THIRD AND DATA

William & Mary game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 30at Furman21–23 L673525.335–14419–32–208224–120–217–5929:1548%42%
Sep 6vs Maine28–27 W592534.339–12413–20–129194–111–303–4727:0845%42%
Sep 13at #16 Virginia16–55 L492635.424–5913–25–20472–130–202–1122:2427%57%
Sep 20vs Charleston Southern34–7 W844475.350–15122–34–2962714–211–303–2536:0443%34%
Sep 27at Villanova24–31 L753564.739–12318–36–233239–151–103–2030:2640%50%
Oct 4vs North Carolina A&T38–34 W484058.432–2388–16–167122–81–323–2520:4638%42%
Oct 18vs Elon26–21 W683194.737–7022–31–249206–161–104–3032:1933%47%
Oct 25at New Hampshire24–34 L583926.834–18819–24–204205–101–103–1527:2348%53%
Nov 1vs UAlbany37–7 W844425.344–17527–40–267268–183–304–6036:4849%32%
Nov 8at Campbell30–27 W765056.638–22325–38–282275–121–317–5829:4151%52%
Nov 15at Hampton55–14 W624327.040–22318–22–209225–121–113–2530:1648%38%
Nov 22vs Richmond21–28 L571943.433–10815–24–86124–120–119–8528:3932%38%
Season12 games7–57874,3605.5445–1826219–342–2,53423768–16011–24651–4605:51:0943%45%

Success rate

William & Mary on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game42.5% · 44.5%
48
42
45
42
27
57
43
34
40
50
38
42
33
47
48
53
49
32
51
52
48
38
32
38
@ Furman
Maine
@ Virginia
Charleston Southern
@ Villanova
North Carolina A&T
Elon
@ New Hampshire
UAlbany
@ Campbell
@ Hampton
Richmond

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 26.5%, defense allows 56.6%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: William & Mary on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is William & Mary's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:William & Mary offense 43% (333 of 783)Opponent offense / William & Mary defense 45% (336 of 755)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Furman: opponent offense 42% of 62Furman: William & Mary offense 48% of 66Maine: opponent offense 42% of 66Maine: William & Mary offense 45% of 60#16 Virginia: opponent offense 57% of 83#16 Virginia: William & Mary offense 27% of 49Charleston Southern: opponent offense 34% of 44Charleston Southern: William & Mary offense 43% of 83Villanova: opponent offense 50% of 62Villanova: William & Mary offense 40% of 75North Carolina A&T: opponent offense 42% of 79North Carolina A&T: William & Mary offense 38% of 48Elon: opponent offense 47% of 57Elon: William & Mary offense 33% of 67New Hampshire: opponent offense 53% of 60New Hampshire: William & Mary offense 48% of 58UAlbany: opponent offense 32% of 59UAlbany: William & Mary offense 49% of 83Campbell: opponent offense 52% of 62Campbell: William & Mary offense 51% of 75Hampton: opponent offense 38% of 58Hampton: William & Mary offense 48% of 62Richmond: opponent offense 38% of 63Richmond: William & Mary offense 32% of 57
@ FurmanMaine@ #16 VirginiaCharleston Southern@ VillanovaNorth Carolina A&TElon@ New HampshireUAlbany@ Campbell@ HamptonRichmond
William & Mary offenseOpponent offense (William & Mary defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Furman

21–23 L · 66 plays to 62
William & Mary offense 48% (32/66)Furman offense 42% (26/62)

vs Maine

28–27 W · 60 plays to 66
William & Mary offense 45% (27/60)Maine offense 42% (28/66)

at #16 Virginia

16–55 L · 49 plays to 83
William & Mary offense 27% (13/49)Virginia offense 57% (47/83)

vs Charleston Southern

34–7 W · 83 plays to 44
William & Mary offense 43% (36/83)Charleston S. offense 34% (15/44)

at Villanova

24–31 L · 75 plays to 62
William & Mary offense 40% (30/75)Villanova offense 50% (31/62)

vs North Carolina A&T

38–34 W · 48 plays to 79
William & Mary offense 38% (18/48)N.C. A&T offense 42% (33/79)

vs Elon

26–21 W · 67 plays to 57
William & Mary offense 33% (22/67)Elon offense 47% (27/57)

at New Hampshire

24–34 L · 58 plays to 60
William & Mary offense 48% (28/58)New Hampshire offense 53% (32/60)

vs UAlbany

37–7 W · 83 plays to 59
William & Mary offense 49% (41/83)UAlbany offense 32% (19/59)

at Campbell

30–27 W · 75 plays to 62
William & Mary offense 51% (38/75)Campbell offense 52% (32/62)

at Hampton

55–14 W · 62 plays to 58
William & Mary offense 48% (30/62)Hampton offense 38% (22/58)

vs Richmond

21–28 L · 57 plays to 63
William & Mary offense 32% (18/57)Richmond offense 38% (24/63)