THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Virginia TechHokies

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Virginia Tech played 10 such games.

ACC, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Virginia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 74 teams · 329.9 yds/g · 3,299 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 193 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 3,881 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -118 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 4 taken, 11 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 136 teams · 712.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 1.232 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 17 ACC teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#32 (Total offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #11–#70. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring offense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#70. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#44 (Total defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #5–#69. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring defense: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#72. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Point margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#72. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Turnover margin: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#71. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#70. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning passing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#124. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning rushing: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#130. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#40 (Team talent: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#74. 1 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #12–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive EPA: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #7–#71. 3 of 17 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#69. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #4–#62. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #3–#70. 2 of 17 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range #13–#71. 0 of 17 in the top 10.)
2025Miami13–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #11 Notre Dame · postseason: #2 Ohio State, #6 Ole Miss, #7 Texas A&M)#25 (of 74 teams · 399.0 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 281.1 yds/g allowed · 2,811 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.4 /g · +164 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:03 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 136 teams · 874.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Clemson7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 74 teams · 409.1 yds/g · 4,091 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 3,673 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5.3 /g · +53 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:57 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 918.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Duke9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#20 (of 74 teams · 407.6 yds/g · 3,668 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 309 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 422.3 yds/g allowed · 3,801 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 29.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · +4.9 /g · +44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11 in these games · 18 taken, 7 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 29:45 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 136 teams · 669.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 74 teams · 0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.366 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.382 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 74 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 411.4 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · +2.9 /g · +29 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 6 taken, 10 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 136 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 715.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 74 teams · 0.277 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 0.265 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami, #24 James Madison)#31 (of 74 teams · 380.2 yds/g · 3,422 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 318.9 yds/g allowed · 2,870 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +38 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 30:49 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 136 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 136 teams · 700.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 74 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025SMU9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #10 Miami · postseason: #17 Arizona)#16 (of 74 teams · 418.1 yds/g · 4,181 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 325 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 401.8 yds/g allowed · 4,018 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.0 /g · +100 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +10 in these games · 21 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:19 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 136 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 136 teams · 766.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 74 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.443 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Virginia11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 3,747 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.3 pts/g · 273 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 323.7 yds/g allowed · 2,913 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +8.4 /g · +76 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 666.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 74 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.255 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Georgia Tech)#32 (of 74 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,786 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 315 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,622 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +4.2 /g · +42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:31 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 136 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 136 teams · 681.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wake Forest9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia)#49 (of 74 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 2,734 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 179 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 338.6 yds/g allowed · 2,709 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -4.0 /g · -32 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 9 taken, 15 given · -0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 136 teams · 627.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 74 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025California7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 74 teams · 339.9 yds/g · 3,059 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 25.4 pts/g · 229 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 386.9 yds/g allowed · 3,482 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · -4.1 /g · -37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +0 in these games · 10 taken, 10 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 30:13 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#130 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 726.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 74 teams · 0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.203 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Florida State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Alabama)#18 (of 74 teams · 416.3 yds/g · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 354.6 yds/g allowed · 3,546 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 136 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 828.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.175 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025NC State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Virginia, #22 Georgia Tech)#36 (of 74 teams · 373.9 yds/g · 3,739 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 445.9 yds/g allowed · 4,459 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · -3.7 /g · -37 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:17 /g · 5h 03m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 136 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 136 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 707.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.245 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.407 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025North Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 285.4 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 170 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 356.8 yds/g allowed · 3,568 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · -11.5 /g · -115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · -7 in these games · 7 taken, 14 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:56 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 136 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 136 teams · 753.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 74 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Boston College2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 74 teams · 365.9 yds/g · 3,659 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 458.9 yds/g allowed · 4,589 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 34.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · -12.9 /g · -129 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 136 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 650.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 74 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Stanford4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 292.3 yds/g · 2,923 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 17.6 pts/g · 176 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 407.3 yds/g allowed · 4,073 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 298 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · -12.2 /g · -122 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -4 in these games · 11 taken, 15 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 136 teams · 707.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.057 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 0.196 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Syracuse3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 17 ACC teams in 2025. Range 0–3.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 300.1 yds/g · 3,001 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 149 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 431.2 yds/g allowed · 4,312 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 375 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -22.6 /g · -226 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -12 in these games · 7 taken, 19 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 31:15 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#124 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 136 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 136 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 136 teams · 727.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 1.166 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20252025 Virginia TechACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #32
Total offense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #11 of 74; 2025 SMU #16 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Florida State #18 of 74; 2025 Clemson #19 of 74; 2025 Duke #20 of 74; 2025 Miami #25 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #32 of 74; 2025 NC State #36 of 74; 2025 Boston College #42 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #49 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #66 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 55 of 74. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring offensemedian #31
Scoring offense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Duke #7 of 74; 2025 SMU #12 of 74; 2025 Miami #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #14 of 74; 2025 Virginia #19 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #24 of 74; 2025 NC State #26 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 Louisville #31 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 Florida State #41 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #48 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 Stanford #67 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #68 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 58 of 74. ACC median rank 31.
Total defensemedian #44
Total defense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #5 of 74; 2025 Louisville #9 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #18 of 74; 2025 Florida State #25 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #26 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #29 of 74; 2025 Clemson #30 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 SMU #49 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #55 of 74; 2025 Duke #59 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #61 of 74; 2025 NC State #67 of 74; 2025 Boston College #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 45 of 74. ACC median rank 44.
Scoring defensemedian #46
Scoring defense. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 Clemson #18 of 74; 2025 SMU #20 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Florida State #33 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #38 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #50 of 74; 2025 Duke #51 of 74; 2025 California #52 of 74; 2025 Stanford #54 of 74; 2025 NC State #58 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 56 of 74. ACC median rank 46.
Point marginmedian #36
Point margin. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #15 of 74; 2025 Clemson #20 of 74; 2025 Duke #21 of 74; 2025 Louisville #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #23 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #30 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 NC State #44 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #45 of 74; 2025 California #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #58 of 74; 2025 Stanford #62 of 74; 2025 Boston College #63 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 61 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Turnover marginmedian #40
Turnover margin. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Duke #4 of 74; 2025 SMU #7 of 74; 2025 Miami #13 of 74; 2025 Louisville #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #17 of 74; 2025 NC State #22 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #22 of 74; 2025 California #37 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #53 of 74; 2025 Stanford #53 of 74; 2025 Florida State #57 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #60 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #64 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 60 of 74. ACC median rank 40.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #3 of 74; 2025 Virginia #13 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2025 Louisville #24 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #32 of 74; 2025 NC State #34 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Duke #42 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #46 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #47 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #55 of 74; 2025 Boston College #62 of 74; 2025 Florida State #66 of 74; 2025 SMU #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 59 of 74. ACC median rank 42.
Returning passingmedian #80
Returning passing. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #1 of 136; 2025 SMU #35 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #37 of 136; 2025 NC State #41 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #52 of 136; 2025 Boston College #57 of 136; 2025 Florida State #65 of 136; 2025 Stanford #80 of 136; 2025 Duke #87 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #97 of 136; 2025 Miami #98 of 136; 2025 California #100 of 136; 2025 Virginia #118 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #124 of 136; 2025 Louisville #127 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 38 of 136. ACC median rank 80.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Boston College #10 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #13 of 136; 2025 NC State #14 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 Louisville #39 of 136; 2025 Duke #50 of 136; 2025 SMU #60 of 136; 2025 Stanford #66 of 136; 2025 Virginia #71 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #89 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #96 of 136; 2025 Florida State #97 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #103 of 136; 2025 California #118 of 136; 2025 Miami #124 of 136. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 78 of 136. ACC median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #55
Returning rushing. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Wake Forest #7 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #8 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #11 of 136; 2025 Louisville #16 of 136; 2025 Stanford #47 of 136; 2025 Clemson #48 of 136; 2025 NC State #51 of 136; 2025 Florida State #54 of 136; 2025 Miami #55 of 136; 2025 Duke #74 of 136; 2025 Virginia #76 of 136; 2025 Boston College #81 of 136; 2025 SMU #91 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #94 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #97 of 136; 2025 California #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 68 of 136. ACC median rank 55.
Team talentmedian #40
Team talent. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Clemson #7 of 136; 2025 Miami #15 of 136; 2025 Florida State #19 of 136; 2025 SMU #25 of 136; 2025 North Carolina #31 of 136; 2025 Syracuse #34 of 136; 2025 California #36 of 136; 2025 Georgia Tech #39 of 136; 2025 NC State #45 of 136; 2025 Stanford #46 of 136; 2025 Louisville #50 of 136; 2025 Pittsburgh #56 of 136; 2025 Duke #58 of 136; 2025 Virginia #62 of 136; 2025 Boston College #69 of 136; 2025 Wake Forest #74 of 136. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 40 of 136. ACC median rank 40.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #12 of 74; 2025 SMU #14 of 74; 2025 Duke #15 of 74; 2025 Miami #18 of 74; 2025 NC State #19 of 74; 2025 Florida State #24 of 74; 2025 Clemson #29 of 74; 2025 Virginia #33 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #36 of 74; 2025 Louisville #39 of 74; 2025 California #44 of 74; 2025 Boston College #48 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #58 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #61 of 74; 2025 Stanford #68 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 37 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #37
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #7 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #8 of 74; 2025 Virginia #10 of 74; 2025 SMU #11 of 74; 2025 Louisville #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #19 of 74; 2025 Clemson #22 of 74; 2025 Florida State #36 of 74; 2025 Stanford #37 of 74; 2025 California #40 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #43 of 74; 2025 NC State #60 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #61 of 74; 2025 Duke #62 of 74; 2025 Boston College #66 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 65 of 74. ACC median rank 37.
Offensive success ratemedian #42
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Georgia Tech #3 of 74; 2025 Miami #9 of 74; 2025 Duke #22 of 74; 2025 Louisville #23 of 74; 2025 Florida State #30 of 74; 2025 Clemson #32 of 74; 2025 Boston College #38 of 74; 2025 NC State #39 of 74; 2025 SMU #42 of 74; 2025 Virginia #47 of 74; 2025 California #50 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #57 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #60 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #64 of 74; 2025 Stanford #66 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 50 of 74. ACC median rank 42.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Miami #4 of 74; 2025 Louisville #10 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #11 of 74; 2025 Virginia #12 of 74; 2025 Clemson #14 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #17 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 NC State #31 of 74; 2025 Stanford #32 of 74; 2025 California #33 of 74; 2025 Florida State #34 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #39 of 74; 2025 Duke #46 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #49 of 74; 2025 Boston College #52 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #62 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 54 of 74. ACC median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 SMU #3 of 74; 2025 Duke #10 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #12 of 74; 2025 NC State #13 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #14 of 74; 2025 Florida State #17 of 74; 2025 Virginia #18 of 74; 2025 California #36 of 74; 2025 Clemson #40 of 74; 2025 Boston College #46 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #52 of 74; 2025 Louisville #53 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #57 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #67 of 74; 2025 Miami #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 34 of 74. ACC median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #47
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Florida State #13 of 74; 2025 Louisville #21 of 74; 2025 North Carolina #24 of 74; 2025 SMU #27 of 74; 2025 Wake Forest #29 of 74; 2025 Virginia #40 of 74; 2025 Georgia Tech #46 of 74; 2025 California #47 of 74; 2025 Pittsburgh #50 of 74; 2025 Miami #51 of 74; 2025 Stanford #57 of 74; 2025 Clemson #61 of 74; 2025 Syracuse #64 of 74; 2025 Boston College #65 of 74; 2025 Duke #69 of 74; 2025 NC State #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Virginia Tech, ranked 32 of 74. ACC median rank 47.