THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

AlabamaCrimson Tide

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2014’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Alabama played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2014

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Alabama12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Mississippi State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Mississippi State, #16 Missouri, #19 Auburn, #23 LSU)#17 (of 76 teams · 454.8 yds/g · 4,093 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 347.4 yds/g allowed · 3,127 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.6 /g · +122 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · +1 in these games · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 32:42 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.285 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.365 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #2–#75. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #2–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#74. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#76. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #2–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#123. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)#66 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#124. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#125. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#75. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#73. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #1–#73. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #2–#75. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range #2–#75. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)
2014Michigan State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 484.9 yds/g · 4,364 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 343 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 317.4 yds/g allowed · 2,857 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +15.4 /g · +139 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 21 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34:02 /g · 5h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 1.287 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Oregon13–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #10 Arizona · postseason: #3 Florida State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #10 Arizona, #14 UCLA, #22 Utah · postseason: #3 Florida State)#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 524.5 yds/g · 5,245 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 44.1 pts/g · 441 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 434.6 yds/g allowed · 4,346 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +18.9 /g · +189 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +12 in these games · 19 taken, 7 given · +1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.399 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.400 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 1.248 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Baylor11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 TCU)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 TCU, #11 Kansas State)#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 557.0 yds/g · 5,013 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 45.3 pts/g · 408 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 416.6 yds/g allowed · 3,749 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.1 /g · +145 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +11 in these games · 19 taken, 8 given · +1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 30:02 /g · 4h 30m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.273 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Auburn8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss, #11 Kansas State, #23 LSU)#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 502.0 yds/g · 4,518 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 3,786 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · +2.1 /g · +19 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 31:49 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Georgia10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 Missouri, #17 Clemson, #19 Auburn · postseason: #21 Louisville)#23 (of 76 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 4,332 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 379 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.3 /g · +133 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13 in these games · 22 taken, 9 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.274 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 0.175 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Stanford8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 UCLA)#40 (of 76 teams · 376.2 yds/g · 3,762 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 228 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 312.7 yds/g allowed · 3,127 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · -6 in these games · 10 taken, 16 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33:21 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 76 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #25 Minnesota · postseason: #19 Auburn)#16 (of 76 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 318 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 271.8 yds/g allowed · 2,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.3 /g · +147 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · -3 in these games · 11 taken, 14 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 32:20 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 1.300 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Clemson10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Louisville)#37 (of 76 teams · 382.9 yds/g · 3,829 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 291.6 yds/g allowed · 2,916 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · +5.6 /g · +56 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 32:23 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 76 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Georgia Tech11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Mississippi State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #13 Georgia, #17 Clemson · postseason: #7 Mississippi State)#14 (of 76 teams · 469.6 yds/g · 4,226 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 36.4 pts/g · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 387.1 yds/g allowed · 3,484 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +13.0 /g · +117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 23 taken, 13 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34:30 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.329 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 52% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 76 teams · 381.6 yds/g · 3,816 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 291 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 302.2 yds/g allowed · 3,022 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · +6.9 /g · +69 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 32:55 /g · 5h 29m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 76 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 76 teams · 1.286 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014TCU12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Ole Miss)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 Kansas State, #25 Minnesota · postseason: #9 Ole Miss)#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 533.7 yds/g · 5,337 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 45.8 pts/g · 458 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 392.6 yds/g allowed · 3,926 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +22.8 /g · +228 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +15 in these games · 31 taken, 16 given · +1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 30:06 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 76 teams · 0.254 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.384 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Ohio State14–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #18 Wisconsin, #25 Minnesota · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)#12 (of 76 teams · 475.9 yds/g · 4,283 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 42.1 pts/g · 379 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 340.9 yds/g allowed · 3,068 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 31:16 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 76 teams · 0.263 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 1.295 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Ole Miss9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Alabama, #7 Mississippi State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Alabama, #7 Mississippi State, #20 Boise State)#33 (of 76 teams · 405.1 yds/g · 3,241 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 202 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 359.1 yds/g allowed · 2,873 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · +8.4 /g · +67 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.50 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 30:03 /g · 4h 00m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 76 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 1.291 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.064 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Arizona State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah, #24 USC)#30 (of 76 teams · 416.7 yds/g · 4,167 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 437.7 yds/g allowed · 4,377 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · +4.6 /g · +46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 76 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.410 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 1.354 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Iowa7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 76 teams · 392.4 yds/g · 3,924 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 291 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 339.0 yds/g allowed · 3,390 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · +3.9 /g · +39 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · -5 in these games · 12 taken, 17 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 31:39 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 76 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 1.230 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014LSU8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss, #18 Wisconsin)#58 (of 76 teams · 342.4 yds/g · 3,082 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 181 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 344.1 yds/g allowed · 3,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · -1.0 /g · -9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33:31 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 76 teams · 0.052 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 1.250 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Missouri11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Minnesota)#50 (of 76 teams · 352.7 yds/g · 3,174 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 218 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 322.3 yds/g allowed · 2,901 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · +3.8 /g · +34 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 29:47 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 76 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 1.279 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Penn State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 267.5 yds/g · 2,140 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 14.0 pts/g · 112 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 274.8 yds/g allowed · 2,198 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 165 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · -6.6 /g · -53 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 30:04 /g · 4h 01m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 76 teams · -0.051 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 31% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.972 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Virginia5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Louisville)#55 (of 76 teams · 346.8 yds/g · 3,121 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 187 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 356.0 yds/g allowed · 3,204 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -3.9 /g · -35 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 31:06 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 76 teams · 0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Ohio State)#60 (of 76 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,052 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 21.1 pts/g · 190 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 3,054 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · -5 in these games · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 30:16 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 76 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.412 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Arkansas7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Ole Miss, #23 LSU)#43 (of 76 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,332 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 378.3 yds/g allowed · 3,405 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · +1.0 /g · +9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33:58 /g · 5h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 76 teams · 0.121 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 1.290 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 USC)#53 (of 76 teams · 348.7 yds/g · 3,138 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 331.4 yds/g allowed · 2,983 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 9 taken, 10 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 31:48 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 76 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Florida State13–13 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech, #17 Clemson, #21 Louisville)#26 (of 76 teams · 424.4 yds/g · 4,669 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 378 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 375.6 yds/g allowed · 4,131 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · +11.4 /g · +126 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · -4 in these games · 23 taken, 27 given · -0.36 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 30:52 /g · 5h 40m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 76 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 1.219 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Kansas State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 76 teams · 418.3 yds/g · 4,183 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 378.0 yds/g allowed · 3,780 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · +10.0 /g · +100 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +10 in these games · 19 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 32:19 /g · 5h 23m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 76 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Maryland7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 76 teams · 343.5 yds/g · 3,435 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 469.8 yds/g allowed · 4,698 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 323 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · -5.0 /g · -50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 27:15 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 76 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Miami6–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 76 teams · 405.2 yds/g · 3,647 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 340.7 yds/g allowed · 3,066 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 231 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · -1.0 /g · -9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 16 taken, 16 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 29:13 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 76 teams · 0.203 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.087 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Mississippi State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Auburn, #23 LSU)#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 496.8 yds/g · 3,974 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 270 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 424.6 yds/g allowed · 3,397 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 22.5 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · +11.3 /g · +90 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 31:47 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 76 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 50% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.101 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Oklahoma8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 76 teams · 475.0 yds/g · 4,750 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 36.7 pts/g · 367 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 401.4 yds/g allowed · 4,014 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 274 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · +9.3 /g · +93 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · -3 in these games · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 31:55 /g · 5h 19m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 76 teams · 0.220 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Pittsburgh6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#21 (of 76 teams · 437.7 yds/g · 3,939 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 383.6 yds/g allowed · 3,452 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · +0.6 /g · +5 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · -4 in these games · 9 taken, 13 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 33:34 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 76 teams · 0.230 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 0.247 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 52% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.124 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Purdue3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 76 teams · 335.7 yds/g · 3,021 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 430.3 yds/g allowed · 3,873 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · -11.6 /g · -104 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · -5 in these games · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 28:34 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 76 teams · 0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Texas6–74 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 76 teams · 371.5 yds/g · 3,715 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 226 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 365.7 yds/g allowed · 3,657 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · -0.5 /g · -5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 30:53 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 76 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.132 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014USC9–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)#24 (of 76 teams · 430.2 yds/g · 4,732 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 369 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 405.6 yds/g allowed · 4,461 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · +8.8 /g · +97 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.82 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 30:09 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 76 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.363 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 1.203 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 UCLA, #24 USC)#61 (of 76 teams · 338.2 yds/g · 3,382 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 416.2 yds/g allowed · 4,162 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 273 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · -2.6 /g · -26 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 76 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Duke9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech)#44 (of 76 teams · 369.1 yds/g · 3,322 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 257 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 409.9 yds/g allowed · 3,689 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · +5.9 /g · +53 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 27:53 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 76 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.120 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.057 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 76 teams · 355.1 yds/g · 3,196 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 360.4 yds/g allowed · 3,244 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · +2.3 /g · +21 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · +4 in these games · 17 taken, 13 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 31:53 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 76 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 76 teams · 396.9 yds/g · 3,572 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 308 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 398.8 yds/g allowed · 3,589 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 248 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 76 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 1.271 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014UCLA10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Arizona)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Arizona, #15 Arizona State, #24 USC · postseason: #11 Kansas State)#15 (of 76 teams · 461.4 yds/g · 5,075 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 353 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 394.8 yds/g allowed · 4,343 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 76 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · +5.3 /g · +58 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 29:16 /g · 5h 22m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 76 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.138 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Washington8–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 76 teams · 386.4 yds/g · 3,864 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 280 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 400.6 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 235 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · +4.5 /g · +45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 29:45 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 128 teams · 15% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 76 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 76 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014West Virginia7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Baylor)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Baylor)#8 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 492.6 yds/g · 5,419 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 344 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 4,541 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 28.6 pts/g allowed · 314 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +2.7 /g · +30 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -14 in these games · 13 taken, 27 given · -1.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 31:21 /g · 5h 45m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 76 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 1.346 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Arizona10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oregon)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Oregon, #15 Arizona State, #22 Utah)#18 (of 76 teams · 447.4 yds/g · 4,027 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 76 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 451.9 yds/g allowed · 4,067 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 242 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 76 teams · +8.8 /g · +79 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 76 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 28:49 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 76 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 1.305 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Illinois6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Minnesota)#65 (of 76 teams · 328.3 yds/g · 2,955 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 207 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 479.7 yds/g allowed · 4,317 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 35.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · -12.7 /g · -114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 27:27 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 76 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 0.247 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 1.271 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Indiana4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Missouri)#56 (of 76 teams · 346.6 yds/g · 3,119 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 182 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · 457.3 yds/g allowed · 4,116 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 35.0 pts/g allowed · 315 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · -14.8 /g · -133 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 27:31 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 76 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 1.345 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Kentucky5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#47 (of 76 teams · 356.0 yds/g · 3,204 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 444.2 yds/g allowed · 3,998 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 38.2 pts/g allowed · 344 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · -13.4 /g · -121 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 29:20 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 76 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 76 teams · 1.329 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 1.191 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014NC State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 76 teams · 352.0 yds/g · 2,816 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 197 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 390.5 yds/g allowed · 3,124 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · -6.6 /g · -53 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.25 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 28:46 /g · 3h 50m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 76 teams · 0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.122 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 1.236 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Northwestern5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Wisconsin)#47 (of 76 teams · 356.0 yds/g · 3,560 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 237 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 383.4 yds/g allowed · 3,834 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 76 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · -3.5 /g · -35 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · +3 in these games · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 76 teams · 30:12 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 76 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.121 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Oregon State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Arizona State)#41 (of 76 teams · 375.8 yds/g · 3,382 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 213 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 456.7 yds/g allowed · 4,110 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 36.4 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · -12.8 /g · -115 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · +0 in these games · 9 taken, 9 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 30:12 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 76 teams · 0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · 0.270 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 1.291 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.371 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Rutgers8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 76 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 3,252 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 207 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 460.1 yds/g allowed · 4,141 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 316 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · -12.1 /g · -109 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 29:26 /g · 4h 25m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 76 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 0.273 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.417 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Tennessee7–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 76 teams · 357.6 yds/g · 3,218 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 76 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 3,543 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · -4.1 /g · -37 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · -4 in these games · 15 taken, 19 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 29:34 /g · 4h 26m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 76 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · 1.224 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.381 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Washington State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 507.7 yds/g · 5,077 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 310 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 76 teams · 462.1 yds/g allowed · 4,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 41.8 pts/g allowed · 418 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · -10.8 /g · -108 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -15 in these games · 6 taken, 21 given · -1.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 76 teams · 31:51 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 76 teams · 0.192 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.296 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.405 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.414 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014California5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#11 (of 76 teams · 479.5 yds/g · 4,795 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 369 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 530.0 yds/g allowed · 5,300 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 42.1 pts/g allowed · 421 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · -5.2 /g · -52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · -5 in these games · 13 taken, 18 given · -0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 28:54 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 76 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Florida7–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Georgia)#64 (of 76 teams · 331.9 yds/g · 2,987 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 218 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 350.4 yds/g allowed · 3,154 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 76 teams · -1.3 /g · -12 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · +1 in these games · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 29:45 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.143 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 1.288 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Michigan5–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 297.6 yds/g · 2,976 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 165 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 325.8 yds/g allowed · 3,258 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 245 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · -8.0 /g · -80 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -13 in these games · 9 taken, 22 given · -1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 30:41 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 76 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 76 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.143 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014North Carolina6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Georgia Tech)#25 (of 76 teams · 425.4 yds/g · 3,829 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 283 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 478.2 yds/g allowed · 4,304 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 37.9 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · -6.4 /g · -58 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 26:08 /g · 3h 55m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 76 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 0.274 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Oklahoma State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 76 teams · 349.5 yds/g · 3,495 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · 466.7 yds/g allowed · 4,667 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · -10.2 /g · -102 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -9 in these games · 11 taken, 20 given · -0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 27:07 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#76 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 76 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 0.206 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · 1.309 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014South Carolina7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Georgia)#20 (of 76 teams · 440.8 yds/g · 3,967 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 76 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 289 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 462.1 yds/g allowed · 4,159 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 76 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 76 teams · -4.4 /g · -40 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · -6 in these games · 7 taken, 13 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · 31:12 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 76 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.293 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 76 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 1.325 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 76 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Syracuse3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 (of 76 teams · 316.7 yds/g · 3,167 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 138 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 76 teams · 358.4 yds/g allowed · 3,584 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 76 teams · -12.5 /g · -125 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 76 teams · -3 in these games · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 26:25 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 76 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 76 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 1.185 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.136 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Texas A&M8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Auburn)#28 (of 76 teams · 422.3 yds/g · 3,378 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 223 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 509.5 yds/g allowed · 4,076 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · 36.6 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 76 teams · -8.8 /g · -70 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 76 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.38 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 26:53 /g · 3h 35m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 76 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 76 teams · 43% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 76 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Texas Tech4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 490.9 yds/g · 4,909 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 76 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 536.2 yds/g allowed · 5,362 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 43.4 pts/g allowed · 434 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 76 teams · -14.0 /g · -140 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -10 in these games · 15 taken, 25 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 26:30 /g · 4h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 76 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.313 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 76 teams · 1.478 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 76 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Colorado2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 76 teams · 446.2 yds/g · 4,016 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 76 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 497.1 yds/g allowed · 4,474 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 387 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · -13.8 /g · -124 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -11 in these games · 7 taken, 18 given · -1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 32:28 /g · 4h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 76 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.287 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 76 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 76 teams · 1.202 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.403 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Iowa State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 76 teams · 376.3 yds/g · 3,763 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 227 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 541.6 yds/g allowed · 5,416 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 40.2 pts/g allowed · 402 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -17.5 /g · -175 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 76 teams · +2 in these games · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 76 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 0.280 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 76 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 76 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 76 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Kansas3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 306.3 yds/g · 3,063 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 15.6 pts/g · 156 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 473.8 yds/g allowed · 4,738 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 76 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 361 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -20.5 /g · -205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 76 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 76 teams · 30:12 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#90 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 76 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 76 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 34% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 76 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 1.334 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Wake Forest3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 193.0 yds/g · 1,544 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 12.1 pts/g · 97 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 76 teams · 399.8 yds/g allowed · 3,198 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 76 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -17.4 /g · -139 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 76 teams · -1 in these games · 12 taken, 13 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 76 teams · 31:16 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 76 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 76 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 76 teams · 1.191 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2014Vanderbilt3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2014. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 256.6 yds/g · 2,053 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 12.8 pts/g · 102 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 76 teams · 425.4 yds/g allowed · 3,403 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 283 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -22.6 /g · -181 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -10 in these games · 8 taken, 18 given · -1.25 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 76 teams · 27:30 /g · 3h 40m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · -0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 76 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 33% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 76 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 76 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 76 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20142014 AlabamaPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Baylor #2 of 76; 2014 TCU #3 of 76; 2014 Oregon #4 of 76; 2014 Washington State #5 of 76; 2014 Auburn #6 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #7 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #8 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #9 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #10 of 76; 2014 California #11 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #12 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #13 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #14 of 76; 2014 UCLA #15 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #16 of 76; 2014 Arizona #18 of 76; 2014 Colorado #19 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #20 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #21 of 76; 2014 Georgia #23 of 76; 2014 USC #24 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #25 of 76; 2014 Florida State #26 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #28 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #29 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #30 of 76; 2014 Miami #32 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #33 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #34 of 76; 2014 Iowa #35 of 76; 2014 Washington #36 of 76; 2014 Clemson #37 of 76; 2014 Louisville #38 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #39 of 76; 2014 Stanford #40 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #41 of 76; 2014 Texas #42 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #43 of 76; 2014 Duke #44 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #45 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #46 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #47 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #47 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #49 of 76; 2014 Missouri #50 of 76; 2014 NC State #51 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #52 of 76; 2014 Boston College #53 of 76; 2014 Virginia #55 of 76; 2014 Indiana #56 of 76; 2014 Maryland #57 of 76; 2014 LSU #58 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #60 of 76; 2014 Utah #61 of 76; 2014 Purdue #62 of 76; 2014 Florida #64 of 76; 2014 Illinois #65 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #66 of 76; 2014 Kansas #67 of 76; 2014 Michigan #68 of 76; 2014 Penn State #71 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #73 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #75 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 17 of 76. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #35
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Baylor #2 of 76; 2014 Oregon #3 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #4 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Georgia #8 of 76; 2014 California #9 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #10 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #11 of 76; 2014 Arizona #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 Florida State #14 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #15 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #16 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #17 of 76; 2014 USC #18 of 76; 2014 Auburn #20 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #21 of 76; 2014 UCLA #22 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #23 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #24 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #25 of 76; 2014 Washington State #26 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #28 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #29 of 76; 2014 Colorado #30 of 76; 2014 Iowa #31 of 76; 2014 Louisville #31 of 76; 2014 Duke #33 of 76; 2014 Washington #34 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #35 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #36 of 76; 2014 Maryland #37 of 76; 2014 Clemson #39 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #40 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #41 of 76; 2014 Utah #42 of 76; 2014 Miami #43 of 76; 2014 NC State #44 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #45 of 76; 2014 Boston College #46 of 76; 2014 Florida #47 of 76; 2014 Missouri #47 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #49 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #49 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #51 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #52 of 76; 2014 Illinois #53 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #53 of 76; 2014 Stanford #55 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #56 of 76; 2014 Texas #57 of 76; 2014 Purdue #58 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #59 of 76; 2014 Virginia #60 of 76; 2014 Indiana #62 of 76; 2014 LSU #63 of 76; 2014 Michigan #67 of 76; 2014 Kansas #68 of 76; 2014 Penn State #70 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #71 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #73 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #74 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 19 of 76. Power 5 median rank 35.
Total defensemedian #34
Total defense. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Wisconsin #2 of 76; 2014 Penn State #3 of 76; 2014 Clemson #4 of 76; 2014 Louisville #5 of 76; 2014 Stanford #6 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Missouri #8 of 76; 2014 Michigan #9 of 76; 2014 Boston College #10 of 76; 2014 Iowa #11 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #12 of 76; 2014 Miami #13 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #14 of 76; 2014 LSU #15 of 76; 2014 Florida #17 of 76; 2014 Virginia #18 of 76; 2014 Georgia #19 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #20 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #21 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #22 of 76; 2014 Texas #23 of 76; 2014 Florida State #24 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #25 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #26 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #27 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #28 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #30 of 76; 2014 NC State #31 of 76; 2014 TCU #32 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #33 of 76; 2014 UCLA #34 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #35 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #37 of 76; 2014 Washington #38 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #39 of 76; 2014 USC #41 of 76; 2014 Duke #42 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #43 of 76; 2014 Utah #44 of 76; 2014 Baylor #45 of 76; 2014 Auburn #47 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #49 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #50 of 76; 2014 Purdue #51 of 76; 2014 Oregon #52 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #53 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #55 of 76; 2014 Arizona #57 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #59 of 76; 2014 Indiana #60 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #61 of 76; 2014 Washington State #62 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #63 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #65 of 76; 2014 Maryland #66 of 76; 2014 Kansas #67 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #68 of 76; 2014 Illinois #69 of 76; 2014 Colorado #70 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #71 of 76; 2014 California #72 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #73 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #74 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 16 of 76. Power 5 median rank 34.
Scoring defensemedian #34
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ole Miss #1 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #2 of 76; 2014 Stanford #3 of 76; 2014 Clemson #5 of 76; 2014 Missouri #6 of 76; 2014 Penn State #7 of 76; 2014 LSU #8 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #9 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #10 of 76; 2014 Louisville #11 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #12 of 76; 2014 Duke #13 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #13 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #15 of 76; 2014 Boston College #15 of 76; 2014 Florida State #17 of 76; 2014 TCU #18 of 76; 2014 Texas #19 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #20 of 76; 2014 Washington #21 of 76; 2014 Michigan #22 of 76; 2014 Georgia #23 of 76; 2014 Virginia #24 of 76; 2014 USC #25 of 76; 2014 Iowa #27 of 76; 2014 Oregon #27 of 76; 2014 Florida #30 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #30 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #30 of 76; 2014 Miami #33 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #34 of 76; 2014 UCLA #35 of 76; 2014 Arizona #36 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #38 of 76; 2014 Utah #39 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #40 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #42 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #43 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #44 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #45 of 76; 2014 Baylor #46 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #47 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #47 of 76; 2014 Auburn #50 of 76; 2014 NC State #51 of 76; 2014 Maryland #53 of 76; 2014 Purdue #54 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #56 of 76; 2014 Indiana #57 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #58 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #59 of 76; 2014 Illinois #60 of 76; 2014 Kansas #61 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #62 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #63 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #64 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #65 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #67 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #70 of 76; 2014 Washington State #71 of 76; 2014 California #72 of 76; 2014 Colorado #73 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #74 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 4 of 76. Power 5 median rank 34.
Point marginmedian #34
Point margin. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Oregon #2 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #3 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #4 of 76; 2014 Baylor #6 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #10 of 76; 2014 Florida State #11 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #12 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #13 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #14 of 76; 2014 USC #15 of 76; 2014 Arizona #16 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #18 of 76; 2014 Louisville #19 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #20 of 76; 2014 Duke #21 of 76; 2014 Clemson #22 of 76; 2014 UCLA #23 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #24 of 76; 2014 Washington #25 of 76; 2014 Iowa #26 of 76; 2014 Missouri #27 of 76; 2014 Stanford #28 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #29 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #30 of 76; 2014 Auburn #31 of 76; 2014 Boston College #32 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #33 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #34 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #36 of 76; 2014 Texas #37 of 76; 2014 LSU #38 of 76; 2014 Miami #38 of 76; 2014 Florida #40 of 76; 2014 Utah #41 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #42 of 76; 2014 Virginia #43 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #44 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #45 of 76; 2014 Maryland #46 of 76; 2014 California #47 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #49 of 76; 2014 NC State #50 of 76; 2014 Penn State #50 of 76; 2014 Michigan #52 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #53 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #55 of 76; 2014 Washington State #56 of 76; 2014 Purdue #58 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #59 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #60 of 76; 2014 Illinois #61 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #62 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #63 of 76; 2014 Colorado #64 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #65 of 76; 2014 Indiana #66 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #68 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #69 of 76; 2014 Kansas #72 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #73 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 8 of 76. Power 5 median rank 34.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 TCU #1 of 76; 2014 Georgia #2 of 76; 2014 Baylor #3 of 76; 2014 Oregon #4 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #5 of 76; 2014 Arizona #6 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #6 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #6 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #6 of 76; 2014 USC #12 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #13 of 76; 2014 Washington #14 of 76; 2014 Duke #15 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #16 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #17 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #17 of 76; 2014 Utah #19 of 76; 2014 Missouri #20 of 76; 2014 Louisville #21 of 76; 2014 Maryland #21 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #21 of 76; 2014 NC State #24 of 76; 2014 LSU #25 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #26 of 76; 2014 Florida #27 of 76; 2014 Auburn #29 of 76; 2014 Clemson #29 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #29 of 76; 2014 Miami #29 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #29 of 76; 2014 UCLA #29 of 76; 2014 Virginia #29 of 76; 2014 Texas #39 of 76; 2014 Boston College #40 of 76; 2014 Illinois #40 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #40 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #43 of 76; 2014 Penn State #43 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #43 of 76; 2014 Kansas #46 of 76; 2014 Indiana #47 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #47 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #51 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #51 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #53 of 76; 2014 Florida State #54 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #55 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #56 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #56 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #56 of 76; 2014 California #59 of 76; 2014 Iowa #59 of 76; 2014 Purdue #61 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #61 of 76; 2014 Stanford #63 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #65 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #69 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #70 of 76; 2014 Colorado #72 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #73 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #74 of 76; 2014 Michigan #75 of 76; 2014 Washington State #76 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 27 of 76. Power 5 median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #35
Possession. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #2 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #4 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #5 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #6 of 76; 2014 LSU #7 of 76; 2014 Stanford #8 of 76; 2014 Louisville #9 of 76; 2014 Colorado #11 of 76; 2014 Clemson #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #15 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #16 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #17 of 76; 2014 Washington State #18 of 76; 2014 Auburn #19 of 76; 2014 Boston College #20 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #21 of 76; 2014 Iowa #22 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #23 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #24 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #24 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #26 of 76; 2014 Virginia #27 of 76; 2014 Texas #28 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 Michigan #30 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #31 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #32 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #33 of 76; 2014 Kansas #34 of 76; 2014 USC #35 of 76; 2014 TCU #36 of 76; 2014 Penn State #37 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #38 of 76; 2014 Baylor #39 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #41 of 76; 2014 Missouri #42 of 76; 2014 Florida #43 of 76; 2014 Washington #44 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #45 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #46 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #49 of 76; 2014 Utah #50 of 76; 2014 UCLA #51 of 76; 2014 Miami #52 of 76; 2014 Georgia #53 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #54 of 76; 2014 California #55 of 76; 2014 Arizona #56 of 76; 2014 NC State #57 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #59 of 76; 2014 Purdue #60 of 76; 2014 Oregon #61 of 76; 2014 Duke #62 of 76; 2014 Indiana #63 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #64 of 76; 2014 Illinois #65 of 76; 2014 Maryland #67 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #68 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #69 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #70 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #71 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #73 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 10 of 76. Power 5 median rank 35.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Auburn #1 of 128; 2014 Florida State #1 of 128; 2014 Iowa #1 of 128; 2014 Maryland #1 of 128; 2014 Stanford #1 of 128; 2014 Utah #1 of 128; 2014 Virginia #1 of 128; 2014 Baylor #15 of 128; 2014 Iowa State #16 of 128; 2014 Michigan #16 of 128; 2014 UCLA #16 of 128; 2014 Arkansas #20 of 128; 2014 Tennessee #24 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #26 of 128; 2014 Oregon #28 of 128; 2014 Oregon State #33 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma #34 of 128; 2014 Penn State #34 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2014 Washington State #38 of 128; 2014 USC #40 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #41 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #46 of 128; 2014 West Virginia #48 of 128; 2014 California #49 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #51 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #52 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #54 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #55 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #56 of 128; 2014 Duke #58 of 128; 2014 Indiana #59 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #60 of 128; 2014 Purdue #62 of 128; 2014 Colorado #65 of 128; 2014 Kentucky #67 of 128; 2014 Texas Tech #70 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #73 of 128; 2014 TCU #75 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma State #76 of 128; 2014 Florida #77 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #79 of 128; 2014 Missouri #82 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #83 of 128; 2014 Vanderbilt #86 of 128; 2014 South Carolina #87 of 128; 2014 Georgia #88 of 128; 2014 Texas #89 of 128; 2014 Kansas #90 of 128; 2014 Washington #94 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #100 of 128; 2014 Miami #101 of 128; 2014 LSU #102 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #105 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #106 of 128; 2014 Illinois #108 of 128; 2014 Texas A&M #109 of 128; 2014 NC State #110 of 128; 2014 Pittsburgh #115 of 128; 2014 Louisville #116 of 128; 2014 Boston College #118 of 128; 2014 Arizona #123 of 128. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 104 of 128. Power 5 median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #66
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Washington State #4 of 128; 2014 Auburn #5 of 128; 2014 Purdue #9 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #10 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #11 of 128; 2014 Duke #13 of 128; 2014 Stanford #19 of 128; 2014 Pittsburgh #24 of 128; 2014 Maryland #26 of 128; 2014 Baylor #29 of 128; 2014 UCLA #30 of 128; 2014 Iowa #32 of 128; 2014 South Carolina #32 of 128; 2014 Kentucky #35 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #36 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #38 of 128; 2014 Iowa State #39 of 128; 2014 California #40 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #41 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #42 of 128; 2014 Virginia #42 of 128; 2014 West Virginia #45 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #46 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #48 of 128; 2014 Georgia #50 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #55 of 128; 2014 Tennessee #56 of 128; 2014 Miami #60 of 128; 2014 Louisville #66 of 128; 2014 Arizona #67 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #69 of 128; 2014 Florida #70 of 128; 2014 TCU #72 of 128; 2014 Kansas #73 of 128; 2014 Texas #75 of 128; 2014 USC #76 of 128; 2014 Colorado #77 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #78 of 128; 2014 Arkansas #81 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #82 of 128; 2014 Oregon #84 of 128; 2014 Oregon State #85 of 128; 2014 Washington #91 of 128; 2014 Texas Tech #92 of 128; 2014 NC State #93 of 128; 2014 Clemson #96 of 128; 2014 Illinois #99 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #100 of 128; 2014 Michigan #101 of 128; 2014 Utah #106 of 128; 2014 Texas A&M #107 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma State #108 of 128; 2014 Boston College #112 of 128; 2014 Penn State #113 of 128; 2014 Indiana #115 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma #118 of 128; 2014 Florida State #119 of 128; 2014 Missouri #121 of 128; 2014 Vanderbilt #122 of 128; 2014 LSU #123 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 23 of 128. Power 5 median rank 66.
Returning rushingmedian #62
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Iowa #1 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Maryland #4 of 128; 2014 Penn State #6 of 128; 2014 Virginia #8 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #11 of 128; 2014 Colorado #15 of 128; 2014 Pittsburgh #17 of 128; 2014 Arkansas #22 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #23 of 128; 2014 Florida #26 of 128; 2014 Georgia #27 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #28 of 128; 2014 UCLA #30 of 128; 2014 Purdue #31 of 128; 2014 Texas #33 of 128; 2014 Oregon State #34 of 128; 2014 Miami #36 of 128; 2014 Oregon #36 of 128; 2014 Washington State #39 of 128; 2014 North Carolina #43 of 128; 2014 TCU #44 of 128; 2014 Illinois #47 of 128; 2014 Ole Miss #48 of 128; 2014 Texas Tech #50 of 128; 2014 South Carolina #51 of 128; 2014 USC #53 of 128; 2014 Duke #54 of 128; 2014 Vanderbilt #57 of 128; 2014 Mississippi State #58 of 128; 2014 Iowa State #62 of 128; 2014 Virginia Tech #63 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma State #66 of 128; 2014 California #68 of 128; 2014 Michigan #69 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #70 of 128; 2014 Arizona State #72 of 128; 2014 Louisville #74 of 128; 2014 Indiana #76 of 128; 2014 NC State #77 of 128; 2014 Baylor #79 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #81 of 128; 2014 Auburn #84 of 128; 2014 Missouri #85 of 128; 2014 Utah #87 of 128; 2014 West Virginia #88 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #90 of 128; 2014 Texas A&M #92 of 128; 2014 Florida State #93 of 128; 2014 Syracuse #98 of 128; 2014 Georgia Tech #99 of 128; 2014 Tennessee #100 of 128; 2014 Wake Forest #101 of 128; 2014 Kentucky #103 of 128; 2014 LSU #106 of 128; 2014 Clemson #110 of 128; 2014 Washington #110 of 128; 2014 Kansas #112 of 128; 2014 Oklahoma #113 of 128; 2014 Stanford #114 of 128; 2014 Kansas State #119 of 128; 2014 Boston College #120 of 128; 2014 Arizona #125 of 128. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 16 of 128. Power 5 median rank 62.
Team talent
Team talent. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Alabama, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Oregon #1 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #3 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #4 of 76; 2014 Auburn #7 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Baylor #10 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #11 of 76; 2014 TCU #12 of 76; 2014 Florida State #13 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #14 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #15 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #16 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #17 of 76; 2014 California #18 of 76; 2014 USC #19 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #20 of 76; 2014 Miami #21 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #22 of 76; 2014 Washington State #23 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #25 of 76; 2014 Arizona #26 of 76; 2014 NC State #27 of 76; 2014 UCLA #28 of 76; 2014 Stanford #29 of 76; 2014 Louisville #30 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #31 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #32 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #33 of 76; 2014 Colorado #34 of 76; 2014 Boston College #35 of 76; 2014 Iowa #36 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #37 of 76; 2014 Missouri #38 of 76; 2014 Washington #39 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #40 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #41 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #42 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #44 of 76; 2014 Duke #46 of 76; 2014 Texas #47 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #48 of 76; 2014 Clemson #49 of 76; 2014 Illinois #50 of 76; 2014 Indiana #51 of 76; 2014 Maryland #52 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #53 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #54 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #55 of 76; 2014 Purdue #56 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #57 of 76; 2014 LSU #59 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #60 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #61 of 76; 2014 Michigan #62 of 76; 2014 Utah #64 of 76; 2014 Virginia #65 of 76; 2014 Kansas #66 of 76; 2014 Florida #67 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #69 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #73 of 76; 2014 Penn State #74 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #75 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 6 of 76. Power 5 median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #1 of 76; 2014 Louisville #3 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #4 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #5 of 76; 2014 Missouri #6 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #7 of 76; 2014 Clemson #8 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #9 of 76; 2014 Stanford #12 of 76; 2014 TCU #13 of 76; 2014 Texas #14 of 76; 2014 Florida #15 of 76; 2014 Florida State #16 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #17 of 76; 2014 LSU #18 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #19 of 76; 2014 Washington #20 of 76; 2014 Virginia #21 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #22 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #23 of 76; 2014 Utah #24 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #25 of 76; 2014 Michigan #26 of 76; 2014 UCLA #27 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #28 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #29 of 76; 2014 Boston College #30 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #31 of 76; 2014 Iowa #32 of 76; 2014 Duke #33 of 76; 2014 USC #35 of 76; 2014 Arizona #36 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #37 of 76; 2014 Miami #38 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #39 of 76; 2014 Purdue #40 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #41 of 76; 2014 Maryland #43 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #44 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #45 of 76; 2014 Baylor #46 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #47 of 76; 2014 Oregon #50 of 76; 2014 NC State #51 of 76; 2014 Georgia #52 of 76; 2014 Auburn #54 of 76; 2014 Indiana #55 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #56 of 76; 2014 Kansas #57 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #58 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #59 of 76; 2014 Illinois #60 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #62 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #64 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #65 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #66 of 76; 2014 California #67 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #68 of 76; 2014 Colorado #69 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #70 of 76; 2014 Washington State #71 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #72 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #73 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 10 of 76. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #36
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Georgia Tech #1 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #2 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #3 of 76; 2014 Baylor #4 of 76; 2014 Oregon #6 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #7 of 76; 2014 Auburn #8 of 76; 2014 Georgia #9 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #11 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #12 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 76; 2014 TCU #14 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #15 of 76; 2014 UCLA #16 of 76; 2014 California #17 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #18 of 76; 2014 NC State #20 of 76; 2014 Florida State #21 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #22 of 76; 2014 Colorado #23 of 76; 2014 USC #25 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #26 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #27 of 76; 2014 Miami #28 of 76; 2014 Washington State #29 of 76; 2014 Stanford #31 of 76; 2014 Duke #32 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #33 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #34 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #35 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #36 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #37 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #38 of 76; 2014 Iowa #39 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #40 of 76; 2014 Michigan #41 of 76; 2014 Washington #42 of 76; 2014 Texas #43 of 76; 2014 Missouri #44 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #45 of 76; 2014 Louisville #46 of 76; 2014 Boston College #47 of 76; 2014 Arizona #48 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #49 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #50 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #51 of 76; 2014 Clemson #52 of 76; 2014 Illinois #53 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #54 of 76; 2014 Maryland #56 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #57 of 76; 2014 Florida #58 of 76; 2014 LSU #61 of 76; 2014 Utah #62 of 76; 2014 Purdue #63 of 76; 2014 Virginia #65 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #66 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #67 of 76; 2014 Kansas #68 of 76; 2014 Indiana #69 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #71 of 76; 2014 Penn State #72 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #74 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 19 of 76. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive success ratemedian #35
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Louisville #1 of 76; 2014 Clemson #2 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #3 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #4 of 76; 2014 TCU #5 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #6 of 76; 2014 Stanford #8 of 76; 2014 Penn State #9 of 76; 2014 LSU #10 of 76; 2014 Florida #11 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #12 of 76; 2014 Missouri #13 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #14 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #15 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #16 of 76; 2014 Virginia #17 of 76; 2014 Texas #18 of 76; 2014 Boston College #19 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #20 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #22 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #24 of 76; 2014 Utah #25 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #26 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #27 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #28 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 UCLA #31 of 76; 2014 Arizona #32 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #33 of 76; 2014 Iowa #34 of 76; 2014 Baylor #35 of 76; 2014 Michigan #36 of 76; 2014 Oregon #37 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #38 of 76; 2014 Washington #39 of 76; 2014 Indiana #40 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #41 of 76; 2014 USC #42 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #43 of 76; 2014 Maryland #45 of 76; 2014 Miami #46 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #47 of 76; 2014 Georgia #49 of 76; 2014 Kansas #50 of 76; 2014 Purdue #51 of 76; 2014 Auburn #52 of 76; 2014 NC State #53 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #54 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #55 of 76; 2014 Duke #56 of 76; 2014 Washington State #58 of 76; 2014 Colorado #59 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #61 of 76; 2014 Illinois #62 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #63 of 76; 2014 California #64 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #66 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #67 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #69 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #70 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #71 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #72 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #73 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 7 of 76. Power 5 median rank 35.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #37
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Texas Tech #2 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #4 of 76; 2014 Washington State #5 of 76; 2014 Oregon #6 of 76; 2014 Boston College #7 of 76; 2014 USC #9 of 76; 2014 Florida State #10 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #11 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #13 of 76; 2014 Arizona #14 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #15 of 76; 2014 Purdue #16 of 76; 2014 California #17 of 76; 2014 TCU #18 of 76; 2014 Louisville #19 of 76; 2014 Miami #20 of 76; 2014 Maryland #21 of 76; 2014 Indiana #22 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #23 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #24 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #25 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #26 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #27 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #28 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #29 of 76; 2014 Missouri #30 of 76; 2014 Auburn #31 of 76; 2014 Illinois #33 of 76; 2014 Virginia #34 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #36 of 76; 2014 Georgia #37 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #38 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #39 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #40 of 76; 2014 Clemson #41 of 76; 2014 Kansas #42 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #43 of 76; 2014 Iowa #45 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #46 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #47 of 76; 2014 Washington #48 of 76; 2014 Stanford #49 of 76; 2014 Colorado #52 of 76; 2014 Texas #53 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #54 of 76; 2014 LSU #55 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #56 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #57 of 76; 2014 Baylor #58 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #59 of 76; 2014 Utah #62 of 76; 2014 Penn State #63 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #65 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #66 of 76; 2014 Florida #67 of 76; 2014 Michigan #68 of 76; 2014 UCLA #69 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #70 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #71 of 76; 2014 NC State #72 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #73 of 76; 2014 Duke #74 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #75 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 8 of 76. Power 5 median rank 37.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #2 of 76; 2014 Duke #4 of 76; 2014 Ole Miss #5 of 76; 2014 Miami #6 of 76; 2014 Michigan #7 of 76; 2014 Texas #8 of 76; 2014 UCLA #9 of 76; 2014 Syracuse #10 of 76; 2014 Vanderbilt #11 of 76; 2014 Kansas State #14 of 76; 2014 Iowa State #15 of 76; 2014 Georgia Tech #16 of 76; 2014 Georgia #18 of 76; 2014 Kentucky #22 of 76; 2014 USC #23 of 76; 2014 Washington #24 of 76; 2014 Texas A&M #25 of 76; 2014 Iowa #26 of 76; 2014 Missouri #27 of 76; 2014 Purdue #28 of 76; 2014 Florida State #29 of 76; 2014 Virginia #30 of 76; 2014 South Carolina #31 of 76; 2014 NC State #32 of 76; 2014 Northwestern #33 of 76; 2014 Maryland #34 of 76; 2014 Minnesota #35 of 76; 2014 Oregon #36 of 76; 2014 LSU #38 of 76; 2014 Boston College #39 of 76; 2014 Stanford #40 of 76; 2014 California #42 of 76; 2014 Nebraska #43 of 76; 2014 North Carolina #44 of 76; 2014 Mississippi State #45 of 76; 2014 Wisconsin #46 of 76; 2014 Pittsburgh #47 of 76; 2014 Louisville #48 of 76; 2014 Florida #49 of 76; 2014 Arkansas #50 of 76; 2014 Ohio State #51 of 76; 2014 Illinois #52 of 76; 2014 Arizona #53 of 76; 2014 Texas Tech #54 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma State #55 of 76; 2014 Auburn #56 of 76; 2014 Baylor #58 of 76; 2014 Kansas #59 of 76; 2014 Utah #60 of 76; 2014 Indiana #61 of 76; 2014 West Virginia #62 of 76; 2014 Oklahoma #63 of 76; 2014 Clemson #65 of 76; 2014 Arizona State #66 of 76; 2014 Oregon State #67 of 76; 2014 Tennessee #68 of 76; 2014 TCU #69 of 76; 2014 Michigan State #70 of 76; 2014 Wake Forest #71 of 76; 2014 Colorado #72 of 76; 2014 Virginia Tech #73 of 76; 2014 Washington State #74 of 76; 2014 Rutgers #75 of 76. Marked: 2014 Alabama, ranked 37 of 76. Power 5 median rank 40.