Metrics

UTEPMiners

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010UTEP670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 120 teams · 360.4 yds/g · 4,685 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#91 (of 120 teams · 412.6 yds/g allowed · 5,364 yards)#66 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#73 (of 120 teams · -1.5 /g · -19 on the season)#81 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.38 /g)#86 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#109 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.876 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Conference USA teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #5–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #6–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Total defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #15–#120. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#85 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #8–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Point margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #13–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#84 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #1–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#66 (Possession: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #2–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#37 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #10–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#88 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #23–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#19 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #10–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#82 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #10–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #6–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#59 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range #31–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010East Carolina670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 120 teams · 437.6 yds/g · 5,689 yards)#16 (of 120 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 478 points)#120 (of 120 teams · 478.8 yds/g allowed · 6,224 yards)#119 (of 120 teams · 44.0 pts/g allowed · 572 points)#91 (of 120 teams · -7.2 /g · -94 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 21 taken, 30 given · -0.69 /g)#114 (of 120 teams · 16:54 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#83 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.939 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Houston570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#11 (of 120 teams · 480.5 yds/g · 5,766 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 37.7 pts/g · 452 points)#103 (of 120 teams · 432.8 yds/g allowed · 5,194 yards)#96 (of 120 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#46 (of 120 teams · +5.5 /g · +66 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.42 /g)#118 (of 120 teams · 16:24 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#117 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.875 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Marshall570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#103 (of 120 teams · 314.3 yds/g · 3,771 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 250 points)#71 (of 120 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 4,632 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#93 (of 120 teams · -7.9 /g · -95 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 17 taken, 23 given · -0.50 /g)#110 (of 120 teams · 17:14 /g · 3h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 120 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#63 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.920 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Memphis1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#117 (of 120 teams · 285.0 yds/g · 3,420 yards)#119 (of 120 teams · 14.4 pts/g · 173 points)#115 (of 120 teams · 460.7 yds/g allowed · 5,528 yards)#117 (of 120 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 478 points)#119 (of 120 teams · -25.4 /g · -305 on the season)#118 (of 120 teams · -13 on the season · 13 taken, 26 given · -1.08 /g)#74 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 120 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#116 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.998 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Rice480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 120 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,504 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#107 (of 120 teams · 448.8 yds/g allowed · 5,386 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 462 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#99 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.58 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:55 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#99 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010SMU770 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 414.6 yds/g · 5,804 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 360 points)#40 (of 120 teams · 352.9 yds/g allowed · 4,940 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#67 (of 120 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#111 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 15 taken, 27 given · -0.86 /g)#20 (of 120 teams · 19:42 /g · 4h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.140 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#102 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.025 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Southern Miss850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 120 teams · 453.4 yds/g · 5,894 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 479 points)#47 (of 120 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,633 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 384 points)#36 (of 120 teams · +7.3 /g · +95 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 26 taken, 18 given · +0.62 /g)#29 (of 120 teams · 19:23 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 120 teams · -0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 120 teams · 1.038 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Tulane480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 120 teams · 373.3 yds/g · 4,479 yards)#80 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 299 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 390.1 yds/g allowed · 4,681 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 446 points)#104 (of 120 teams · -12.3 /g · -147 on the season)#68 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.17 /g)#22 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.858 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.923 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Tulsa1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 505.6 yds/g · 6,573 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.4 pts/g · 538 points)#111 (of 120 teams · 450.9 yds/g allowed · 5,861 yards)#85 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 394 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +11.1 /g · +144 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +18 on the season · 37 taken, 19 given · +1.38 /g)#66 (of 120 teams · 18:36 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.121 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#82 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 0.995 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.964 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UAB480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 120 teams · 422.8 yds/g · 5,074 yards)#66 (of 120 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#80 (of 120 teams · 398.8 yds/g allowed · 4,786 yards)#95 (of 120 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#85 (of 120 teams · -5.3 /g · -63 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.50 /g)#81 (of 120 teams · 18:02 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#74 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.940 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UCF1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 374.0 yds/g · 5,236 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#15 (of 120 teams · 315.4 yds/g allowed · 4,415 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 240 points)#13 (of 120 teams · +14.9 /g · +209 on the season)#31 (of 120 teams · +6 on the season · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.43 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:47 /g · 4h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#41 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 120 teams · 0.809 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20102010 UTEPConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Tulsa #5 of 120; 2010 Houston #11 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #18 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #25 of 120; 2010 UAB #30 of 120; 2010 SMU #33 of 120; 2010 Rice #63 of 120; 2010 UCF #65 of 120; 2010 Tulane #66 of 120; 2010 Marshall #103 of 120; 2010 Memphis #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 78 of 120. Conference USA median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #52
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Tulsa #6 of 120; 2010 Houston #13 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #15 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #16 of 120; 2010 UCF #31 of 120; 2010 Rice #52 of 120; 2010 UAB #66 of 120; 2010 SMU #74 of 120; 2010 Tulane #80 of 120; 2010 Marshall #101 of 120; 2010 Memphis #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 71 of 120. Conference USA median rank 52.
Total defensemedian #80
Total defense. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UCF #15 of 120; 2010 SMU #40 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #47 of 120; 2010 Marshall #71 of 120; 2010 Tulane #74 of 120; 2010 UAB #80 of 120; 2010 Houston #103 of 120; 2010 Rice #107 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #111 of 120; 2010 Memphis #115 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 91 of 120. Conference USA median rank 80.
Scoring defensemedian #85
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UCF #8 of 120; 2010 SMU #59 of 120; 2010 Marshall #74 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #81 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #85 of 120; 2010 UAB #95 of 120; 2010 Houston #96 of 120; 2010 Tulane #113 of 120; 2010 Rice #114 of 120; 2010 Memphis #117 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 66 of 120. Conference USA median rank 85.
Point marginmedian #73
Point margin. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UCF #13 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #25 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #36 of 120; 2010 Houston #46 of 120; 2010 SMU #67 of 120; 2010 UAB #85 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #91 of 120; 2010 Marshall #93 of 120; 2010 Rice #96 of 120; 2010 Tulane #104 of 120; 2010 Memphis #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 73 of 120. Conference USA median rank 73.
Turnover marginmedian #84
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Tulsa #1 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #22 of 120; 2010 UCF #31 of 120; 2010 Tulane #68 of 120; 2010 Houston #84 of 120; 2010 Marshall #90 of 120; 2010 UAB #90 of 120; 2010 Rice #99 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #106 of 120; 2010 SMU #111 of 120; 2010 Memphis #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 81 of 120. Conference USA median rank 84.
Possessionmedian #66
Possession. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UCF #2 of 120; 2010 SMU #20 of 120; 2010 Tulane #22 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #29 of 120; 2010 Rice #49 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #66 of 120; 2010 Memphis #74 of 120; 2010 UAB #81 of 120; 2010 Marshall #110 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #114 of 120; 2010 Houston #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 86 of 120. Conference USA median rank 66.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 UTEP, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 UTEP, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 UTEP, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 UTEP, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #37
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 SMU #10 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #17 of 120; 2010 Houston #19 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #25 of 120; 2010 UCF #33 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #37 of 120; 2010 UAB #56 of 120; 2010 Rice #65 of 120; 2010 Memphis #89 of 120; 2010 Tulane #92 of 120; 2010 Marshall #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 70 of 120. Conference USA median rank 37.
Defensive EPAmedian #88
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Southern Miss #23 of 120; 2010 UCF #38 of 120; 2010 Marshall #43 of 120; 2010 Tulane #60 of 120; 2010 SMU #73 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #88 of 120; 2010 UAB #95 of 120; 2010 Houston #100 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #104 of 120; 2010 Memphis #107 of 120; 2010 Rice #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 114 of 120. Conference USA median rank 88.
Offensive success ratemedian #19
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UCF #10 of 120; 2010 Houston #14 of 120; 2010 SMU #15 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #17 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #18 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #19 of 120; 2010 UAB #52 of 120; 2010 Tulane #68 of 120; 2010 Rice #71 of 120; 2010 Memphis #99 of 120; 2010 Marshall #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 61 of 120. Conference USA median rank 19.
Defensive success ratemedian #82
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Southern Miss #10 of 120; 2010 UCF #41 of 120; 2010 Tulane #60 of 120; 2010 Marshall #63 of 120; 2010 UAB #74 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #82 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #83 of 120; 2010 Rice #99 of 120; 2010 SMU #102 of 120; 2010 Memphis #116 of 120; 2010 Houston #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 109 of 120. Conference USA median rank 82.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #35
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 SMU #6 of 120; 2010 Memphis #11 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #13 of 120; 2010 UAB #21 of 120; 2010 Rice #32 of 120; 2010 Houston #35 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #43 of 120; 2010 Marshall #44 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #83 of 120; 2010 Tulane #101 of 120; 2010 UCF #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 66 of 120. Conference USA median rank 35.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #59
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Houston #31 of 120; 2010 Memphis #34 of 120; 2010 SMU #35 of 120; 2010 Marshall #56 of 120; 2010 Tulane #59 of 120; 2010 UCF #66 of 120; 2010 East Carolina #68 of 120; 2010 UAB #72 of 120; 2010 Tulsa #88 of 120; 2010 Rice #98 of 120; 2010 Southern Miss #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 UTEP, ranked 32 of 120. Conference USA median rank 59.