Metrics

Texas TechRed Raiders

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Texas Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 579.5 yds/g · 7,533 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 45.1 pts/g · 586 points)#127 (of 128 teams · 547.7 yds/g allowed · 7,120 yards)#125 (of 128 teams · 43.6 pts/g allowed · 567 points)#69 (of 128 teams · +1.5 /g · +19 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#105 (of 128 teams · 27:53 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#35 (of 128 teams · 641.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.301 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#127 (of 128 teams · 0.339 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#126 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#22 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#115. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#14 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#123. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#100 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #39–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#87 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #28–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#37 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#128. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#51 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #4–#113. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #24–#115. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #15–#116. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #11–#126. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning rushing: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #15–#120. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #11–#68. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#22 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#121. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #26–#127. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #4–#126. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #11–#128. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #3–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range #21–#100. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)
2015Baylor1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #16 Oklahoma State · postseason: #10 North Carolina)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 616.2 yds/g · 8,011 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 48.1 pts/g · 625 points)#62 (of 128 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,155 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19.8 /g · +257 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#107 (of 128 teams · 27:52 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#94 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.360 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#48 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Iowa State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 128 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 4,900 yards)#93 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 300 points)#108 (of 128 teams · 453.4 yds/g allowed · 5,441 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#101 (of 128 teams · -7.7 /g · -92 on the season)#113 (of 128 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.92 /g)#32 (of 128 teams · 31:32 /g · 6h 18m on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#62 (of 128 teams · 529.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 128 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 128 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#115 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 128 teams · 1.122 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 128 teams · 1.137 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Kansas0120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#115 (of 128 teams · 331.5 yds/g · 3,978 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 15.3 pts/g · 183 points)#128 (of 128 teams · 560.8 yds/g allowed · 6,730 yards)#128 (of 128 teams · 46.1 pts/g allowed · 553 points)#128 (of 128 teams · -30.8 /g · -370 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 18 taken, 25 given · -0.58 /g)#100 (of 128 teams · 28:12 /g · 5h 38m on the season)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#68 (of 128 teams · 500.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 128 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#122 (of 128 teams · 0.304 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#126 (of 128 teams · 34% of plays successful)#128 (of 128 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 128 teams · 1.123 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Kansas State670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#113 (of 128 teams · 333.7 yds/g · 4,338 yards)#58 (of 128 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 389 points)#106 (of 128 teams · 452.2 yds/g allowed · 5,879 yards)#93 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 409 points)#83 (of 128 teams · -1.5 /g · -20 on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 16 taken, 19 given · -0.23 /g)#24 (of 128 teams · 32:08 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#67 (of 128 teams · 503.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 128 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 128 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#112 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 128 teams · 1.084 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma1121 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU, #16 Oklahoma State, #17 Baylor, #23 Tennessee)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 530.2 yds/g · 6,893 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.5 pts/g · 566 points)#39 (of 128 teams · 364.5 yds/g allowed · 4,738 yards)#28 (of 128 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 286 points)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.5 /g · +280 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.69 /g)#48 (of 128 teams · 30:42 /g · 6h 39m on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 128 teams · 775.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 128 teams · 0.269 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#36 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 128 teams · 1.109 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oklahoma State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU)#22 (of 128 teams · 480.0 yds/g · 6,240 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 514 points)#100 (of 128 teams · 439.1 yds/g allowed · 5,708 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#37 (of 128 teams · +9.1 /g · +118 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#72 (of 128 teams · 29:30 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#33 (of 128 teams · 651.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 128 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#63 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.346 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015TCU1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Baylor · postseason: #15 Oregon)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 562.9 yds/g · 7,317 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 547 points)#63 (of 128 teams · 398.4 yds/g allowed · 5,179 yards)#64 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#17 (of 128 teams · +14.8 /g · +193 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#35 (of 128 teams · 31:22 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#45 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#39 (of 128 teams · 630.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.270 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#31 (of 128 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#17 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 128 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Texas573 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma, #17 Baylor)#92 (of 128 teams · 370.8 yds/g · 4,449 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#107 (of 128 teams · 452.6 yds/g allowed · 5,431 yards)#87 (of 128 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 364 points)#91 (of 128 teams · -3.9 /g · -47 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#115 (of 128 teams · 27:07 /g · 5h 25m on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's receiving production returning)#81 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 821.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 128 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 128 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#116 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 128 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015West Virginia850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2015. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#23 (of 128 teams · 479.7 yds/g · 6,236 yards)#35 (of 128 teams · 34.0 pts/g · 442 points)#61 (of 128 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,154 yards)#44 (of 128 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points)#35 (of 128 teams · +9.4 /g · +122 on the season)#15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 31 taken, 22 given · +0.69 /g)#70 (of 128 teams · 29:31 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#91 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing production returning)#105 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's receiving production returning)#66 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 625.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 128 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#11 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 128 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20152015 Texas TechBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #22
Total offense. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 TCU #3 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #23 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #58 of 128; 2015 Texas #92 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #113 of 128; 2015 Kansas #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 2 of 128. Big 12 median rank 22.
Scoring offensemedian #14
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #4 of 128; 2015 TCU #7 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #14 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #35 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #58 of 128; 2015 Texas #83 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #93 of 128; 2015 Kansas #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 2 of 128. Big 12 median rank 14.
Total defensemedian #100
Total defense. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #39 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #61 of 128; 2015 Baylor #62 of 128; 2015 TCU #63 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #100 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #106 of 128; 2015 Texas #107 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #108 of 128; 2015 Kansas #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 127 of 128. Big 12 median rank 100.
Scoring defensemedian #87
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #28 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #44 of 128; 2015 TCU #64 of 128; 2015 Baylor #79 of 128; 2015 Texas #87 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #93 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #97 of 128; 2015 Kansas #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 125 of 128. Big 12 median rank 87.
Point marginmedian #37
Point margin. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 128; 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #35 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #37 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #83 of 128; 2015 Texas #91 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #101 of 128; 2015 Kansas #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 69 of 128. Big 12 median rank 37.
Turnover marginmedian #51
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #4 of 128; 2015 Texas #8 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #15 of 128; 2015 Baylor #66 of 128; 2015 TCU #66 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #88 of 128; 2015 Kansas #105 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #113 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 51 of 128. Big 12 median rank 51.
Possessionmedian #70
Possession. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Kansas State #24 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #32 of 128; 2015 TCU #35 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #48 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #70 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #72 of 128; 2015 Kansas #100 of 128; 2015 Baylor #107 of 128; 2015 Texas #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 105 of 128. Big 12 median rank 70.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 Kansas #26 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #34 of 128; 2015 TCU #49 of 128; 2015 Texas #58 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #91 of 128; 2015 Baylor #94 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 54 of 128. Big 12 median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 128; 2015 TCU #28 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #32 of 128; 2015 Baylor #55 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #86 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #105 of 128; 2015 Texas #114 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #123 of 128; 2015 Kansas #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 38 of 128. Big 12 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #66
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #37 of 128; 2015 TCU #45 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #66 of 128; 2015 Texas #81 of 128; 2015 Kansas #96 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #100 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #109 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 15 of 128. Big 12 median rank 66.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Texas #11 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #16 of 128; 2015 Baylor #31 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #33 of 128; 2015 TCU #39 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #41 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #62 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #67 of 128; 2015 Kansas #68 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 35 of 128. Big 12 median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #22
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #1 of 128; 2015 TCU #16 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #17 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #22 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #48 of 128; 2015 Texas #68 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #87 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #93 of 128; 2015 Kansas #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 8 of 128. Big 12 median rank 22.
Defensive EPAmedian #70
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 West Virginia #26 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #29 of 128; 2015 TCU #31 of 128; 2015 Baylor #53 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2015 Texas #84 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #108 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #109 of 128; 2015 Kansas #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 127 of 128. Big 12 median rank 70.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Baylor #4 of 128; 2015 TCU #8 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #37 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #41 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #65 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #70 of 128; 2015 Texas #95 of 128; 2015 Kansas #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 13 of 128. Big 12 median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #63
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 West Virginia #11 of 128; 2015 TCU #17 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #48 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #63 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #112 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #115 of 128; 2015 Texas #116 of 128; 2015 Kansas #128 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 126 of 128. Big 12 median rank 63.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #57
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #3 of 128; 2015 Baylor #11 of 128; 2015 Kansas #40 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #57 of 128; 2015 Texas #73 of 128; 2015 TCU #80 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #93 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #107 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #119 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 13 of 128. Big 12 median rank 57.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #52
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Texas #21 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #22 of 128; 2015 Kansas #30 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #32 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #52 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #84 of 128; 2015 TCU #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #93 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #100 of 128. Marked: 2015 Texas Tech, ranked 90 of 128. Big 12 median rank 52.