Metrics

UABBlazers

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2019

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019UAB950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#105 (of 130 teams · 351.6 yds/g · 4,923 yards)#102 (of 130 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 324 points)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 301.9 yds/g allowed · 4,226 yards)#28 (of 130 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 302 points)#61 (of 130 teams · +1.6 /g · +22 on the season)#109 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.57 /g)#30 (of 130 teams · 31:31 /g · 7h 21m on the season)#84 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's passing production returning)#125 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 441.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 130 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 130 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 130 teams · 1.304 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Conference USA teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#75 (Total offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #24–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#85 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #14–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Total defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #8–#114. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #22–#119. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#77 (Point margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #20–#124. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#91 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #1–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Possession: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #21–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning passing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #1–#110. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #3–#129. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #13–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#88 (Team talent: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #73–#115. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#80 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #32–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#61 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #5–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#79 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #29–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #2–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#76 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #11–#113. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range #12–#122. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)
2019Charlotte760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 130 teams · 411.9 yds/g · 5,354 yards)#59 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#59 (of 130 teams · 380.9 yds/g allowed · 4,952 yards)#103 (of 130 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 421 points)#87 (of 130 teams · -2.5 /g · -33 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.31 /g)#23 (of 130 teams · 32:00 /g · 6h 56m on the season)#45 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#109 (of 130 teams · 386.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 130 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 130 teams · 0.236 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 130 teams · 1.323 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 130 teams · 1.289 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Florida Atlantic1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 130 teams · 446.2 yds/g · 6,247 yards)#14 (of 130 teams · 36.4 pts/g · 510 points)#47 (of 130 teams · 371.9 yds/g allowed · 5,206 yards)#40 (of 130 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#20 (of 130 teams · +13.7 /g · +192 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +21 on the season · 33 taken, 12 given · +1.50 /g)#98 (of 130 teams · 28:30 /g · 6h 39m on the season)#58 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 524.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 130 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 130 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#18 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 130 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.295 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Florida International670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#90 (of 130 teams · 377.5 yds/g · 4,908 yards)#83 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 344 points)#66 (of 130 teams · 391.0 yds/g allowed · 5,083 yards)#63 (of 130 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#77 (of 130 teams · -0.8 /g · -10 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#86 (of 130 teams · 29:09 /g · 6h 19m on the season)#54 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#49 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 532.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 130 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 130 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#68 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 130 teams · 1.155 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Louisiana Tech1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 130 teams · 436.9 yds/g · 5,679 yards)#35 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 422 points)#52 (of 130 teams · 377.2 yds/g allowed · 4,904 yards)#30 (of 130 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#27 (of 130 teams · +10.6 /g · +138 on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g)#42 (of 130 teams · 30:44 /g · 6h 40m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 501.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 130 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 130 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#52 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 130 teams · 1.162 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 130 teams · 1.095 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Marshall850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 (of 130 teams · 393.0 yds/g · 5,109 yards)#88 (of 130 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 335 points)#57 (of 130 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 4,935 yards)#47 (of 130 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#62 (of 130 teams · +0.8 /g · +10 on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.15 /g)#39 (of 130 teams · 30:55 /g · 6h 42m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#79 (of 130 teams · 489.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 130 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#61 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 130 teams · 1.155 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 130 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Middle Tennessee480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 130 teams · 408.3 yds/g · 4,900 yards)#85 (of 130 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#114 (of 130 teams · 459.3 yds/g allowed · 5,512 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#92 (of 130 teams · -3.6 /g · -43 on the season)#43 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.25 /g)#118 (of 130 teams · 26:46 /g · 5h 21m on the season)#110 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#87 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#92 (of 130 teams · 450.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 130 teams · 0.193 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#112 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 130 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 130 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019North Texas480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 130 teams · 418.8 yds/g · 5,026 yards)#52 (of 130 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#80 (of 130 teams · 411.8 yds/g allowed · 4,941 yards)#105 (of 130 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#85 (of 130 teams · -1.9 /g · -23 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.50 /g)#107 (of 130 teams · 28:08 /g · 5h 38m on the season)#39 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#33 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#17 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#88 (of 130 teams · 457.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 130 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 130 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#72 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 130 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Old Dominion1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 130 teams · 273.8 yds/g · 3,285 yards)#127 (of 130 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 195 points)#46 (of 130 teams · 371.6 yds/g allowed · 4,459 yards)#79 (of 130 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#117 (of 130 teams · -13.6 /g · -163 on the season)#81 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.17 /g)#43 (of 130 teams · 30:44 /g · 6h 09m on the season)#95 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's passing production returning)#129 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's receiving production returning)#83 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 374.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 130 teams · -0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 130 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#127 (of 130 teams · 35% of plays successful)#71 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 130 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Rice390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 130 teams · 294.2 yds/g · 3,530 yards)#123 (of 130 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 215 points)#58 (of 130 teams · 380.0 yds/g allowed · 4,560 yards)#49 (of 130 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#104 (of 130 teams · -8.0 /g · -96 on the season)#97 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 11 taken, 16 given · -0.42 /g)#35 (of 130 teams · 31:13 /g · 6h 15m on the season)#86 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's passing production returning)#90 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 397.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 130 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 130 teams · 0.214 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#74 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 130 teams · 1.187 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 130 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Southern Miss760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 (of 130 teams · 407.0 yds/g · 5,291 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#37 (of 130 teams · 352.6 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yards)#55 (of 130 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 341 points)#64 (of 130 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · -11 on the season · 15 taken, 26 given · -0.85 /g)#32 (of 130 teams · 31:22 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#22 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#89 (of 130 teams · 456.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 130 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 130 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#31 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 130 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 130 teams · 1.334 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019UTEP1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#116 (of 130 teams · 329.5 yds/g · 3,954 yards)#119 (of 130 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#95 (of 130 teams · 431.1 yds/g allowed · 5,173 yards)#119 (of 130 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 431 points)#124 (of 130 teams · -16.3 /g · -196 on the season)#93 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 10 taken, 14 given · -0.33 /g)#21 (of 130 teams · 32:07 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#64 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing production returning)#128 (of 130 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 355.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 130 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#127 (of 130 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#118 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 130 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 130 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019UTSA480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#107 (of 130 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 4,139 yards)#117 (of 130 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 244 points)#92 (of 130 teams · 429.1 yds/g allowed · 5,149 yards)#112 (of 130 teams · 33.9 pts/g allowed · 407 points)#117 (of 130 teams · -13.6 /g · -163 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.50 /g)#80 (of 130 teams · 29:20 /g · 5h 52m on the season)#71 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's passing production returning)#73 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#72 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's rushing production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 471.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 130 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 130 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#107 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#84 (of 130 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 130 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2019Western Kentucky940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#84 (of 130 teams · 387.8 yds/g · 5,041 yards)#91 (of 130 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 330 points)#24 (of 130 teams · 335.5 yds/g allowed · 4,361 yards)#22 (of 130 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points)#49 (of 130 teams · +5.3 /g · +69 on the season)#100 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.46 /g)#24 (of 130 teams · 32:00 /g · 6h 56m on the season)#67 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#82 (of 130 teams · 487.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 130 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 130 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#21 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 130 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 130 teams · 1.225 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20192019 UABConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #75
Total offense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida Atlantic #24 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #35 of 130; 2019 North Texas #54 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #57 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #59 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #63 of 130; 2019 Marshall #75 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #84 of 130; 2019 Florida International #90 of 130; 2019 UTSA #107 of 130; 2019 UTEP #116 of 130; 2019 Rice #125 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 105 of 130. Conference USA median rank 75.
Scoring offensemedian #85
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida Atlantic #14 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #35 of 130; 2019 North Texas #52 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #59 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #81 of 130; 2019 Florida International #83 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #85 of 130; 2019 Marshall #88 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #91 of 130; 2019 UTSA #117 of 130; 2019 UTEP #119 of 130; 2019 Rice #123 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 102 of 130. Conference USA median rank 85.
Total defensemedian #57
Total defense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Western Kentucky #24 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #37 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #46 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #47 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #52 of 130; 2019 Marshall #57 of 130; 2019 Rice #58 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #59 of 130; 2019 Florida International #66 of 130; 2019 North Texas #80 of 130; 2019 UTSA #92 of 130; 2019 UTEP #95 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #114 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 8 of 130. Conference USA median rank 57.
Scoring defensemedian #55
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Western Kentucky #22 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #30 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #40 of 130; 2019 Marshall #47 of 130; 2019 Rice #49 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #55 of 130; 2019 Florida International #63 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #79 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #81 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #103 of 130; 2019 North Texas #105 of 130; 2019 UTSA #112 of 130; 2019 UTEP #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 28 of 130. Conference USA median rank 55.
Point marginmedian #77
Point margin. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida Atlantic #20 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #27 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #49 of 130; 2019 Marshall #62 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #64 of 130; 2019 Florida International #77 of 130; 2019 North Texas #85 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #87 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #92 of 130; 2019 Rice #104 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #117 of 130; 2019 UTSA #117 of 130; 2019 UTEP #124 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 61 of 130. Conference USA median rank 77.
Turnover marginmedian #91
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida Atlantic #1 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #26 of 130; 2019 Florida International #40 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #43 of 130; 2019 Marshall #75 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #81 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #91 of 130; 2019 UTEP #93 of 130; 2019 Rice #97 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #100 of 130; 2019 North Texas #103 of 130; 2019 UTSA #103 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 109 of 130. Conference USA median rank 91.
Possessionmedian #39
Possession. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UTEP #21 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #23 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #24 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #32 of 130; 2019 Rice #35 of 130; 2019 Marshall #39 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #42 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #43 of 130; 2019 UTSA #80 of 130; 2019 Florida International #86 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #98 of 130; 2019 North Texas #107 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 30 of 130. Conference USA median rank 39.
Returning passingmedian #58
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana Tech #1 of 130; 2019 Marshall #12 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #22 of 130; 2019 North Texas #39 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #45 of 130; 2019 Florida International #54 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #58 of 130; 2019 UTEP #64 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #67 of 130; 2019 UTSA #71 of 130; 2019 Rice #86 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #95 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #110 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 84 of 130. Conference USA median rank 58.
Returning receivingmedian #73
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Southern Miss #3 of 130; 2019 Florida International #12 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #15 of 130; 2019 North Texas #33 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #57 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #61 of 130; 2019 UTSA #73 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #78 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #87 of 130; 2019 Rice #90 of 130; 2019 Marshall #98 of 130; 2019 UTEP #128 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #129 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 125 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UTEP #13 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #15 of 130; 2019 North Texas #17 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #31 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #37 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #40 of 130; 2019 Florida International #49 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #71 of 130; 2019 UTSA #72 of 130; 2019 Marshall #74 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #83 of 130; 2019 Rice #114 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 38 of 130. Conference USA median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #88
Team talent. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida International #73 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #75 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #78 of 130; 2019 Marshall #79 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #82 of 130; 2019 UTSA #84 of 130; 2019 North Texas #88 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #89 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #92 of 130; 2019 Rice #107 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #109 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #111 of 130; 2019 UTEP #115 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 94 of 130. Conference USA median rank 88.
Offensive EPAmedian #80
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Charlotte #32 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #41 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #48 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #53 of 130; 2019 Florida International #71 of 130; 2019 North Texas #79 of 130; 2019 Marshall #80 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #81 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #84 of 130; 2019 UTEP #95 of 130; 2019 UTSA #106 of 130; 2019 Rice #120 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #128 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 112 of 130. Conference USA median rank 80.
Defensive EPAmedian #61
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana Tech #13 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #33 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #34 of 130; 2019 Marshall #55 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #59 of 130; 2019 Florida International #61 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #73 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #87 of 130; 2019 UTSA #89 of 130; 2019 North Texas #93 of 130; 2019 Rice #101 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #111 of 130; 2019 UTEP #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 5 of 130. Conference USA median rank 61.
Offensive success ratemedian #79
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana Tech #29 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #55 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #57 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #65 of 130; 2019 North Texas #75 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #77 of 130; 2019 Marshall #79 of 130; 2019 Florida International #80 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #102 of 130; 2019 UTEP #105 of 130; 2019 UTSA #110 of 130; 2019 Rice #117 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #127 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 108 of 130. Conference USA median rank 79.
Defensive success ratemedian #68
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Florida Atlantic #18 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #21 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #31 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #52 of 130; 2019 Marshall #61 of 130; 2019 Florida International #68 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #71 of 130; 2019 North Texas #72 of 130; 2019 Rice #74 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #85 of 130; 2019 UTSA #107 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #112 of 130; 2019 UTEP #118 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 2 of 130. Conference USA median rank 68.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #76
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Southern Miss #11 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #12 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #13 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #38 of 130; 2019 North Texas #41 of 130; 2019 UTEP #61 of 130; 2019 Rice #77 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #82 of 130; 2019 UTSA #84 of 130; 2019 Louisiana Tech #91 of 130; 2019 Marshall #95 of 130; 2019 Florida International #96 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #113 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 76 of 130. Conference USA median rank 76.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #73
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Louisiana Tech #12 of 130; 2019 Middle Tennessee #28 of 130; 2019 Florida International #50 of 130; 2019 Rice #60 of 130; 2019 Marshall #64 of 130; 2019 Old Dominion #68 of 130; 2019 Western Kentucky #73 of 130; 2019 UTSA #92 of 130; 2019 North Texas #99 of 130; 2019 Charlotte #107 of 130; 2019 Florida Atlantic #110 of 130; 2019 UTEP #119 of 130; 2019 Southern Miss #122 of 130. Marked: 2019 UAB, ranked 114 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.