Metrics

UABBlazers

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2006

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2006UAB390 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 119 teams · 310.1 yds/g · 3,721 yards)#93 (of 119 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 225 points)#87 (of 119 teams · 359.3 yds/g allowed · 4,311 yards)#74 (of 119 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#89 (of 119 teams · -6.0 /g · -72 on the season)#35 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.42 /g)#24 (of 119 teams · 19:03 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#84 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 119 teams · 0.871 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 119 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Conference USA teams in 20060 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#50 (Total offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #5–#90. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #10–#94. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#87 (Total defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #25–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #28–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Point margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #26–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #17–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Possession: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #8–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #9–#79. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #29–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #13–#89. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #42–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #17–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range #9–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2006East Carolina760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#50 (of 119 teams · 348.1 yds/g · 4,526 yards)#79 (of 119 teams · 21.5 pts/g · 280 points)#56 (of 119 teams · 329.3 yds/g allowed · 4,281 yards)#46 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 270 points)#61 (of 119 teams · +0.8 /g · +10 on the season)#44 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 28 taken, 24 given · +0.31 /g)#49 (of 119 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#90 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.989 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.832 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Houston1040 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 446.1 yds/g · 6,245 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 462 points)#76 (of 119 teams · 351.4 yds/g allowed · 4,920 yards)#64 (of 119 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#26 (of 119 teams · +9.5 /g · +133 on the season)#21 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.64 /g)#66 (of 119 teams · 18:03 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#44 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 119 teams · 1.056 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Marshall570 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 119 teams · 354.3 yds/g · 4,252 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 311 points)#103 (of 119 teams · 390.9 yds/g allowed · 4,691 yards)#102 (of 119 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#79 (of 119 teams · -3.3 /g · -40 on the season)#102 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 24 taken, 33 given · -0.75 /g)#42 (of 119 teams · 18:35 /g · 3h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 119 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#116 (of 119 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Memphis2100 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#61 (of 119 teams · 336.3 yds/g · 4,035 yards)#60 (of 119 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 281 points)#113 (of 119 teams · 408.7 yds/g allowed · 4,904 yards)#103 (of 119 teams · 30.4 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#92 (of 119 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#56 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#101 (of 119 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 119 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#107 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 119 teams · 0.799 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.845 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Rice760 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 119 teams · 345.1 yds/g · 4,486 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#114 (of 119 teams · 414.5 yds/g allowed · 5,388 yards)#112 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 432 points)#90 (of 119 teams · -6.3 /g · -82 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 32 taken, 22 given · +0.77 /g)#13 (of 119 teams · 19:26 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 119 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#85 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 119 teams · 1.092 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006SMU660 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 119 teams · 319.5 yds/g · 3,834 yards)#40 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#79 (of 119 teams · 353.3 yds/g allowed · 4,240 yards)#71 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#55 (of 119 teams · +2.6 /g · +31 on the season)#49 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.17 /g)#110 (of 119 teams · 16:50 /g · 3h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#88 (of 119 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.905 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Southern Miss950 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 119 teams · 331.1 yds/g · 4,635 yards)#51 (of 119 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 356 points)#33 (of 119 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,313 yards)#28 (of 119 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#39 (of 119 teams · +6.9 /g · +96 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:56 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 119 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#42 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 119 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Tulane480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 119 teams · 338.7 yds/g · 4,064 yards)#94 (of 119 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 224 points)#108 (of 119 teams · 399.7 yds/g allowed · 4,796 yards)#113 (of 119 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#111 (of 119 teams · -14.7 /g · -176 on the season)#112 (of 119 teams · -13 on the season · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.08 /g)#97 (of 119 teams · 17:19 /g · 3h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.051 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#77 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006Tulsa850 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 119 teams · 388.5 yds/g · 5,051 yards)#37 (of 119 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 360 points)#25 (of 119 teams · 296.9 yds/g allowed · 3,859 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points)#33 (of 119 teams · +7.5 /g · +98 on the season)#91 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.46 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:37 /g · 4h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 119 teams · 0.839 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006UCF480 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 119 teams · 373.2 yds/g · 4,478 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 232 points)#106 (of 119 teams · 398.1 yds/g allowed · 4,777 yards)#101 (of 119 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#101 (of 119 teams · -9.4 /g · -113 on the season)#102 (of 119 teams · -9 on the season · 12 taken, 21 given · -0.75 /g)#60 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · 0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 119 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#94 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 119 teams · 0.873 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2006UTEP570 / 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2006. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 119 teams · 370.4 yds/g · 4,445 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 328 points)#104 (of 119 teams · 394.9 yds/g allowed · 4,739 yards)#107 (of 119 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#80 (of 119 teams · -3.9 /g · -47 on the season)#65 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g)#103 (of 119 teams · 17:09 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 119 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 119 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#100 (of 119 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.037 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.890 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20062006 UABConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #50
Total offense. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Houston #5 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #22 of 119; 2006 UCF #32 of 119; 2006 UTEP #37 of 119; 2006 Marshall #46 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #50 of 119; 2006 Rice #54 of 119; 2006 Tulane #58 of 119; 2006 Memphis #61 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #65 of 119; 2006 SMU #78 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 90 of 119. Conference USA median rank 50.
Scoring offensemedian #48
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Houston #10 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #37 of 119; 2006 UTEP #38 of 119; 2006 SMU #40 of 119; 2006 Rice #41 of 119; 2006 Marshall #48 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #51 of 119; 2006 Memphis #60 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #79 of 119; 2006 UCF #90 of 119; 2006 Tulane #94 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 93 of 119. Conference USA median rank 48.
Total defensemedian #87
Total defense. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Tulsa #25 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #33 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #56 of 119; 2006 Houston #76 of 119; 2006 SMU #79 of 119; 2006 Marshall #103 of 119; 2006 UTEP #104 of 119; 2006 UCF #106 of 119; 2006 Tulane #108 of 119; 2006 Memphis #113 of 119; 2006 Rice #114 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 87 of 119. Conference USA median rank 87.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Southern Miss #28 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #43 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #46 of 119; 2006 Houston #64 of 119; 2006 SMU #71 of 119; 2006 UCF #101 of 119; 2006 Marshall #102 of 119; 2006 Memphis #103 of 119; 2006 UTEP #107 of 119; 2006 Rice #112 of 119; 2006 Tulane #113 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 74 of 119. Conference USA median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #79
Point margin. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Houston #26 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #33 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #39 of 119; 2006 SMU #55 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #61 of 119; 2006 Marshall #79 of 119; 2006 UTEP #80 of 119; 2006 Rice #90 of 119; 2006 Memphis #92 of 119; 2006 UCF #101 of 119; 2006 Tulane #111 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 89 of 119. Conference USA median rank 79.
Turnover marginmedian #49
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Rice #17 of 119; 2006 Houston #21 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #26 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #44 of 119; 2006 SMU #49 of 119; 2006 Memphis #56 of 119; 2006 UTEP #65 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #91 of 119; 2006 Marshall #102 of 119; 2006 UCF #102 of 119; 2006 Tulane #112 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 35 of 119. Conference USA median rank 49.
Possessionmedian #49
Possession. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Tulsa #8 of 119; 2006 Rice #13 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #27 of 119; 2006 Marshall #42 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #49 of 119; 2006 UCF #60 of 119; 2006 Houston #66 of 119; 2006 Tulane #97 of 119; 2006 Memphis #101 of 119; 2006 UTEP #103 of 119; 2006 SMU #110 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 24 of 119. Conference USA median rank 49.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: . Marked: 2006 UAB, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Houston #9 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #12 of 119; 2006 UCF #28 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #31 of 119; 2006 Tulane #35 of 119; 2006 Marshall #45 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #49 of 119; 2006 UTEP #53 of 119; 2006 Memphis #62 of 119; 2006 SMU #63 of 119; 2006 Rice #79 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 72 of 119. Conference USA median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #83
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Tulsa #29 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #46 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #64 of 119; 2006 Tulane #70 of 119; 2006 SMU #83 of 119; 2006 UTEP #94 of 119; 2006 UCF #98 of 119; 2006 Houston #99 of 119; 2006 Memphis #100 of 119; 2006 Marshall #101 of 119; 2006 Rice #107 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 80 of 119. Conference USA median rank 83.
Offensive success ratemedian #40
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Houston #13 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #15 of 119; 2006 UCF #22 of 119; 2006 Marshall #34 of 119; 2006 Memphis #38 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #40 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #44 of 119; 2006 Tulane #55 of 119; 2006 SMU #61 of 119; 2006 Rice #66 of 119; 2006 UTEP #89 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 60 of 119. Conference USA median rank 40.
Defensive success ratemedian #85
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Southern Miss #42 of 119; 2006 Houston #44 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #46 of 119; 2006 Tulane #77 of 119; 2006 Rice #85 of 119; 2006 SMU #88 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #90 of 119; 2006 UCF #94 of 119; 2006 UTEP #100 of 119; 2006 Memphis #107 of 119; 2006 Marshall #116 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 84 of 119. Conference USA median rank 85.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #52
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 UTEP #17 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #27 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #28 of 119; 2006 Tulane #29 of 119; 2006 Houston #41 of 119; 2006 SMU #52 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #69 of 119; 2006 Rice #74 of 119; 2006 Marshall #78 of 119; 2006 UCF #95 of 119; 2006 Memphis #113 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 96 of 119. Conference USA median rank 52.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2006, best rank first: 2006 Marshall #9 of 119; 2006 East Carolina #12 of 119; 2006 Tulsa #14 of 119; 2006 Memphis #18 of 119; 2006 UTEP #36 of 119; 2006 SMU #46 of 119; 2006 UCF #56 of 119; 2006 Tulane #69 of 119; 2006 Southern Miss #78 of 119; 2006 Houston #111 of 119; 2006 Rice #117 of 119. Marked: 2006 UAB, ranked 44 of 119. Conference USA median rank 44.