Metrics

TulaneGreen Wave

Season
Current

American Athletic

American Athletic, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Tulane760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 (of 130 teams · 401.1 yds/g · 5,214 yards)#82 (of 130 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 349 points)#76 (of 130 teams · 408.0 yds/g allowed · 5,304 yards)#73 (of 130 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#76 (of 130 teams · -0.7 /g · -9 on the season)#72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g)#23 (of 130 teams · 32:14 /g · 6h 59m on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#83 (of 130 teams · 445.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 130 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 130 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#30 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.404 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 130 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#57 (Total offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #4–#111. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #5–#112. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#89 (Total defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #10–#130. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#94 (Scoring defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #9–#130. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Point margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #5–#130. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Turnover margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #4–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#87 (Possession: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #10–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #12–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #5–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #18–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #51–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #4–#115. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #9–#130. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #21–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #4–#130. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#16 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #1–#111. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #8–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2018Cincinnati1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 130 teams · 457.0 yds/g · 5,941 yards)#23 (of 130 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 454 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 301.7 yds/g allowed · 3,922 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 17.2 pts/g allowed · 224 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17.7 /g · +230 on the season)#83 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.15 /g)#14 (of 130 teams · 32:52 /g · 7h 07m on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#64 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 130 teams · 0.244 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 130 teams · 1.282 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018East Carolina390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 130 teams · 414.2 yds/g · 4,970 yards)#109 (of 130 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#101 (of 130 teams · 439.8 yds/g allowed · 5,278 yards)#121 (of 130 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 448 points)#119 (of 130 teams · -14.6 /g · -175 on the season)#127 (of 130 teams · -14 on the season · 11 taken, 25 given · -1.17 /g)#47 (of 130 teams · 30:17 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#125 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#92 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#85 (of 130 teams · 434.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 130 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 130 teams · 0.207 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#122 (of 130 teams · 37% of plays successful)#47 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays)#125 (of 130 teams · 1.392 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Houston850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 512.0 yds/g · 6,656 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 43.9 pts/g · 571 points)#127 (of 130 teams · 496.5 yds/g allowed · 6,455 yards)#119 (of 130 teams · 37.1 pts/g allowed · 483 points)#44 (of 130 teams · +6.8 /g · +88 on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#129 (of 130 teams · 25:01 /g · 5h 25m on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#113 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 130 teams · 577.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.306 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 130 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#107 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.467 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Memphis860 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 522.6 yds/g · 7,317 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 42.9 pts/g · 601 points)#90 (of 130 teams · 428.1 yds/g allowed · 5,994 yards)#94 (of 130 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 447 points)#26 (of 130 teams · +11.0 /g · +154 on the season)#44 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.29 /g)#93 (of 130 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 39m on the season)#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 480.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 130 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#40 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 130 teams · 1.333 average PPA on successful plays)#120 (of 130 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Navy3100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 130 teams · 349.0 yds/g · 4,537 yards)#96 (of 130 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 325 points)#87 (of 130 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 5,543 yards)#103 (of 130 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 436 points)#108 (of 130 teams · -8.5 /g · -111 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 21 taken, 17 given · +0.31 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:22 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#32 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#56 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 349.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 130 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 130 teams · 0.269 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#108 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 130 teams · 1.137 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 130 teams · 1.303 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018SMU570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#81 (of 130 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 4,638 yards)#54 (of 130 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 365 points)#89 (of 130 teams · 427.8 yds/g allowed · 5,133 yards)#110 (of 130 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 423 points)#94 (of 130 teams · -4.8 /g · -58 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.75 /g)#116 (of 130 teams · 27:13 /g · 5h 27m on the season)#31 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning)#122 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#18 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 485.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 130 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 130 teams · 1.237 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018South Florida760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 130 teams · 437.2 yds/g · 5,684 yards)#70 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#105 (of 130 teams · 446.3 yds/g allowed · 5,802 yards)#95 (of 130 teams · 32.0 pts/g allowed · 416 points)#91 (of 130 teams · -3.5 /g · -46 on the season)#72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#126 (of 130 teams · 25:12 /g · 5h 28m on the season)#109 (of 130 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#102 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's rushing production returning)#62 (of 130 teams · 548.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 130 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#75 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 130 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Temple850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 130 teams · 409.7 yds/g · 5,326 yards)#23 (of 130 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 454 points)#47 (of 130 teams · 372.3 yds/g allowed · 4,840 yards)#66 (of 130 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 352 points)#42 (of 130 teams · +7.8 /g · +102 on the season)#30 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 31 taken, 25 given · +0.46 /g)#94 (of 130 teams · 28:16 /g · 6h 07m on the season)#80 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#76 (of 130 teams · 478.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 130 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 130 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#53 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 130 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 130 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Tulsa390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#89 (of 130 teams · 377.8 yds/g · 4,533 yards)#103 (of 130 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 289 points)#75 (of 130 teams · 407.9 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yards)#80 (of 130 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#99 (of 130 teams · -5.5 /g · -66 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 20 taken, 24 given · -0.33 /g)#87 (of 130 teams · 28:47 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning)#108 (of 130 teams · 368.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 130 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 130 teams · 0.136 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#90 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 130 teams · 1.122 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.057 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UCF1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 522.7 yds/g · 6,795 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 43.2 pts/g · 562 points)#95 (of 130 teams · 433.7 yds/g allowed · 5,638 yards)#36 (of 130 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +20.5 /g · +267 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +14 on the season · 28 taken, 14 given · +1.08 /g)#127 (of 130 teams · 25:11 /g · 5h 27m on the season)#45 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#64 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 130 teams · 568.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.339 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 130 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#50 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 130 teams · 1.342 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 130 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018UConn1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#90 (of 130 teams · 376.2 yds/g · 4,514 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 22.2 pts/g · 266 points)#130 (of 130 teams · 617.4 yds/g allowed · 7,409 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 50.4 pts/g allowed · 605 points)#130 (of 130 teams · -28.3 /g · -339 on the season)#129 (of 130 teams · -17 on the season · 11 taken, 28 given · -1.42 /g)#28 (of 130 teams · 31:43 /g · 6h 21m on the season)#89 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 389.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#89 (of 130 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#130 (of 130 teams · 0.502 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#130 (of 130 teams · 56% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 130 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 130 teams · 1.387 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20182018 TulaneAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #57
Total offense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UCF #4 of 130; 2018 Memphis #5 of 130; 2018 Houston #7 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #24 of 130; 2018 South Florida #34 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #57 of 130; 2018 Temple #62 of 130; 2018 SMU #81 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #89 of 130; 2018 UConn #90 of 130; 2018 Navy #111 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 70 of 130. American Athletic median rank 57.
Scoring offensemedian #54
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Houston #5 of 130; 2018 UCF #6 of 130; 2018 Memphis #7 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #23 of 130; 2018 Temple #23 of 130; 2018 SMU #54 of 130; 2018 South Florida #70 of 130; 2018 Navy #96 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #103 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #109 of 130; 2018 UConn #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 82 of 130. American Athletic median rank 54.
Total defensemedian #89
Total defense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Cincinnati #10 of 130; 2018 Temple #47 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #75 of 130; 2018 Navy #87 of 130; 2018 SMU #89 of 130; 2018 Memphis #90 of 130; 2018 UCF #95 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #101 of 130; 2018 South Florida #105 of 130; 2018 Houston #127 of 130; 2018 UConn #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 76 of 130. American Athletic median rank 89.
Scoring defensemedian #94
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Cincinnati #9 of 130; 2018 UCF #36 of 130; 2018 Temple #66 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #80 of 130; 2018 Memphis #94 of 130; 2018 South Florida #95 of 130; 2018 Navy #103 of 130; 2018 SMU #110 of 130; 2018 Houston #119 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #121 of 130; 2018 UConn #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 73 of 130. American Athletic median rank 94.
Point marginmedian #76
Point margin. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UCF #5 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #8 of 130; 2018 Memphis #26 of 130; 2018 Temple #42 of 130; 2018 Houston #44 of 130; 2018 South Florida #91 of 130; 2018 SMU #94 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #99 of 130; 2018 Navy #108 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #119 of 130; 2018 UConn #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 76 of 130. American Athletic median rank 76.
Turnover marginmedian #44
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UCF #4 of 130; 2018 SMU #15 of 130; 2018 Temple #30 of 130; 2018 Houston #34 of 130; 2018 Navy #40 of 130; 2018 Memphis #44 of 130; 2018 South Florida #72 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #83 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #91 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #127 of 130; 2018 UConn #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 72 of 130. American Athletic median rank 44.
Possessionmedian #87
Possession. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Navy #10 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #14 of 130; 2018 UConn #28 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #47 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #87 of 130; 2018 Memphis #93 of 130; 2018 Temple #94 of 130; 2018 SMU #116 of 130; 2018 South Florida #126 of 130; 2018 UCF #127 of 130; 2018 Houston #129 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 23 of 130. American Athletic median rank 87.
Returning passingmedian #45
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Tulsa #12 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #30 of 130; 2018 SMU #31 of 130; 2018 Navy #32 of 130; 2018 UCF #45 of 130; 2018 Temple #80 of 130; 2018 UConn #89 of 130; 2018 Houston #91 of 130; 2018 South Florida #109 of 130; 2018 Memphis #120 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 44 of 130. American Athletic median rank 45.
Returning receivingmedian #80
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UConn #13 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #22 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #61 of 130; 2018 UCF #64 of 130; 2018 Temple #80 of 130; 2018 Memphis #93 of 130; 2018 South Florida #102 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #105 of 130; 2018 Navy #112 of 130; 2018 SMU #122 of 130; 2018 Houston #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 5 of 130. American Athletic median rank 80.
Returning rushingmedian #74
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 SMU #18 of 130; 2018 UCF #36 of 130; 2018 Memphis #39 of 130; 2018 Navy #56 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #69 of 130; 2018 Temple #74 of 130; 2018 UConn #90 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #92 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #96 of 130; 2018 Houston #113 of 130; 2018 South Florida #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 101 of 130. American Athletic median rank 74.
Team talentmedian #74
Team talent. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Houston #51 of 130; 2018 UCF #55 of 130; 2018 South Florida #62 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #64 of 130; 2018 SMU #73 of 130; 2018 Memphis #74 of 130; 2018 Temple #76 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #85 of 130; 2018 UConn #98 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #108 of 130; 2018 Navy #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 83 of 130. American Athletic median rank 74.
Offensive EPAmedian #61
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UCF #4 of 130; 2018 Houston #8 of 130; 2018 Memphis #9 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #22 of 130; 2018 South Florida #55 of 130; 2018 Temple #61 of 130; 2018 Navy #83 of 130; 2018 UConn #89 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #105 of 130; 2018 SMU #107 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 87 of 130. American Athletic median rank 61.
Defensive EPAmedian #69
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Cincinnati #9 of 130; 2018 UCF #37 of 130; 2018 Temple #38 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #57 of 130; 2018 Memphis #69 of 130; 2018 SMU #81 of 130; 2018 South Florida #92 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #97 of 130; 2018 Houston #107 of 130; 2018 Navy #118 of 130; 2018 UConn #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 53 of 130. American Athletic median rank 69.
Offensive success ratemedian #64
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 UCF #21 of 130; 2018 Memphis #24 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #46 of 130; 2018 Houston #49 of 130; 2018 South Florida #61 of 130; 2018 Temple #64 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #74 of 130; 2018 UConn #80 of 130; 2018 Navy #91 of 130; 2018 SMU #111 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #122 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 119 of 130. American Athletic median rank 64.
Defensive success ratemedian #53
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Cincinnati #4 of 130; 2018 Memphis #40 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #47 of 130; 2018 UCF #50 of 130; 2018 Temple #53 of 130; 2018 South Florida #75 of 130; 2018 SMU #83 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #90 of 130; 2018 Houston #107 of 130; 2018 Navy #108 of 130; 2018 UConn #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 30 of 130. American Athletic median rank 53.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #16
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Houston #1 of 130; 2018 SMU #8 of 130; 2018 UCF #12 of 130; 2018 Memphis #15 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #16 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #30 of 130; 2018 Temple #38 of 130; 2018 UConn #45 of 130; 2018 South Florida #46 of 130; 2018 Navy #102 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #111 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 3 of 130. American Athletic median rank 16.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #80
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Tulsa #8 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #51 of 130; 2018 UCF #61 of 130; 2018 Houston #65 of 130; 2018 Temple #72 of 130; 2018 SMU #80 of 130; 2018 South Florida #104 of 130; 2018 Navy #105 of 130; 2018 Memphis #120 of 130; 2018 UConn #124 of 130; 2018 East Carolina #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 Tulane, ranked 117 of 130. American Athletic median rank 80.