Metrics

UTEPMiners

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014UTEP760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#108 (of 128 teams · 350.7 yds/g · 4,559 yards)#84 (of 128 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#40 (of 128 teams · 368.5 yds/g allowed · 4,791 yards)#77 (of 128 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#77 (of 128 teams · -1.5 /g · -19 on the season)#17 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.69 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35:17 /g · 7h 39m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning)#80 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#19 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 128 teams · 0.076 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 128 teams · 0.205 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#46 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 128 teams · 1.007 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.372 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Conference USA teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #2–#123. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#66 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #3–#121. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#55 (Total defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #32–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #18–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#77 (Point margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #2–#124. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #5–#115. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#74 (Possession: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #1–#123. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #24–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#58 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #2–#110. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#78 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #13–#116. 0 of 13 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#80 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #3–#122. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#85 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #16–#126. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#79 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #12–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#65 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #14–#125. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #9–#128. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range #3–#124. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)
2014Florida Atlantic390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#103 (of 128 teams · 363.1 yds/g · 4,357 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 288 points)#114 (of 128 teams · 460.8 yds/g allowed · 5,529 yards)#110 (of 128 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#109 (of 128 teams · -10.4 /g · -125 on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g)#80 (of 128 teams · 29:40 /g · 5h 56m on the season)#24 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#119 (of 128 teams · 0.272 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#117 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 128 teams · 1.110 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Florida International480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#123 (of 128 teams · 293.2 yds/g · 3,518 yards)#101 (of 128 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#36 (of 128 teams · 363.8 yds/g allowed · 4,365 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#81 (of 128 teams · -1.8 /g · -22 on the season)#25 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.58 /g)#42 (of 128 teams · 31:16 /g · 6h 15m on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 128 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 128 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#15 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 128 teams · 1.069 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 128 teams · 1.359 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Louisiana Tech950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 (of 128 teams · 400.8 yds/g · 5,611 yards)#14 (of 128 teams · 37.4 pts/g · 523 points)#35 (of 128 teams · 362.5 yds/g allowed · 5,075 yards)#39 (of 128 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#16 (of 128 teams · +12.6 /g · +177 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +16 on the season · 42 taken, 26 given · +1.14 /g)#74 (of 128 teams · 29:51 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#63 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's passing production returning)#102 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 128 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#14 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 128 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 128 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Marshall1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 559.2 yds/g · 7,829 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 45.6 pts/g · 638 points)#32 (of 128 teams · 357.1 yds/g allowed · 4,999 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +24.6 /g · +344 on the season)#73 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 22 taken, 24 given · -0.14 /g)#96 (of 128 teams · 29:03 /g · 6h 47m on the season)#36 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 128 teams · 0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#59 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Middle Tennessee660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 128 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 5,176 yards)#49 (of 128 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 379 points)#108 (of 128 teams · 452.3 yds/g allowed · 5,427 yards)#96 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#75 (of 128 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#95 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 20 taken, 24 given · -0.33 /g)#84 (of 128 teams · 29:35 /g · 5h 55m on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 128 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 128 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.136 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 128 teams · 1.091 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014North Texas480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#117 (of 128 teams · 326.4 yds/g · 3,917 yards)#79 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 326 points)#43 (of 128 teams · 369.4 yds/g allowed · 4,433 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#85 (of 128 teams · -2.7 /g · -32 on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#51 (of 128 teams · 30:46 /g · 6h 09m on the season)#113 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#111 (of 128 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 128 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#71 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 128 teams · 1.163 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 128 teams · 1.226 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Old Dominion660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 128 teams · 441.9 yds/g · 5,303 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 392 points)#107 (of 128 teams · 452.2 yds/g allowed · 5,426 yards)#115 (of 128 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 456 points)#91 (of 128 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#70 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 19 taken, 20 given · -0.08 /g)#123 (of 128 teams · 26:38 /g · 5h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.260 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 128 teams · 0.298 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#125 (of 128 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 128 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Rice850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 (of 128 teams · 399.2 yds/g · 5,190 yards)#66 (of 128 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 374 points)#55 (of 128 teams · 385.9 yds/g allowed · 5,017 yards)#82 (of 128 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#74 (of 128 teams · +0.3 /g · +4 on the season)#22 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.62 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:21 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#107 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#116 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 128 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 128 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#65 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 128 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 128 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Southern Miss390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#100 (of 128 teams · 365.0 yds/g · 4,380 yards)#117 (of 128 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 228 points)#106 (of 128 teams · 451.4 yds/g allowed · 5,417 yards)#111 (of 128 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#124 (of 128 teams · -16.4 /g · -197 on the season)#115 (of 128 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.83 /g)#85 (of 128 teams · 29:34 /g · 5h 55m on the season)#64 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's passing production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 128 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 128 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#94 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 128 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 128 teams · 1.187 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014UAB660 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 128 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 5,182 yards)#39 (of 128 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 398 points)#75 (of 128 teams · 406.1 yds/g allowed · 4,873 yards)#88 (of 128 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#64 (of 128 teams · +3.3 /g · +39 on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.17 /g)#47 (of 128 teams · 31:07 /g · 6h 13m on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 128 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 128 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#40 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 128 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014UTSA480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#122 (of 128 teams · 297.5 yds/g · 3,570 yards)#121 (of 128 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#44 (of 128 teams · 369.7 yds/g allowed · 4,436 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#105 (of 128 teams · -8.8 /g · -106 on the season)#88 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.25 /g)#26 (of 128 teams · 32:10 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#73 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 128 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 128 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful)#18 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.156 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Western Kentucky850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2014. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 534.6 yds/g · 6,950 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 44.4 pts/g · 577 points)#123 (of 128 teams · 509.9 yds/g allowed · 6,629 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 39.9 pts/g allowed · 519 points)#59 (of 128 teams · +4.5 /g · +58 on the season)#38 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.38 /g)#99 (of 128 teams · 28:57 /g · 6h 16m on the season)#27 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.320 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 128 teams · 0.235 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful)#118 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 128 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 128 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20142014 UTEPConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #2 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #4 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #37 of 128; 2014 UAB #45 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #46 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #65 of 128; 2014 Rice #68 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #100 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #103 of 128; 2014 North Texas #117 of 128; 2014 UTSA #122 of 128; 2014 Florida International #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 108 of 128. Conference USA median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #66
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #3 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #6 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #14 of 128; 2014 UAB #39 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #41 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #49 of 128; 2014 Rice #66 of 128; 2014 North Texas #79 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #97 of 128; 2014 Florida International #101 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #117 of 128; 2014 UTSA #121 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 84 of 128. Conference USA median rank 66.
Total defensemedian #55
Total defense. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #32 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #35 of 128; 2014 Florida International #36 of 128; 2014 North Texas #43 of 128; 2014 UTSA #44 of 128; 2014 Rice #55 of 128; 2014 UAB #75 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #106 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #107 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #108 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #114 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 40 of 128. Conference USA median rank 55.
Scoring defensemedian #86
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #18 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #39 of 128; 2014 Florida International #41 of 128; 2014 UTSA #55 of 128; 2014 Rice #82 of 128; 2014 North Texas #86 of 128; 2014 UAB #88 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #96 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #110 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #111 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #115 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 77 of 128. Conference USA median rank 86.
Point marginmedian #77
Point margin. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #2 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #16 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #59 of 128; 2014 UAB #64 of 128; 2014 Rice #74 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #75 of 128; 2014 Florida International #81 of 128; 2014 North Texas #85 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #91 of 128; 2014 UTSA #105 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #109 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 77 of 128. Conference USA median rank 77.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisiana Tech #5 of 128; 2014 Rice #22 of 128; 2014 Florida International #25 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #38 of 128; 2014 North Texas #60 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #70 of 128; 2014 Marshall #73 of 128; 2014 UAB #78 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #88 of 128; 2014 UTSA #88 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #95 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #115 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 17 of 128. Conference USA median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #74
Possession. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Rice #8 of 128; 2014 UTSA #26 of 128; 2014 Florida International #42 of 128; 2014 UAB #47 of 128; 2014 North Texas #51 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #74 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #80 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #84 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #85 of 128; 2014 Marshall #96 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #99 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 1 of 128. Conference USA median rank 74.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Florida Atlantic #24 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #27 of 128; 2014 Marshall #36 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #63 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #64 of 128; 2014 Florida International #74 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #97 of 128; 2014 UTSA #103 of 128; 2014 Rice #107 of 128; 2014 North Texas #113 of 128; 2014 UAB #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 44 of 128. Conference USA median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #58
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 UTSA #2 of 128; 2014 Florida International #3 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #21 of 128; 2014 UAB #25 of 128; 2014 Marshall #31 of 128; 2014 Rice #58 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #65 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #78 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #102 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #102 of 128; 2014 North Texas #110 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 80 of 128. Conference USA median rank 58.
Returning rushingmedian #78
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisiana Tech #13 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #38 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #61 of 128; 2014 UTSA #73 of 128; 2014 Florida International #78 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #85 of 128; 2014 North Texas #96 of 128; 2014 Marshall #101 of 128; 2014 UAB #109 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #115 of 128; 2014 Rice #116 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 19 of 128. Conference USA median rank 78.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 UTEP, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #80
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #3 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #5 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #16 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #32 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #55 of 128; 2014 Rice #56 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #80 of 128; 2014 UAB #88 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #104 of 128; 2014 North Texas #111 of 128; 2014 Florida International #119 of 128; 2014 UTSA #122 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 97 of 128. Conference USA median rank 80.
Defensive EPAmedian #85
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisiana Tech #16 of 128; 2014 Florida International #17 of 128; 2014 Marshall #19 of 128; 2014 UTSA #44 of 128; 2014 UAB #62 of 128; 2014 North Texas #65 of 128; 2014 Rice #85 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #98 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #99 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #109 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #119 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #126 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 103 of 128. Conference USA median rank 85.
Offensive success ratemedian #79
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Western Kentucky #12 of 128; 2014 Marshall #17 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #28 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #34 of 128; 2014 UAB #52 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #62 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #79 of 128; 2014 Rice #80 of 128; 2014 North Texas #105 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #110 of 128; 2014 Florida International #120 of 128; 2014 UTSA #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 87 of 128. Conference USA median rank 79.
Defensive success ratemedian #65
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisiana Tech #14 of 128; 2014 Florida International #15 of 128; 2014 UTSA #18 of 128; 2014 UAB #40 of 128; 2014 Marshall #59 of 128; 2014 Rice #65 of 128; 2014 North Texas #71 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #94 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #105 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #117 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #118 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 46 of 128. Conference USA median rank 65.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #73
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #9 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #10 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #12 of 128; 2014 Rice #21 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #29 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #47 of 128; 2014 North Texas #73 of 128; 2014 UTSA #75 of 128; 2014 UAB #80 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #90 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #102 of 128; 2014 Florida International #119 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 128 of 128. Conference USA median rank 73.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #93
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Marshall #3 of 128; 2014 Middle Tennessee #19 of 128; 2014 Old Dominion #32 of 128; 2014 Southern Miss #58 of 128; 2014 Florida Atlantic #75 of 128; 2014 North Texas #84 of 128; 2014 UTSA #93 of 128; 2014 Louisiana Tech #94 of 128; 2014 Western Kentucky #111 of 128; 2014 Rice #114 of 128; 2014 UAB #118 of 128; 2014 Florida International #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 UTEP, ranked 124 of 128. Conference USA median rank 93.