THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Wake ForestDemon Deacons

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

ACC, 2012

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Wake Forest5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 301.3 yds/g · 3,616 yds)#116 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 222 points)#91 (of 124 teams · 432.8 yds/g allowed · 5,194 yds)#93 (of 124 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#114 (of 124 teams · -13.3 /g · -160 on the season)#26 (of 124 teams · +8 on the season · 23 taken, 15 given · +0.67 /g)#75 (of 124 teams · 30:05 /g · 6h 01m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 124 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 36% of plays successful)#71 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#48 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #9–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #6–#116. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#59 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #6–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #3–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #26–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #4–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #4–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #8–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2012Florida State12–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 124 teams · 470.8 yds/g · 6,591 yds)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 550 points)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 253.8 yds/g allowed · 3,553 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 14.7 pts/g allowed · 206 points)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +24.6 /g · +344 on the season)#96 (of 124 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.57 /g)#13 (of 124 teams · 33:06 /g · 7h 43m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 50% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 124 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Clemson11–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 512.7 yds/g · 6,665 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 533 points)#64 (of 124 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,154 yds)#48 (of 124 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16.1 /g · +210 on the season)#58 (of 124 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#99 (of 124 teams · 28:50 /g · 6h 15m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 124 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 124 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#32 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#20 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#124 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.110 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Georgia Tech7–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 124 teams · 441.1 yds/g · 6,175 yds)#34 (of 124 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 470 points)#44 (of 124 teams · 374.0 yds/g allowed · 5,236 yds)#65 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#51 (of 124 teams · +5.3 /g · +74 on the season)#47 (of 124 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.29 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34:04 /g · 7h 57m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 124 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#20 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#60 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.878 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 124 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012North Carolina8–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 124 teams · 485.6 yds/g · 5,827 yds)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 40.6 pts/g · 487 points)#59 (of 124 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 4,675 yds)#53 (of 124 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#11 (of 124 teams · +14.9 /g · +179 on the season)#31 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.58 /g)#112 (of 124 teams · 27:50 /g · 5h 34m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 124 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 124 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#19 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#21 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 124 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 124 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Boston College2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 124 teams · 349.0 yds/g · 4,188 yds)#111 (of 124 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 238 points)#103 (of 124 teams · 455.6 yds/g allowed · 5,467 yds)#76 (of 124 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#105 (of 124 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#90 (of 124 teams · -5 on the season · 19 taken, 24 given · -0.42 /g)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 26:50 /g · 5h 22m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 124 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 124 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#104 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#109 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 124 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.831 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Duke6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 124 teams · 409.1 yds/g · 5,319 yds)#44 (of 124 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points)#109 (of 124 teams · 469.1 yds/g allowed · 6,099 yds)#110 (of 124 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 468 points)#86 (of 124 teams · -4.5 /g · -58 on the season)#52 (of 124 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.15 /g)#46 (of 124 teams · 31:16 /g · 6h 46m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 124 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#77 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#103 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 124 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 124 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 5,475 yds)#71 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 365 points)#70 (of 124 teams · 404.7 yds/g allowed · 5,261 yds)#52 (of 124 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#61 (of 124 teams · +2.5 /g · +32 on the season)#102 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 24 taken, 33 given · -0.69 /g)#65 (of 124 teams · 30:28 /g · 6h 36m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 124 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#79 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#15 (of 124 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 124 teams · 0.954 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.978 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 124 teams · 396.5 yds/g · 4,758 yds)#95 (of 124 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#29 (of 124 teams · 353.3 yds/g allowed · 4,240 yds)#71 (of 124 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#91 (of 124 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#114 (of 124 teams · -14 on the season · 12 taken, 26 given · -1.17 /g)#12 (of 124 teams · 33:06 /g · 6h 37m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 124 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 124 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#90 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#29 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 124 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 124 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 124 teams · 376.8 yds/g · 4,898 yds)#83 (of 124 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 326 points)#19 (of 124 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 4,326 yds)#32 (of 124 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#63 (of 124 teams · +2.2 /g · +29 on the season)#82 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.31 /g)#70 (of 124 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 32m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#113 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 124 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Miami7–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 124 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 5,282 yds)#49 (of 124 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 377 points)#120 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 486.4 yds/g allowed · 5,837 yds)#84 (of 124 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#68 (of 124 teams · +0.9 /g · +11 on the season)#31 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 22 taken, 15 given · +0.58 /g)#109 (of 124 teams · 28:02 /g · 5h 36m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 124 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 124 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#70 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#112 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 124 teams · 0.886 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#123 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 284.8 yds/g · 3,417 yds)#109 (of 124 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 241 points)#22 (of 124 teams · 336.8 yds/g allowed · 4,042 yds)#56 (of 124 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#98 (of 124 teams · -7.1 /g · -85 on the season)#100 (of 124 teams · -8 on the season · 21 taken, 29 given · -0.67 /g)#30 (of 124 teams · 31:59 /g · 6h 24m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 124 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#124 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 33% of plays successful)#38 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.054 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 124 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20122012 Wake ForestACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #48
Total offense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Clemson #9 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #14 of 124; 2012 Florida State #19 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #35 of 124; 2012 Miami #37 of 124; 2012 NC State #48 of 124; 2012 Duke #55 of 124; 2012 Virginia #62 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #83 of 124; 2012 Boston College #101 of 124; 2012 Maryland #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 120 of 124. ACC median rank 48.
Scoring offensemedian #49
Scoring offense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Clemson #6 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #8 of 124; 2012 Florida State #10 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #34 of 124; 2012 Duke #44 of 124; 2012 Miami #49 of 124; 2012 NC State #71 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #83 of 124; 2012 Virginia #95 of 124; 2012 Maryland #109 of 124; 2012 Boston College #111 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 116 of 124. ACC median rank 49.
Total defensemedian #59
Total defense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #2 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #19 of 124; 2012 Maryland #22 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #44 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #59 of 124; 2012 Clemson #64 of 124; 2012 NC State #70 of 124; 2012 Boston College #103 of 124; 2012 Duke #109 of 124; 2012 Miami #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 91 of 124. ACC median rank 59.
Scoring defensemedian #56
Scoring defense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #6 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #32 of 124; 2012 Clemson #48 of 124; 2012 NC State #52 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #53 of 124; 2012 Maryland #56 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #65 of 124; 2012 Virginia #71 of 124; 2012 Boston College #76 of 124; 2012 Miami #84 of 124; 2012 Duke #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 93 of 124. ACC median rank 56.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #3 of 124; 2012 Clemson #10 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #11 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #51 of 124; 2012 NC State #61 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #63 of 124; 2012 Miami #68 of 124; 2012 Duke #86 of 124; 2012 Virginia #91 of 124; 2012 Maryland #98 of 124; 2012 Boston College #105 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 114 of 124. ACC median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #58
Turnover margin. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Miami #31 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #31 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #47 of 124; 2012 Duke #52 of 124; 2012 Clemson #58 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #82 of 124; 2012 Boston College #90 of 124; 2012 Florida State #96 of 124; 2012 Maryland #100 of 124; 2012 NC State #102 of 124; 2012 Virginia #114 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 26 of 124. ACC median rank 58.
Possessionmedian #65
Possession. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Georgia Tech #4 of 124; 2012 Virginia #12 of 124; 2012 Florida State #13 of 124; 2012 Maryland #30 of 124; 2012 Duke #46 of 124; 2012 NC State #65 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #70 of 124; 2012 Clemson #99 of 124; 2012 Miami #109 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #112 of 124; 2012 Boston College #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 75 of 124. ACC median rank 65.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #4 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #11 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #18 of 124; 2012 Clemson #22 of 124; 2012 Virginia #66 of 124; 2012 Miami #77 of 124; 2012 Duke #84 of 124; 2012 NC State #96 of 124; 2012 Boston College #97 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #119 of 124; 2012 Maryland #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 120 of 124. ACC median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #2 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #3 of 124; 2012 NC State #20 of 124; 2012 Virginia #23 of 124; 2012 Maryland #25 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #35 of 124; 2012 Clemson #39 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #68 of 124; 2012 Boston College #73 of 124; 2012 Duke #105 of 124; 2012 Miami #109 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 87 of 124. ACC median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #77
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #2 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #19 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #20 of 124; 2012 Clemson #32 of 124; 2012 Miami #70 of 124; 2012 Duke #77 of 124; 2012 NC State #79 of 124; 2012 Virginia #90 of 124; 2012 Boston College #104 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #113 of 124; 2012 Maryland #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 119 of 124. ACC median rank 77.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Florida State #2 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #4 of 124; 2012 NC State #15 of 124; 2012 Clemson #20 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #21 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Maryland #38 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #60 of 124; 2012 Duke #103 of 124; 2012 Boston College #109 of 124; 2012 Miami #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 71 of 124. ACC median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Maryland #2 of 124; 2012 Boston College #15 of 124; 2012 Miami #32 of 124; 2012 Virginia #33 of 124; 2012 Clemson #40 of 124; 2012 NC State #41 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #69 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #91 of 124; 2012 Florida State #102 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #105 of 124; 2012 Duke #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 88 of 124. ACC median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #52
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Boston College #8 of 124; 2012 Florida State #26 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Miami #30 of 124; 2012 Maryland #38 of 124; 2012 Duke #52 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #86 of 124; 2012 NC State #96 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #106 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #117 of 124; 2012 Clemson #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Wake Forest, ranked 105 of 124. ACC median rank 52.