Metrics

UCFKnights

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008UCF480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 120 teams · 229.5 yds/g · 2,754 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 199 points)#44 (of 120 teams · 333.8 yds/g allowed · 4,005 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#94 (of 120 teams · -7.5 /g · -90 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#97 (of 120 teams · 17:07 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 120 teams · 30% of plays successful)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.940 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Conference USA teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#30 (Total offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #1–#119. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #2–#114. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#86 (Total defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #41–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#76 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #30–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Point margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #9–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #7–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Possession: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #7–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#52 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #2–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#82 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #17–#120. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #4–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#84 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #9–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #9–#103. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#59 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range #20–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2008East Carolina950 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 120 teams · 340.4 yds/g · 4,765 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 328 points)#41 (of 120 teams · 333.0 yds/g allowed · 4,662 yards)#30 (of 120 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +2.4 /g · +33 on the season)#59 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 33 taken, 32 given · +0.07 /g)#51 (of 120 teams · 18:32 /g · 4h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 120 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#22 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.917 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Houston850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 562.8 yds/g · 7,316 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 40.6 pts/g · 528 points)#103 (of 120 teams · 413.5 yds/g allowed · 5,375 yards)#92 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g allowed · 402 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +9.7 /g · +126 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.38 /g)#112 (of 120 teams · 16:37 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#91 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.873 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Marshall480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 120 teams · 330.4 yds/g · 3,965 yards)#97 (of 120 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#105 (of 120 teams · 418.1 yds/g allowed · 5,017 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 332 points)#93 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#85 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.42 /g)#102 (of 120 teams · 16:58 /g · 3h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 120 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#84 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.012 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.905 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Memphis670 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#23 (of 120 teams · 417.2 yds/g · 5,424 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 353 points)#61 (of 120 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 4,599 yards)#68 (of 120 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 353 points)#64 (of 120 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 18 taken, 18 given · +0.00 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:54 /g · 4h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.043 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#56 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.835 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Rice1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 470.9 yds/g · 6,122 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 537 points)#112 (of 120 teams · 452.2 yds/g allowed · 5,879 yards)#104 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 433 points)#26 (of 120 teams · +8.0 /g · +104 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 32 taken, 17 given · +1.15 /g)#42 (of 120 teams · 18:46 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#87 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 120 teams · 1.023 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008SMU1110 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 120 teams · 314.3 yds/g · 3,772 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 256 points)#119 (of 120 teams · 479.5 yds/g allowed · 5,754 yards)#116 (of 120 teams · 38.2 pts/g allowed · 458 points)#114 (of 120 teams · -16.8 /g · -202 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -13 on the season · 20 taken, 33 given · -1.08 /g)#117 (of 120 teams · 15:54 /g · 3h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#112 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.892 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Southern Miss760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 120 teams · 433.5 yds/g · 5,636 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#68 (of 120 teams · 366.5 yds/g allowed · 4,764 yards)#54 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points)#34 (of 120 teams · +6.5 /g · +85 on the season)#17 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 29 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#52 (of 120 teams · 18:31 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#76 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.014 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.900 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Tulane2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 120 teams · 339.7 yds/g · 4,076 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 200 points)#86 (of 120 teams · 391.3 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 414 points)#115 (of 120 teams · -17.8 /g · -214 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.50 /g)#25 (of 120 teams · 19:08 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 120 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 120 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#116 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.935 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Tulsa1130 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 569.9 yds/g · 7,978 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 661 points)#75 (of 120 teams · 379.1 yds/g allowed · 5,308 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 391 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.3 /g · +270 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 29 taken, 31 given · -0.14 /g)#75 (of 120 teams · 17:50 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#49 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.981 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.036 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008UAB480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 366.2 yds/g · 4,394 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#108 (of 120 teams · 429.9 yds/g allowed · 5,159 yards)#96 (of 120 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -8.5 /g · -102 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#33 (of 120 teams · 18:55 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 120 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#85 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.940 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 120 teams · 1.028 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008UTEP570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 120 teams · 406.5 yds/g · 4,878 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 395 points)#116 (of 120 teams · 469.8 yds/g allowed · 5,637 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 444 points)#86 (of 120 teams · -4.1 /g · -49 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16 on the season · 31 taken, 15 given · +1.33 /g)#41 (of 120 teams · 18:46 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#115 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.848 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20082008 UCFConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #30
Total offense. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Tulsa #1 of 120; 2008 Houston #2 of 120; 2008 Rice #10 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #18 of 120; 2008 Memphis #23 of 120; 2008 UTEP #30 of 120; 2008 UAB #54 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #76 of 120; 2008 Tulane #78 of 120; 2008 Marshall #85 of 120; 2008 SMU #97 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 119 of 120. Conference USA median rank 30.
Scoring offensemedian #48
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Tulsa #2 of 120; 2008 Rice #8 of 120; 2008 Houston #10 of 120; 2008 UTEP #25 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #31 of 120; 2008 Memphis #48 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #81 of 120; 2008 UAB #86 of 120; 2008 SMU #93 of 120; 2008 Marshall #97 of 120; 2008 Tulane #113 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 114 of 120. Conference USA median rank 48.
Total defensemedian #86
Total defense. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 East Carolina #41 of 120; 2008 Memphis #61 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #68 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #75 of 120; 2008 Tulane #86 of 120; 2008 Houston #103 of 120; 2008 Marshall #105 of 120; 2008 UAB #108 of 120; 2008 Rice #112 of 120; 2008 UTEP #116 of 120; 2008 SMU #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 44 of 120. Conference USA median rank 86.
Scoring defensemedian #76
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 East Carolina #30 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #54 of 120; 2008 Memphis #68 of 120; 2008 Marshall #73 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #76 of 120; 2008 Houston #92 of 120; 2008 UAB #96 of 120; 2008 Rice #104 of 120; 2008 Tulane #107 of 120; 2008 UTEP #113 of 120; 2008 SMU #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 55 of 120. Conference USA median rank 76.
Point marginmedian #64
Point margin. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Tulsa #9 of 120; 2008 Houston #25 of 120; 2008 Rice #26 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #34 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #55 of 120; 2008 Memphis #64 of 120; 2008 UTEP #86 of 120; 2008 Marshall #93 of 120; 2008 UAB #96 of 120; 2008 SMU #114 of 120; 2008 Tulane #115 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 94 of 120. Conference USA median rank 64.
Turnover marginmedian #64
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UTEP #7 of 120; 2008 Rice #12 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #17 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #59 of 120; 2008 Memphis #61 of 120; 2008 UAB #64 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #70 of 120; 2008 Houston #80 of 120; 2008 Marshall #85 of 120; 2008 Tulane #90 of 120; 2008 SMU #112 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 64 of 120. Conference USA median rank 64.
Possessionmedian #51
Possession. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Memphis #7 of 120; 2008 Tulane #25 of 120; 2008 UAB #33 of 120; 2008 UTEP #41 of 120; 2008 Rice #42 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #51 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #52 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #75 of 120; 2008 Marshall #102 of 120; 2008 Houston #112 of 120; 2008 SMU #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 97 of 120. Conference USA median rank 51.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 UCF, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #52
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Houston #2 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #7 of 120; 2008 Rice #14 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #25 of 120; 2008 UAB #30 of 120; 2008 UTEP #52 of 120; 2008 Memphis #54 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #74 of 120; 2008 SMU #76 of 120; 2008 Marshall #102 of 120; 2008 Tulane #107 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 120 of 120. Conference USA median rank 52.
Defensive EPAmedian #82
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 East Carolina #17 of 120; 2008 Houston #65 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #69 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #73 of 120; 2008 Memphis #82 of 120; 2008 Marshall #86 of 120; 2008 Rice #102 of 120; 2008 UTEP #110 of 120; 2008 UAB #111 of 120; 2008 SMU #115 of 120; 2008 Tulane #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 18 of 120. Conference USA median rank 82.
Offensive success ratemedian #60
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Houston #4 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #7 of 120; 2008 Rice #12 of 120; 2008 Memphis #29 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #45 of 120; 2008 UAB #60 of 120; 2008 UTEP #61 of 120; 2008 SMU #65 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #72 of 120; 2008 Tulane #90 of 120; 2008 Marshall #108 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 120 of 120. Conference USA median rank 60.
Defensive success ratemedian #84
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 East Carolina #22 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #49 of 120; 2008 Memphis #56 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #76 of 120; 2008 Marshall #84 of 120; 2008 UAB #85 of 120; 2008 Rice #87 of 120; 2008 Houston #91 of 120; 2008 SMU #112 of 120; 2008 UTEP #115 of 120; 2008 Tulane #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 9 of 120. Conference USA median rank 84.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Southern Miss #9 of 120; 2008 Marshall #10 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #21 of 120; 2008 UTEP #28 of 120; 2008 Houston #33 of 120; 2008 Rice #38 of 120; 2008 UAB #39 of 120; 2008 SMU #40 of 120; 2008 Tulane #42 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #57 of 120; 2008 Memphis #103 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 92 of 120. Conference USA median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #59
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Tulane #20 of 120; 2008 UTEP #25 of 120; 2008 Houston #35 of 120; 2008 SMU #48 of 120; 2008 East Carolina #53 of 120; 2008 Southern Miss #59 of 120; 2008 Marshall #63 of 120; 2008 Memphis #106 of 120; 2008 Rice #110 of 120; 2008 UAB #111 of 120; 2008 Tulsa #112 of 120. Marked: 2008 UCF, ranked 84 of 120. Conference USA median rank 59.