Metrics

UCFKnights

Season
Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season AP poll of 2004, released in week 15.

AP Top 25, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004UCF0110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 119 teams · 280.0 yds/g · 3,080 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g · 175 points)#92 (of 119 teams · 403.9 yds/g allowed · 4,443 yards)#101 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points)#115 (of 119 teams · -17.0 /g · -187 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 22 taken, 30 given · -0.73 /g)#56 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 119 teams · -0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 119 teams · -0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 119 teams · 26% of plays successful)#86 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 119 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#24 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#97. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#25 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#98. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #5–#82. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#68. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#45. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#95. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#102. 6 of 25 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#23 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#74. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#26 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#81. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #1–#92. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #2–#83. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#52 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #8–#104. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range #17–#114. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)
2004USC1300 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 119 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 5,838 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 280.4 yds/g allowed · 3,645 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 13.0 pts/g allowed · 169 points)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +25.1 /g · +327 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +24 on the season · 43 taken, 19 given · +1.85 /g)#14 (of 119 teams · 19:17 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 119 teams · -0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#21 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 119 teams · 0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Oklahoma1210 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 462.1 yds/g · 6,007 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 452 points)#15 (of 119 teams · 299.0 yds/g allowed · 3,887 yards)#11 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.9 /g · +233 on the season)#25 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.62 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:12 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 119 teams · -0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 119 teams · 1.060 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Auburn1300 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 119 teams · 420.7 yds/g · 5,469 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 277.6 yds/g allowed · 3,609 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 11.3 pts/g allowed · 147 points)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +270 on the season)#33 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 30 taken, 23 given · +0.54 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:28 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 119 teams · -0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 119 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004California1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.4 yds/g · 5,909 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 441 points)#28 (of 119 teams · 320.9 yds/g allowed · 3,851 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 192 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +249 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.17 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:19 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 119 teams · -0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 45% of plays successful)#20 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.957 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 119 teams · 1.032 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Utah1200 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 499.8 yds/g · 5,997 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 45.3 pts/g · 544 points)#43 (of 119 teams · 343.4 yds/g allowed · 4,121 yards)#23 (of 119 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 234 points)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +25.8 /g · +310 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 29 taken, 14 given · +1.25 /g)#21 (of 119 teams · 19:04 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 119 teams · -0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 46% of plays successful)#37 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 119 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.950 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 464.4 yds/g · 5,573 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 423 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 320.1 yds/g allowed · 3,841 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 17.9 pts/g allowed · 215 points)#11 (of 119 teams · +17.3 /g · +208 on the season)#36 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.42 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:39 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 119 teams · 0.055 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · -0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 42% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 119 teams · 1.016 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Louisville1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 539.0 yds/g · 6,468 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 49.8 pts/g · 597 points)#18 (of 119 teams · 305.9 yds/g allowed · 3,671 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 236 points)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +30.1 /g · +361 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 28 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#24 (of 119 teams · 18:57 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 47% of plays successful)#34 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 119 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Georgia1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 119 teams · 404.5 yds/g · 4,854 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 335 points)#11 (of 119 teams · 288.9 yds/g allowed · 3,467 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.5 pts/g allowed · 198 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +11.4 /g · +137 on the season)#57 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#43 (of 119 teams · 18:27 /g · 3h 41m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · -0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#31 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#25 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 119 teams · 1.090 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 119 teams · 1.026 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Miami930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 119 teams · 365.3 yds/g · 4,384 yards)#21 (of 119 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 380 points)#31 (of 119 teams · 328.1 yds/g allowed · 3,937 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 204 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +14.7 /g · +176 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17 on the season · 32 taken, 15 given · +1.42 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 18:08 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 119 teams · -0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 119 teams · -0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.133 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 119 teams · 1.034 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Virginia Tech1030 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 119 teams · 365.5 yds/g · 4,752 yards)#25 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 400 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 268.0 yds/g allowed · 3,484 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 167 points)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +17.9 /g · +233 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 35 taken, 22 given · +1.00 /g)#18 (of 119 teams · 19:08 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 119 teams · -0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#15 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.991 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 119 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Boise State1110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 492.7 yds/g · 5,912 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48.9 pts/g · 587 points)#50 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g allowed · 4,294 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +23.3 /g · +279 on the season)#20 (of 119 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.67 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 19:45 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 119 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#28 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 119 teams · 1.045 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Iowa1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 119 teams · 312.7 yds/g · 3,752 yards)#69 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 292 points)#13 (of 119 teams · 293.8 yds/g allowed · 3,526 yards)#17 (of 119 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#33 (of 119 teams · +6.8 /g · +81 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16 on the season · 35 taken, 19 given · +1.33 /g)#17 (of 119 teams · 19:12 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 119 teams · -0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 119 teams · -0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#11 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 119 teams · 1.021 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 119 teams · 0.939 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004LSU930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 119 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 4,747 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 256.9 yds/g allowed · 3,083 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 205 points)#15 (of 119 teams · +11.6 /g · +139 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 25 taken, 26 given · -0.08 /g)#20 (of 119 teams · 19:04 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 119 teams · -0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 27% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 119 teams · 1.071 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Michigan930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 4,638 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 370 points)#36 (of 119 teams · 336.3 yds/g allowed · 4,035 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#29 (of 119 teams · +7.6 /g · +91 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.58 /g)#22 (of 119 teams · 19:03 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 119 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#19 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Tennessee1030 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 119 teams · 399.5 yds/g · 5,193 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points)#48 (of 119 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,633 yards)#39 (of 119 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#35 (of 119 teams · +6.4 /g · +83 on the season)#39 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#51 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 119 teams · -0.007 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 119 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#71 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 119 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Florida State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 119 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,470 yards)#57 (of 119 teams · 25.2 pts/g · 302 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 283.8 yds/g allowed · 3,406 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 169 points)#17 (of 119 teams · +11.1 /g · +133 on the season)#26 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 31 taken, 24 given · +0.58 /g)#42 (of 119 teams · 18:28 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 119 teams · -0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 27% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 119 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 119 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Wisconsin930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 119 teams · 328.1 yds/g · 3,937 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 249 points)#12 (of 119 teams · 291.3 yds/g allowed · 3,495 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)#57 (of 119 teams · +0 on the season · 23 taken, 23 given · +0.00 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 20:30 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 119 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 119 teams · -0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 119 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Virginia840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 119 teams · 423.4 yds/g · 5,081 yards)#27 (of 119 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 363 points)#22 (of 119 teams · 313.3 yds/g allowed · 3,760 yards)#18 (of 119 teams · 17.7 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +12.6 /g · +151 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.33 /g)#23 (of 119 teams · 19:00 /g · 3h 48m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 119 teams · -0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#56 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.968 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 119 teams · 1.035 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Pittsburgh840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 119 teams · 357.8 yds/g · 4,294 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 325 points)#82 (of 119 teams · 395.4 yds/g allowed · 4,745 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#45 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +37 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 28 taken, 13 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 119 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 119 teams · -0.081 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#46 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 119 teams · 1.092 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 119 teams · 1.042 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Florida750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 119 teams · 426.9 yds/g · 5,123 yards)#19 (of 119 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 382 points)#46 (of 119 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 4,147 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points)#18 (of 119 teams · +10.8 /g · +129 on the season)#42 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.33 /g)#95 (of 119 teams · 17:08 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 119 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#65 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 119 teams · 1.008 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 119 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Arizona State930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 119 teams · 435.4 yds/g · 5,225 yards)#32 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 358 points)#51 (of 119 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 4,307 yards)#49 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#37 (of 119 teams · +5.3 /g · +64 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.17 /g)#35 (of 119 teams · 18:39 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 119 teams · -0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 119 teams · -0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#42 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 119 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 119 teams · 1.036 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas A&M750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 119 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 5,141 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 341 points)#69 (of 119 teams · 386.8 yds/g allowed · 4,641 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#43 (of 119 teams · +4.1 /g · +49 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 23 taken, 13 given · +0.83 /g)#102 (of 119 teams · 16:47 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 119 teams · -0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#83 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 119 teams · 1.076 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Boston College930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 385.4 yds/g · 4,625 yards)#62 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#34 (of 119 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 3,994 yards)#12 (of 119 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 203 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +7.8 /g · +93 on the season)#63 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#40 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 42m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 119 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 119 teams · 35% of plays successful)#50 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 119 teams · 1.036 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 119 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Texas Tech840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 5,900 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 36.2 pts/g · 434 points)#49 (of 119 teams · 357.0 yds/g allowed · 4,284 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#20 (of 119 teams · +10.0 /g · +120 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g)#61 (of 119 teams · 18:06 /g · 3h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44% of plays successful)#64 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 119 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Ohio State840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2004's final AP poll. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 119 teams · 320.8 yds/g · 3,850 yards)#72 (of 119 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 290 points)#33 (of 119 teams · 332.0 yds/g allowed · 3,984 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 18.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#36 (of 119 teams · +5.9 /g · +71 on the season)#95 (of 119 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.58 /g)#69 (of 119 teams · 17:57 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 119 teams · -0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 119 teams · 33% of plays successful)#43 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 119 teams · 1.018 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 119 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

AP Top 25, 20042004 UCFAP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #24
Total offense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #3 of 119; 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 California #5 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #6 of 119; 2004 Texas #7 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 USC #11 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #15 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #19 of 119; 2004 Florida #20 of 119; 2004 Virginia #22 of 119; 2004 Auburn #24 of 119; 2004 Georgia #30 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2004 LSU #37 of 119; 2004 Michigan #44 of 119; 2004 Boston College #45 of 119; 2004 Florida State #59 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #63 of 119; 2004 Miami #64 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #70 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #90 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #95 of 119; 2004 Iowa #97 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 112 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring offensemedian #25
Scoring offense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Boise State #2 of 119; 2004 Utah #3 of 119; 2004 USC #6 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #14 of 119; 2004 Auburn #18 of 119; 2004 Florida #19 of 119; 2004 Miami #21 of 119; 2004 Michigan #24 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #25 of 119; 2004 Virginia #27 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #32 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 LSU #41 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #43 of 119; 2004 Georgia #45 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #48 of 119; 2004 Florida State #57 of 119; 2004 Boston College #62 of 119; 2004 Iowa #69 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #72 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #98 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 115 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 25.
Total defensemedian #28
Total defense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 LSU #5 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #7 of 119; 2004 Auburn #8 of 119; 2004 USC #9 of 119; 2004 Florida State #10 of 119; 2004 Georgia #11 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #12 of 119; 2004 Iowa #13 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #15 of 119; 2004 Louisville #18 of 119; 2004 Virginia #22 of 119; 2004 Texas #27 of 119; 2004 California #28 of 119; 2004 Miami #31 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #33 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 Michigan #36 of 119; 2004 Utah #43 of 119; 2004 Florida #46 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #48 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #49 of 119; 2004 Boise State #50 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #69 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #82 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 92 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Scoring defensemedian #18
Scoring defense. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Auburn #1 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 Florida State #4 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #6 of 119; 2004 California #8 of 119; 2004 Georgia #9 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #11 of 119; 2004 Boston College #12 of 119; 2004 Miami #13 of 119; 2004 LSU #15 of 119; 2004 Iowa #17 of 119; 2004 Virginia #18 of 119; 2004 Texas #19 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #20 of 119; 2004 Utah #23 of 119; 2004 Louisville #25 of 119; 2004 Florida #33 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 Michigan #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #48 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #49 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #68 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 101 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 18.
Point marginmedian #16
Point margin. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 USC #3 of 119; 2004 Boise State #4 of 119; 2004 Auburn #6 of 119; 2004 California #7 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #9 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #9 of 119; 2004 Texas #11 of 119; 2004 Miami #12 of 119; 2004 Virginia #14 of 119; 2004 LSU #15 of 119; 2004 Georgia #16 of 119; 2004 Florida State #17 of 119; 2004 Florida #18 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #20 of 119; 2004 Boston College #28 of 119; 2004 Michigan #29 of 119; 2004 Iowa #33 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #35 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #36 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #37 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #37 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #45 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 115 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 16.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 USC #1 of 119; 2004 Miami #3 of 119; 2004 Iowa #4 of 119; 2004 Utah #6 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #6 of 119; 2004 Louisville #9 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #9 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #13 of 119; 2004 Boise State #20 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #25 of 119; 2004 Michigan #26 of 119; 2004 Florida State #26 of 119; 2004 Auburn #33 of 119; 2004 Texas #36 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #39 of 119; 2004 Virginia #42 of 119; 2004 Florida #42 of 119; 2004 California #51 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #51 of 119; 2004 Georgia #57 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #57 of 119; 2004 LSU #63 of 119; 2004 Boston College #63 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #87 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #95 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 100 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #23
Possession. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Wisconsin #2 of 119; 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #5 of 119; 2004 Boise State #6 of 119; 2004 Texas #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #9 of 119; 2004 USC #14 of 119; 2004 Iowa #17 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #18 of 119; 2004 LSU #20 of 119; 2004 Utah #21 of 119; 2004 Michigan #22 of 119; 2004 Virginia #23 of 119; 2004 Louisville #24 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #27 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #35 of 119; 2004 Boston College #40 of 119; 2004 Florida State #42 of 119; 2004 Georgia #43 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #51 of 119; 2004 Miami #57 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #61 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #69 of 119; 2004 Florida #95 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #102 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 56 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Returning passing
Returning passing. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #23
Offensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 California #4 of 119; 2004 Louisville #5 of 119; 2004 Virginia #6 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #10 of 119; 2004 Texas #12 of 119; 2004 Boise State #13 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #15 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #17 of 119; 2004 Florida #19 of 119; 2004 Georgia #22 of 119; 2004 USC #23 of 119; 2004 LSU #24 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #28 of 119; 2004 Miami #33 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #34 of 119; 2004 Boston College #37 of 119; 2004 Michigan #40 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #58 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #61 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #62 of 119; 2004 Florida State #72 of 119; 2004 Iowa #74 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 95 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 23.
Defensive EPAmedian #26
Defensive EPA. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Virginia Tech #2 of 119; 2004 Florida State #7 of 119; 2004 Michigan #8 of 119; 2004 Boise State #9 of 119; 2004 Louisville #10 of 119; 2004 Iowa #12 of 119; 2004 USC #16 of 119; 2004 Auburn #18 of 119; 2004 Miami #20 of 119; 2004 LSU #21 of 119; 2004 Utah #24 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #25 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #26 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #30 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #33 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 California #36 of 119; 2004 Texas #38 of 119; 2004 Georgia #40 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #44 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #45 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #59 of 119; 2004 Virginia #68 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #80 of 119; 2004 Florida #81 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 42 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 26.
Offensive success ratemedian #20
Offensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Louisville #1 of 119; 2004 Utah #2 of 119; 2004 California #3 of 119; 2004 Virginia #4 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #5 of 119; 2004 Auburn #8 of 119; 2004 Texas #9 of 119; 2004 Boise State #11 of 119; 2004 Florida #12 of 119; 2004 LSU #13 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #18 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #19 of 119; 2004 USC #20 of 119; 2004 Michigan #28 of 119; 2004 Georgia #31 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #48 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #49 of 119; 2004 Boston College #54 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #56 of 119; 2004 Florida State #58 of 119; 2004 Miami #61 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #66 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #68 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #83 of 119; 2004 Iowa #92 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 112 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive success ratemedian #28
Defensive success rate. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Florida State #2 of 119; 2004 LSU #3 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #8 of 119; 2004 Auburn #10 of 119; 2004 Iowa #11 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #15 of 119; 2004 Michigan #19 of 119; 2004 California #20 of 119; 2004 USC #21 of 119; 2004 Miami #24 of 119; 2004 Georgia #25 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #26 of 119; 2004 Boise State #28 of 119; 2004 Texas #31 of 119; 2004 Louisville #34 of 119; 2004 Utah #37 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #42 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #43 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #46 of 119; 2004 Boston College #50 of 119; 2004 Virginia #56 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #64 of 119; 2004 Florida #65 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #71 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #83 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 86 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 28.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #52
Offensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Miami #8 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #10 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #16 of 119; 2004 Georgia #17 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #18 of 119; 2004 Texas A&M #23 of 119; 2004 Boise State #29 of 119; 2004 Boston College #34 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #35 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #43 of 119; 2004 Iowa #46 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #47 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #52 of 119; 2004 Florida #53 of 119; 2004 Louisville #57 of 119; 2004 USC #58 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #62 of 119; 2004 Utah #69 of 119; 2004 Virginia #73 of 119; 2004 LSU #79 of 119; 2004 California #81 of 119; 2004 Auburn #82 of 119; 2004 Florida State #86 of 119; 2004 Texas #99 of 119; 2004 Michigan #104 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 60 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 52.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #56
Defensive explosiveness. AP Top 25, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Texas A&M #17 of 119; 2004 Texas Tech #19 of 119; 2004 Ohio State #24 of 119; 2004 Virginia Tech #29 of 119; 2004 USC #31 of 119; 2004 Tennessee #33 of 119; 2004 Michigan #34 of 119; 2004 Iowa #37 of 119; 2004 Louisville #39 of 119; 2004 Utah #41 of 119; 2004 Florida #47 of 119; 2004 Auburn #52 of 119; 2004 Boston College #56 of 119; 2004 Wisconsin #62 of 119; 2004 Boise State #65 of 119; 2004 Texas #73 of 119; 2004 Georgia #81 of 119; 2004 California #84 of 119; 2004 Miami #85 of 119; 2004 Virginia #87 of 119; 2004 Arizona State #89 of 119; 2004 Pittsburgh #91 of 119; 2004 Oklahoma #100 of 119; 2004 LSU #102 of 119; 2004 Florida State #114 of 119. Marked: 2004 UCF, ranked 76 of 119. AP Top 25 median rank 56.