Metrics

WashingtonHuskies

Season
Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2012

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Washington760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 124 teams · 355.2 yds/g · 4,618 yards)#90 (of 124 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 312 points)#32 (of 124 teams · 357.4 yds/g allowed · 4,646 yards)#39 (of 124 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#72 (of 124 teams · -0.1 /g · -2 on the season)#41 (of 124 teams · +5 on the season · 33 taken, 28 given · +0.38 /g)#26 (of 124 teams · 32:08 /g · 6h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 124 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#33 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 124 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 124 teams · 0.856 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#43 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #5–#119. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #21–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #11–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#118. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #7–#122. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#116. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #10–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2012Arizona850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 526.1 yds/g · 6,840 yards)#15 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#122 (of 124 teams · 499.0 yds/g allowed · 6,487 yards)#105 (of 124 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 459 points)#59 (of 124 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#65 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 27 taken, 28 given · -0.08 /g)#118 (of 124 teams · 27:03 /g · 5h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 124 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 124 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#15 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#104 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 124 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 124 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Arizona State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 124 teams · 464.5 yds/g · 6,039 yards)#14 (of 124 teams · 38.4 pts/g · 499 points)#28 (of 124 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,560 yards)#40 (of 124 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#15 (of 124 teams · +14.1 /g · +183 on the season)#40 (of 124 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.46 /g)#86 (of 124 teams · 29:32 /g · 6h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 124 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 124 teams · -0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#21 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 124 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 124 teams · 0.970 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012California390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 (of 124 teams · 390.8 yds/g · 4,689 yards)#93 (of 124 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#95 (of 124 teams · 441.3 yds/g allowed · 5,295 yards)#98 (of 124 teams · 33.1 pts/g allowed · 397 points)#106 (of 124 teams · -10.1 /g · -121 on the season)#97 (of 124 teams · -7 on the season · 23 taken, 30 given · -0.58 /g)#116 (of 124 teams · 27:27 /g · 5h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 124 teams · 0.064 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 124 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#72 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 124 teams · 0.907 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Colorado1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 124 teams · 302.8 yds/g · 3,633 yards)#120 (of 124 teams · 17.8 pts/g · 214 points)#121 (of 124 teams · 488.5 yds/g allowed · 5,862 yards)#124 (of 124 teams · 46.0 pts/g allowed · 552 points)#124 (of 124 teams · -28.2 /g · -338 on the season)#122 (of 124 teams · -19 on the season · 15 taken, 34 given · -1.58 /g)#21 (of 124 teams · 32:36 /g · 6h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 124 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#121 (of 124 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#121 (of 124 teams · 35% of plays successful)#116 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 124 teams · 0.891 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 124 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oregon1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 537.4 yds/g · 6,986 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 49.6 pts/g · 645 points)#45 (of 124 teams · 374.1 yds/g allowed · 4,864 yards)#25 (of 124 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +28.0 /g · +364 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +21 on the season · 40 taken, 19 given · +1.62 /g)#103 (of 124 teams · 28:27 /g · 6h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 47% of plays successful)#67 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 124 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.747 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oregon State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 124 teams · 431.5 yds/g · 5,609 yards)#37 (of 124 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 423 points)#31 (of 124 teams · 354.0 yds/g allowed · 4,602 yards)#22 (of 124 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 268 points)#26 (of 124 teams · +11.9 /g · +155 on the season)#28 (of 124 teams · +8 on the season · 31 taken, 23 given · +0.62 /g)#16 (of 124 teams · 32:55 /g · 7h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 124 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 124 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#37 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 124 teams · 0.943 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Stanford1220 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 124 teams · 374.4 yds/g · 5,242 yards)#72 (of 124 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 390 points)#21 (of 124 teams · 336.6 yds/g allowed · 4,712 yards)#11 (of 124 teams · 17.2 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#29 (of 124 teams · +10.6 /g · +149 on the season)#27 (of 124 teams · +9 on the season · 27 taken, 18 given · +0.64 /g)#41 (of 124 teams · 31:30 /g · 7h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 124 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 124 teams · 0.900 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 124 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UCLA951 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 124 teams · 464.9 yds/g · 6,508 yards)#31 (of 124 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 482 points)#79 (of 124 teams · 415.9 yds/g allowed · 5,823 yards)#58 (of 124 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#44 (of 124 teams · +6.9 /g · +96 on the season)#37 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 32 taken, 25 given · +0.50 /g)#50 (of 124 teams · 31:04 /g · 7h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 124 teams · 0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 124 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 124 teams · 42% of plays successful)#41 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 124 teams · 0.953 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012USC765 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 124 teams · 432.9 yds/g · 5,628 yards)#40 (of 124 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#62 (of 124 teams · 394.0 yds/g allowed · 5,122 yards)#40 (of 124 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#37 (of 124 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)#71 (of 124 teams · -2 on the season · 32 taken, 34 given · -0.15 /g)#79 (of 124 teams · 29:46 /g · 6h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 124 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 124 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#93 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 124 teams · 0.984 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.819 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Utah570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 124 teams · 324.4 yds/g · 3,893 yards)#75 (of 124 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 320 points)#38 (of 124 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yards)#49 (of 124 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points)#66 (of 124 teams · +1.6 /g · +19 on the season)#44 (of 124 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.33 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 33:10 /g · 6h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 124 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 124 teams · 36% of plays successful)#46 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.920 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 124 teams · 0.931 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Washington State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#96 (of 124 teams · 359.5 yds/g · 4,314 yards)#108 (of 124 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 245 points)#85 (of 124 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 5,111 yards)#101 (of 124 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#113 (of 124 teams · -13.3 /g · -159 on the season)#104 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 21 taken, 30 given · -0.75 /g)#114 (of 124 teams · 27:39 /g · 5h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 124 teams · 0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 124 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#94 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.006 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 124 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20122012 WashingtonPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #43
Total offense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #5 of 124; 2012 Arizona #7 of 124; 2012 UCLA #24 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #25 of 124; 2012 USC #41 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #43 of 124; 2012 California #69 of 124; 2012 Stanford #86 of 124; 2012 Washington State #96 of 124; 2012 Utah #108 of 124; 2012 Colorado #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 99 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 43.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #2 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #14 of 124; 2012 Arizona #15 of 124; 2012 UCLA #31 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #37 of 124; 2012 USC #40 of 124; 2012 Stanford #72 of 124; 2012 Utah #75 of 124; 2012 California #93 of 124; 2012 Washington State #108 of 124; 2012 Colorado #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 90 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Stanford #21 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #28 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #31 of 124; 2012 Utah #38 of 124; 2012 Oregon #45 of 124; 2012 USC #62 of 124; 2012 UCLA #79 of 124; 2012 Washington State #85 of 124; 2012 California #95 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124; 2012 Arizona #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 32 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #40
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Stanford #11 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #22 of 124; 2012 Oregon #25 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #40 of 124; 2012 USC #40 of 124; 2012 Utah #49 of 124; 2012 UCLA #58 of 124; 2012 California #98 of 124; 2012 Washington State #101 of 124; 2012 Arizona #105 of 124; 2012 Colorado #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 39 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Point marginmedian #44
Point margin. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #15 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #26 of 124; 2012 Stanford #29 of 124; 2012 USC #37 of 124; 2012 UCLA #44 of 124; 2012 Arizona #59 of 124; 2012 Utah #66 of 124; 2012 California #106 of 124; 2012 Washington State #113 of 124; 2012 Colorado #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 72 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Turnover marginmedian #41
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 Stanford #27 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #28 of 124; 2012 UCLA #37 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #40 of 124; 2012 Utah #44 of 124; 2012 Arizona #65 of 124; 2012 USC #71 of 124; 2012 California #97 of 124; 2012 Washington State #104 of 124; 2012 Colorado #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 41 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Utah #10 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #16 of 124; 2012 Colorado #21 of 124; 2012 Stanford #41 of 124; 2012 UCLA #50 of 124; 2012 USC #79 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #86 of 124; 2012 Oregon #103 of 124; 2012 Washington State #114 of 124; 2012 California #116 of 124; 2012 Arizona #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 26 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Washington, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Washington, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Washington, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Washington, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #7 of 124; 2012 Arizona #20 of 124; 2012 UCLA #47 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #48 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #59 of 124; 2012 California #60 of 124; 2012 Stanford #72 of 124; 2012 USC #80 of 124; 2012 Utah #98 of 124; 2012 Washington State #100 of 124; 2012 Colorado #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 90 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #48
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #8 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #13 of 124; 2012 Stanford #32 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #44 of 124; 2012 UCLA #48 of 124; 2012 Washington State #49 of 124; 2012 USC #56 of 124; 2012 California #64 of 124; 2012 Utah #76 of 124; 2012 Arizona #106 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 21 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Offensive success ratemedian #63
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #10 of 124; 2012 Arizona #15 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #21 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #56 of 124; 2012 UCLA #57 of 124; 2012 California #63 of 124; 2012 USC #64 of 124; 2012 Stanford #76 of 124; 2012 Washington State #114 of 124; 2012 Utah #117 of 124; 2012 Colorado #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 88 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 63.
Defensive success ratemedian #46
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Arizona State #8 of 124; 2012 Stanford #18 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #37 of 124; 2012 UCLA #41 of 124; 2012 Utah #46 of 124; 2012 Oregon #67 of 124; 2012 California #72 of 124; 2012 USC #93 of 124; 2012 Washington State #94 of 124; 2012 Arizona #104 of 124; 2012 Colorado #116 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 33 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 46.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #68
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Washington State #10 of 124; 2012 USC #22 of 124; 2012 UCLA #42 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #50 of 124; 2012 Arizona #65 of 124; 2012 Utah #68 of 124; 2012 Oregon #74 of 124; 2012 California #82 of 124; 2012 Stanford #87 of 124; 2012 Colorado #94 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #115 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 93 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #50
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oregon #1 of 124; 2012 USC #6 of 124; 2012 Washington State #11 of 124; 2012 UCLA #32 of 124; 2012 Arizona #50 of 124; 2012 Oregon State #54 of 124; 2012 Utah #62 of 124; 2012 Arizona State #93 of 124; 2012 California #98 of 124; 2012 Stanford #111 of 124; 2012 Colorado #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Washington, ranked 13 of 124. Pac-12 median rank 50.