THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Wake ForestDemon Deacons

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2014, released in week 16.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Wake Forest played 8 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2014

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Wake Forest3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 193.0 yds/g · 1,544 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 12.1 pts/g · 97 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 399.8 yds/g allowed · 3,198 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -17.4 /g · -139 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 31:16 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 1.191 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)2 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#18 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #2–#61. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#63. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #2–#57. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#50. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#41. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#54. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #2–#61. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#123. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#124. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#72 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#125. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#15 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#64. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#23 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #3–#54. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#62. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#25 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #1–#69. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#28 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #4–#75. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range #5–#70. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)
2014Michigan State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 484.9 yds/g · 4,364 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 343 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 317.4 yds/g allowed · 2,857 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +15.4 /g · +139 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 21 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34:02 /g · 5h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 1.287 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Alabama12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Mississippi State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Mississippi State, #16 Missouri, #19 Auburn, #23 LSU)#17 (of 76 teams · 454.8 yds/g · 4,093 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 347.4 yds/g allowed · 3,127 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.6 /g · +122 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · +1 in these games · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 32:42 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.285 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.365 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Oregon13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #10 Arizona · postseason: #3 Florida State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #10 Arizona, #14 UCLA, #22 Utah · postseason: #3 Florida State)#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 524.5 yds/g · 5,245 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 44.1 pts/g · 441 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 434.6 yds/g allowed · 4,346 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +18.9 /g · +189 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +12 in these games · 19 taken, 7 given · +1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.399 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.400 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Baylor11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 TCU)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 TCU, #11 Kansas State)#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 557.0 yds/g · 5,013 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 45.3 pts/g · 408 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 416.6 yds/g allowed · 3,749 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.1 /g · +145 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +11 in these games · 19 taken, 8 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 30:02 /g · 4h 30m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.273 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Georgia10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 Missouri, #17 Clemson, #19 Auburn · postseason: #21 Louisville)#23 (of 76 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 4,332 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 379 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.3 /g · +133 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13 in these games · 22 taken, 9 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.274 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 0.175 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #25 Minnesota · postseason: #19 Auburn)#16 (of 76 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 318 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 271.8 yds/g allowed · 2,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.3 /g · +147 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · -3 in these games · 11 taken, 14 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Auburn8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss, #11 Kansas State, #23 LSU)#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 502.0 yds/g · 4,518 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 3,786 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · +2.1 /g · +19 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 31:49 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014TCU12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Ole Miss)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Kansas State, #25 Minnesota · postseason: #9 Ole Miss)#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 533.7 yds/g · 5,337 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 45.8 pts/g · 458 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 392.6 yds/g allowed · 3,926 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +22.8 /g · +228 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +15 in these games · 31 taken, 16 given · +1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 30:06 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 76 teams · 0.254 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.384 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Georgia Tech11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Mississippi State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #13 Georgia, #17 Clemson · postseason: #7 Mississippi State)#14 (of 76 teams · 469.6 yds/g · 4,226 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 36.4 pts/g · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 387.1 yds/g allowed · 3,484 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.0 /g · +117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 23 taken, 13 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34:30 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.329 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 52% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Clemson10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Louisville)#37 (of 76 teams · 382.9 yds/g · 3,829 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 291.6 yds/g allowed · 2,916 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · +5.6 /g · +56 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 32:23 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 76 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 76 teams · 381.6 yds/g · 3,816 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 291 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 302.2 yds/g allowed · 3,022 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · +6.9 /g · +69 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 32:55 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 76 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 76 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Ohio State14–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #18 Wisconsin, #25 Minnesota · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)#12 (of 76 teams · 475.9 yds/g · 4,283 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 379 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 3,068 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 31:16 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 76 teams · 0.263 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 1.295 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Ole Miss9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Alabama, #7 Mississippi State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Alabama, #7 Mississippi State, #20 Boise State)#33 (of 76 teams · 405.1 yds/g · 3,241 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 202 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 359.1 yds/g allowed · 2,873 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · +8.4 /g · +67 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.50 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 30:03 /g · 4h 00m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 76 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 1.291 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.064 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Arizona State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah, #24 USC)#30 (of 76 teams · 416.7 yds/g · 4,167 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 437.7 yds/g allowed · 4,377 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · +4.6 /g · +46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 76 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.410 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 1.354 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Missouri11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Minnesota)#50 (of 76 teams · 352.7 yds/g · 3,174 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 218 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 322.3 yds/g allowed · 2,901 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · +3.8 /g · +34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 29:47 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 76 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014LSU8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss, #18 Wisconsin)#58 (of 76 teams · 342.4 yds/g · 3,082 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 181 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 344.1 yds/g allowed · 3,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · -1.0 /g · -9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33:31 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 76 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Florida State13–13 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech, #17 Clemson, #21 Louisville)#26 (of 76 teams · 424.4 yds/g · 4,669 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 378 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 375.6 yds/g allowed · 4,131 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · +11.4 /g · +126 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · -4 in these games · 23 taken, 27 given · -0.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 30:52 /g · 5h 40m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 76 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 1.219 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Mississippi State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Auburn, #23 LSU)#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 496.8 yds/g · 3,974 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 270 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 424.6 yds/g allowed · 3,397 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · +11.3 /g · +90 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 31:47 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 76 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 50% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Kansas State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 76 teams · 418.3 yds/g · 4,183 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 378.0 yds/g allowed · 3,780 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · +10.0 /g · +100 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 19 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 32:19 /g · 5h 23m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 76 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 UCLA, #24 USC)#61 (of 76 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 3,382 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 416.2 yds/g allowed · 4,162 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · -2.6 /g · -26 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 76 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014USC9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)#24 (of 76 teams · 430.2 yds/g · 4,732 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 369 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,461 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · +8.8 /g · +97 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.82 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 30:09 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 76 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.363 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014UCLA10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Arizona, #15 Arizona State, #24 USC · postseason: #11 Kansas State)#15 (of 76 teams · 461.4 yds/g · 5,075 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 353 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 394.8 yds/g allowed · 4,343 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · +5.3 /g · +58 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 29:16 /g · 5h 22m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 76 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Boise State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Arizona)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Arizona)— (399.0 yds/g · 399 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.0 pts/g · 13 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (458.0 yds/g allowed · 458 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35.0 pts/g allowed · 35 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-22.0 /g · -22 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 3 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:40 /g · 0h 36m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#69 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.110 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2014Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 76 teams · 355.1 yds/g · 3,196 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 360.4 yds/g allowed · 3,244 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · +2.3 /g · +21 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 17 taken, 13 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 31:53 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 76 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Arizona10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2014's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oregon)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oregon, #15 Arizona State, #22 Utah)#18 (of 76 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 4,027 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 451.9 yds/g allowed · 4,067 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · +8.8 /g · +79 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 28:49 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 76 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 1.305 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20142014 Wake ForestCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #18
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Baylor #2 of 76; 2014 TCU #3 of 76; 2014 Oregon #4 of 76; 2014 Auburn #6 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #7 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #10 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #12 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #14 of 76; 2014 UCLA #15 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #16 of 76; 2014 Alabama #17 of 76; 2014 Arizona #18 of 76; 2014 Georgia #23 of 76; 2014 USC #24 of 76; 2014 Florida State #26 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #29 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #30 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #33 of 76; 2014 Clemson #37 of 76; 2014 Louisville #38 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #49 of 76; 2014 Missouri #50 of 76; 2014 LSU #58 of 76; 2014 Utah #61 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 75 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Scoring offensemedian #17
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Baylor #2 of 76; 2014 Oregon #3 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #4 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Georgia #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #11 of 76; 2014 Arizona #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 Florida State #14 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #16 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #17 of 76; 2014 USC #18 of 76; 2014 Alabama #19 of 76; 2014 Auburn #20 of 76; 2014 UCLA #22 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #23 of 76; 2014 Louisville #31 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #35 of 76; 2014 Clemson #39 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #40 of 76; 2014 Utah #42 of 76; 2014 Missouri #47 of 76; 2014 LSU #63 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 74 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Wisconsin #2 of 76; 2014 Clemson #4 of 76; 2014 Louisville #5 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Missouri #8 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #14 of 76; 2014 LSU #15 of 76; 2014 Alabama #16 of 76; 2014 Georgia #19 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #21 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #22 of 76; 2014 Florida State #24 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #25 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #30 of 76; 2014 TCU #32 of 76; 2014 UCLA #34 of 76; 2014 USC #41 of 76; 2014 Utah #44 of 76; 2014 Baylor #45 of 76; 2014 Auburn #47 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #49 of 76; 2014 Oregon #52 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #53 of 76; 2014 Arizona #57 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 37 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #18
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ole Miss #1 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #2 of 76; 2014 Alabama #4 of 76; 2014 Clemson #5 of 76; 2014 Missouri #6 of 76; 2014 LSU #8 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #10 of 76; 2014 Louisville #11 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #12 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #13 of 76; 2014 Florida State #17 of 76; 2014 TCU #18 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #20 of 76; 2014 Georgia #23 of 76; 2014 USC #25 of 76; 2014 Oregon #27 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #30 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #30 of 76; 2014 UCLA #35 of 76; 2014 Arizona #36 of 76; 2014 Utah #39 of 76; 2014 Baylor #46 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #47 of 76; 2014 Auburn #50 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 47 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Point marginmedian #13
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Oregon #2 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #3 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #4 of 76; 2014 Baylor #6 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Alabama #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #10 of 76; 2014 Florida State #11 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #12 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #13 of 76; 2014 USC #15 of 76; 2014 Arizona #16 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #18 of 76; 2014 Louisville #19 of 76; 2014 Clemson #22 of 76; 2014 UCLA #23 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #24 of 76; 2014 Missouri #27 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #30 of 76; 2014 Auburn #31 of 76; 2014 LSU #38 of 76; 2014 Utah #41 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 68 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Turnover marginmedian #16
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Georgia #2 of 76; 2014 Baylor #3 of 76; 2014 Oregon #4 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #5 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #6 of 76; 2014 Arizona #6 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #6 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #6 of 76; 2014 USC #12 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #13 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #16 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #17 of 76; 2014 Utah #19 of 76; 2014 Missouri #20 of 76; 2014 Louisville #21 of 76; 2014 LSU #25 of 76; 2014 Alabama #27 of 76; 2014 UCLA #29 of 76; 2014 Clemson #29 of 76; 2014 Auburn #29 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #43 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #53 of 76; 2014 Florida State #54 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 43 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Possessionmedian #24
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #2 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #4 of 76; 2014 LSU #7 of 76; 2014 Louisville #9 of 76; 2014 Alabama #10 of 76; 2014 Clemson #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #15 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #17 of 76; 2014 Auburn #19 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #21 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #24 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 USC #35 of 76; 2014 TCU #36 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #38 of 76; 2014 Baylor #39 of 76; 2014 Missouri #42 of 76; 2014 Utah #50 of 76; 2014 UCLA #51 of 76; 2014 Georgia #53 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #54 of 76; 2014 Arizona #56 of 76; 2014 Oregon #61 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 24 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 24.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Florida State #1 of 128; 2014 Auburn #1 of 128; 2014 Utah #1 of 128; 2014 Baylor #15 of 128; 2014 UCLA #16 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #26 of 128; 2014 Oregon #28 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2014 USC #40 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #41 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #46 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #51 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #54 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #55 of 128; 2014 Boise State #69 of 128; 2014 TCU #75 of 128; 2014 Missouri #82 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #83 of 128; 2014 Georgia #88 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #100 of 128; 2014 LSU #102 of 128; 2014 Alabama #104 of 128; 2014 Louisville #116 of 128; 2014 Arizona #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 106 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Auburn #5 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #11 of 128; 2014 Alabama #23 of 128; 2014 Baylor #29 of 128; 2014 UCLA #30 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #38 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #42 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #46 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #48 of 128; 2014 Georgia #50 of 128; 2014 Boise State #51 of 128; 2014 Louisville #66 of 128; 2014 Arizona #67 of 128; 2014 TCU #72 of 128; 2014 USC #76 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #78 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #82 of 128; 2014 Oregon #84 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Utah #106 of 128; 2014 Florida State #119 of 128; 2014 Missouri #121 of 128; 2014 LSU #123 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 100 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #72
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Alabama #16 of 128; 2014 Georgia #27 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #28 of 128; 2014 UCLA #30 of 128; 2014 Oregon #36 of 128; 2014 Boise State #42 of 128; 2014 TCU #44 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #48 of 128; 2014 USC #53 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #58 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #70 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #72 of 128; 2014 Louisville #74 of 128; 2014 Baylor #79 of 128; 2014 Auburn #84 of 128; 2014 Missouri #85 of 128; 2014 Utah #87 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #90 of 128; 2014 Florida State #93 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #99 of 128; 2014 LSU #106 of 128; 2014 Clemson #110 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #119 of 128; 2014 Arizona #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 101 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 72.
Team talent
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #15
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Oregon #1 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #3 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #4 of 76; 2014 Alabama #6 of 76; 2014 Auburn #7 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Baylor #10 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #11 of 76; 2014 TCU #12 of 76; 2014 Florida State #13 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #15 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #16 of 76; 2014 USC #19 of 76; 2014 Arizona #26 of 76; 2014 UCLA #28 of 76; 2014 Louisville #30 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #33 of 76; 2014 Missouri #38 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #41 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #42 of 76; 2014 Clemson #49 of 76; 2014 LSU #59 of 76; 2014 Utah #64 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 75 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Defensive EPAmedian #23
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisville #3 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #5 of 76; 2014 Missouri #6 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #7 of 76; 2014 Clemson #8 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #9 of 76; 2014 Alabama #10 of 76; 2014 TCU #13 of 76; 2014 Florida State #16 of 76; 2014 LSU #18 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #19 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #23 of 76; 2014 Utah #24 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #25 of 76; 2014 UCLA #27 of 76; 2014 USC #35 of 76; 2014 Arizona #36 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #37 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #39 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #41 of 76; 2014 Baylor #46 of 76; 2014 Oregon #50 of 76; 2014 Georgia #52 of 76; 2014 Auburn #54 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 44 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 23.
Offensive success ratemedian #16
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #1 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #3 of 76; 2014 Baylor #4 of 76; 2014 Oregon #6 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #7 of 76; 2014 Auburn #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #11 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 TCU #14 of 76; 2014 UCLA #16 of 76; 2014 Alabama #19 of 76; 2014 Florida State #21 of 76; 2014 USC #25 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #33 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #37 of 76; 2014 Missouri #44 of 76; 2014 Louisville #46 of 76; 2014 Arizona #48 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #51 of 76; 2014 Clemson #52 of 76; 2014 LSU #61 of 76; 2014 Utah #62 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 74 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Defensive success ratemedian #25
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisville #1 of 76; 2014 Clemson #2 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #3 of 76; 2014 TCU #5 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #6 of 76; 2014 Alabama #7 of 76; 2014 LSU #10 of 76; 2014 Missouri #13 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #16 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #22 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #24 of 76; 2014 Utah #25 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #27 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 UCLA #31 of 76; 2014 Arizona #32 of 76; 2014 Baylor #35 of 76; 2014 Oregon #37 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #38 of 76; 2014 USC #42 of 76; 2014 Georgia #49 of 76; 2014 Auburn #52 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #61 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #69 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 14 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 25.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #28
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Arizona State #4 of 76; 2014 Oregon #6 of 76; 2014 Alabama #8 of 76; 2014 USC #9 of 76; 2014 Florida State #10 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #11 of 76; 2014 Arizona #14 of 76; 2014 TCU #18 of 76; 2014 Louisville #19 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #24 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #27 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #28 of 76; 2014 Missouri #30 of 76; 2014 Auburn #31 of 76; 2014 Georgia #37 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #39 of 76; 2014 Clemson #41 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #54 of 76; 2014 LSU #55 of 76; 2014 Baylor #58 of 76; 2014 Utah #62 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #65 of 76; 2014 UCLA #69 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #75 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 56 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 28.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #38
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ole Miss #5 of 76; 2014 UCLA #9 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #14 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #16 of 76; 2014 Georgia #18 of 76; 2014 USC #23 of 76; 2014 Missouri #27 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #35 of 76; 2014 Oregon #36 of 76; 2014 Alabama #37 of 76; 2014 LSU #38 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #45 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #46 of 76; 2014 Louisville #48 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #51 of 76; 2014 Arizona #53 of 76; 2014 Auburn #56 of 76; 2014 Baylor #58 of 76; 2014 Utah #60 of 76; 2014 Clemson #65 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #66 of 76; 2014 TCU #69 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #70 of 76. Marked: 2014 Wake Forest, ranked 71 of 76. CFP Top 25 median rank 38.