THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

ToledoRockets

Season
‹

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2026

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Toledo1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 138 teams · 421.0 yds/g · 842 yards)#30 (of 138 teams · 41.5 pts/g · 83 points)#40 (of 138 teams · 268.0 yds/g allowed · 536 yards)#67 (of 138 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 40 points)#39 (of 138 teams · +21.5 /g · +43 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 1 taken, 3 given · -1.00 /g)#132 (of 138 teams · 25:24 /g · 0h 51m on the season)#50 (of 138 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#24 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#116 (of 138 teams · 556.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 138 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 138 teams · -0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 138 teams · 39% of plays successful)#18 (of 138 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 1.850 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 138 teams · 1.159 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#117 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #59–#137. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#100 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #30–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#109 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #40–#135. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#93 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #34–#132. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#105 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #39–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#91 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #5–#110. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#63 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #19–#132. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#52 (Returning passing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #1–#127. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#37 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #1–#126. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#89 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #1–#123. 3 of 13 in the top 10.)#116 (Team talent: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #86–#130. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#102 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #23–#133. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#99 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #24–#135. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#110 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #25–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#108 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #18–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#75 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #1–#133. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#97 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range #4–#127. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)
2026Akron1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 138 teams · 414.0 yds/g · 828 yards)#72 (of 138 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 61 points)#101 (of 138 teams · 376.5 yds/g allowed · 753 yards)#85 (of 138 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 48 points)#84 (of 138 teams · +6.5 /g · +13 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g)#33 (of 138 teams · 32:55 /g · 1h 06m on the season)#13 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 138 teams · 546.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 138 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 138 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 138 teams · 52% of plays successful)#52 (of 138 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#133 (of 138 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#127 (of 138 teams · 1.506 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Ball State1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#117 (of 138 teams · 323.5 yds/g · 647 yards)#107 (of 138 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 44 points)#134 (of 138 teams · 500.5 yds/g allowed · 1,001 yards)#130 (of 138 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 73 points)#126 (of 138 teams · -14.5 /g · -29 on the season)#43 (of 138 teams · +1 on the season · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g)#62 (of 138 teams · 30:45 /g · 1h 01m on the season)#127 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#87 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's receiving production returning)#98 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's rushing production returning)#113 (of 138 teams · 563.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 138 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#131 (of 138 teams · 0.306 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#134 (of 138 teams · 31% of plays successful)#125 (of 138 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 138 teams · 1.469 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 138 teams · 1.405 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Bowling Green0–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#132 (of 138 teams · 267.5 yds/g · 535 yards)#136 (of 138 teams · 10.0 pts/g · 20 points)#135 (of 138 teams · 505.0 yds/g allowed · 1,010 yards)#132 (of 138 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 76 points)#136 (of 138 teams · -28.0 /g · -56 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 2 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g)#49 (of 138 teams · 31:36 /g · 1h 03m on the season)#76 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's rushing production returning)#111 (of 138 teams · 568.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 138 teams · -0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#132 (of 138 teams · 0.328 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 138 teams · 36% of plays successful)#134 (of 138 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#132 (of 138 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 138 teams · 1.380 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Buffalo1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#116 (of 138 teams · 324.0 yds/g · 648 yards)#114 (of 138 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 41 points)#112 (of 138 teams · 408.0 yds/g allowed · 816 yards)#90 (of 138 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 50 points)#105 (of 138 teams · -4.5 /g · -9 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 2 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g)#63 (of 138 teams · 30:42 /g · 1h 01m on the season)#107 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#71 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#123 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 138 teams · 549.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 138 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 138 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#132 (of 138 teams · 33% of plays successful)#46 (of 138 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 138 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 138 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Central Michigan1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#137 (of 138 teams · 212.5 yds/g · 425 yards)#136 (of 138 teams · 10.0 pts/g · 20 points)#49 (of 138 teams · 291.5 yds/g allowed · 583 yards)#85 (of 138 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 48 points)#125 (of 138 teams · -14.0 /g · -28 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.50 /g)#110 (of 138 teams · 27:36 /g · 0h 55m on the season)#79 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 138 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#62 (of 138 teams · 47% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 138 teams · 540.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#133 (of 138 teams · -0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 138 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#136 (of 138 teams · 30% of plays successful)#108 (of 138 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 138 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.906 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Eastern Michigan1–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#128 (of 138 teams · 282.7 yds/g · 848 yards)#119 (of 138 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 56 points)#109 (of 138 teams · 397.7 yds/g allowed · 1,193 yards)#98 (of 138 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 79 points)#114 (of 138 teams · -7.7 /g · -23 on the season)#41 (of 138 teams · +2 on the season · 5 taken, 3 given · +0.67 /g)#69 (of 138 teams · 30:25 /g · 1h 31m on the season)#13 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 138 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)#103 (of 138 teams · 580.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 138 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 138 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 138 teams · 38% of plays successful)#87 (of 138 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 138 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 138 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Kent State1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#121 (of 138 teams · 313.5 yds/g · 627 yards)#122 (of 138 teams · 18.0 pts/g · 36 points)#113 (of 138 teams · 409.0 yds/g allowed · 818 yards)#128 (of 138 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 72 points)#129 (of 138 teams · -18.0 /g · -36 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -2 on the season · 2 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g)#51 (of 138 teams · 31:18 /g · 1h 03m on the season)#52 (of 138 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 138 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#130 (of 138 teams · 522.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 138 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 138 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#126 (of 138 teams · 35% of plays successful)#136 (of 138 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 138 teams · 1.353 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 138 teams · 1.118 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Massachusetts2–00 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 138 teams · 356.0 yds/g · 712 yards)#44 (of 138 teams · 37.0 pts/g · 74 points)#70 (of 138 teams · 326.0 yds/g allowed · 652 yards)#44 (of 138 teams · 15.5 pts/g allowed · 31 points)#39 (of 138 teams · +21.5 /g · +43 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +5 on the season · 5 taken, 0 given · +2.50 /g)#64 (of 138 teams · 30:40 /g · 1h 01m on the season)#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 138 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#116 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#128 (of 138 teams · 525.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 138 teams · 0.373 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 138 teams · -0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#36 (of 138 teams · 50% of plays successful)#66 (of 138 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 138 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 138 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Miami (OH)1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 138 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 726 yards)#79 (of 138 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 59 points)#116 (of 138 teams · 413.5 yds/g allowed · 827 yards)#123 (of 138 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 66 points)#104 (of 138 teams · -3.5 /g · -7 on the season)#91 (of 138 teams · -1 on the season · 0 taken, 1 given · -0.50 /g)#40 (of 138 teams · 32:12 /g · 1h 04m on the season)#74 (of 138 teams · 24% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 138 teams · 32% of last season's rushing production returning)#86 (of 138 teams · 621.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 138 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 138 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 138 teams · 45% of plays successful)#120 (of 138 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 138 teams · 1.282 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 138 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Ohio1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#129 (of 138 teams · 282.5 yds/g · 565 yards)#93 (of 138 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 50 points)#131 (of 138 teams · 485.0 yds/g allowed · 970 yards)#132 (of 138 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 76 points)#123 (of 138 teams · -13.0 /g · -26 on the season)#69 (of 138 teams · +0 on the season · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g)#67 (of 138 teams · 30:28 /g · 1h 01m on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#73 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#129 (of 138 teams · 522.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 138 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#135 (of 138 teams · 0.364 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 138 teams · 38% of plays successful)#131 (of 138 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 138 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 138 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Sacramento State1–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#113 (of 138 teams · 327.7 yds/g · 983 yards)#100 (of 138 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 72 points)#82 (of 138 teams · 345.7 yds/g allowed · 1,037 yards)#93 (of 138 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 77 points)#101 (of 138 teams · -1.7 /g · -5 on the season)#110 (of 138 teams · -3 on the season · 2 taken, 5 given · -1.00 /g)#84 (of 138 teams · 29:49 /g · 1h 29m on the season)— (— of last season's passing production returning)— (— of last season's receiving production returning)— (— of last season's rushing production returning)#114 (of 138 teams · 561.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 138 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 138 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 138 teams · 41% of plays successful)#60 (of 138 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 138 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 138 teams · 1.338 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2026Western Michigan1–10 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 138 teams · 317.5 yds/g · 635 yards)#72 (of 138 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 61 points)#85 (of 138 teams · 353.5 yds/g allowed · 707 yards)#34 (of 138 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 27 points)#52 (of 138 teams · +17.0 /g · +34 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · +5 on the season · 5 taken, 0 given · +2.50 /g)#19 (of 138 teams · 34:08 /g · 1h 08m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#108 (of 138 teams · 572.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 138 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 138 teams · -0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 138 teams · 40% of plays successful)#118 (of 138 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 138 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20262026 ToledoMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #117
Total offense. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Akron #66 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #98 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #102 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #113 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #116 of 138; 2026 Ball State #117 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #119 of 138; 2026 Kent State #121 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #128 of 138; 2026 Ohio #129 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #132 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #137 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 59 of 138. Mid-American median rank 117.
Scoring offensemedian #100
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Massachusetts #44 of 138; 2026 Akron #72 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #72 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #79 of 138; 2026 Ohio #93 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #100 of 138; 2026 Ball State #107 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #114 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #119 of 138; 2026 Kent State #122 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #136 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 30 of 138. Mid-American median rank 100.
Total defensemedian #109
Total defense. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Central Michigan #49 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #70 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #82 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #85 of 138; 2026 Akron #101 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #109 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #112 of 138; 2026 Kent State #113 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #116 of 138; 2026 Ohio #131 of 138; 2026 Ball State #134 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #135 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 40 of 138. Mid-American median rank 109.
Scoring defensemedian #93
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Western Michigan #34 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #44 of 138; 2026 Akron #85 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #85 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #90 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #93 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #98 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #123 of 138; 2026 Kent State #128 of 138; 2026 Ball State #130 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #132 of 138; 2026 Ohio #132 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 67 of 138. Mid-American median rank 93.
Point marginmedian #105
Point margin. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Massachusetts #39 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #52 of 138; 2026 Akron #84 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #101 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #104 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #105 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #114 of 138; 2026 Ohio #123 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #125 of 138; 2026 Ball State #126 of 138; 2026 Kent State #129 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 39 of 138. Mid-American median rank 105.
Turnover marginmedian #91
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Massachusetts #5 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #5 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #41 of 138; 2026 Ball State #43 of 138; 2026 Akron #69 of 138; 2026 Ohio #69 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #91 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #91 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #110 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #110 of 138; 2026 Kent State #110 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #110 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 110 of 138. Mid-American median rank 91.
Possessionmedian #63
Possession. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Western Michigan #19 of 138; 2026 Akron #33 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #40 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #49 of 138; 2026 Kent State #51 of 138; 2026 Ball State #62 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #63 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #64 of 138; 2026 Ohio #67 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #69 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #84 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #110 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 132 of 138. Mid-American median rank 63.
Returning passingmedian #52
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Western Michigan #1 of 138; 2026 Ohio #8 of 138; 2026 Akron #13 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #13 of 138; 2026 Kent State #52 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #74 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #76 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #79 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #107 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #111 of 138; 2026 Ball State #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 50 of 138. Mid-American median rank 52.
Returning receivingmedian #37
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Western Michigan #1 of 138; 2026 Akron #8 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #22 of 138; 2026 Kent State #34 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #37 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #71 of 138; 2026 Ohio #73 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #83 of 138; 2026 Ball State #87 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #94 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 24 of 138. Mid-American median rank 37.
Returning rushingmedian #89
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Western Michigan #1 of 138; 2026 Ohio #4 of 138; 2026 Akron #6 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #62 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #84 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #89 of 138; 2026 Ball State #98 of 138; 2026 Kent State #100 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #101 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #116 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 96 of 138. Mid-American median rank 89.
Team talentmedian #116
Team talent. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Miami (OH) #86 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #103 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #108 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #111 of 138; 2026 Ball State #113 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #114 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #120 of 138; 2026 Akron #121 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #125 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #128 of 138; 2026 Ohio #129 of 138; 2026 Kent State #130 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 116 of 138. Mid-American median rank 116.
Offensive EPAmedian #102
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Massachusetts #23 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #39 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #65 of 138; 2026 Akron #71 of 138; 2026 Ohio #99 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #102 of 138; 2026 Kent State #107 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #119 of 138; 2026 Ball State #120 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #122 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #124 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #133 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 49 of 138. Mid-American median rank 102.
Defensive EPAmedian #99
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Massachusetts #36 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #54 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #71 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #81 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #96 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #99 of 138; 2026 Akron #115 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #117 of 138; 2026 Kent State #125 of 138; 2026 Ball State #131 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #132 of 138; 2026 Ohio #135 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 24 of 138. Mid-American median rank 99.
Offensive success ratemedian #110
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Akron #25 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #36 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #65 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #93 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #99 of 138; 2026 Ohio #110 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #113 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #123 of 138; 2026 Kent State #126 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #132 of 138; 2026 Ball State #134 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 104 of 138. Mid-American median rank 110.
Defensive success ratemedian #108
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Buffalo #46 of 138; 2026 Akron #52 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #60 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #66 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #87 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #108 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #118 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #120 of 138; 2026 Ball State #125 of 138; 2026 Ohio #131 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #134 of 138; 2026 Kent State #136 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 18 of 138. Mid-American median rank 108.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #75
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Ball State #12 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #30 of 138; 2026 Kent State #32 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #55 of 138; 2026 Central Michigan #59 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #75 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #86 of 138; 2026 Ohio #103 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #108 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #117 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #132 of 138; 2026 Akron #133 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 1 of 138. Mid-American median rank 75.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #97
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Central Michigan #4 of 138; 2026 Western Michigan #8 of 138; 2026 Kent State #41 of 138; 2026 Massachusetts #82 of 138; 2026 Eastern Michigan #83 of 138; 2026 Miami (OH) #97 of 138; 2026 Buffalo #98 of 138; 2026 Sacramento State #105 of 138; 2026 Ohio #108 of 138; 2026 Bowling Green #117 of 138; 2026 Ball State #122 of 138; 2026 Akron #127 of 138. Marked: 2026 Toledo, ranked 52 of 138. Mid-American median rank 97.