THIRD AND DATA

The Citadel game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29at Wofford14–42 L693515.145–22715–24–124215–122–334–5035:0549%55%
Sep 5at Charlotte43–41 W634006.350–2689–13–132168–151–102–1029:4548%49%
Sep 12vs Charleston Southern20–26 L713084.357–2353–14–73175–162–314–3534:1038%41%
Sep 26vs Chattanooga8–27 L652333.645–17213–20–61178–170–112–1534:5338%42%
Oct 3at South Carolina State34–31 W554488.139–24410–16–204155–120–003–3530:5242%45%
Oct 10vs East Tennessee State16–34 L662593.948–1267–18–133134–173–525–4034:2027%39%
Oct 17at Texas A&M0–41 L571833.247–1403–10–43125–152–402–2033:5934%58%
Oct 24vs Tennessee Tech13–28 L511903.739–1815–12–9115–130–114–3530:4026%54%
Oct 31at Mercer19–28 L642874.546–14412–18–143185–131–113–3335:4833%42%
Season9 games2–75612,6594.7416–173777–145–92214050–13011–19929–2734:59:3237%48%

Success rate

The Citadel on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game37.3% · 47.5%
49
55
48
49
38
41
38
42
42
45
27
39
34
58
26
54
33
42
@ Wofford
@ Charlotte
Charleston Southern
Chattanooga
@ South Carolina State
East Tennessee State
@ Texas A&M
Tennessee Tech
@ Mercer
Furman
@ VMI
@ Western Carolina

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 33.9%, defense allows 58.5%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: The Citadel on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is The Citadel's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:The Citadel offense 37% (209 of 561)Opponent offense / The Citadel defense 48% (247 of 520)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Wofford: opponent offense 55% of 56Wofford: The Citadel offense 49% of 70Charlotte: opponent offense 49% of 74Charlotte: The Citadel offense 48% of 63Charleston Southern: opponent offense 41% of 59Charleston Southern: The Citadel offense 38% of 72Chattanooga: opponent offense 42% of 50Chattanooga: The Citadel offense 38% of 64South Carolina State: opponent offense 45% of 62South Carolina State: The Citadel offense 42% of 55East Tennessee State: opponent offense 39% of 54East Tennessee State: The Citadel offense 27% of 67Texas A&M: opponent offense 58% of 65Texas A&M: The Citadel offense 34% of 56Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 54% of 52Tennessee Tech: The Citadel offense 26% of 50Mercer: opponent offense 42% of 48Mercer: The Citadel offense 33% of 64
@ Wofford@ CharlotteCharleston SouthernChattanooga@ South Carolina StateEast Tennessee State@ Texas A&MTennessee Tech@ MercerFurman@ VMI@ Western Carolina
The Citadel offenseOpponent offense (The Citadel defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Wofford

14–42 L · 70 plays to 56
The Citadel offense 49% (34/70)Wofford offense 55% (31/56)

at Charlotte

43–41 W · 63 plays to 74
The Citadel offense 48% (30/63)Charlotte offense 49% (36/74)

vs Charleston Southern

20–26 L · 72 plays to 59
The Citadel offense 38% (27/72)Charleston S. offense 41% (24/59)

vs Chattanooga

8–27 L · 64 plays to 50
The Citadel offense 38% (24/64)Chattanooga offense 42% (21/50)

at South Carolina State

34–31 W · 55 plays to 62
The Citadel offense 42% (23/55)SC State offense 45% (28/62)

vs East Tennessee State

16–34 L · 67 plays to 54
The Citadel offense 27% (18/67)East Tenn. St. offense 39% (21/54)

at Texas A&M

0–41 L · 56 plays to 65
The Citadel offense 34% (19/56)Texas A&M offense 58% (38/65)

vs Tennessee Tech

13–28 L · 50 plays to 52
The Citadel offense 26% (13/50)Tennessee Tech offense 54% (28/52)

at Mercer

19–28 L · 64 plays to 48
The Citadel offense 33% (21/64)Mercer offense 42% (20/48)