:38 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 549.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arizona7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 496.3 yds/g · 4,467 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 361 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 489.7 yds/g allowed · 4,407 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.9 pts/g allowed · 350 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 607.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.453 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arizona State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington)#17 (of 70 teams · 438.9 yds/g · 4,389 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 32.6 pts/g · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 446.3 yds/g allowed · 4,463 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 720.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 70 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Georgia Tech5–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#31 (of 70 teams · 398.6 yds/g · 3,986 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 3,708 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1.0 /g · -10 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 7 taken, 15 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:43 /g · 5h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 70 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Oklahoma, #15 TCU · postseason: #20 Memphis)#44 (of 70 teams · 375.9 yds/g · 3,759 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 371.2 yds/g allowed · 3,712 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · +6.2 /g · +62 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 559.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 70 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017LSU9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn)#32 (of 70 teams · 398.2 yds/g · 3,584 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 337.6 yds/g allowed · 3,038 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +53 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +7 in these games · 11 taken, 4 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 31:48 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 907.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 70 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Miami10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Notre Dame, #22 Virginia Tech)#35 (of 70 teams · 390.6 yds/g · 3,515 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 258 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · +11.1 /g · +100 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 26 taken, 11 given · +1.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 749.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 70 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 70 teams · 441.6 yds/g · 4,416 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 3,746 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · +2.0 /g · +20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:07 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 70 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017South Carolina9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#59 (of 70 teams · 325.5 yds/g · 3,255 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 3,907 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · +1.7 /g · +17 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +7 in these games · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 28:27 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 702.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 70 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 1.205 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 70 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 3,702 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 30:14 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 535.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 70 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Duke7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Northwestern)#43 (of 70 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 3,760 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 3,599 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 627.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 70 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Penn State · postseason: #18 Washington State)#49 (of 70 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 3,618 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 316.6 yds/g allowed · 3,166 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · -0.5 /g · -5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35:09 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Michigan State)#46 (of 70 teams · 367.6 yds/g · 3,676 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · +6.5 /g · +65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 627.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 70 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.127 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Utah7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 70 teams · 398.0 yds/g · 3,582 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 389.8 yds/g allowed · 3,508 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 14 taken, 18 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 31:19 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 631.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 70 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 1.296 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 70 teams · 365.4 yds/g · 3,289 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 216 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 334.4 yds/g allowed · 3,010 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 145 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +7.9 /g · +71 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 31:46 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 662.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 70 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.444 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017California5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#41 (of 70 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 4,183 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 300 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 417.1 yds/g allowed · 4,588 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · -1.9 /g · -21 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 29:55 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 603.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 70 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.271 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kansas State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Oklahoma State)#53 (of 70 teams · 340.8 yds/g · 3,408 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 284 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · -0.9 /g · -9 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 30:23 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 517.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 70 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.322 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.290 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oregon7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 70 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 4,191 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 377.0 yds/g allowed · 3,770 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +0.9 /g · +9 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 28:28 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 720.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 70 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Purdue7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 70 teams · 375.2 yds/g · 4,127 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 246 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 502.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Texas7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 70 teams · 388.8 yds/g · 4,277 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 294 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 381.1 yds/g allowed · 4,192 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · +3.1 /g · +34 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 30:19 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 811.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Texas Tech6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 70 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 4,474 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 448.0 yds/g allowed · 4,480 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 347 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · -1.8 /g · -18 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 28:28 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 574.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 70 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 0.215 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wake Forest8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#15 (of 70 teams · 443.3 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.2 yds/g allowed · 4,322 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:57 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 527.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017West Virginia7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 467.0 yds/g · 4,670 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 320 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 465.9 yds/g allowed · 4,659 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 343 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · -2.3 /g · -23 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 28:14 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 613.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 70 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.389 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Baylor1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 70 teams · 405.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 452.3 yds/g allowed · 4,523 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 366 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · -12.9 /g · -129 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 10 taken, 22 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 657.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 70 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.521 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.351 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida4–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 70 teams · 328.6 yds/g · 3,286 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 3,662 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · -8.6 /g · -86 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 13 taken, 20 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 793.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 70 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida State7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 313.7 yds/g · 3,137 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 201 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 355.2 yds/g allowed · 3,552 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 925.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 70 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 3,804 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 243 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 357.2 yds/g allowed · 3,572 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · -4.4 /g · -44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 28:24 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 547.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Minnesota5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 3,668 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -5.0 /g · -50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Mississippi State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 LSU)#38 (of 70 teams · 385.6 yds/g · 3,085 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 343.8 yds/g allowed · 2,750 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 191 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2.4 /g · +19 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:59 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 701.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 70 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.423 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Missouri7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 453.6 yds/g · 4,082 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 442.1 yds/g allowed · 3,979 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 33.9 pts/g allowed · 305 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2.8 /g · -25 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:00 /g · 3h 45m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 623.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 70 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.374 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Pittsburgh5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)#51 (of 70 teams · 356.5 yds/g · 3,565 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 406.4 yds/g allowed · 4,064 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -7.1 /g · -71 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 32:05 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 70 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 70 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 3,667 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 494.9 yds/g allowed · 4,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 311 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -9.9 /g · -89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 28:50 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 568.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 70 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#47 (of 70 teams · 365.8 yds/g · 3,292 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 457.1 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 290 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · -6.2 /g · -56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 31:04 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 671.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 70 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Ole Miss6–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Mississippi State)#21 (of 70 teams · 425.9 yds/g · 3,833 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 252 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 486.6 yds/g allowed · 4,379 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 343 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 24:39 /g · 3h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 795.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 70 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.274 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 70 teams · 377.3 yds/g · 3,773 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 452.4 yds/g allowed · 4,524 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 380 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · -13.1 /g · -131 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 9 taken, 16 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 693.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 70 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.362 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Vanderbilt5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 70 teams · 338.6 yds/g · 3,047 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 194 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 450.0 yds/g allowed · 4,050 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 353 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.7 /g · -159 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 5 taken, 13 given · -0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 28:38 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 607.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 70 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.306 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 1.354 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)#60 (of 70 teams · 317.1 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 30:58 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 603.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Illinois2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 277.2 yds/g · 2,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.1 pts/g · 118 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -20.6 /g · -185 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 16m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 538.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)#14 (of 70 teams · 444.8 yds/g · 4,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 490.7 yds/g allowed · 4,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · -13.0 /g · -117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 5 taken, 17 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 539.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.430 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017UCLA6–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 70 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 4,450 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 304 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 479.0 yds/g allowed · 4,790 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 370 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · -6.6 /g · -66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 8 taken, 18 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 26:22 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 830.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 70 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 314.9 yds/g · 3,149 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 429.6 yds/g allowed · 4,296 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.4 /g · -174 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 696.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 70 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017North Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 70 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 3,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.4 pts/g · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · -14.8 /g · -148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:59 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 697.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arkansas4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 70 teams · 338.8 yds/g · 3,049 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 485.6 yds/g allowed · 4,370 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 40.6 pts/g allowed · 365 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -16.7 /g · -150 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 30:13 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 717.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 70 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.385 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 234.8 yds/g · 2,348 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 138 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 4,264 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.6 /g · -186 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Tennessee4–82 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 285.4 yds/g · 2,569 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 17.2 pts/g · 155 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 464.4 yds/g allowed · 4,180 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.2 /g · -164 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 817.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.091 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oregon State1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 316.0 yds/g · 3,160 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 463.7 yds/g allowed · 4,637 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 426 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -24.0 /g · -240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 9 taken, 21 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 30:06 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 557.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 70 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.341 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.167 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kansas1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 287.8 yds/g · 2,590 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 14.3 pts/g · 129 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.8 yds/g allowed · 4,327 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 46.4 pts/g allowed · 418 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -32.1 /g · -289 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -14 in these games · 6 taken, 20 given · -1.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:36 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 512.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 29% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 1.304 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.366 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20172017 Texas A&MPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma #1 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #2 of 70; 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Arizona #5 of 70; 2017 USC #6 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #7 of 70; 2017 Missouri #8 of 70; 2017 Alabama #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #11 of 70; 2017 UCLA #13 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #14 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #15 of 70; 2017 NC State #16 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #17 of 70; 2017 Georgia #17 of 70; 2017 Penn State #20 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #21 of 70; 2017 Washington State #22 of 70; 2017 Oregon #24 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Colorado #26 of 70; 2017 Baylor #27 of 70; 2017 Washington #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #29 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #31 of 70; 2017 LSU #32 of 70; 2017 Utah #33 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #34 of 70; 2017 Miami #35 of 70; 2017 TCU #36 of 70; 2017 Texas #37 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #38 of 70; 2017 Stanford #39 of 70; 2017 Indiana #40 of 70; 2017 California #41 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #42 of 70; 2017 Duke #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #44 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #46 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #47 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #49 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #51 of 70; 2017 Michigan #52 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #53 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #54 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #55 of 70; 2017 Iowa #56 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Florida #58 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Florida State #63 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #64 of 70; 2017 Kansas #65 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #66 of 70; 2017 Illinois #67 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 50 of 70. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #34
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma State #1 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #3 of 70; 2017 Arizona #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Louisville #6 of 70; 2017 Auburn #7 of 70; 2017 Alabama #8 of 70; 2017 Georgia #9 of 70; 2017 USC #10 of 70; 2017 Washington #12 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #13 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #14 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #15 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #17 of 70; 2017 Oregon #18 of 70; 2017 Missouri #19 of 70; 2017 Stanford #20 of 70; 2017 Clemson #21 of 70; 2017 UCLA #22 of 70; 2017 TCU #23 of 70; 2017 Miami #24 of 70; 2017 Iowa #25 of 70; 2017 Washington State #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #27 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #28 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #31 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #31 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #33 of 70; 2017 California #34 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #35 of 70; 2017 LSU #36 of 70; 2017 Utah #36 of 70; 2017 Texas #38 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #39 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #40 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #41 of 70; 2017 Boston College #42 of 70; 2017 Colorado #43 of 70; 2017 Michigan #44 of 70; 2017 Indiana #45 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #47 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #48 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 70; 2017 Baylor #50 of 70; 2017 Duke #52 of 70; 2017 Purdue #53 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #54 of 70; 2017 Maryland #55 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #56 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #57 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #57 of 70; 2017 Florida #59 of 70; 2017 Florida State #60 of 70; 2017 Virginia #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #62 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #63 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #64 of 70; 2017 Kansas #66 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #67 of 70; 2017 Illinois #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 30 of 70. Power 5 median rank 34.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Alabama #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Michigan #4 of 70; 2017 Washington #5 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #6 of 70; 2017 Clemson #7 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #8 of 70; 2017 TCU #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #11 of 70; 2017 LSU #12 of 70; 2017 Washington State #14 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #15 of 70; 2017 Penn State #16 of 70; 2017 Florida State #17 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Indiana #19 of 70; 2017 Virginia #20 of 70; 2017 Duke #21 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 70; 2017 Florida #23 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #24 of 70; 2017 Purdue #25 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #26 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #27 of 70; 2017 Iowa #28 of 70; 2017 NC State #29 of 70; 2017 Oregon #31 of 70; 2017 Texas #32 of 70; 2017 Utah #33 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Stanford #36 of 70; 2017 Boston College #37 of 70; 2017 Illinois #38 of 70; 2017 USC #39 of 70; 2017 California #40 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #41 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #42 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #43 of 70; 2017 Maryland #45 of 70; 2017 Louisville #47 of 70; 2017 Missouri #48 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #49 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #50 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #51 of 70; 2017 Baylor #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #55 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #56 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #59 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 UCLA #61 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #62 of 70; 2017 Kansas #63 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #64 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #66 of 70; 2017 Arizona #67 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70; 2017 Colorado #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 46 of 70. Power 5 median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 TCU #5 of 70; 2017 Clemson #6 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 Miami #8 of 70; 2017 Auburn #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan #12 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #13 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #14 of 70; 2017 LSU #15 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #16 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #17 of 70; 2017 Duke #18 of 70; 2017 Stanford #18 of 70; 2017 Iowa #20 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #21 of 70; 2017 Texas #23 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #24 of 70; 2017 Florida State #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #26 of 70; 2017 USC #27 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #29 of 70; 2017 Utah #30 of 70; 2017 Washington State #30 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #32 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #35 of 70; 2017 Indiana #36 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #36 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #38 of 70; 2017 California #39 of 70; 2017 Florida #40 of 70; 2017 Virginia #41 of 70; 2017 Oregon #43 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #45 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #46 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #48 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #49 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #51 of 70; 2017 Illinois #52 of 70; 2017 Missouri #53 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #54 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #55 of 70; 2017 Colorado #56 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #57 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #58 of 70; 2017 Baylor #59 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #60 of 70; 2017 UCLA #61 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #62 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #63 of 70; 2017 Arizona #64 of 70; 2017 Maryland #65 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #66 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #67 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 50 of 70. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #5 of 70; 2017 Auburn #6 of 70; 2017 Washington #7 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #9 of 70; 2017 TCU #10 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #11 of 70; 2017 Miami #12 of 70; 2017 Stanford #14 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 USC #16 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #18 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #19 of 70; 2017 Louisville #20 of 70; 2017 LSU #21 of 70; 2017 Michigan #22 of 70; 2017 Purdue #23 of 70; 2017 Texas #24 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #25 of 70; 2017 NC State #26 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #27 of 70; 2017 Washington State #28 of 70; 2017 Arizona #29 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #30 of 70; 2017 Duke #30 of 70; 2017 Oregon #32 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #33 of 70; 2017 Utah #34 of 70; 2017 Boston College #35 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #37 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #38 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #39 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #40 of 70; 2017 California #41 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #42 of 70; 2017 Missouri #43 of 70; 2017 Indiana #44 of 70; 2017 Florida State #45 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #46 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #48 of 70; 2017 UCLA #49 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #50 of 70; 2017 Florida #51 of 70; 2017 Colorado #53 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #54 of 70; 2017 Virginia #54 of 70; 2017 Baylor #56 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #57 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #58 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #63 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #64 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 47 of 70. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Miami #1 of 70; 2017 Stanford #2 of 70; 2017 Auburn #3 of 70; 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 Alabama #6 of 70; 2017 LSU #7 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #8 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #9 of 70; 2017 Iowa #10 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #10 of 70; 2017 TCU #10 of 70; 2017 Boston College #14 of 70; 2017 Georgia #15 of 70; 2017 Louisville #15 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #15 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #18 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #18 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #18 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #21 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #23 of 70; 2017 USC #24 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Maryland #25 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #25 of 70; 2017 Oregon #25 of 70; 2017 California #29 of 70; 2017 Texas #29 of 70; 2017 Duke #31 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Arizona #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #33 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #33 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #38 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #39 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #39 of 70; 2017 Virginia #39 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #43 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #43 of 70; 2017 Colorado #46 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #46 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #49 of 70; 2017 Missouri #50 of 70; 2017 Utah #50 of 70; 2017 Washington State #50 of 70; 2017 Florida #53 of 70; 2017 Florida State #53 of 70; 2017 Indiana #53 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #53 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #60 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #61 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #62 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #63 of 70; 2017 UCLA #63 of 70; 2017 Baylor #66 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 46 of 70. Power 5 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #34
Possession. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan State #1 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #2 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #3 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #4 of 70; 2017 NC State #6 of 70; 2017 Washington State #7 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #8 of 70; 2017 Georgia #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Michigan #11 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #12 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #13 of 70; 2017 LSU #14 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Clemson #16 of 70; 2017 TCU #17 of 70; 2017 Baylor #18 of 70; 2017 Utah #19 of 70; 2017 Duke #20 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #21 of 70; 2017 USC #22 of 70; 2017 Virginia #23 of 70; 2017 Stanford #24 of 70; 2017 Penn State #26 of 70; 2017 Alabama #27 of 70; 2017 Louisville #28 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #29 of 70; 2017 Texas #30 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #32 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #33 of 70; 2017 Florida #34 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #35 of 70; 2017 California #36 of 70; 2017 Florida State #37 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #40 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #41 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa #44 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #45 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #46 of 70; 2017 Washington #47 of 70; 2017 Colorado #48 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #50 of 70; 2017 Oregon #51 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #51 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #54 of 70; 2017 Purdue #55 of 70; 2017 Indiana #56 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #57 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #58 of 70; 2017 Arizona #59 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #60 of 70; 2017 Miami #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Kansas #63 of 70; 2017 UCLA #64 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #65 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 70; 2017 Missouri #68 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 49 of 70. Power 5 median rank 34.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Duke #1 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #1 of 130; 2017 NC State #1 of 130; 2017 Stanford #1 of 130; 2017 Utah #1 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #14 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #16 of 130; 2017 Washington State #16 of 130; 2017 Penn State #21 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #26 of 130; 2017 Washington #30 of 130; 2017 Purdue #32 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #33 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #34 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #36 of 130; 2017 Missouri #37 of 130; 2017 Texas #37 of 130; 2017 Michigan #40 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #41 of 130; 2017 Indiana #44 of 130; 2017 Florida State #45 of 130; 2017 Georgia #46 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 130; 2017 Louisville #51 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2017 Alabama #56 of 130; 2017 LSU #58 of 130; 2017 TCU #59 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #60 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #61 of 130; 2017 Virginia #64 of 130; 2017 Arizona #65 of 130; 2017 USC #68 of 130; 2017 Oregon #76 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #79 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #80 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #81 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #82 of 130; 2017 Florida #83 of 130; 2017 UCLA #84 of 130; 2017 Baylor #87 of 130; 2017 Illinois #91 of 130; 2017 Kansas #92 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #93 of 130; 2017 Colorado #94 of 130; 2017 Maryland #95 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #96 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #103 of 130; 2017 Boston College #105 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #108 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #109 of 130; 2017 Clemson #110 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #111 of 130; 2017 Iowa #112 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #115 of 130; 2017 Auburn #118 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #118 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #120 of 130; 2017 California #121 of 130; 2017 Miami #122 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 98 of 130. Power 5 median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #67
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #1 of 130; 2017 Colorado #2 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #3 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #4 of 130; 2017 TCU #6 of 130; 2017 Boston College #7 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #8 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #11 of 130; 2017 Florida #12 of 130; 2017 Missouri #15 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #23 of 130; 2017 Duke #27 of 130; 2017 Penn State #29 of 130; 2017 Georgia #30 of 130; 2017 NC State #31 of 130; 2017 Texas #32 of 130; 2017 UCLA #38 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #44 of 130; 2017 Auburn #46 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #48 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #50 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #51 of 130; 2017 California #52 of 130; 2017 Washington State #53 of 130; 2017 Washington #55 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #56 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #57 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #58 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #60 of 130; 2017 Stanford #66 of 130; 2017 Alabama #67 of 130; 2017 Illinois #67 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #70 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #71 of 130; 2017 Virginia #72 of 130; 2017 Kansas #73 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #77 of 130; 2017 Arizona #78 of 130; 2017 Utah #80 of 130; 2017 Miami #81 of 130; 2017 USC #82 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #85 of 130; 2017 Indiana #86 of 130; 2017 Louisville #88 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #91 of 130; 2017 Oregon #91 of 130; 2017 Clemson #95 of 130; 2017 Purdue #98 of 130; 2017 Baylor #102 of 130; 2017 LSU #103 of 130; 2017 Maryland #105 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #107 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #108 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #109 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #110 of 130; 2017 Florida State #111 of 130; 2017 Iowa #115 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #117 of 130; 2017 Michigan #119 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #123 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 89 of 130. Power 5 median rank 67.
Returning rushingmedian #59
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #4 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #5 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #7 of 130; 2017 Washington State #9 of 130; 2017 Washington #11 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #13 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 130; 2017 Georgia #16 of 130; 2017 UCLA #18 of 130; 2017 Purdue #19 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #23 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #24 of 130; 2017 Oregon #28 of 130; 2017 Alabama #29 of 130; 2017 Florida #30 of 130; 2017 Missouri #33 of 130; 2017 Arizona #36 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #38 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #39 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #41 of 130; 2017 TCU #43 of 130; 2017 Auburn #45 of 130; 2017 Illinois #49 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #50 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #50 of 130; 2017 Colorado #52 of 130; 2017 USC #54 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #55 of 130; 2017 LSU #57 of 130; 2017 Boston College #58 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #59 of 130; 2017 Louisville #62 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #64 of 130; 2017 Duke #66 of 130; 2017 Baylor #68 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #69 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #71 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #73 of 130; 2017 California #74 of 130; 2017 Michigan #75 of 130; 2017 Miami #76 of 130; 2017 Maryland #77 of 130; 2017 Utah #81 of 130; 2017 Kansas #87 of 130; 2017 Stanford #90 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #91 of 130; 2017 NC State #92 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #98 of 130; 2017 Iowa #100 of 130; 2017 Indiana #101 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #103 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #104 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #108 of 130; 2017 Florida State #109 of 130; 2017 Texas #112 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #113 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #117 of 130; 2017 Clemson #119 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #120 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #121 of 130; 2017 Virginia #126 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 53 of 130. Power 5 median rank 59.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2017 USC #3 of 130; 2017 Georgia #4 of 130; 2017 Florida State #5 of 130; 2017 LSU #6 of 130; 2017 Michigan #7 of 130; 2017 Auburn #8 of 130; 2017 Clemson #9 of 130; 2017 UCLA #11 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #12 of 130; 2017 Texas #13 of 130; 2017 Stanford #14 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #16 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #17 of 130; 2017 Florida #18 of 130; 2017 Penn State #19 of 130; 2017 Miami #20 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #21 of 130; 2017 Oregon #22 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #23 of 130; 2017 Washington #24 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #25 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #26 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #27 of 130; 2017 Maryland #28 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #29 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #30 of 130; 2017 TCU #31 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #33 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #34 of 130; 2017 Baylor #35 of 130; 2017 Louisville #36 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #37 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #38 of 130; 2017 Utah #39 of 130; 2017 Duke #40 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2017 Missouri #42 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #43 of 130; 2017 NC State #44 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #45 of 130; 2017 Arizona #46 of 130; 2017 Virginia #47 of 130; 2017 California #48 of 130; 2017 Iowa #49 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #50 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #52 of 130; 2017 Colorado #55 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #56 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 130; 2017 Washington State #60 of 130; 2017 Indiana #61 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #62 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #63 of 130; 2017 Illinois #64 of 130; 2017 Boston College #65 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #67 of 130; 2017 Kansas #68 of 130; 2017 Purdue #70 of 130. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 15 of 130. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma #1 of 70; 2017 Louisville #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Arizona #5 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #6 of 70; 2017 Alabama #7 of 70; 2017 Washington #8 of 70; 2017 Stanford #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Missouri #11 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #12 of 70; 2017 USC #13 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 70; 2017 UCLA #15 of 70; 2017 LSU #16 of 70; 2017 Auburn #17 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #19 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #21 of 70; 2017 Oregon #22 of 70; 2017 NC State #23 of 70; 2017 TCU #24 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #25 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #26 of 70; 2017 Clemson #27 of 70; 2017 Utah #28 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #29 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #30 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #31 of 70; 2017 Florida #32 of 70; 2017 Iowa #33 of 70; 2017 Miami #34 of 70; 2017 Colorado #35 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #36 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #37 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #39 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #40 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #41 of 70; 2017 Baylor #42 of 70; 2017 California #43 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #44 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #45 of 70; 2017 Michigan #46 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #47 of 70; 2017 Washington State #48 of 70; 2017 Indiana #49 of 70; 2017 Purdue #50 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #54 of 70; 2017 Texas #55 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #56 of 70; 2017 Boston College #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #58 of 70; 2017 Maryland #59 of 70; 2017 Duke #60 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #61 of 70; 2017 Florida State #62 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #63 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Virginia #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70; 2017 Kansas #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 52 of 70. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Alabama #2 of 70; 2017 Miami #3 of 70; 2017 Clemson #4 of 70; 2017 Georgia #5 of 70; 2017 Michigan #6 of 70; 2017 TCU #7 of 70; 2017 Iowa #8 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #9 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #11 of 70; 2017 Washington #12 of 70; 2017 Auburn #13 of 70; 2017 Duke #14 of 70; 2017 Texas #15 of 70; 2017 Washington State #16 of 70; 2017 Penn State #17 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #18 of 70; 2017 Purdue #20 of 70; 2017 Oregon #22 of 70; 2017 Florida State #23 of 70; 2017 Indiana #24 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #25 of 70; 2017 Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 USC #29 of 70; 2017 Boston College #30 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #31 of 70; 2017 Florida #32 of 70; 2017 LSU #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #34 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #35 of 70; 2017 Utah #36 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #37 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #38 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #39 of 70; 2017 California #40 of 70; 2017 Illinois #41 of 70; 2017 Stanford #42 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #46 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #47 of 70; 2017 Baylor #49 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #50 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #51 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #52 of 70; 2017 Missouri #53 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #54 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #55 of 70; 2017 UCLA #56 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #57 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #58 of 70; 2017 Arizona #59 of 70; 2017 Maryland #60 of 70; 2017 Kansas #61 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #63 of 70; 2017 Colorado #64 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #65 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #68 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 48 of 70. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #1 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #2 of 70; 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Georgia #6 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Arizona #9 of 70; 2017 Alabama #10 of 70; 2017 Utah #11 of 70; 2017 USC #12 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #13 of 70; 2017 Auburn #14 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 UCLA #16 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #17 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #18 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #19 of 70; 2017 TCU #20 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #21 of 70; 2017 Colorado #22 of 70; 2017 LSU #23 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #24 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #25 of 70; 2017 Oregon #26 of 70; 2017 Missouri #27 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #29 of 70; 2017 Washington State #30 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #31 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #33 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #34 of 70; 2017 California #35 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #36 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #39 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #41 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #42 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Stanford #45 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #46 of 70; 2017 Miami #47 of 70; 2017 Boston College #48 of 70; 2017 Florida #49 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #50 of 70; 2017 Texas #51 of 70; 2017 Iowa #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan #54 of 70; 2017 Florida State #55 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #56 of 70; 2017 Duke #57 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #58 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Indiana #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Baylor #63 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #65 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 67 of 70. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Michigan #2 of 70; 2017 TCU #3 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #4 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #5 of 70; 2017 Georgia #6 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #7 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Washington State #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Duke #12 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #14 of 70; 2017 Oregon #15 of 70; 2017 Texas #16 of 70; 2017 Auburn #17 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #21 of 70; 2017 Florida #22 of 70; 2017 Indiana #23 of 70; 2017 LSU #24 of 70; 2017 Virginia #25 of 70; 2017 Washington #26 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #27 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #28 of 70; 2017 USC #29 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #30 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #36 of 70; 2017 Utah #37 of 70; 2017 Iowa #38 of 70; 2017 Missouri #39 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #41 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #42 of 70; 2017 Baylor #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #45 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Kansas #47 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #50 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 70; 2017 Stanford #52 of 70; 2017 UCLA #53 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #56 of 70; 2017 California #57 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #59 of 70; 2017 Louisville #60 of 70; 2017 Colorado #61 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #63 of 70; 2017 Maryland #64 of 70; 2017 Arizona #65 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #66 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #67 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #68 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 40 of 70. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Baylor #1 of 70; 2017 Stanford #2 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #3 of 70; 2017 Arizona #4 of 70; 2017 Louisville #5 of 70; 2017 Miami #6 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #8 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #9 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #12 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #13 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Georgia #15 of 70; 2017 Michigan #17 of 70; 2017 Missouri #18 of 70; 2017 Maryland #19 of 70; 2017 Alabama #20 of 70; 2017 USC #21 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #22 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #23 of 70; 2017 NC State #24 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #25 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 Kansas #27 of 70; 2017 Florida #28 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #30 of 70; 2017 Penn State #31 of 70; 2017 Indiana #32 of 70; 2017 UCLA #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa #34 of 70; 2017 California #35 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #36 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #37 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #38 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #39 of 70; 2017 Texas #40 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #41 of 70; 2017 Oregon #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Boston College #44 of 70; 2017 Colorado #45 of 70; 2017 TCU #46 of 70; 2017 LSU #47 of 70; 2017 Duke #48 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Virginia #50 of 70; 2017 Washington State #51 of 70; 2017 Florida State #52 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #53 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Purdue #57 of 70; 2017 Utah #58 of 70; 2017 Auburn #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #60 of 70; 2017 Washington #61 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #62 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #63 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #64 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #65 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #66 of 70; 2017 Clemson #67 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #68 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 10 of 70. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Tennessee #2 of 70; 2017 Washington #3 of 70; 2017 Iowa #4 of 70; 2017 Maryland #6 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 California #8 of 70; 2017 Illinois #9 of 70; 2017 Stanford #11 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #12 of 70; 2017 Georgia #13 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #15 of 70; 2017 UCLA #16 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #17 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #18 of 70; 2017 Alabama #19 of 70; 2017 LSU #20 of 70; 2017 Indiana #21 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #22 of 70; 2017 Miami #23 of 70; 2017 Clemson #24 of 70; 2017 NC State #25 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #26 of 70; 2017 Auburn #27 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #28 of 70; 2017 Virginia #29 of 70; 2017 Louisville #30 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #31 of 70; 2017 Penn State #32 of 70; 2017 Texas #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #34 of 70; 2017 Florida State #35 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #36 of 70; 2017 Arizona #37 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #38 of 70; 2017 Utah #39 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #41 of 70; 2017 Colorado #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #48 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #49 of 70; 2017 Boston College #50 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #51 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #52 of 70; 2017 Duke #53 of 70; 2017 USC #54 of 70; 2017 Baylor #55 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #56 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #57 of 70; 2017 Oregon #58 of 70; 2017 Washington State #59 of 70; 2017 Kansas #60 of 70; 2017 Missouri #61 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #62 of 70; 2017 Michigan #63 of 70; 2017 TCU #64 of 70; 2017 Florida #65 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #68 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Texas A&M, ranked 46 of 70. Power 5 median rank 35.