THIRD AND DATA

UL Monroe game log

2007: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 30vs Tulsa17–35 L———————————33%42%
Sep 8at #21 Clemson26–49 L———————————35%58%
Sep 15at Texas A&M14–54 L———————————57%50%
Sep 29at Troy7–24 L———————————35%41%
Oct 6vs Arkansas State30–13 W———————————45%46%
Oct 13at North Texas21–31 L———————————37%43%
Oct 20vs Florida International28–14 W———————————42%34%
Oct 27at Florida Atlantic33–30 W———————————44%40%
Nov 3vs Middle Tennessee40–43 L———————————51%45%
Nov 10vs Grambling28–14 W———————————39%25%
Nov 17at Alabama21–14 W—————————————
Nov 24at Louisiana17–11 W———————————40%40%
Season12 games6–6—————–—–———————42%42%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: UL Monroe on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is UL Monroe's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:UL Monroe offense 42% (339 of 811)Opponent offense / UL Monroe defense 42% (331 of 783)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Tulsa: opponent offense 42% of 85Tulsa: UL Monroe offense 33% of 64#21 Clemson: opponent offense 58% of 65#21 Clemson: UL Monroe offense 35% of 82Texas A&M: opponent offense 50% of 76Texas A&M: UL Monroe offense 57% of 69Troy: opponent offense 41% of 73Troy: UL Monroe offense 35% of 63Arkansas State: opponent offense 46% of 61Arkansas State: UL Monroe offense 45% of 75North Texas: opponent offense 43% of 68North Texas: UL Monroe offense 37% of 82Florida International: opponent offense 34% of 74Florida International: UL Monroe offense 42% of 64Florida Atlantic: opponent offense 40% of 86Florida Atlantic: UL Monroe offense 44% of 82Middle Tennessee: opponent offense 45% of 65Middle Tennessee: UL Monroe offense 51% of 84Grambling: opponent offense 25% of 55Grambling: UL Monroe offense 39% of 74Louisiana: opponent offense 40% of 75Louisiana: UL Monroe offense 40% of 72
Tulsa@ #21 Clemson@ Texas A&M@ TroyArkansas State@ North TexasFlorida International@ Florida AtlanticMiddle TennesseeGrambling@ Alabama@ Louisiana
UL Monroe offenseOpponent offense (UL Monroe defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Tulsa

17–35 L · 64 plays to 85
UL Monroe offense 33% (21/64)Tulsa offense 42% (36/85)

at #21 Clemson

26–49 L · 82 plays to 65
UL Monroe offense 35% (29/82)Clemson offense 58% (38/65)

at Texas A&M

14–54 L · 69 plays to 76
UL Monroe offense 57% (39/69)Texas A&M offense 50% (38/76)

at Troy

7–24 L · 63 plays to 73
UL Monroe offense 35% (22/63)Troy offense 41% (30/73)

vs Arkansas State

30–13 W · 75 plays to 61
UL Monroe offense 45% (34/75)Arkansas State offense 46% (28/61)

at North Texas

21–31 L · 82 plays to 68
UL Monroe offense 37% (30/82)North Texas offense 43% (29/68)

vs Florida International

28–14 W · 64 plays to 74
UL Monroe offense 42% (27/64)FIU offense 34% (25/74)

at Florida Atlantic

33–30 W · 82 plays to 86
UL Monroe offense 44% (36/82)Florida Atlantic offense 40% (34/86)

vs Middle Tennessee

40–43 L · 84 plays to 65
UL Monroe offense 51% (43/84)Middle Tennessee offense 45% (29/65)

vs Grambling

28–14 W · 74 plays to 55
UL Monroe offense 39% (29/74)Grambling offense 25% (14/55)

at Louisiana

17–11 W · 72 plays to 75
UL Monroe offense 40% (29/72)Louisiana offense 40% (30/75)