Metrics

UABBlazers

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004UAB750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 (of 119 teams · 358.1 yds/g · 4,297 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 372 points)#61 (of 119 teams · 373.0 yds/g allowed · 4,476 yards)#78 (of 119 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#54 (of 119 teams · +1.8 /g · +21 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.08 /g)#105 (of 119 teams · 16:40 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 119 teams · -0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#76 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 119 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Conference USA teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#49 (Total offense: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #1–#102. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #1–#95. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#87 (Total defense: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #18–#119. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#95 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #25–#117. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #1–#117. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#51 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #9–#109. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#77 (Possession: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #1–#111. 1 of 11 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#94 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #5–#112. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#87 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #10–#111. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#88 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #1–#113. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #14–#116. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#55 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #7–#114. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range #3–#118. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)
2004Army290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 119 teams · 381.6 yds/g · 4,198 yards)#80 (of 119 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 260 points)#119 (of 119 teams · 490.1 yds/g allowed · 5,391 yards)#108 (of 119 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 388 points)#101 (of 119 teams · -11.6 /g · -128 on the season)#48 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.18 /g)#101 (of 119 teams · 16:51 /g · 3h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 119 teams · -0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful)#116 (of 119 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.789 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Cincinnati750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 119 teams · 405.6 yds/g · 4,867 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#42 (of 119 teams · 341.3 yds/g allowed · 4,096 yards)#70 (of 119 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 320 points)#53 (of 119 teams · +2.0 /g · +24 on the season)#71 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 22 taken, 24 given · -0.17 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:43 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 119 teams · -0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#14 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 119 teams · 0.798 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 119 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004East Carolina290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#102 (of 119 teams · 308.4 yds/g · 3,392 yards)#94 (of 119 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 231 points)#114 (of 119 teams · 456.8 yds/g allowed · 5,025 yards)#117 (of 119 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 439 points)#117 (of 119 teams · -18.9 /g · -208 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 24 taken, 28 given · -0.36 /g)#82 (of 119 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 119 teams · -0.192 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 119 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 119 teams · 27% of plays successful)#79 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 119 teams · 1.074 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Houston380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 119 teams · 389.7 yds/g · 4,287 yards)#95 (of 119 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 230 points)#88 (of 119 teams · 399.3 yds/g allowed · 4,392 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#100 (of 119 teams · -11.3 /g · -124 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.73 /g)#30 (of 119 teams · 18:48 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 119 teams · -0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 119 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#87 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 119 teams · 1.016 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 119 teams · 1.124 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Louisville1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 539.0 yds/g · 6,468 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.8 pts/g · 597 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 305.9 yds/g allowed · 3,671 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 236 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +30.1 /g · +361 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 28 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#24 (of 119 teams · 18:57 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#34 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Memphis840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 119 teams · 421.8 yds/g · 5,061 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 430 points)#60 (of 119 teams · 372.8 yds/g allowed · 4,474 yards)#91 (of 119 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#40 (of 119 teams · +4.6 /g · +55 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.17 /g)#111 (of 119 teams · 16:21 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#102 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 119 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 119 teams · 0.880 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004South Florida470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 119 teams · 353.3 yds/g · 3,886 yards)#63 (of 119 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 271 points)#87 (of 119 teams · 398.4 yds/g allowed · 4,383 yards)#95 (of 119 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#91 (of 119 teams · -7.3 /g · -80 on the season)#109 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 12 taken, 23 given · -1.00 /g)#89 (of 119 teams · 17:20 /g · 3h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 119 teams · -0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 119 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#63 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 119 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 119 teams · 1.392 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Southern Miss750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 326.3 yds/g · 3,915 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points)#62 (of 119 teams · 376.0 yds/g allowed · 4,512 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#58 (of 119 teams · +0.9 /g · +11 on the season)#34 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 25 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#72 (of 119 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 119 teams · -0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 119 teams · -0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful)#69 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 119 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 119 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004TCU560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 119 teams · 430.7 yds/g · 4,738 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 362 points)#106 (of 119 teams · 426.0 yds/g allowed · 4,686 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 33.9 pts/g allowed · 373 points)#63 (of 119 teams · -1.0 /g · -11 on the season)#29 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.55 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 119 teams · -0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 119 teams · -0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 119 teams · 28% of plays successful)#92 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 119 teams · 1.031 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Tulane560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Conference USA teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 119 teams · 360.6 yds/g · 3,967 yards)#47 (of 119 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 300 points)#100 (of 119 teams · 421.6 yds/g allowed · 4,637 yards)#100 (of 119 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 361 points)#84 (of 119 teams · -5.5 /g · -61 on the season)#103 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 13 taken, 22 given · -0.82 /g)#77 (of 119 teams · 17:46 /g · 3h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 119 teams · -0.164 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 119 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 119 teams · 26% of plays successful)#100 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 119 teams · 0.952 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 119 teams · 0.890 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20042004 UABConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #49
Total offense. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 TCU #17 of 119; 2004 Memphis #23 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #29 of 119; 2004 Houston #42 of 119; 2004 Army #49 of 119; 2004 Tulane #67 of 119; 2004 South Florida #72 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #92 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #102 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 69 of 119. Conference USA median rank 49.
Scoring offensemedian #47
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Memphis #10 of 119; 2004 TCU #16 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #41 of 119; 2004 Tulane #47 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #53 of 119; 2004 South Florida #63 of 119; 2004 Army #80 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #94 of 119; 2004 Houston #95 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 23 of 119. Conference USA median rank 47.
Total defensemedian #87
Total defense. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #18 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #42 of 119; 2004 Memphis #60 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #62 of 119; 2004 South Florida #87 of 119; 2004 Houston #88 of 119; 2004 Tulane #100 of 119; 2004 TCU #106 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #114 of 119; 2004 Army #119 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 61 of 119. Conference USA median rank 87.
Scoring defensemedian #95
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #25 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #55 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #70 of 119; 2004 Memphis #91 of 119; 2004 South Florida #95 of 119; 2004 Houston #97 of 119; 2004 Tulane #100 of 119; 2004 TCU #104 of 119; 2004 Army #108 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 78 of 119. Conference USA median rank 95.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Memphis #40 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #53 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #58 of 119; 2004 TCU #63 of 119; 2004 Tulane #84 of 119; 2004 South Florida #91 of 119; 2004 Houston #100 of 119; 2004 Army #101 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 54 of 119. Conference USA median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #51
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #9 of 119; 2004 Houston #17 of 119; 2004 TCU #29 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #34 of 119; 2004 Army #48 of 119; 2004 Memphis #51 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #71 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #82 of 119; 2004 Tulane #103 of 119; 2004 South Florida #109 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 63 of 119. Conference USA median rank 51.
Possessionmedian #77
Possession. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Cincinnati #1 of 119; 2004 Louisville #24 of 119; 2004 Houston #30 of 119; 2004 TCU #48 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #72 of 119; 2004 Tulane #77 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #82 of 119; 2004 South Florida #89 of 119; 2004 Army #101 of 119; 2004 Memphis #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 105 of 119. Conference USA median rank 77.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #94
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #5 of 119; 2004 Memphis #9 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #45 of 119; 2004 Houston #64 of 119; 2004 Army #94 of 119; 2004 TCU #96 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #99 of 119; 2004 Tulane #104 of 119; 2004 South Florida #107 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #112 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 25 of 119. Conference USA median rank 94.
Defensive EPAmedian #87
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #10 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #29 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #43 of 119; 2004 TCU #75 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #87 of 119; 2004 Memphis #90 of 119; 2004 Tulane #95 of 119; 2004 Army #104 of 119; 2004 Houston #109 of 119; 2004 South Florida #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 23 of 119. Conference USA median rank 87.
Offensive success ratemedian #88
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Memphis #22 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #76 of 119; 2004 Houston #82 of 119; 2004 South Florida #88 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #102 of 119; 2004 Army #103 of 119; 2004 TCU #107 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #109 of 119; 2004 Tulane #113 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 24 of 119. Conference USA median rank 88.
Defensive success ratemedian #79
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Cincinnati #14 of 119; 2004 Louisville #34 of 119; 2004 South Florida #63 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #69 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #79 of 119; 2004 Houston #87 of 119; 2004 TCU #92 of 119; 2004 Tulane #100 of 119; 2004 Memphis #102 of 119; 2004 Army #116 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 76 of 119. Conference USA median rank 79.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #55
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 East Carolina #7 of 119; 2004 Memphis #11 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #13 of 119; 2004 TCU #41 of 119; 2004 Houston #48 of 119; 2004 Louisville #57 of 119; 2004 Army #65 of 119; 2004 South Florida #75 of 119; 2004 Tulane #85 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #114 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 55 of 119. Conference USA median rank 55.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #39
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Army #3 of 119; 2004 TCU #12 of 119; 2004 Memphis #13 of 119; 2004 Tulane #16 of 119; 2004 Louisville #39 of 119; 2004 Southern Miss #48 of 119; 2004 East Carolina #103 of 119; 2004 Houston #108 of 119; 2004 Cincinnati #116 of 119; 2004 South Florida #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 UAB, ranked 25 of 119. Conference USA median rank 39.