THIRD AND DATA

Wofford game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs The Citadel42–14 W573416.030–16019–27–181245–81–121–524:5555%49%
Sep 5vs Gardner-Webb17–13 W552083.833–8811–22–120127–150–026–6226:0935%37%
Sep 12at Kent State15–36 L531733.326–5813–27–115100–120–029–7022:3830%41%
Sep 19at Chattanooga7–41 L532504.735–929–18–15893–142–327–6123:0630%36%
Sep 26vs Tennessee Tech38–42 L543807.023–7619–31–304205–110–202–1520:3839%57%
Oct 3at Furman32–25 W634126.540–10415–23–308166–140–0110–9233:1039%41%
Oct 10at Elon16–0 W702523.638–9914–32–153134–180–105–5531:5428%29%
Oct 17vs VMI41–14 W575149.036–24416–21–270196–100–0112–8529:1552%23%
Oct 31at Samford9–10 L723865.450–22714–22–159225–151–124–4538:2844%27%
Season9 games5–45342,9165.5311–1148130–223–1,76814541–1174–81256–4904:10:1339%39%

Success rate

Wofford on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game39.3% · 38.7%
55
49
35
37
30
41
30
36
39
57
39
41
28
29
52
23
44
27
The Citadel
Gardner-Webb
@ Kent State
@ Chattanooga
Tennessee Tech
@ Furman
@ Elon
VMI
@ Samford
@ Western Carolina
East Tennessee State
@ Ole Miss

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Wofford on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Wofford's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Wofford offense 39% (208 of 529)Opponent offense / Wofford defense 39% (232 of 599)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%The Citadel: opponent offense 49% of 70The Citadel: Wofford offense 55% of 56Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 37% of 82Gardner-Webb: Wofford offense 35% of 54Kent State: opponent offense 41% of 71Kent State: Wofford offense 30% of 53Chattanooga: opponent offense 36% of 59Chattanooga: Wofford offense 30% of 53Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 57% of 76Tennessee Tech: Wofford offense 39% of 54Furman: opponent offense 41% of 76Furman: Wofford offense 39% of 64Elon: opponent offense 29% of 58Elon: Wofford offense 28% of 67VMI: opponent offense 23% of 56VMI: Wofford offense 52% of 56Samford: opponent offense 27% of 51Samford: Wofford offense 44% of 72
The CitadelGardner-Webb@ Kent State@ ChattanoogaTennessee Tech@ Furman@ ElonVMI@ Samford@ Western CarolinaEast Tennessee State@ #12 Ole Miss
Wofford offenseOpponent offense (Wofford defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs The Citadel

42–14 W · 56 plays to 70
Wofford offense 55% (31/56)The Citadel offense 49% (34/70)

vs Gardner-Webb

17–13 W · 54 plays to 82
Wofford offense 35% (19/54)Gardner-Webb offense 37% (30/82)

at Kent State

15–36 L · 53 plays to 71
Wofford offense 30% (16/53)Kent State offense 41% (29/71)

at Chattanooga

7–41 L · 53 plays to 59
Wofford offense 30% (16/53)Chattanooga offense 36% (21/59)

vs Tennessee Tech

38–42 L · 54 plays to 76
Wofford offense 39% (21/54)Tennessee Tech offense 57% (43/76)

at Furman

32–25 W · 64 plays to 76
Wofford offense 39% (25/64)Furman offense 41% (31/76)

at Elon

16–0 W · 67 plays to 58
Wofford offense 28% (19/67)Elon offense 29% (17/58)

vs VMI

41–14 W · 56 plays to 56
Wofford offense 52% (29/56)VMI offense 23% (13/56)

at Samford

9–10 L · 72 plays to 51
Wofford offense 44% (32/72)Samford offense 27% (14/51)