THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Washington StateCougars

Season
‹

Pac-12

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Washington State played 3 such games.

Pac-12, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Washington State1–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 247.7 yds/g · 743 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 13.7 pts/g · 41 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 445.3 yds/g allowed · 1,336 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 92 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -17.0 /g · -51 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -3 in these games · 3 taken, 6 given · -1.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 27:27 /g · 1h 22m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 630.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.093 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 0.187 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 30% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 1.254 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 8 Pac-12 teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #68–#68. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#69 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #69–#69. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#63 (Total defense: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #63–#63. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#52 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #52–#52. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#65 (Point margin: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #65–#65. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#60 (Turnover margin: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #60–#60. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#62 (Possession: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #62–#62. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#17 (Returning passing: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #1–#111. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#13 (Returning receiving: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #2–#82. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#26 (Returning rushing: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #1–#121. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#81 (Team talent: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #74–#123. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive EPA: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #68–#68. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#53 (Defensive EPA: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #53–#53. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#69 (Offensive success rate: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #69–#69. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive success rate: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #58–#58. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #35–#35. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range #34–#34. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)
2026San Diego State4–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (189.0 yds/g · 189 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (365.0 yds/g allowed · 365 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g allowed · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-18.0 /g · -18 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:05 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 138 teams · 609.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.194 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.737 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Boise State7–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (274.0 yds/g · 274 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (497.0 yds/g allowed · 497 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-7.0 /g · -7 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:54 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#12 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 138 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 138 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 138 teams · 641.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.300 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.018 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.489 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Colorado State3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (302.0 yds/g · 302 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.0 pts/g · 23 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (559.0 yds/g allowed · 559 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41.0 pts/g allowed · 41 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-18.0 /g · -18 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:36 /g · 0h 27m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#71 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 (of 138 teams · 14% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 138 teams · 640.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.446 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (65% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.183 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Fresno State5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (116.0 yds/g · 116 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.0 pts/g · 0 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (552.0 yds/g allowed · 552 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39.0 pts/g allowed · 39 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-39.0 /g · -39 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21:08 /g · 0h 21m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 138 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 138 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 138 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.230 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.363 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.043 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.368 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Oregon State5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (437.0 yds/g · 874 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 44 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (442.5 yds/g allowed · 885 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 68 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-12.0 /g · -24 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:48 /g · 1h 00m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#49 (of 138 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 138 teams · 635.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.635 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Texas State4–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (349.0 yds/g · 349 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 7 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (516.0 yds/g allowed · 516 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59.0 pts/g allowed · 59 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-52.0 /g · -52 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:26 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#23 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 138 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 138 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 138 teams · 624.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.459 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.580 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2026Utah State3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Pac-12 teams in 2026. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (229.5 yds/g · 459 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g · 14 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (418.0 yds/g allowed · 836 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.5 pts/g allowed · 49 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-17.5 /g · -35 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24:51 /g · 0h 50m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#17 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 (of 138 teams · 544.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.537 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20262026 Washington StatePac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 68 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #69
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 69 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 69.
Total defensemedian #63
Total defense. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 63 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 63.
Scoring defensemedian #52
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 52 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 52.
Point marginmedian #65
Point margin. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 65 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 65.
Turnover marginmedian #60
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 60 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 60.
Possessionmedian #62
Possession. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 62 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 62.
Returning passingmedian #17
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: 2026 San Diego State #1 of 138; 2026 Boise State #12 of 138; 2026 Utah State #17 of 138; 2026 Texas State #23 of 138; 2026 Oregon State #49 of 138; 2026 Colorado State #71 of 138; 2026 Fresno State #111 of 138. Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 1 of 138. Pac-12 median rank 17.
Returning receivingmedian #13
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: 2026 San Diego State #2 of 138; 2026 Fresno State #12 of 138; 2026 Texas State #13 of 138; 2026 Colorado State #38 of 138; 2026 Utah State #57 of 138; 2026 Boise State #68 of 138; 2026 Oregon State #82 of 138. Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 3 of 138. Pac-12 median rank 13.
Returning rushingmedian #26
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: 2026 San Diego State #1 of 138; 2026 Boise State #19 of 138; 2026 Fresno State #26 of 138; 2026 Utah State #30 of 138; 2026 Texas State #71 of 138; 2026 Oregon State #94 of 138; 2026 Colorado State #121 of 138. Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 1 of 138. Pac-12 median rank 26.
Team talentmedian #81
Team talent. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Boise State #74 of 138; 2026 Colorado State #75 of 138; 2026 Oregon State #76 of 138; 2026 Texas State #82 of 138; 2026 Fresno State #88 of 138; 2026 San Diego State #89 of 138; 2026 Utah State #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 81 of 138. Pac-12 median rank 81.
Offensive EPAmedian #68
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 68 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Defensive EPAmedian #53
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 53 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 53.
Offensive success ratemedian #69
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 69 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 69.
Defensive success ratemedian #58
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 58 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 58.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #35
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 35 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 35.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #34
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2026, best rank first: . Marked: 2026 Washington State, ranked 34 of 69. Pac-12 median rank 34.