THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Texas A&MAggies

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2019’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Texas A&M played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019Texas A&M8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Oklahoma State)#50 (of 73 teams · 352.2 yds/g · 3,170 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 212 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 382.4 yds/g allowed · 3,442 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · -4.0 /g · -36 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 32:16 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 848.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 73 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 1.351 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#34 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#72. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#71. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#129. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#127. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#130. 6 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#74. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range #2–#71. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)
2019Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Virginia · postseason: #2 Ohio State)#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 533.3 yds/g · 5,333 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 43.2 pts/g · 432 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 232.2 yds/g allowed · 2,322 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 9.7 pts/g allowed · 97 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +33.5 /g · +335 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 32:27 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 863.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · -0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 1.333 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.143 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Minnesota11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Penn State · postseason: #12 Auburn)#15 (of 73 teams · 450.2 yds/g · 4,052 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 311 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 315.9 yds/g allowed · 2,843 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 181 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +14.4 /g · +130 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:35 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 621.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.319 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Penn State, #14 Michigan, #21 Cincinnati)#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 537.0 yds/g · 4,833 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 48.4 pts/g · 436 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 239.6 yds/g allowed · 2,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 12.9 pts/g allowed · 116 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +35.6 /g · +320 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 32:26 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 973.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.394 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 1.376 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Utah11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 73 teams · 458.3 yds/g · 4,125 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 331 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 242.3 yds/g allowed · 2,181 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 11.8 pts/g allowed · 106 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +25.0 /g · +225 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35:04 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 620.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · -0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Alabama11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Michigan)#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 500.2 yds/g · 4,502 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 44.7 pts/g · 402 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 3,155 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 206 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +21.8 /g · +196 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 16 taken, 8 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 31:19 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 985.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.356 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 51% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Georgia12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida · postseason: #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #15 Notre Dame · postseason: #7 Baylor)#35 (of 73 teams · 383.0 yds/g · 3,830 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 277 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 258.1 yds/g allowed · 2,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 10.8 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +16.9 /g · +169 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:13 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 960.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 73 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Florida11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #12 Auburn · postseason: #24 Virginia)#26 (of 73 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 4,083 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 313 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 314.6 yds/g allowed · 3,146 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 173 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +14.0 /g · +140 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 29:54 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 835.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 73 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.394 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019LSU15–04 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #9 Florida, #12 Auburn, #13 Alabama · postseason: #3 Clemson, #4 Oklahoma)#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 560.2 yds/g · 5,042 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 46.9 pts/g · 422 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 401.8 yds/g allowed · 3,616 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +20.0 /g · +180 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +4 in these games · 13 taken, 9 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 28:12 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 906.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.426 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 54% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.418 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Oklahoma12–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Baylor, #7 Baylor, #25 Oklahoma State)#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 535.1 yds/g · 5,351 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 413 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 328.6 yds/g allowed · 3,286 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +16.2 /g · +162 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · -6 in these games · 8 taken, 14 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 30:46 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 869.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.396 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 54% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 1.305 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019USC8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Utah)#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 465.0 yds/g · 4,650 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 340 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 409.0 yds/g allowed · 4,090 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 280 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · +6.0 /g · +60 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · -3 in these games · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 28:43 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 915.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.308 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Iowa10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #18 Minnesota · postseason: #22 USC)#59 (of 73 teams · 332.8 yds/g · 3,328 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 200 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 3,189 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 141 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 31:06 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 637.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 73 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.102 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Notre Dame, #16 Iowa)#27 (of 73 teams · 403.2 yds/g · 4,032 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 332 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 297.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +14.0 /g · +140 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 28:44 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 853.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 73 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019North Carolina7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 462.2 yds/g · 4,622 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 396.9 yds/g allowed · 3,969 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 254 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · +3.4 /g · +34 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 16 taken, 8 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 30:30 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 697.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 73 teams · 0.216 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.390 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 1.268 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Oregon12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Wisconsin)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Utah, #22 USC · postseason: #8 Wisconsin)#23 (of 73 teams · 424.4 yds/g · 4,244 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · +13.8 /g · +138 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 28:47 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 817.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 73 teams · 0.255 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.127 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Tennessee8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 73 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 2,894 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 160 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 2,890 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · -3.3 /g · -26 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 8 taken, 13 given · -0.63 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 28:23 /g · 3h 47m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 73 teams · 0.150 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.451 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.150 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Texas8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #25 Oklahoma State · postseason: #11 Utah)#8 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 465.5 yds/g · 4,655 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 327 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 467.6 yds/g allowed · 4,676 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 320 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · +0.7 /g · +7 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 31:00 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 877.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.275 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 0.226 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 1.314 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Baylor11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Oklahoma State)#22 (of 73 teams · 427.7 yds/g · 3,849 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 294 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 380.7 yds/g allowed · 3,426 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · +13.0 /g · +117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +11 in these games · 24 taken, 13 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 28:50 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 668.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 73 teams · 0.210 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 0.080 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.152 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Indiana8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 73 teams · 429.3 yds/g · 3,864 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 267 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 394.1 yds/g allowed · 3,547 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 267 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 34:37 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 73 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Kentucky8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 73 teams · 370.7 yds/g · 3,336 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 21.1 pts/g · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 324.7 yds/g allowed · 2,922 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 173 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 32:09 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 672.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 73 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 1.306 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Penn State11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa · postseason: #17 Memphis)#39 (of 73 teams · 379.7 yds/g · 3,797 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 3,388 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 14.9 pts/g allowed · 149 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 857.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 73 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 1.316 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 73 teams · 347.3 yds/g · 3,126 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 169 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 313.9 yds/g allowed · 2,825 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · -3.9 /g · -35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · -7 in these games · 11 taken, 18 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 30:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 638.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 73 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Wisconsin10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #16 Iowa, #18 Minnesota)#25 (of 73 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 3,756 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 271 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 331.7 yds/g allowed · 2,985 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 175 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · +10.7 /g · +96 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35:21 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 675.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 73 teams · 0.249 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 47% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 1.188 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.488 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Florida State6–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 73 teams · 376.2 yds/g · 3,386 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 426.9 yds/g allowed · 3,842 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · -2.9 /g · -26 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 10 taken, 8 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 26:51 /g · 4h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 878.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 73 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.380 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 1.208 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Miami6–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Virginia)#48 (of 73 teams · 360.3 yds/g · 3,243 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 334.3 yds/g allowed · 3,009 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 207 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · +2.6 /g · +23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · +5 in these games · 15 taken, 10 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 30:10 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 815.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 73 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.448 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.431 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Missouri6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 73 teams · 334.4 yds/g · 3,010 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 181 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 338.9 yds/g allowed · 3,050 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · -0.6 /g · -5 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 29:56 /g · 4h 29m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 642.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 73 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.167 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Nebraska5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 73 teams · 418.9 yds/g · 4,189 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 257 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 4,002 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · -4.7 /g · -47 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · -2 in these games · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 29:54 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 729.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 73 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Oregon State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#30 (of 73 teams · 396.1 yds/g · 3,961 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 301 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 454.5 yds/g allowed · 4,545 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 352 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · -5.1 /g · -51 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +7 in these games · 12 taken, 5 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 28:39 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 595.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 73 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 1.367 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Stanford4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 73 teams · 369.0 yds/g · 4,059 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 233 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 419.8 yds/g allowed · 4,618 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · -7.3 /g · -80 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 32:09 /g · 5h 54m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 787.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 73 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019TCU5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 73 teams · 398.4 yds/g · 3,984 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 342.2 yds/g allowed · 3,422 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · +1.8 /g · +18 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · +3 in these games · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:19 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 691.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 73 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 1.192 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 1.378 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Virginia9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 73 teams · 381.0 yds/g · 3,429 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 269 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 353.7 yds/g allowed · 3,183 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · +5.3 /g · +48 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 33:28 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 580.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 73 teams · 0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019West Virginia5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 73 teams · 324.4 yds/g · 3,569 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 227 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 405.8 yds/g allowed · 4,464 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · -9.6 /g · -106 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -9 in these games · 11 taken, 20 given · -0.82 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 28:17 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 130 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 639.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 73 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 36% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Arizona State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)#44 (of 73 teams · 370.5 yds/g · 3,705 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 414.1 yds/g allowed · 4,141 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · -1.0 /g · -10 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 18 taken, 10 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 28:45 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 686.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 73 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 73 teams · 386.2 yds/g · 3,862 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 4,359 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · -11.4 /g · -114 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · -3 in these games · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 614.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 73 teams · 0.173 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 0.275 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 1.191 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Iowa State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#20 (of 73 teams · 432.7 yds/g · 4,327 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 365.7 yds/g allowed · 3,657 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 258 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · +5.0 /g · +50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 30:52 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 597.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 73 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 1.333 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 1.207 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Kansas State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma)#56 (of 73 teams · 340.2 yds/g · 3,402 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 267 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 395.2 yds/g allowed · 3,952 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · +2.3 /g · +23 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 32:44 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 543.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 73 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 0.211 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 1.251 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Virginia)#19 (of 73 teams · 434.8 yds/g · 4,348 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 312 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 489.5 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · -7.3 /g · -73 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · -2 in these games · 14 taken, 16 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 31:58 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 645.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 0.263 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.615 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 1.393 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Michigan State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 73 teams · 345.3 yds/g · 3,453 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 185 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 339.8 yds/g allowed · 3,398 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · -6.3 /g · -63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 30:52 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 688.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Mississippi State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 73 teams · 375.0 yds/g · 3,375 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 402.2 yds/g allowed · 3,620 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -8.6 /g · -77 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · -5 in these games · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 32:26 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 130 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 732.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 73 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 73 teams · 0.214 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 1.402 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Ole Miss4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 73 teams · 455.8 yds/g · 4,102 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 228 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 452.1 yds/g allowed · 4,069 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · -4.8 /g · -43 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 717.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 73 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.385 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Syracuse5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 73 teams · 377.0 yds/g · 3,393 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 515.6 yds/g allowed · 4,640 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · -12.2 /g · -110 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +8 in these games · 16 taken, 8 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 29:40 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 73 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 0.278 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 1.252 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Virginia Tech8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 73 teams · 382.2 yds/g · 3,440 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 282 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 383.8 yds/g allowed · 3,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · +5.4 /g · +49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 32:06 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 696.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 73 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.449 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Wake Forest8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 73 teams · 442.4 yds/g · 3,982 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 424.1 yds/g allowed · 3,817 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 288 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · -2.6 /g · -23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 30:50 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 73 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Arizona4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#28 (of 73 teams · 402.2 yds/g · 4,022 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 220 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 462.0 yds/g allowed · 4,620 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 343 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · -12.3 /g · -123 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -9 in these games · 7 taken, 16 given · -0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 27:19 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 570.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 73 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 73 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Auburn9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Oregon, #13 Alabama)#32 (of 73 teams · 388.6 yds/g · 3,497 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 73 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 277 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 358.8 yds/g allowed · 3,229 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 201 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 28:48 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 843.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 73 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 1.250 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Oklahoma State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#14 (of 73 teams · 451.5 yds/g · 4,515 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 73 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · +1.6 /g · +16 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 644.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 73 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 0.197 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Purdue4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 73 teams · 381.7 yds/g · 4,199 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 279 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 440.1 yds/g allowed · 4,841 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 333 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · -4.9 /g · -54 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 14 taken, 18 given · -0.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 27:15 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#129 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 607.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 73 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 0.181 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 73 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Washington8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #22 USC · postseason: #19 Boise State)#47 (of 73 teams · 360.9 yds/g · 3,248 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 73 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 73 teams · 360.1 yds/g allowed · 3,241 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · +4.7 /g · +42 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 73 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 29:21 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 801.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 73 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 73 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Boston College6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 73 teams · 445.2 yds/g · 4,897 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 326 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 490.9 yds/g allowed · 5,400 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 33.4 pts/g allowed · 367 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · -3.7 /g · -41 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 73 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 29:09 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 565.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 73 teams · 0.230 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 0.253 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 73 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.415 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019California8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 73 teams · 312.7 yds/g · 3,127 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 19.1 pts/g · 191 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 402.7 yds/g allowed · 4,027 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 235 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · -4.4 /g · -44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · +3 in these games · 12 taken, 9 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 28:05 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 611.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 73 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 73 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Illinois6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 Wisconsin)#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 286.9 yds/g · 2,582 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 439.8 yds/g allowed · 3,958 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 245 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · -2.4 /g · -22 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 73 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:14 /g · 3h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 661.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 73 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 73 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Texas Tech4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Oklahoma State)#12 (of 73 teams · 457.6 yds/g · 4,576 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 534.4 yds/g allowed · 5,344 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 351 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · -6.8 /g · -68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 28:07 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 577.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 73 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.441 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Georgia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 285.9 yds/g · 2,573 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 17.8 pts/g · 160 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · 460.2 yds/g allowed · 4,142 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 36.4 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · -18.7 /g · -168 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 26:58 /g · 4h 03m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 629.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 73 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 1.332 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 73 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 73 teams · 388.1 yds/g · 3,881 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 507.9 yds/g allowed · 5,079 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 40.4 pts/g allowed · 404 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · -15.3 /g · -153 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · -8 in these games · 7 taken, 15 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 26:39 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 528.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 73 teams · 0.211 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.323 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.414 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Maryland3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 73 teams · 315.9 yds/g · 3,159 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 489.5 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 39.6 pts/g allowed · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · -18.9 /g · -189 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · -8 in these games · 12 taken, 20 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 24:39 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 703.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 73 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 1.395 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 73 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019South Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Georgia)#58 (of 73 teams · 334.2 yds/g · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 73 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 182 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 425.0 yds/g allowed · 4,250 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 283 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · -10.1 /g · -101 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 26:48 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 762.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 73 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.119 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 1.284 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019UCLA4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#18 (of 73 teams · 438.9 yds/g · 4,389 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 73 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 292 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 468.5 yds/g allowed · 4,685 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 370 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 73 teams · -7.8 /g · -78 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · -4 in these games · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 73 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 741.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 73 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.375 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 73 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.408 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Washington State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#6 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 500.1 yds/g · 4,501 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 322 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 493.6 yds/g allowed · 4,442 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 73 teams · -0.8 /g · -7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -13 in these games · 9 taken, 22 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 73 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 556.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 73 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.308 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 73 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 73 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.425 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Duke5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 291.9 yds/g · 2,919 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 73 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 395.1 yds/g allowed · 3,951 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 73 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 73 teams · -10.2 /g · -102 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -12 in these games · 15 taken, 27 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 27:58 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 130 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 633.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 32% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 73 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 73 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019NC State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 73 teams · 349.7 yds/g · 3,147 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 156 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 73 teams · 443.9 yds/g allowed · 3,995 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -19.6 /g · -176 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -15 in these games · 4 taken, 19 given · -1.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 28:20 /g · 4h 15m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 668.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 0.280 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 73 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 73 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 1.187 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 1.379 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Northwestern3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 272.3 yds/g · 2,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 12.1 pts/g · 121 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 73 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 3,388 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 73 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · -14.2 /g · -142 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -9 in these games · 10 taken, 19 given · -0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 73 teams · 29:42 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#107 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 612.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 73 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 73 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.116 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 73 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 (of 73 teams · 292.4 yds/g · 2,339 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 139 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 471.5 yds/g allowed · 3,772 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -22.5 /g · -180 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.38 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 73 teams · 27:45 /g · 3h 42m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 707.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.321 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 34% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 73 teams · 1.323 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 73 teams · 1.315 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Vanderbilt3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 273.7 yds/g · 2,463 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 14.0 pts/g · 126 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 73 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 4,368 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -22.6 /g · -203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 73 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 73 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 605.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 73 teams · 0.256 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 33% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 1.205 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 73 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2019Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2019. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 226.0 yds/g · 2,260 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 6.7 pts/g · 67 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 73 teams · 445.7 yds/g allowed · 4,457 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -31.8 /g · -318 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -13 in these games · 7 taken, 20 given · -1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 73 teams · 28:39 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 587.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · -0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 73 teams · 0.273 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 28% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 73 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 73 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 73 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20192019 Texas A&MPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #34
Total offense. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #3 of 73; 2019 Clemson #4 of 73; 2019 Alabama #5 of 73; 2019 Washington State #6 of 73; 2019 Texas #8 of 73; 2019 USC #9 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #10 of 73; 2019 Utah #11 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #12 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #13 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #14 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #15 of 73; 2019 Boston College #16 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #17 of 73; 2019 UCLA #18 of 73; 2019 Louisville #19 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #20 of 73; 2019 Indiana #21 of 73; 2019 Baylor #22 of 73; 2019 Oregon #23 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #24 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #25 of 73; 2019 Florida #26 of 73; 2019 Michigan #27 of 73; 2019 Arizona #28 of 73; 2019 TCU #29 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #30 of 73; 2019 Auburn #32 of 73; 2019 Kansas #33 of 73; 2019 Colorado #34 of 73; 2019 Georgia #35 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #36 of 73; 2019 Purdue #37 of 73; 2019 Virginia #38 of 73; 2019 Penn State #39 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #40 of 73; 2019 Florida State #41 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #42 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #43 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #44 of 73; 2019 Stanford #45 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #46 of 73; 2019 Washington #47 of 73; 2019 Miami #48 of 73; 2019 NC State #51 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #52 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #55 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #56 of 73; 2019 Missouri #57 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #58 of 73; 2019 Iowa #59 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #60 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 California #62 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #63 of 73; 2019 Duke #64 of 73; 2019 Illinois #65 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #66 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #69 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #70 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 50 of 73. Power 5 median rank 34.
Scoring offensemedian #34
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 73; 2019 LSU #2 of 73; 2019 Alabama #3 of 73; 2019 Clemson #4 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #5 of 73; 2019 Utah #6 of 73; 2019 Washington State #7 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 USC #9 of 73; 2019 Michigan #10 of 73; 2019 Texas #11 of 73; 2019 Baylor #12 of 73; 2019 Oregon #14 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #15 of 73; 2019 Florida #16 of 73; 2019 Louisville #17 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #18 of 73; 2019 Auburn #19 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #21 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #22 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #23 of 73; 2019 Virginia #24 of 73; 2019 Indiana #25 of 73; 2019 Boston College #26 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #27 of 73; 2019 UCLA #28 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #29 of 73; 2019 Penn State #29 of 73; 2019 TCU #31 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #32 of 73; 2019 Georgia #33 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #34 of 73; 2019 Washington #35 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #36 of 73; 2019 Miami #37 of 73; 2019 Purdue #38 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #39 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #40 of 73; 2019 Kansas #41 of 73; 2019 Florida State #42 of 73; 2019 Illinois #43 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #44 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #46 of 73; 2019 Arizona #48 of 73; 2019 Duke #49 of 73; 2019 Stanford #50 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #51 of 73; 2019 Colorado #52 of 73; 2019 Maryland #52 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #54 of 73; 2019 Missouri #56 of 73; 2019 Iowa #57 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #57 of 73; 2019 California #59 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #60 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #61 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #62 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #63 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #64 of 73; 2019 NC State #65 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #68 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #70 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 45 of 73. Power 5 median rank 34.
Total defensemedian #33
Total defense. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Clemson #1 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Utah #3 of 73; 2019 Georgia #4 of 73; 2019 Michigan #5 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #6 of 73; 2019 Florida #7 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Iowa #9 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #10 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #12 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #13 of 73; 2019 Miami #14 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #15 of 73; 2019 Penn State #15 of 73; 2019 Missouri #17 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #18 of 73; 2019 TCU #19 of 73; 2019 Alabama #20 of 73; 2019 Virginia #21 of 73; 2019 Oregon #22 of 73; 2019 Auburn #23 of 73; 2019 Washington #24 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #25 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #26 of 73; 2019 Baylor #27 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #29 of 73; 2019 Indiana #30 of 73; 2019 Duke #31 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #32 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #33 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #34 of 73; 2019 LSU #35 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #36 of 73; 2019 California #37 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #38 of 73; 2019 USC #39 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #40 of 73; 2019 Stanford #41 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #42 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #43 of 73; 2019 Florida State #44 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #46 of 73; 2019 Colorado #48 of 73; 2019 Illinois #49 of 73; 2019 Purdue #50 of 73; 2019 NC State #52 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #53 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #54 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #55 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #56 of 73; 2019 Arizona #57 of 73; 2019 Texas #58 of 73; 2019 UCLA #59 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #60 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #63 of 73; 2019 Louisville #64 of 73; 2019 Maryland #64 of 73; 2019 Boston College #66 of 73; 2019 Washington State #67 of 73; 2019 Kansas #68 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #69 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 28 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Scoring defensemedian #33
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Clemson #1 of 73; 2019 Georgia #2 of 73; 2019 Utah #3 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #4 of 73; 2019 Iowa #5 of 73; 2019 Penn State #6 of 73; 2019 Florida #7 of 73; 2019 Oregon #8 of 73; 2019 Michigan #9 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #10 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #11 of 73; 2019 Baylor #12 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #13 of 73; 2019 Missouri #14 of 73; 2019 Washington #16 of 73; 2019 Auburn #17 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #18 of 73; 2019 Alabama #19 of 73; 2019 Miami #20 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #21 of 73; 2019 California #22 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #23 of 73; 2019 Virginia #24 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #25 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #26 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #27 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #28 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #29 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #30 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #30 of 73; 2019 LSU #32 of 73; 2019 TCU #33 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 Florida State #36 of 73; 2019 USC #37 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #38 of 73; 2019 Stanford #39 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #40 of 73; 2019 Indiana #41 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #42 of 73; 2019 Purdue #43 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #43 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #45 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #46 of 73; 2019 Duke #47 of 73; 2019 Texas #48 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #48 of 73; 2019 Colorado #51 of 73; 2019 Boston College #52 of 73; 2019 Arizona #53 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #55 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #56 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #57 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #58 of 73; 2019 Washington State #58 of 73; 2019 NC State #61 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #61 of 73; 2019 UCLA #63 of 73; 2019 Louisville #64 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #64 of 73; 2019 Maryland #67 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #68 of 73; 2019 Kansas #69 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 35 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Ohio State #1 of 73; 2019 Clemson #2 of 73; 2019 Utah #3 of 73; 2019 Alabama #4 of 73; 2019 LSU #5 of 73; 2019 Georgia #6 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #7 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Florida #9 of 73; 2019 Michigan #9 of 73; 2019 Penn State #11 of 73; 2019 Oregon #12 of 73; 2019 Baylor #13 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #14 of 73; 2019 Auburn #16 of 73; 2019 USC #17 of 73; 2019 Iowa #18 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #19 of 73; 2019 Virginia #20 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #21 of 73; 2019 Washington #22 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #23 of 73; 2019 Miami #24 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #25 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #26 of 73; 2019 TCU #27 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #28 of 73; 2019 Texas #29 of 73; 2019 Indiana #30 of 73; 2019 Missouri #31 of 73; 2019 Washington State #32 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #33 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #35 of 73; 2019 Florida State #36 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #37 of 73; 2019 Boston College #38 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #39 of 73; 2019 California #41 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #42 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #43 of 73; 2019 Purdue #44 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #45 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #46 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #47 of 73; 2019 Stanford #48 of 73; 2019 Louisville #49 of 73; 2019 UCLA #51 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #52 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #54 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #55 of 73; 2019 Duke #56 of 73; 2019 Colorado #57 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #58 of 73; 2019 Arizona #59 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #60 of 73; 2019 Kansas #61 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #62 of 73; 2019 Maryland #63 of 73; 2019 NC State #64 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #68 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #69 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 40 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Baylor #1 of 73; 2019 Illinois #2 of 73; 2019 Clemson #3 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #3 of 73; 2019 Alabama #5 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #5 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #7 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #7 of 73; 2019 Oregon #9 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #9 of 73; 2019 Utah #11 of 73; 2019 Penn State #13 of 73; 2019 Miami #14 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #14 of 73; 2019 Iowa #16 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #16 of 73; 2019 LSU #18 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #18 of 73; 2019 Texas #20 of 73; 2019 Boston College #21 of 73; 2019 Indiana #22 of 73; 2019 California #23 of 73; 2019 TCU #23 of 73; 2019 Auburn #25 of 73; 2019 Florida State #25 of 73; 2019 Michigan #27 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #27 of 73; 2019 Missouri #29 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #29 of 73; 2019 Washington #29 of 73; 2019 Florida #32 of 73; 2019 Georgia #32 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #34 of 73; 2019 Virginia #34 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #34 of 73; 2019 Stanford #40 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #41 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #41 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #43 of 73; 2019 Louisville #44 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #44 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #46 of 73; 2019 Colorado #47 of 73; 2019 USC #47 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #49 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #49 of 73; 2019 Purdue #52 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #53 of 73; 2019 UCLA #54 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #55 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #56 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #58 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #59 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #61 of 73; 2019 Kansas #62 of 73; 2019 Maryland #62 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #64 of 73; 2019 Arizona #65 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #65 of 73; 2019 Duke #67 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #68 of 73; 2019 Washington State #70 of 73; 2019 NC State #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 56 of 73. Power 5 median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Wisconsin #1 of 73; 2019 Utah #2 of 73; 2019 Indiana #4 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #5 of 73; 2019 Virginia #6 of 73; 2019 TCU #7 of 73; 2019 Georgia #9 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #10 of 73; 2019 Clemson #11 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #12 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #13 of 73; 2019 Stanford #15 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #16 of 73; 2019 UCLA #17 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #18 of 73; 2019 Louisville #19 of 73; 2019 Colorado #21 of 73; 2019 Alabama #22 of 73; 2019 Iowa #23 of 73; 2019 Texas #24 of 73; 2019 Washington State #25 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #26 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #27 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #28 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #29 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #30 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #31 of 73; 2019 Miami #32 of 73; 2019 Missouri #33 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #34 of 73; 2019 Florida #35 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #36 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #37 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #38 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #39 of 73; 2019 Washington #40 of 73; 2019 Boston College #41 of 73; 2019 Baylor #43 of 73; 2019 Auburn #44 of 73; 2019 Oregon #45 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #46 of 73; 2019 Michigan #47 of 73; 2019 USC #48 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #49 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #50 of 73; 2019 Penn State #51 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #52 of 73; 2019 NC State #53 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #54 of 73; 2019 LSU #55 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #56 of 73; 2019 California #57 of 73; 2019 Duke #58 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #59 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #60 of 73; 2019 Arizona #62 of 73; 2019 Purdue #63 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #64 of 73; 2019 Florida State #65 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #66 of 73; 2019 Kansas #67 of 73; 2019 Maryland #70 of 73; 2019 Illinois #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 14 of 73. Power 5 median rank 35.
Returning passingmedian #70
Returning passing. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 130; 2019 Michigan State #1 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #1 of 130; 2019 Stanford #1 of 130; 2019 Utah #12 of 130; 2019 Florida #16 of 130; 2019 Virginia #16 of 130; 2019 Colorado #19 of 130; 2019 Wake Forest #19 of 130; 2019 Arizona #23 of 130; 2019 Pittsburgh #23 of 130; 2019 Iowa #29 of 130; 2019 Michigan #30 of 130; 2019 Indiana #32 of 130; 2019 Oregon #35 of 130; 2019 USC #41 of 130; 2019 Louisville #42 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #44 of 130; 2019 Texas Tech #46 of 130; 2019 Texas #47 of 130; 2019 Clemson #50 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #51 of 130; 2019 Virginia Tech #53 of 130; 2019 Boston College #55 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #56 of 130; 2019 Georgia #57 of 130; 2019 Alabama #59 of 130; 2019 Baylor #62 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #65 of 130; 2019 Kansas State #70 of 130; 2019 California #74 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #75 of 130; 2019 Iowa State #77 of 130; 2019 Miami #78 of 130; 2019 UCLA #82 of 130; 2019 TCU #87 of 130; 2019 Maryland #88 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #91 of 130; 2019 Syracuse #92 of 130; 2019 Kansas #96 of 130; 2019 Duke #98 of 130; 2019 Georgia Tech #99 of 130; 2019 Florida State #100 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #101 of 130; 2019 West Virginia #102 of 130; 2019 Purdue #105 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #107 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #108 of 130; 2019 North Carolina #109 of 130; 2019 Missouri #112 of 130; 2019 Penn State #113 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #115 of 130; 2019 Illinois #117 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #120 of 130; 2019 Washington State #121 of 130; 2019 Auburn #122 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #123 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #124 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #125 of 130; 2019 NC State #127 of 130; 2019 Washington #128 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 40 of 130. Power 5 median rank 70.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #2 of 130; 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #5 of 130; 2019 Utah #6 of 130; 2019 Florida #7 of 130; 2019 Washington #10 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #13 of 130; 2019 Michigan State #17 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #19 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #21 of 130; 2019 Baylor #22 of 130; 2019 Clemson #23 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #25 of 130; 2019 LSU #28 of 130; 2019 Illinois #29 of 130; 2019 Florida State #31 of 130; 2019 Alabama #34 of 130; 2019 Missouri #35 of 130; 2019 Colorado #38 of 130; 2019 UCLA #40 of 130; 2019 TCU #41 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #43 of 130; 2019 Indiana #44 of 130; 2019 North Carolina #47 of 130; 2019 Washington State #48 of 130; 2019 Miami #51 of 130; 2019 Virginia Tech #52 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #55 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #55 of 130; 2019 Boston College #57 of 130; 2019 Oregon #57 of 130; 2019 Syracuse #60 of 130; 2019 Maryland #62 of 130; 2019 Louisville #65 of 130; 2019 Michigan #67 of 130; 2019 Pittsburgh #70 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #72 of 130; 2019 Purdue #74 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #76 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #80 of 130; 2019 Penn State #83 of 130; 2019 Texas #84 of 130; 2019 Virginia #84 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #89 of 130; 2019 Wake Forest #92 of 130; 2019 Kansas #95 of 130; 2019 Auburn #96 of 130; 2019 Iowa State #97 of 130; 2019 Iowa #103 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #104 of 130; 2019 NC State #106 of 130; 2019 Texas Tech #108 of 130; 2019 Kansas State #109 of 130; 2019 Georgia Tech #111 of 130; 2019 West Virginia #112 of 130; 2019 Stanford #115 of 130; 2019 Georgia #118 of 130; 2019 Arizona #119 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #123 of 130; 2019 Duke #124 of 130; 2019 California #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 37 of 130. Power 5 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #65
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Minnesota #1 of 130; 2019 Indiana #5 of 130; 2019 Arizona #7 of 130; 2019 Iowa #8 of 130; 2019 Kansas #10 of 130; 2019 West Virginia #10 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #14 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #20 of 130; 2019 Boston College #21 of 130; 2019 Oregon #25 of 130; 2019 UCLA #28 of 130; 2019 Baylor #30 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #32 of 130; 2019 Auburn #33 of 130; 2019 TCU #35 of 130; 2019 Duke #41 of 130; 2019 Michigan State #41 of 130; 2019 Utah #43 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #45 of 130; 2019 Maryland #46 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #50 of 130; 2019 Wake Forest #50 of 130; 2019 Florida #52 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #57 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 130; 2019 USC #60 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #61 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #62 of 130; 2019 Illinois #63 of 130; 2019 Missouri #64 of 130; 2019 Clemson #65 of 130; 2019 North Carolina #67 of 130; 2019 Virginia Tech #68 of 130; 2019 Texas #70 of 130; 2019 Georgia #73 of 130; 2019 Louisville #76 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #77 of 130; 2019 Georgia Tech #78 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #84 of 130; 2019 Stanford #85 of 130; 2019 LSU #87 of 130; 2019 Texas Tech #87 of 130; 2019 Florida State #90 of 130; 2019 Virginia #91 of 130; 2019 Syracuse #92 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #93 of 130; 2019 Miami #101 of 130; 2019 Alabama #102 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #106 of 130; 2019 Washington #107 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #111 of 130; 2019 Michigan #112 of 130; 2019 Iowa State #113 of 130; 2019 NC State #118 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #119 of 130; 2019 Colorado #120 of 130; 2019 Pittsburgh #121 of 130; 2019 California #122 of 130; 2019 Washington State #123 of 130; 2019 Kansas State #126 of 130; 2019 Purdue #129 of 130; 2019 Penn State #130 of 130. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 109 of 130. Power 5 median rank 65.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Alabama #1 of 130; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2019 Georgia #3 of 130; 2019 USC #4 of 130; 2019 LSU #5 of 130; 2019 Florida State #6 of 130; 2019 Texas #7 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma #8 of 130; 2019 Clemson #9 of 130; 2019 Penn State #10 of 130; 2019 Michigan #11 of 130; 2019 Auburn #13 of 130; 2019 Florida #15 of 130; 2019 Tennessee #16 of 130; 2019 Oregon #17 of 130; 2019 Miami #18 of 130; 2019 Washington #19 of 130; 2019 Stanford #20 of 130; 2019 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2019 UCLA #22 of 130; 2019 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2019 Nebraska #24 of 130; 2019 Ole Miss #25 of 130; 2019 Arkansas #26 of 130; 2019 Maryland #27 of 130; 2019 North Carolina #28 of 130; 2019 Virginia Tech #29 of 130; 2019 TCU #30 of 130; 2019 Michigan State #31 of 130; 2019 Arizona State #32 of 130; 2019 Wisconsin #33 of 130; 2019 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Baylor #35 of 130; 2019 NC State #36 of 130; 2019 Illinois #37 of 130; 2019 Louisville #38 of 130; 2019 Oklahoma State #39 of 130; 2019 Missouri #40 of 130; 2019 West Virginia #41 of 130; 2019 Pittsburgh #42 of 130; 2019 Iowa #43 of 130; 2019 Duke #44 of 130; 2019 Georgia Tech #45 of 130; 2019 Minnesota #46 of 130; 2019 Utah #47 of 130; 2019 Colorado #48 of 130; 2019 Northwestern #49 of 130; 2019 California #50 of 130; 2019 Purdue #51 of 130; 2019 Vanderbilt #52 of 130; 2019 Indiana #53 of 130; 2019 Iowa State #56 of 130; 2019 Oregon State #57 of 130; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 130; 2019 Virginia #59 of 130; 2019 Texas Tech #60 of 130; 2019 Syracuse #62 of 130; 2019 Arizona #63 of 130; 2019 Boston College #65 of 130; 2019 Wake Forest #66 of 130; 2019 Washington State #70 of 130; 2019 Kansas State #72 of 130; 2019 Kansas #74 of 130. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 12 of 130. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #2 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #3 of 73; 2019 Alabama #4 of 73; 2019 Clemson #5 of 73; 2019 Utah #6 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #7 of 73; 2019 USC #8 of 73; 2019 Texas #9 of 73; 2019 Louisville #10 of 73; 2019 Oregon #11 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #12 of 73; 2019 Boston College #14 of 73; 2019 Michigan #15 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #16 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #17 of 73; 2019 Florida #18 of 73; 2019 Washington State #19 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #20 of 73; 2019 Kansas #21 of 73; 2019 Baylor #22 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #23 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #24 of 73; 2019 Penn State #25 of 73; 2019 Indiana #26 of 73; 2019 UCLA #28 of 73; 2019 Stanford #29 of 73; 2019 Colorado #30 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #31 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #32 of 73; 2019 Arizona #33 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #34 of 73; 2019 Florida State #35 of 73; 2019 Auburn #36 of 73; 2019 Georgia #37 of 73; 2019 Virginia #38 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #39 of 73; 2019 TCU #40 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #41 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #42 of 73; 2019 Miami #43 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #45 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #46 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #47 of 73; 2019 California #48 of 73; 2019 Purdue #49 of 73; 2019 Washington #51 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #52 of 73; 2019 Missouri #54 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #56 of 73; 2019 Illinois #57 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #59 of 73; 2019 Iowa #60 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #62 of 73; 2019 NC State #64 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #65 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #66 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #67 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #68 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #70 of 73; 2019 Duke #71 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 44 of 73. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #33
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Clemson #1 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Utah #3 of 73; 2019 Georgia #4 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #5 of 73; 2019 Michigan #6 of 73; 2019 Missouri #7 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #8 of 73; 2019 Florida #9 of 73; 2019 Iowa #10 of 73; 2019 Alabama #11 of 73; 2019 Auburn #12 of 73; 2019 Oregon #13 of 73; 2019 Baylor #14 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #15 of 73; 2019 Penn State #16 of 73; 2019 Miami #17 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #19 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #20 of 73; 2019 TCU #21 of 73; 2019 Illinois #22 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #23 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #24 of 73; 2019 Washington #25 of 73; 2019 California #26 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #27 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #28 of 73; 2019 LSU #29 of 73; 2019 Duke #30 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #31 of 73; 2019 Florida State #32 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #33 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #34 of 73; 2019 Virginia #35 of 73; 2019 Purdue #36 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #38 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #39 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #41 of 73; 2019 USC #42 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #43 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #44 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #45 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #46 of 73; 2019 Indiana #47 of 73; 2019 Texas #48 of 73; 2019 Stanford #49 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #50 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #51 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #52 of 73; 2019 Boston College #53 of 73; 2019 Maryland #54 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #55 of 73; 2019 Arizona #56 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #58 of 73; 2019 Colorado #59 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #60 of 73; 2019 NC State #61 of 73; 2019 Louisville #62 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #63 of 73; 2019 Washington State #64 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #66 of 73; 2019 Kansas #67 of 73; 2019 UCLA #70 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 37 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive success ratemedian #34
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 LSU #1 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #2 of 73; 2019 Alabama #4 of 73; 2019 USC #5 of 73; 2019 Utah #6 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #7 of 73; 2019 Clemson #8 of 73; 2019 Washington State #9 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #10 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #11 of 73; 2019 Texas #12 of 73; 2019 Baylor #13 of 73; 2019 Oregon #14 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #15 of 73; 2019 UCLA #16 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #17 of 73; 2019 Michigan #18 of 73; 2019 Virginia #19 of 73; 2019 Indiana #20 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #21 of 73; 2019 Georgia #22 of 73; 2019 Washington #23 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #24 of 73; 2019 Boston College #26 of 73; 2019 Colorado #28 of 73; 2019 Florida #29 of 73; 2019 Penn State #30 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #31 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #32 of 73; 2019 TCU #33 of 73; 2019 Stanford #34 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #35 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #36 of 73; 2019 Auburn #37 of 73; 2019 Arizona #39 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #40 of 73; 2019 Louisville #41 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #42 of 73; 2019 Purdue #43 of 73; 2019 Kansas #44 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #45 of 73; 2019 Florida State #46 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #47 of 73; 2019 California #48 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #49 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #51 of 73; 2019 Iowa #52 of 73; 2019 NC State #54 of 73; 2019 Miami #55 of 73; 2019 Missouri #56 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #57 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #58 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #59 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #60 of 73; 2019 Maryland #61 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #62 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #66 of 73; 2019 Illinois #67 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #68 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #69 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #70 of 73; 2019 Duke #71 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #73 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 25 of 73. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive success ratemedian #33
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Clemson #1 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #2 of 73; 2019 Utah #3 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #4 of 73; 2019 Missouri #5 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #6 of 73; 2019 Miami #7 of 73; 2019 Georgia #8 of 73; 2019 Penn State #9 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #10 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #11 of 73; 2019 Michigan #12 of 73; 2019 Florida #13 of 73; 2019 TCU #14 of 73; 2019 Auburn #15 of 73; 2019 LSU #16 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #17 of 73; 2019 Virginia #18 of 73; 2019 Iowa #19 of 73; 2019 Alabama #20 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #21 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #22 of 73; 2019 Duke #23 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #24 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #26 of 73; 2019 Oregon #27 of 73; 2019 Washington #28 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #30 of 73; 2019 Illinois #31 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #32 of 73; 2019 Baylor #33 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #34 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #35 of 73; 2019 Indiana #36 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #37 of 73; 2019 Florida State #38 of 73; 2019 California #39 of 73; 2019 Boston College #40 of 73; 2019 NC State #41 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #42 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #43 of 73; 2019 Purdue #44 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #46 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #47 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #48 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #49 of 73; 2019 Texas #50 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #51 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #52 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #53 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #54 of 73; 2019 USC #56 of 73; 2019 Washington State #57 of 73; 2019 Louisville #58 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #61 of 73; 2019 Stanford #62 of 73; 2019 Colorado #63 of 73; 2019 Maryland #64 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #65 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #66 of 73; 2019 UCLA #67 of 73; 2019 Arizona #68 of 73; 2019 Kansas #69 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 29 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #33
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisville #1 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #2 of 73; 2019 Miami #3 of 73; 2019 Kansas #5 of 73; 2019 Maryland #6 of 73; 2019 Florida #7 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #8 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #9 of 73; 2019 Florida State #10 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #11 of 73; 2019 LSU #12 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #13 of 73; 2019 Alabama #14 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #15 of 73; 2019 Clemson #16 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #17 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #18 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #19 of 73; 2019 Penn State #20 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #21 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #22 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #23 of 73; 2019 Texas #24 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #25 of 73; 2019 Illinois #26 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #27 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #28 of 73; 2019 Purdue #29 of 73; 2019 USC #30 of 73; 2019 Arizona #31 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #32 of 73; 2019 Utah #33 of 73; 2019 Michigan #34 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #36 of 73; 2019 Duke #38 of 73; 2019 Oregon #39 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #40 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #41 of 73; 2019 Boston College #42 of 73; 2019 UCLA #43 of 73; 2019 California #44 of 73; 2019 Stanford #45 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #47 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #48 of 73; 2019 Auburn #49 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #50 of 73; 2019 Indiana #51 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #52 of 73; 2019 Baylor #54 of 73; 2019 Iowa #55 of 73; 2019 Virginia #56 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #58 of 73; 2019 Washington State #59 of 73; 2019 TCU #60 of 73; 2019 Colorado #61 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #62 of 73; 2019 NC State #63 of 73; 2019 Georgia #65 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #66 of 73; 2019 Missouri #68 of 73; 2019 Washington #70 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #71 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #72 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 69 of 73. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #37
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Iowa #2 of 73; 2019 Georgia #3 of 73; 2019 Oregon #4 of 73; 2019 Clemson #7 of 73; 2019 Tennessee #8 of 73; 2019 Baylor #9 of 73; 2019 West Virginia #10 of 73; 2019 Maryland #11 of 73; 2019 Washington #12 of 73; 2019 Arizona #13 of 73; 2019 California #14 of 73; 2019 Michigan #15 of 73; 2019 Kansas #16 of 73; 2019 Arizona State #17 of 73; 2019 Iowa State #18 of 73; 2019 Florida State #19 of 73; 2019 USC #21 of 73; 2019 Ohio State #23 of 73; 2019 Minnesota #24 of 73; 2019 Florida #25 of 73; 2019 Utah #26 of 73; 2019 Northwestern #27 of 73; 2019 Alabama #28 of 73; 2019 Stanford #29 of 73; 2019 Nebraska #30 of 73; 2019 Rutgers #31 of 73; 2019 Colorado #32 of 73; 2019 Purdue #33 of 73; 2019 Illinois #34 of 73; 2019 North Carolina #35 of 73; 2019 Auburn #36 of 73; 2019 Kentucky #37 of 73; 2019 South Carolina #38 of 73; 2019 Vanderbilt #39 of 73; 2019 Georgia Tech #40 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma #41 of 73; 2019 Pittsburgh #42 of 73; 2019 Texas #43 of 73; 2019 Arkansas #44 of 73; 2019 Michigan State #45 of 73; 2019 Penn State #46 of 73; 2019 Wake Forest #47 of 73; 2019 Duke #48 of 73; 2019 Ole Miss #49 of 73; 2019 Oklahoma State #50 of 73; 2019 Kansas State #51 of 73; 2019 Virginia #54 of 73; 2019 Indiana #55 of 73; 2019 Missouri #57 of 73; 2019 Oregon State #58 of 73; 2019 TCU #59 of 73; 2019 NC State #60 of 73; 2019 Syracuse #61 of 73; 2019 Louisville #62 of 73; 2019 Mississippi State #63 of 73; 2019 UCLA #64 of 73; 2019 Boston College #65 of 73; 2019 LSU #66 of 73; 2019 Washington State #67 of 73; 2019 Miami #68 of 73; 2019 Texas Tech #69 of 73; 2019 Virginia Tech #70 of 73; 2019 Wisconsin #71 of 73. Marked: 2019 Texas A&M, ranked 52 of 73. Power 5 median rank 37.