THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Western MichiganBroncos

Season
‹
›Current

Mid-American

Peers are the 64 teams in 2017’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Western Michigan played 2 such games.

Power 5, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Western Michigan6–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (276.0 yds/g · 552 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.5 pts/g · 45 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (489.0 yds/g allowed · 978 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.5 pts/g allowed · 77 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.0 /g · -32 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:54 /g · 1h 02m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 414.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.321 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.274 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#68. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 13 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#125. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#126. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #4–#128. 4 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range #2–#69. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)
2017Alabama13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #17 LSU, #23 Mississippi State · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Georgia)#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 452.3 yds/g · 4,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36.8 pts/g · 331 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 252.0 yds/g allowed · 2,268 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 105 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +25.1 /g · +226 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 30:40 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 997.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.278 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.024 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.227 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Georgia13–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Auburn · postseason: #2 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Auburn, #14 Notre Dame, #23 Mississippi State · postseason: #2 Oklahoma)#17 (of 70 teams · 438.9 yds/g · 4,389 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 353 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 273.1 yds/g allowed · 2,731 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 141 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +21.2 /g · +212 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 15 taken, 10 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:23 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 930.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.331 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Auburn10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Georgia, #4 Alabama)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Georgia, #4 Alabama, #23 Mississippi State)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 449.6 yds/g · 4,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.0 pts/g · 333 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 331.7 yds/g allowed · 2,985 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +18.6 /g · +167 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 14 taken, 5 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:21 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 867.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 70 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 1.183 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State · postseason: #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State, #16 Michigan State · postseason: #8 USC)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 5,108 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 433 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 296.0 yds/g allowed · 2,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +22.3 /g · +223 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 959.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Penn State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #11 Washington)#20 (of 70 teams · 434.4 yds/g · 4,344 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 347.3 yds/g allowed · 3,473 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +20.5 /g · +205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 30:47 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 779.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Clemson12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami, #22 Virginia Tech, #24 NC State)#25 (of 70 teams · 416.8 yds/g · 4,168 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 306.3 yds/g allowed · 3,063 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 853.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 70 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017TCU11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #19 Oklahoma State · postseason: #13 Stanford)#36 (of 70 teams · 390.3 yds/g · 3,903 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 328.2 yds/g allowed · 3,282 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.2 pts/g allowed · 152 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.3 /g · +143 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31:38 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 672.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 70 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.400 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Washington10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#28 (of 70 teams · 401.4 yds/g · 4,014 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 332 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 285.3 yds/g allowed · 2,853 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +18.1 /g · +181 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 706.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.092 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wisconsin13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #10 Miami)#34 (of 70 teams · 397.7 yds/g · 3,579 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 288 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 233.2 yds/g allowed · 2,099 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 12.7 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +19.3 /g · +174 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:32 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 639.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 70 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 551.1 yds/g · 5,511 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 4,411 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 312 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oklahoma12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State, #15 TCU, #15 TCU, #19 Oklahoma State)#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 581.5 yds/g · 5,815 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 431 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 422.7 yds/g allowed · 4,227 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.4 /g · +144 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 31:59 /g · 5h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 801.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.424 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 52% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.402 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.440 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #22 Virginia Tech)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 576.3 yds/g · 5,763 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45.2 pts/g · 452 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 419.6 yds/g allowed · 4,196 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · +12.2 /g · +122 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 633.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.310 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.513 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 1.339 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Stanford9–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington, #14 Notre Dame)#39 (of 70 teams · 381.9 yds/g · 3,819 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 309 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 408.9 yds/g allowed · 4,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +8.8 /g · +88 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 22 taken, 7 given · +1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 30:57 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 810.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.516 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)#56 (of 70 teams · 338.5 yds/g · 3,385 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 372.6 yds/g allowed · 3,726 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +6.3 /g · +63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 29:30 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 593.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 70 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 70 teams · 348.6 yds/g · 3,486 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 279.1 yds/g allowed · 2,791 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 874.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.395 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017USC11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Stanford, #13 Stanford)#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 485.6 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 369 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 414.7 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 283 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · +7.8 /g · +86 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 31:01 /g · 5h 41m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 934.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.349 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Washington State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #8 USC, #13 Stanford, #25 Boise State)#22 (of 70 teams · 425.7 yds/g · 3,831 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 254 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 3,068 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · +1.3 /g · +12 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:38 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 549.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 1.365 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arizona7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 496.3 yds/g · 4,467 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 361 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 489.7 yds/g allowed · 4,407 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.9 pts/g allowed · 350 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 27:52 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 607.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.453 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arizona State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Washington)#17 (of 70 teams · 438.9 yds/g · 4,389 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 32.6 pts/g · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 446.3 yds/g allowed · 4,463 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 130 teams · 720.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 70 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 0.212 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Georgia Tech5–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#31 (of 70 teams · 398.6 yds/g · 3,986 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 3,708 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1.0 /g · -10 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 7 taken, 15 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:43 /g · 5h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 70 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Oklahoma, #15 TCU · postseason: #20 Memphis)#44 (of 70 teams · 375.9 yds/g · 3,759 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 371.2 yds/g allowed · 3,712 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · +6.2 /g · +62 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 559.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 70 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017LSU9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn)#32 (of 70 teams · 398.2 yds/g · 3,584 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 337.6 yds/g allowed · 3,038 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +53 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +7 in these games · 11 taken, 4 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 31:48 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 907.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 70 teams · 0.214 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Miami10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Notre Dame, #22 Virginia Tech)#35 (of 70 teams · 390.6 yds/g · 3,515 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 258 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · +11.1 /g · +100 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 26 taken, 11 given · +1.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 749.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 70 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 70 teams · 441.6 yds/g · 4,416 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 3,746 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · +2.0 /g · +20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:07 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 70 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017South Carolina9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#59 (of 70 teams · 325.5 yds/g · 3,255 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 241 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 390.7 yds/g allowed · 3,907 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · +1.7 /g · +17 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +7 in these games · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 28:27 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 130 teams · 702.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 70 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 1.205 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 70 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 3,702 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 30:14 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 535.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 70 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Duke7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Northwestern)#43 (of 70 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 3,760 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 3,599 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 627.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 70 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Penn State · postseason: #18 Washington State)#49 (of 70 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 3,618 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 316.6 yds/g allowed · 3,166 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · -0.5 /g · -5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35:09 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Michigan State)#46 (of 70 teams · 367.6 yds/g · 3,676 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · +6.5 /g · +65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 627.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 70 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.127 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Utah7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 70 teams · 398.0 yds/g · 3,582 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 389.8 yds/g allowed · 3,508 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · +0.2 /g · +2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 14 taken, 18 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 31:19 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 631.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 70 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 1.296 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 70 teams · 365.4 yds/g · 3,289 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 216 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 334.4 yds/g allowed · 3,010 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 145 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +7.9 /g · +71 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 31:46 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 662.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 70 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.444 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017California5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Washington State)#41 (of 70 teams · 380.3 yds/g · 4,183 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 300 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 417.1 yds/g allowed · 4,588 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · -1.9 /g · -21 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 29:55 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 603.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 70 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.271 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kansas State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Oklahoma State)#53 (of 70 teams · 340.8 yds/g · 3,408 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 459.5 yds/g allowed · 4,595 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 284 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · -0.9 /g · -9 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 30:23 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 517.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 70 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 0.223 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.322 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.290 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oregon7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 70 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 4,191 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 377.0 yds/g allowed · 3,770 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +0.9 /g · +9 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 28:28 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 130 teams · 63% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 720.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 70 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 1.232 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Purdue7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 70 teams · 375.2 yds/g · 4,127 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 246 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 502.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Texas7–63 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#37 (of 70 teams · 388.8 yds/g · 4,277 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 294 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 381.1 yds/g allowed · 4,192 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · +3.1 /g · +34 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 30:19 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 811.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Texas A&M7–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 70 teams · 360.0 yds/g · 3,240 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 249 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 3,873 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · -5.1 /g · -46 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 28:45 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#98 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 807.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 70 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.393 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 1.313 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Texas Tech6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 70 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 4,474 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 448.0 yds/g allowed · 4,480 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 347 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · -1.8 /g · -18 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +4 in these games · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 28:28 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 574.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 70 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 0.215 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 1.245 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wake Forest8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#15 (of 70 teams · 443.3 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.2 yds/g allowed · 4,322 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:57 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 527.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017West Virginia7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 467.0 yds/g · 4,670 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 320 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 465.9 yds/g allowed · 4,659 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 343 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · -2.3 /g · -23 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 28:14 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 130 teams · 613.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 70 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.389 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Baylor1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 70 teams · 405.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 452.3 yds/g allowed · 4,523 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 366 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · -12.9 /g · -129 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 10 taken, 22 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 31:25 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 657.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 70 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.521 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.351 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida4–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 70 teams · 328.6 yds/g · 3,286 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 207 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 3,662 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · -8.6 /g · -86 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 13 taken, 20 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 793.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 70 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida State7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 313.7 yds/g · 3,137 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 201 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 355.2 yds/g allowed · 3,552 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 925.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 70 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 3,804 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 243 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 357.2 yds/g allowed · 3,572 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · -4.4 /g · -44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 28:24 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 547.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Minnesota5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 3,668 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -5.0 /g · -50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Mississippi State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 LSU)#38 (of 70 teams · 385.6 yds/g · 3,085 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 343.8 yds/g allowed · 2,750 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 191 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2.4 /g · +19 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 11 taken, 12 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:59 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 701.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 70 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.423 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Missouri7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 453.6 yds/g · 4,082 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 442.1 yds/g allowed · 3,979 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 33.9 pts/g allowed · 305 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2.8 /g · -25 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:00 /g · 3h 45m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 623.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 70 teams · 0.229 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.374 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Pittsburgh5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)#51 (of 70 teams · 356.5 yds/g · 3,565 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 406.4 yds/g allowed · 4,064 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -7.1 /g · -71 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 32:05 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 70 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Colorado5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 70 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 3,667 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 494.9 yds/g allowed · 4,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 311 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -9.9 /g · -89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 28:50 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 568.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 70 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#47 (of 70 teams · 365.8 yds/g · 3,292 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 457.1 yds/g allowed · 4,114 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 290 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · -6.2 /g · -56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 31:04 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 671.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 70 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Ole Miss6–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Mississippi State)#21 (of 70 teams · 425.9 yds/g · 3,833 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 252 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 486.6 yds/g allowed · 4,379 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 343 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 24:39 /g · 3h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 130 teams · 795.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 70 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 0.255 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.274 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 70 teams · 377.3 yds/g · 3,773 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 452.4 yds/g allowed · 4,524 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 380 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · -13.1 /g · -131 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 9 taken, 16 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 693.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 70 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.362 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Vanderbilt5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#55 (of 70 teams · 338.6 yds/g · 3,047 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 194 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 450.0 yds/g allowed · 4,050 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 353 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.7 /g · -159 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 5 taken, 13 given · -0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 28:38 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 607.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 70 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.306 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 1.354 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)#60 (of 70 teams · 317.1 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 30:58 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 603.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Illinois2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 277.2 yds/g · 2,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.1 pts/g · 118 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -20.6 /g · -185 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 16m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 538.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)#14 (of 70 teams · 444.8 yds/g · 4,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 490.7 yds/g allowed · 4,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · -13.0 /g · -117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 5 taken, 17 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 539.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.430 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017UCLA6–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 70 teams · 445.0 yds/g · 4,450 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 304 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 479.0 yds/g allowed · 4,790 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 370 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · -6.6 /g · -66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 8 taken, 18 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 26:22 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 830.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 70 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 0.240 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 314.9 yds/g · 3,149 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 429.6 yds/g allowed · 4,296 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.4 /g · -174 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 696.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 70 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017North Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 70 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 3,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.4 pts/g · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · -14.8 /g · -148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:59 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 697.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Arkansas4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 70 teams · 338.8 yds/g · 3,049 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 485.6 yds/g allowed · 4,370 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 40.6 pts/g allowed · 365 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -16.7 /g · -150 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 30:13 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 717.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 70 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.385 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.260 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 234.8 yds/g · 2,348 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 138 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 4,264 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.6 /g · -186 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Tennessee4–82 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 285.4 yds/g · 2,569 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 17.2 pts/g · 155 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 464.4 yds/g allowed · 4,180 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.2 /g · -164 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 817.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 0.248 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.091 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Oregon State1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 316.0 yds/g · 3,160 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · 463.7 yds/g allowed · 4,637 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 426 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -24.0 /g · -240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 9 taken, 21 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 30:06 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 557.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 70 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.341 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.167 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Kansas1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 287.8 yds/g · 2,590 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 14.3 pts/g · 129 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.8 yds/g allowed · 4,327 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 46.4 pts/g allowed · 418 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -32.1 /g · -289 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -14 in these games · 6 taken, 20 given · -1.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:36 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 512.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 29% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 1.304 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.366 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20172017 Western MichiganPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma #1 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #2 of 70; 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Arizona #5 of 70; 2017 USC #6 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #7 of 70; 2017 Missouri #8 of 70; 2017 Alabama #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #11 of 70; 2017 UCLA #13 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #14 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #15 of 70; 2017 NC State #16 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #17 of 70; 2017 Georgia #17 of 70; 2017 Penn State #20 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #21 of 70; 2017 Washington State #22 of 70; 2017 Oregon #24 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Colorado #26 of 70; 2017 Baylor #27 of 70; 2017 Washington #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #29 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #31 of 70; 2017 LSU #32 of 70; 2017 Utah #33 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #34 of 70; 2017 Miami #35 of 70; 2017 TCU #36 of 70; 2017 Texas #37 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #38 of 70; 2017 Stanford #39 of 70; 2017 Indiana #40 of 70; 2017 California #41 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #42 of 70; 2017 Duke #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #44 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #46 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #47 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #49 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #50 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #51 of 70; 2017 Michigan #52 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #53 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #54 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #55 of 70; 2017 Iowa #56 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Florida #58 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Florida State #63 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #64 of 70; 2017 Kansas #65 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #66 of 70; 2017 Illinois #67 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #34
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma State #1 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #3 of 70; 2017 Arizona #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Louisville #6 of 70; 2017 Auburn #7 of 70; 2017 Alabama #8 of 70; 2017 Georgia #9 of 70; 2017 USC #10 of 70; 2017 Washington #12 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #13 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #14 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #15 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #17 of 70; 2017 Oregon #18 of 70; 2017 Missouri #19 of 70; 2017 Stanford #20 of 70; 2017 Clemson #21 of 70; 2017 UCLA #22 of 70; 2017 TCU #23 of 70; 2017 Miami #24 of 70; 2017 Iowa #25 of 70; 2017 Washington State #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #27 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #28 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #30 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #31 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #31 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #33 of 70; 2017 California #34 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #35 of 70; 2017 LSU #36 of 70; 2017 Utah #36 of 70; 2017 Texas #38 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #39 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #40 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #41 of 70; 2017 Boston College #42 of 70; 2017 Colorado #43 of 70; 2017 Michigan #44 of 70; 2017 Indiana #45 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #47 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #48 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 70; 2017 Baylor #50 of 70; 2017 Duke #52 of 70; 2017 Purdue #53 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #54 of 70; 2017 Maryland #55 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #56 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #57 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #57 of 70; 2017 Florida #59 of 70; 2017 Florida State #60 of 70; 2017 Virginia #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #62 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #63 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #64 of 70; 2017 Kansas #66 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #67 of 70; 2017 Illinois #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Alabama #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Michigan #4 of 70; 2017 Washington #5 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #6 of 70; 2017 Clemson #7 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #8 of 70; 2017 TCU #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #11 of 70; 2017 LSU #12 of 70; 2017 Washington State #14 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #15 of 70; 2017 Penn State #16 of 70; 2017 Florida State #17 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Indiana #19 of 70; 2017 Virginia #20 of 70; 2017 Duke #21 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 70; 2017 Florida #23 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #24 of 70; 2017 Purdue #25 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #26 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #27 of 70; 2017 Iowa #28 of 70; 2017 NC State #29 of 70; 2017 Oregon #31 of 70; 2017 Texas #32 of 70; 2017 Utah #33 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Stanford #36 of 70; 2017 Boston College #37 of 70; 2017 Illinois #38 of 70; 2017 USC #39 of 70; 2017 California #40 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #41 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #42 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #43 of 70; 2017 Maryland #45 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #46 of 70; 2017 Louisville #47 of 70; 2017 Missouri #48 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #49 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #50 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #51 of 70; 2017 Baylor #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #55 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #56 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #59 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 UCLA #61 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #62 of 70; 2017 Kansas #63 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #64 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #66 of 70; 2017 Arizona #67 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70; 2017 Colorado #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 TCU #5 of 70; 2017 Clemson #6 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 Miami #8 of 70; 2017 Auburn #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan #12 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #13 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #14 of 70; 2017 LSU #15 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #16 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #17 of 70; 2017 Duke #18 of 70; 2017 Stanford #18 of 70; 2017 Iowa #20 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #21 of 70; 2017 Texas #23 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #24 of 70; 2017 Florida State #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #26 of 70; 2017 USC #27 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #29 of 70; 2017 Utah #30 of 70; 2017 Washington State #30 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #32 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #35 of 70; 2017 Indiana #36 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #36 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #38 of 70; 2017 California #39 of 70; 2017 Florida #40 of 70; 2017 Virginia #41 of 70; 2017 Oregon #43 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #45 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #46 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #48 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #49 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #50 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #51 of 70; 2017 Illinois #52 of 70; 2017 Missouri #53 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #54 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #55 of 70; 2017 Colorado #56 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #57 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #58 of 70; 2017 Baylor #59 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #60 of 70; 2017 UCLA #61 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #62 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #63 of 70; 2017 Arizona #64 of 70; 2017 Maryland #65 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #66 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #67 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #5 of 70; 2017 Auburn #6 of 70; 2017 Washington #7 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #9 of 70; 2017 TCU #10 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #11 of 70; 2017 Miami #12 of 70; 2017 Stanford #14 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 USC #16 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #18 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #19 of 70; 2017 Louisville #20 of 70; 2017 LSU #21 of 70; 2017 Michigan #22 of 70; 2017 Purdue #23 of 70; 2017 Texas #24 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #25 of 70; 2017 NC State #26 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #27 of 70; 2017 Washington State #28 of 70; 2017 Arizona #29 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #30 of 70; 2017 Duke #30 of 70; 2017 Oregon #32 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #33 of 70; 2017 Utah #34 of 70; 2017 Boston College #35 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #37 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #38 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #39 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #40 of 70; 2017 California #41 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #42 of 70; 2017 Missouri #43 of 70; 2017 Indiana #44 of 70; 2017 Florida State #45 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #46 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #47 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #48 of 70; 2017 UCLA #49 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #50 of 70; 2017 Florida #51 of 70; 2017 Colorado #53 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #54 of 70; 2017 Virginia #54 of 70; 2017 Baylor #56 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #57 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #58 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #63 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #64 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Miami #1 of 70; 2017 Stanford #2 of 70; 2017 Auburn #3 of 70; 2017 Penn State #4 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 Alabama #6 of 70; 2017 LSU #7 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #8 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #9 of 70; 2017 Iowa #10 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #10 of 70; 2017 TCU #10 of 70; 2017 Boston College #14 of 70; 2017 Georgia #15 of 70; 2017 Louisville #15 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #15 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #18 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #18 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #18 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #21 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #23 of 70; 2017 USC #24 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Maryland #25 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #25 of 70; 2017 Oregon #25 of 70; 2017 California #29 of 70; 2017 Texas #29 of 70; 2017 Duke #31 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Arizona #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #33 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #33 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #38 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #39 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #39 of 70; 2017 Virginia #39 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #43 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #43 of 70; 2017 Colorado #46 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #46 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #46 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #49 of 70; 2017 Missouri #50 of 70; 2017 Utah #50 of 70; 2017 Washington State #50 of 70; 2017 Florida #53 of 70; 2017 Florida State #53 of 70; 2017 Indiana #53 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #53 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #60 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #61 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #62 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #63 of 70; 2017 UCLA #63 of 70; 2017 Baylor #66 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #34
Possession. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan State #1 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #2 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #3 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #4 of 70; 2017 NC State #6 of 70; 2017 Washington State #7 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #8 of 70; 2017 Georgia #9 of 70; 2017 Auburn #10 of 70; 2017 Michigan #11 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #12 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #13 of 70; 2017 LSU #14 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Clemson #16 of 70; 2017 TCU #17 of 70; 2017 Baylor #18 of 70; 2017 Utah #19 of 70; 2017 Duke #20 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #21 of 70; 2017 USC #22 of 70; 2017 Virginia #23 of 70; 2017 Stanford #24 of 70; 2017 Penn State #26 of 70; 2017 Alabama #27 of 70; 2017 Louisville #28 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #29 of 70; 2017 Texas #30 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #32 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #33 of 70; 2017 Florida #34 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #35 of 70; 2017 California #36 of 70; 2017 Florida State #37 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #40 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #41 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa #44 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #45 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #46 of 70; 2017 Washington #47 of 70; 2017 Colorado #48 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #49 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #50 of 70; 2017 Oregon #51 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #51 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #54 of 70; 2017 Purdue #55 of 70; 2017 Indiana #56 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #57 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #58 of 70; 2017 Arizona #59 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #60 of 70; 2017 Miami #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Kansas #63 of 70; 2017 UCLA #64 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #65 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 70; 2017 Missouri #68 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Duke #1 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #1 of 130; 2017 NC State #1 of 130; 2017 Stanford #1 of 130; 2017 Utah #1 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #14 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #16 of 130; 2017 Washington State #16 of 130; 2017 Penn State #21 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #26 of 130; 2017 Washington #30 of 130; 2017 Purdue #32 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #33 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #34 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #36 of 130; 2017 Missouri #37 of 130; 2017 Texas #37 of 130; 2017 Michigan #40 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #41 of 130; 2017 Indiana #44 of 130; 2017 Florida State #45 of 130; 2017 Georgia #46 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 130; 2017 Louisville #51 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2017 Alabama #56 of 130; 2017 LSU #58 of 130; 2017 TCU #59 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #60 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #61 of 130; 2017 Virginia #64 of 130; 2017 Arizona #65 of 130; 2017 USC #68 of 130; 2017 Oregon #76 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #79 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #80 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #81 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #82 of 130; 2017 Florida #83 of 130; 2017 UCLA #84 of 130; 2017 Baylor #87 of 130; 2017 Illinois #91 of 130; 2017 Kansas #92 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #93 of 130; 2017 Colorado #94 of 130; 2017 Maryland #95 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #96 of 130; 2017 Texas A&M #98 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #103 of 130; 2017 Boston College #105 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #108 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #109 of 130; 2017 Clemson #110 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #111 of 130; 2017 Iowa #112 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #115 of 130; 2017 Auburn #118 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #118 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #120 of 130; 2017 California #121 of 130; 2017 Miami #122 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, ranked 126 of 130. Power 5 median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #67
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #1 of 130; 2017 Colorado #2 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #3 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #4 of 130; 2017 TCU #6 of 130; 2017 Boston College #7 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #8 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #11 of 130; 2017 Florida #12 of 130; 2017 Missouri #15 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #23 of 130; 2017 Duke #27 of 130; 2017 Penn State #29 of 130; 2017 Georgia #30 of 130; 2017 NC State #31 of 130; 2017 Texas #32 of 130; 2017 UCLA #38 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #44 of 130; 2017 Auburn #46 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #48 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #50 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #51 of 130; 2017 California #52 of 130; 2017 Washington State #53 of 130; 2017 Washington #55 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #56 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #57 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #58 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #60 of 130; 2017 Stanford #66 of 130; 2017 Alabama #67 of 130; 2017 Illinois #67 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #70 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #71 of 130; 2017 Virginia #72 of 130; 2017 Kansas #73 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #77 of 130; 2017 Arizona #78 of 130; 2017 Utah #80 of 130; 2017 Miami #81 of 130; 2017 USC #82 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #85 of 130; 2017 Indiana #86 of 130; 2017 Louisville #88 of 130; 2017 Texas A&M #89 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #91 of 130; 2017 Oregon #91 of 130; 2017 Clemson #95 of 130; 2017 Purdue #98 of 130; 2017 Baylor #102 of 130; 2017 LSU #103 of 130; 2017 Maryland #105 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #107 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #108 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #109 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #110 of 130; 2017 Florida State #111 of 130; 2017 Iowa #115 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #117 of 130; 2017 Michigan #119 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #123 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, ranked 128 of 130. Power 5 median rank 67.
Returning rushingmedian #59
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Penn State #4 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #5 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #7 of 130; 2017 Washington State #9 of 130; 2017 Washington #11 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #13 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 130; 2017 Georgia #16 of 130; 2017 UCLA #18 of 130; 2017 Purdue #19 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #23 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #24 of 130; 2017 Oregon #28 of 130; 2017 Alabama #29 of 130; 2017 Florida #30 of 130; 2017 Missouri #33 of 130; 2017 Arizona #36 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #38 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #39 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #41 of 130; 2017 TCU #43 of 130; 2017 Auburn #45 of 130; 2017 Illinois #49 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #50 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #50 of 130; 2017 Colorado #52 of 130; 2017 Texas A&M #53 of 130; 2017 USC #54 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #55 of 130; 2017 LSU #57 of 130; 2017 Boston College #58 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #59 of 130; 2017 Louisville #62 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #64 of 130; 2017 Duke #66 of 130; 2017 Baylor #68 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #69 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #71 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #73 of 130; 2017 California #74 of 130; 2017 Michigan #75 of 130; 2017 Miami #76 of 130; 2017 Maryland #77 of 130; 2017 Utah #81 of 130; 2017 Kansas #87 of 130; 2017 Stanford #90 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #91 of 130; 2017 NC State #92 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #98 of 130; 2017 Iowa #100 of 130; 2017 Indiana #101 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #103 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #104 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #108 of 130; 2017 Florida State #109 of 130; 2017 Texas #112 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #113 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #117 of 130; 2017 Clemson #119 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #120 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #121 of 130; 2017 Virginia #126 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, ranked 35 of 130. Power 5 median rank 59.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2017 USC #3 of 130; 2017 Georgia #4 of 130; 2017 Florida State #5 of 130; 2017 LSU #6 of 130; 2017 Michigan #7 of 130; 2017 Auburn #8 of 130; 2017 Clemson #9 of 130; 2017 UCLA #11 of 130; 2017 Tennessee #12 of 130; 2017 Texas #13 of 130; 2017 Stanford #14 of 130; 2017 Texas A&M #15 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma #16 of 130; 2017 Ole Miss #17 of 130; 2017 Florida #18 of 130; 2017 Penn State #19 of 130; 2017 Miami #20 of 130; 2017 Arizona State #21 of 130; 2017 Oregon #22 of 130; 2017 Arkansas #23 of 130; 2017 Washington #24 of 130; 2017 South Carolina #25 of 130; 2017 Mississippi State #26 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #27 of 130; 2017 Maryland #28 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #29 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #30 of 130; 2017 TCU #31 of 130; 2017 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #33 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #34 of 130; 2017 Baylor #35 of 130; 2017 Louisville #36 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #37 of 130; 2017 Oklahoma State #38 of 130; 2017 Utah #39 of 130; 2017 Duke #40 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2017 Missouri #42 of 130; 2017 West Virginia #43 of 130; 2017 NC State #44 of 130; 2017 Vanderbilt #45 of 130; 2017 Arizona #46 of 130; 2017 Virginia #47 of 130; 2017 California #48 of 130; 2017 Iowa #49 of 130; 2017 Texas Tech #50 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #52 of 130; 2017 Colorado #55 of 130; 2017 Iowa State #56 of 130; 2017 Oregon State #58 of 130; 2017 Washington State #60 of 130; 2017 Indiana #61 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #62 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #63 of 130; 2017 Illinois #64 of 130; 2017 Boston College #65 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 130; 2017 Kansas State #67 of 130; 2017 Kansas #68 of 130; 2017 Purdue #70 of 130. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, ranked 83 of 130. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Oklahoma #1 of 70; 2017 Louisville #2 of 70; 2017 Georgia #3 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Arizona #5 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #6 of 70; 2017 Alabama #7 of 70; 2017 Washington #8 of 70; 2017 Stanford #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Missouri #11 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #12 of 70; 2017 USC #13 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 70; 2017 UCLA #15 of 70; 2017 LSU #16 of 70; 2017 Auburn #17 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #19 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #21 of 70; 2017 Oregon #22 of 70; 2017 NC State #23 of 70; 2017 TCU #24 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #25 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #26 of 70; 2017 Clemson #27 of 70; 2017 Utah #28 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #29 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #30 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #31 of 70; 2017 Florida #32 of 70; 2017 Iowa #33 of 70; 2017 Miami #34 of 70; 2017 Colorado #35 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #36 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #37 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #39 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #40 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #41 of 70; 2017 Baylor #42 of 70; 2017 California #43 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #44 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #45 of 70; 2017 Michigan #46 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #47 of 70; 2017 Washington State #48 of 70; 2017 Indiana #49 of 70; 2017 Purdue #50 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #52 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #54 of 70; 2017 Texas #55 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #56 of 70; 2017 Boston College #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #58 of 70; 2017 Maryland #59 of 70; 2017 Duke #60 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #61 of 70; 2017 Florida State #62 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #63 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Virginia #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70; 2017 Kansas #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Alabama #2 of 70; 2017 Miami #3 of 70; 2017 Clemson #4 of 70; 2017 Georgia #5 of 70; 2017 Michigan #6 of 70; 2017 TCU #7 of 70; 2017 Iowa #8 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #9 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #11 of 70; 2017 Washington #12 of 70; 2017 Auburn #13 of 70; 2017 Duke #14 of 70; 2017 Texas #15 of 70; 2017 Washington State #16 of 70; 2017 Penn State #17 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #18 of 70; 2017 Purdue #20 of 70; 2017 Oregon #22 of 70; 2017 Florida State #23 of 70; 2017 Indiana #24 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #25 of 70; 2017 Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 USC #29 of 70; 2017 Boston College #30 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #31 of 70; 2017 Florida #32 of 70; 2017 LSU #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #34 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #35 of 70; 2017 Utah #36 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #37 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #38 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #39 of 70; 2017 California #40 of 70; 2017 Illinois #41 of 70; 2017 Stanford #42 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #46 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #47 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #48 of 70; 2017 Baylor #49 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #50 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #51 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #52 of 70; 2017 Missouri #53 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #54 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #55 of 70; 2017 UCLA #56 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #57 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #58 of 70; 2017 Arizona #59 of 70; 2017 Maryland #60 of 70; 2017 Kansas #61 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #63 of 70; 2017 Colorado #64 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #65 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #68 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #1 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #2 of 70; 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Washington #4 of 70; 2017 Penn State #5 of 70; 2017 Georgia #6 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Arizona #9 of 70; 2017 Alabama #10 of 70; 2017 Utah #11 of 70; 2017 USC #12 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #13 of 70; 2017 Auburn #14 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 UCLA #16 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #17 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #18 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #19 of 70; 2017 TCU #20 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #21 of 70; 2017 Colorado #22 of 70; 2017 LSU #23 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #24 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #25 of 70; 2017 Oregon #26 of 70; 2017 Missouri #27 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #29 of 70; 2017 Washington State #30 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #31 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #33 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #34 of 70; 2017 California #35 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #36 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #39 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #41 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #42 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Stanford #45 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #46 of 70; 2017 Miami #47 of 70; 2017 Boston College #48 of 70; 2017 Florida #49 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #50 of 70; 2017 Texas #51 of 70; 2017 Iowa #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan #54 of 70; 2017 Florida State #55 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #56 of 70; 2017 Duke #57 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #58 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Indiana #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Baylor #63 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #65 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #67 of 70; 2017 Kansas #70 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Alabama #1 of 70; 2017 Michigan #2 of 70; 2017 TCU #3 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #4 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #5 of 70; 2017 Georgia #6 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #7 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Washington State #9 of 70; 2017 Penn State #10 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Duke #12 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #14 of 70; 2017 Oregon #15 of 70; 2017 Texas #16 of 70; 2017 Auburn #17 of 70; 2017 Miami #18 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #21 of 70; 2017 Florida #22 of 70; 2017 Indiana #23 of 70; 2017 LSU #24 of 70; 2017 Virginia #25 of 70; 2017 Washington #26 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #27 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #28 of 70; 2017 USC #29 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #30 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #36 of 70; 2017 Utah #37 of 70; 2017 Iowa #38 of 70; 2017 Missouri #39 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #40 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #41 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #42 of 70; 2017 Baylor #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #45 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Kansas #47 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #50 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 70; 2017 Stanford #52 of 70; 2017 UCLA #53 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #56 of 70; 2017 California #57 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #59 of 70; 2017 Louisville #60 of 70; 2017 Colorado #61 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #63 of 70; 2017 Maryland #64 of 70; 2017 Arizona #65 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #66 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #67 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #68 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Baylor #1 of 70; 2017 Stanford #2 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #3 of 70; 2017 Arizona #4 of 70; 2017 Louisville #5 of 70; 2017 Miami #6 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #8 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #9 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #10 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #12 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #13 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Georgia #15 of 70; 2017 Michigan #17 of 70; 2017 Missouri #18 of 70; 2017 Maryland #19 of 70; 2017 Alabama #20 of 70; 2017 USC #21 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #22 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #23 of 70; 2017 NC State #24 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #25 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 Kansas #27 of 70; 2017 Florida #28 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #30 of 70; 2017 Penn State #31 of 70; 2017 Indiana #32 of 70; 2017 UCLA #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa #34 of 70; 2017 California #35 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #36 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #37 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #38 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #39 of 70; 2017 Texas #40 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #41 of 70; 2017 Oregon #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Boston College #44 of 70; 2017 Colorado #45 of 70; 2017 TCU #46 of 70; 2017 LSU #47 of 70; 2017 Duke #48 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Virginia #50 of 70; 2017 Washington State #51 of 70; 2017 Florida State #52 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #53 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Purdue #57 of 70; 2017 Utah #58 of 70; 2017 Auburn #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #60 of 70; 2017 Washington #61 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #62 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #63 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #64 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #65 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #66 of 70; 2017 Clemson #67 of 70; 2017 Tennessee #68 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Tennessee #2 of 70; 2017 Washington #3 of 70; 2017 Iowa #4 of 70; 2017 Maryland #6 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 California #8 of 70; 2017 Illinois #9 of 70; 2017 Stanford #11 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #12 of 70; 2017 Georgia #13 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 South Carolina #15 of 70; 2017 UCLA #16 of 70; 2017 Kentucky #17 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #18 of 70; 2017 Alabama #19 of 70; 2017 LSU #20 of 70; 2017 Indiana #21 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #22 of 70; 2017 Miami #23 of 70; 2017 Clemson #24 of 70; 2017 NC State #25 of 70; 2017 Texas Tech #26 of 70; 2017 Auburn #27 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #28 of 70; 2017 Virginia #29 of 70; 2017 Louisville #30 of 70; 2017 Arkansas #31 of 70; 2017 Penn State #32 of 70; 2017 Texas #33 of 70; 2017 Iowa State #34 of 70; 2017 Florida State #35 of 70; 2017 Ole Miss #36 of 70; 2017 Arizona #37 of 70; 2017 Kansas State #38 of 70; 2017 Utah #39 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Arizona State #41 of 70; 2017 Colorado #42 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Texas A&M #46 of 70; 2017 Oregon State #48 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #49 of 70; 2017 Boston College #50 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma State #51 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #52 of 70; 2017 Duke #53 of 70; 2017 USC #54 of 70; 2017 Baylor #55 of 70; 2017 Vanderbilt #56 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #57 of 70; 2017 Oregon #58 of 70; 2017 Washington State #59 of 70; 2017 Kansas #60 of 70; 2017 Missouri #61 of 70; 2017 West Virginia #62 of 70; 2017 Michigan #63 of 70; 2017 TCU #64 of 70; 2017 Florida #65 of 70; 2017 Mississippi State #66 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Oklahoma #68 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Western Michigan, which has no value for this metric. Power 5 median rank 35.