Metrics

UL MonroeWarhawks

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014UL Monroe480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#109 (of 128 teams · 349.4 yds/g · 4,193 yards)#115 (of 128 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 241 points)#48 (of 128 teams · 373.3 yds/g allowed · 4,479 yards)#58 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#97 (of 128 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#70 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g)#73 (of 128 teams · 29:53 /g · 5h 59m on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's passing production returning)#59 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 128 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 128 teams · 0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#38 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.063 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 128 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Sun Belt teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #16–#109. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#91 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #10–#115. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#85 (Total defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #25–#120. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#75 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #30–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#89 (Point margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #10–#126. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #18–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #24–#118. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#85 (Returning passing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #22–#121. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#61 (Returning receiving: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #16–#109. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning rushing: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #7–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#70 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #2–#117. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #46–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #6–#107. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#77 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #38–#128. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #15–#122. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range #7–#126. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)
2014App State750 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 128 teams · 461.5 yds/g · 5,538 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 428 points)#25 (of 128 teams · 347.5 yds/g allowed · 4,170 yards)#72 (of 128 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#36 (of 128 teams · +8.3 /g · +100 on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#32 (of 128 teams · 31:41 /g · 6h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 128 teams · 0.257 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 128 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#38 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#41 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 128 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 128 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Arkansas State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 128 teams · 476.5 yds/g · 6,194 yards)#19 (of 128 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 477 points)#85 (of 128 teams · 421.2 yds/g allowed · 5,476 yards)#92 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#45 (of 128 teams · +6.2 /g · +81 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 28 taken, 22 given · +0.46 /g)#86 (of 128 teams · 29:34 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#95 (of 128 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#105 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 128 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#56 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 128 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Georgia Southern930 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 128 teams · 488.3 yds/g · 5,859 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 469 points)#57 (of 128 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 4,657 yards)#30 (of 128 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +15.7 /g · +188 on the season)#18 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.67 /g)#24 (of 128 teams · 32:16 /g · 6h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.356 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 128 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#92 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 128 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 128 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Georgia State1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#88 (of 128 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,504 yards)#103 (of 128 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 272 points)#120 (of 128 teams · 497.1 yds/g allowed · 5,965 yards)#128 (of 128 teams · 43.3 pts/g allowed · 520 points)#126 (of 128 teams · -20.7 /g · -248 on the season)#128 (of 128 teams · -22 on the season · 8 taken, 30 given · -1.83 /g)#109 (of 128 teams · 28:20 /g · 5h 40m on the season)#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 128 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 128 teams · 0.332 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#127 (of 128 teams · 53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 128 teams · 1.134 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Idaho1100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 128 teams · 416.0 yds/g · 4,576 yards)#91 (of 128 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 275 points)#116 (of 128 teams · 462.1 yds/g allowed · 5,083 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#114 (of 128 teams · -12.3 /g · -135 on the season)#117 (of 128 teams · -11 on the season · 17 taken, 28 given · -1.00 /g)#29 (of 128 teams · 31:47 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#71 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 128 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#127 (of 128 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#77 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 128 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays)#126 (of 128 teams · 1.427 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Louisiana940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 128 teams · 416.9 yds/g · 5,419 yards)#61 (of 128 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#74 (of 128 teams · 405.9 yds/g allowed · 5,276 yards)#57 (of 128 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#63 (of 128 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.23 /g)#31 (of 128 teams · 31:43 /g · 6h 52m on the season)#29 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 128 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#61 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 128 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 128 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014New Mexico State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 128 teams · 420.9 yds/g · 5,051 yards)#95 (of 128 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 294 points)#117 (of 128 teams · 484.4 yds/g allowed · 5,813 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 39.1 pts/g allowed · 469 points)#119 (of 128 teams · -14.6 /g · -175 on the season)#119 (of 128 teams · -13 on the season · 21 taken, 34 given · -1.08 /g)#118 (of 128 teams · 27:28 /g · 5h 30m on the season)#121 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 128 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 128 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#128 (of 128 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 128 teams · 1.255 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.016 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014South Alabama670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#87 (of 128 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 4,888 yards)#105 (of 128 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 293 points)#67 (of 128 teams · 399.3 yds/g allowed · 5,191 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#89 (of 128 teams · -3.9 /g · -50 on the season)#108 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 21 taken, 28 given · -0.54 /g)#59 (of 128 teams · 30:14 /g · 6h 33m on the season)#91 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing production returning)#16 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 128 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.156 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#67 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 128 teams · 1.102 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 128 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Texas State750 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#25 (of 128 teams · 464.4 yds/g · 5,573 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 406 points)#101 (of 128 teams · 445.1 yds/g allowed · 5,341 yards)#75 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 332 points)#46 (of 128 teams · +6.2 /g · +74 on the season)#25 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.58 /g)#110 (of 128 teams · 28:18 /g · 5h 40m on the season)#68 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's passing production returning)#57 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#29 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 128 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#82 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 128 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 128 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Troy390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Sun Belt teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#104 (of 128 teams · 362.7 yds/g · 4,352 yards)#108 (of 128 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 262 points)#109 (of 128 teams · 452.7 yds/g allowed · 5,432 yards)#113 (of 128 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 434 points)#117 (of 128 teams · -14.3 /g · -172 on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.33 /g)#91 (of 128 teams · 29:17 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#111 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#48 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 128 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 128 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#85 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#116 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 128 teams · 1.187 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 128 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20142014 UL MonroeSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #16 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #21 of 128; 2014 Texas State #25 of 128; 2014 App State #27 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #52 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #56 of 128; 2014 Idaho #57 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #87 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #88 of 128; 2014 Troy #104 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 109 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #91
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #10 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #19 of 128; 2014 App State #26 of 128; 2014 Texas State #33 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #61 of 128; 2014 Idaho #91 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #95 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #103 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #105 of 128; 2014 Troy #108 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 115 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 91.
Total defensemedian #85
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 App State #25 of 128; 2014 Georgia Southern #57 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #67 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #74 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #85 of 128; 2014 Texas State #101 of 128; 2014 Troy #109 of 128; 2014 Idaho #116 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #117 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #120 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 48 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 85.
Scoring defensemedian #75
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #30 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #57 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #60 of 128; 2014 App State #72 of 128; 2014 Texas State #75 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #92 of 128; 2014 Troy #113 of 128; 2014 Idaho #114 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #121 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 58 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 75.
Point marginmedian #89
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #10 of 128; 2014 App State #36 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #45 of 128; 2014 Texas State #46 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #63 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #89 of 128; 2014 Idaho #114 of 128; 2014 Troy #117 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #119 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 97 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 89.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #18 of 128; 2014 Texas State #25 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #34 of 128; 2014 Troy #41 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #49 of 128; 2014 App State #78 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #108 of 128; 2014 Idaho #117 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #119 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 70 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #24 of 128; 2014 Idaho #29 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #31 of 128; 2014 App State #32 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #59 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #86 of 128; 2014 Troy #91 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #109 of 128; 2014 Texas State #110 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #118 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 73 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 73.
Returning passingmedian #85
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia State #22 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #29 of 128; 2014 Texas State #68 of 128; 2014 Idaho #71 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #91 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #95 of 128; 2014 Troy #111 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #121 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 85 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 85.
Returning receivingmedian #61
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 South Alabama #16 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #37 of 128; 2014 Texas State #57 of 128; 2014 Idaho #61 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #62 of 128; 2014 Troy #83 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #85 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #109 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 59 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 61.
Returning rushingmedian #65
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisiana #7 of 128; 2014 Texas State #29 of 128; 2014 Troy #48 of 128; 2014 Idaho #64 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #65 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #70 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #96 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #105 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 95 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 65.
Team talent
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #70
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #2 of 128; 2014 App State #17 of 128; 2014 Texas State #33 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #45 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #62 of 128; 2014 Troy #70 of 128; 2014 Idaho #81 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #85 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #86 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #109 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 117 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Defensive EPAmedian #80
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 App State #57 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #61 of 128; 2014 Georgia Southern #72 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #78 of 128; 2014 Texas State #80 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #89 of 128; 2014 Troy #115 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #120 of 128; 2014 Idaho #127 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 46 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 80.
Offensive success ratemedian #57
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Southern #6 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #26 of 128; 2014 Texas State #32 of 128; 2014 App State #38 of 128; 2014 Idaho #48 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #57 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #83 of 128; 2014 Troy #85 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #102 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #103 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 107 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 57.
Defensive success ratemedian #77
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 App State #41 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #56 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #61 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #67 of 128; 2014 Idaho #77 of 128; 2014 Texas State #82 of 128; 2014 Georgia Southern #92 of 128; 2014 Troy #116 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #127 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #128 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 38 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 77.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #64
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia State #15 of 128; 2014 App State #26 of 128; 2014 New Mexico State #34 of 128; 2014 Georgia Southern #44 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #49 of 128; 2014 Troy #64 of 128; 2014 Texas State #71 of 128; 2014 Idaho #89 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #105 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #117 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 122 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 64.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #79
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2014, best rank first: 2014 New Mexico State #7 of 128; 2014 Georgia State #31 of 128; 2014 Texas State #33 of 128; 2014 Georgia Southern #42 of 128; 2014 South Alabama #59 of 128; 2014 Arkansas State #79 of 128; 2014 App State #81 of 128; 2014 Troy #95 of 128; 2014 Louisiana #105 of 128; 2014 Idaho #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 UL Monroe, ranked 82 of 128. Sun Belt median rank 79.