THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

AlabamaCrimson Tide

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2015’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Alabama played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #19 Florida, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee · postseason: #1 Clemson, #3 Michigan State)#23 (of 75 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 297.2 yds/g allowed · 2,675 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 156 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +14.6 /g · +131 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 15 taken, 13 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:12 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 981.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 75 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.461 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#36 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#75. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#73 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #7–#127. 2 of 64 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 4 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#69. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#74. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #1–#75. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#73. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range #2–#75. 8 of 64 in the top 10.)
2015North Carolina11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 4,917 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 401 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 416.3 yds/g allowed · 4,163 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +18.0 /g · +180 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 25:23 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.353 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.375 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.116 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oklahoma11–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU, #16 Oklahoma State, #17 Baylor, #23 Tennessee)#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 520.3 yds/g · 5,203 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 45.6 pts/g · 456 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 337.9 yds/g allowed · 3,379 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 208 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +24.8 /g · +248 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +13 in these games · 25 taken, 12 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 31:28 /g · 5h 15m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 775.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.288 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Clemson14–11 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 510.5 yds/g · 5,105 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 295.2 yds/g allowed · 2,952 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 206 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +15.9 /g · +159 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.280 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 1.257 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.577 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Florida10–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #23 Tennessee)#61 (of 75 teams · 332.4 yds/g · 2,992 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 285.7 yds/g allowed · 2,571 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 15.0 pts/g allowed · 135 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +6.2 /g · +56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 32:58 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 789.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 75 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 1.218 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#40 (of 75 teams · 381.9 yds/g · 3,819 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 303.6 yds/g allowed · 3,036 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 199 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +10.9 /g · +109 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · -7 in these games · 8 taken, 15 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 32:46 /g · 5h 28m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 75 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Ohio State12–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#20 (of 75 teams · 441.7 yds/g · 3,975 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 143 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +20.1 /g · +181 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Baylor10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #16 Oklahoma State · postseason: #10 North Carolina)#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 550.4 yds/g · 4,954 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 42.7 pts/g · 384 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 412.6 yds/g allowed · 3,713 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +13.7 /g · +123 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.350 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 1.328 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Stanford12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame · postseason: #5 Iowa)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #25 USC, #25 USC · postseason: #5 Iowa)#21 (of 75 teams · 432.7 yds/g · 4,760 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 412 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 393.7 yds/g allowed · 4,331 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +12.8 /g · +141 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35:21 /g · 6h 29m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 766.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.317 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 51% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Wisconsin10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 USC)#54 (of 75 teams · 351.6 yds/g · 3,164 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 282.0 yds/g allowed · 2,538 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 635.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 75 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.195 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Georgia10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 75 teams · 366.3 yds/g · 3,297 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 196 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 318.2 yds/g allowed · 2,864 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · +3.3 /g · +30 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 30:34 /g · 4h 35m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 128 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 877.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 75 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.103 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oregon9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford, #25 USC)#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 530.8 yds/g · 5,308 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 478.4 yds/g allowed · 4,784 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 37.1 pts/g allowed · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · +2.5 /g · +25 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 27:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.297 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.421 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Iowa12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#34 (of 75 teams · 393.2 yds/g · 3,932 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 3,393 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.7 /g · +117 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +14 in these games · 22 taken, 8 given · +1.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 32:15 /g · 5h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 75 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.207 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Michigan State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#28 (of 75 teams · 410.3 yds/g · 3,693 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 337.7 yds/g allowed · 3,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.2 /g · +101 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 75 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arkansas8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss, #20 LSU, #23 Tennessee)#22 (of 75 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 3,886 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 423.1 yds/g allowed · 3,808 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · +2.6 /g · +23 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 11 taken, 9 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:51 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 695.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.287 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.280 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 1.186 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015California8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 515.2 yds/g · 5,152 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.2 yds/g allowed · 4,842 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · -1.2 /g · -12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 626.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 75 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 1.261 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#32 (of 75 teams · 399.3 yds/g · 3,594 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 243 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 342.8 yds/g allowed · 3,085 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 146 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · +10.8 /g · +97 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 10 taken, 8 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 24m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 1.324 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#36 (of 75 teams · 391.8 yds/g · 3,918 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 321.8 yds/g allowed · 3,218 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · +1.5 /g · +15 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 29:20 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 75 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.398 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Mississippi State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 75 teams · 444.0 yds/g · 3,552 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 415.5 yds/g allowed · 3,324 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 208 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · +0.3 /g · +2 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -6 in these games · 7 taken, 13 given · -0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 28:04 /g · 3h 45m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 680.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 75 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 0.156 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.126 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 TCU)#11 (of 75 teams · 482.6 yds/g · 4,343 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 369 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 471.7 yds/g allowed · 4,245 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 313 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +6.2 /g · +56 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +7 in these games · 19 taken, 12 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 29:40 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#88 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 651.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 75 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 1.308 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015TCU11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Baylor · postseason: #15 Oregon)#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 542.5 yds/g · 5,425 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 37.4 pts/g · 374 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 408.5 yds/g allowed · 4,085 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · +10.5 /g · +105 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 630.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 75 teams · 0.238 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 0.102 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Washington State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Oregon)#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 493.4 yds/g · 4,934 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 437.1 yds/g allowed · 4,371 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 30:31 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 540.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 75 teams · 0.202 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 1.197 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kentucky5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 75 teams · 344.6 yds/g · 3,101 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 164 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 406.1 yds/g allowed · 3,655 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · -10.6 /g · -95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · -5 in these games · 12 taken, 17 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 29:43 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 634.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 75 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 1.231 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015LSU9–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida)#29 (of 75 teams · 404.6 yds/g · 3,641 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 246 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 342.7 yds/g allowed · 3,084 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · +2.7 /g · +24 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 11 taken, 8 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 31:50 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 75 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Miami8–51 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 75 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 3,485 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 235 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 440.8 yds/g allowed · 3,967 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 292 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · -6.3 /g · -57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29:14 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 773.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 75 teams · 0.148 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 1.341 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.129 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 75 teams · 378.6 yds/g · 3,029 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 219 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 395.9 yds/g allowed · 3,167 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 237 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · -2.3 /g · -18 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.75 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 30:04 /g · 4h 01m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 610.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 75 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 1.345 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 322.9 yds/g allowed · 3,229 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · +0.5 /g · +5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 32% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015South Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 North Carolina)#55 (of 75 teams · 350.7 yds/g · 3,507 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 454.1 yds/g allowed · 4,541 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -8.3 /g · -83 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 28:03 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#99 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 725.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 75 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 0.256 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.395 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 1.253 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Northwestern)#30 (of 75 teams · 401.1 yds/g · 3,610 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 274 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 3,410 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0 in these games · 11 taken, 11 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 810.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 75 teams · 0.185 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 1.349 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas A&M8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 75 teams · 383.9 yds/g · 3,455 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 199 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 376.0 yds/g allowed · 3,384 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:07 /g · 4h 04m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 830.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 75 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015USC8–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#24 (of 75 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 408.8 yds/g allowed · 4,088 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · +3.7 /g · +37 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 31:12 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 926.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 75 teams · 0.236 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Auburn7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 75 teams · 356.1 yds/g · 3,205 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 208 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 415.4 yds/g allowed · 3,739 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 253 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · -5.0 /g · -45 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 10 taken, 11 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 75 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 0.179 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.134 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Colorado4–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 75 teams · 361.0 yds/g · 3,249 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 177 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 450.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -12.7 /g · -114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 30:35 /g · 4h 35m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 542.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 75 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.142 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Nebraska6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)#27 (of 75 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 278 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 390.9 yds/g allowed · 3,518 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 8 taken, 21 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 31:20 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 75 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Ole Miss10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Alabama)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #2 Alabama, #20 LSU · postseason: #16 Oklahoma State)#14 (of 75 teams · 470.4 yds/g · 3,763 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 258 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 414.3 yds/g allowed · 3,314 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · +6.0 /g · +48 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 27:44 /g · 3h 42m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 764.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 75 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 45% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Penn State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 75 teams · 369.5 yds/g · 2,956 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 190 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 2,765 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0.8 /g · +6 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 732.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 75 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 1.331 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas5–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #4 Oklahoma, #17 Baylor)#43 (of 75 teams · 379.3 yds/g · 4,172 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 25.0 pts/g · 275 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,969 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · -5.5 /g · -61 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · +7 in these games · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.64 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 28:08 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 821.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 75 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 38% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 1.274 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Texas Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 584.9 yds/g · 5,849 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 43.1 pts/g · 431 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 543.1 yds/g allowed · 5,431 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 44.6 pts/g allowed · 446 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1.5 /g · -15 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 28:30 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 641.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.302 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.354 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015UCLA8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#12 (of 75 teams · 474.1 yds/g · 4,741 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 408.0 yds/g allowed · 4,080 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +5.4 /g · +54 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 15 taken, 11 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 26:33 /g · 4h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 793.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 75 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.083 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Utah10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#41 (of 75 teams · 381.5 yds/g · 3,815 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 294 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 364.4 yds/g allowed · 3,644 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 24 taken, 18 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 75 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 75 teams · 395.0 yds/g · 3,950 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 260 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 412.0 yds/g allowed · 4,120 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 301 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -4.1 /g · -41 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:32 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 667.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 75 teams · 0.177 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 1.370 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Virginia Tech7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 75 teams · 338.6 yds/g · 3,386 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 252 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · +2.6 /g · +26 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 31:47 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 658.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 75 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 0.119 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.441 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Washington7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 USC)#37 (of 75 teams · 388.3 yds/g · 3,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 261 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 377.3 yds/g allowed · 3,396 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · +9.0 /g · +81 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 22 taken, 16 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 30:06 /g · 4h 31m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 667.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 75 teams · 0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 1.262 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015West Virginia8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#17 (of 75 teams · 453.1 yds/g · 4,531 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 314 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 403.8 yds/g allowed · 4,038 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · +5.3 /g · +53 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 29:57 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 128 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 625.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 75 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arizona State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#13 (of 75 teams · 470.6 yds/g · 4,706 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 339 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 472.8 yds/g allowed · 4,728 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 361 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · -2.2 /g · -22 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 32:45 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#87 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 75 teams · 0.158 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.639 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Boston College3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 237.7 yds/g · 2,139 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 89 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 2,797 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · -8.6 /g · -77 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 28:37 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 534.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · -0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 28% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.280 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Duke8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 75 teams · 392.6 yds/g · 3,533 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 230 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · 426.6 yds/g allowed · 3,839 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -3 in these games · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:04 /g · 4h 04m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 75 teams · 0.065 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 0.177 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 1.326 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Georgia Tech3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State)#58 (of 75 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,412 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 75 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 3,896 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 293 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 75 teams · -7.6 /g · -76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 12 taken, 22 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 31:10 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 590.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 75 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.252 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Minnesota6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 75 teams · 346.2 yds/g · 3,116 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 383.0 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · -5.7 /g · -51 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:22 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 516.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 75 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 75 teams · 380.7 yds/g · 3,807 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 270 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 361.9 yds/g allowed · 3,619 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · +1.9 /g · +19 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · +4 in these games · 14 taken, 10 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 32:43 /g · 5h 27m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 611.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 75 teams · 0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.432 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 309.1 yds/g · 2,782 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 459.8 yds/g allowed · 4,138 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · -8.2 /g · -74 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 508.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 75 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Arizona7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#16 (of 75 teams · 464.0 yds/g · 4,176 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 278 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.6 yds/g allowed · 4,361 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 40.3 pts/g allowed · 363 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -9.4 /g · -85 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -9 in these games · 7 taken, 16 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 27:22 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 606.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 75 teams · 0.159 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 75 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Illinois5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 75 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 3,252 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 149 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 3,456 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -11.3 /g · -102 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 28:53 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 531.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Iowa State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#26 (of 75 teams · 410.9 yds/g · 4,109 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 483.0 yds/g allowed · 4,830 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 35.5 pts/g allowed · 355 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · -10.9 /g · -109 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -11 in these games · 10 taken, 21 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 31:20 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 529.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 75 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 1.213 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kansas State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 75 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 2,982 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 75 teams · 29.2 pts/g · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 484.9 yds/g allowed · 4,364 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 36.4 pts/g allowed · 328 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · -7.2 /g · -65 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:16 /g · 4h 59m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 503.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 75 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.277 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 1.176 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · 1.283 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Maryland3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 75 teams · 363.2 yds/g · 3,269 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 3,786 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.9 /g · -143 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.408 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Vanderbilt4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 299.1 yds/g · 2,393 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 13.3 pts/g · 106 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 390.6 yds/g allowed · 3,125 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · -9.8 /g · -78 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0 in these games · 13 taken, 13 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 32:34 /g · 4h 21m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 75 teams · 333.7 yds/g · 3,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 467.8 yds/g allowed · 4,210 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.7 pts/g allowed · 348 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -16.0 /g · -144 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · -6 in these games · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 26:24 /g · 3h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 534.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 75 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 75 teams · 468.4 yds/g · 4,216 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 312 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.9 yds/g allowed · 4,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 37.9 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · -3.2 /g · -29 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 12 taken, 9 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 27:56 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 559.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 1.304 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.445 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 75 teams · 362.6 yds/g · 3,626 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.7 yds/g allowed · 4,947 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 31:38 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 602.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 75 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 1.216 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.406 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Wake Forest3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 307.0 yds/g · 3,070 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 15.1 pts/g · 151 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 397.4 yds/g allowed · 3,974 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 278 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -12.7 /g · -127 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 497.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 0.184 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Missouri5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 245.3 yds/g · 1,962 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 9.1 pts/g · 73 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 335.4 yds/g allowed · 2,683 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 149 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · -9.5 /g · -76 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 8 taken, 9 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 24:56 /g · 3h 20m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 642.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 31% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.118 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 1.162 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Oregon State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#65 (of 75 teams · 320.8 yds/g · 3,208 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 16.7 pts/g · 167 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 534.7 yds/g allowed · 5,347 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 41.6 pts/g allowed · 416 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -24.9 /g · -249 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 9 taken, 13 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 25:13 /g · 4h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 544.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 75 teams · 0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.330 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.134 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Kansas0–120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2015. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 304.3 yds/g · 3,043 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 12.2 pts/g · 122 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 561.6 yds/g allowed · 5,616 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 45.7 pts/g allowed · 457 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#75 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -33.5 /g · -335 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · -8 in these games · 15 taken, 23 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 27:40 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 500.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20152015 AlabamaPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #36
Total offense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Texas Tech #2 of 75; 2015 Baylor #3 of 75; 2015 TCU #4 of 75; 2015 Oregon #5 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #6 of 75; 2015 California #7 of 75; 2015 Clemson #8 of 75; 2015 Washington State #9 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #10 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 75; 2015 UCLA #12 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #13 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #14 of 75; 2015 Indiana #15 of 75; 2015 Arizona #16 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #17 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #19 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #20 of 75; 2015 Stanford #21 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #22 of 75; 2015 USC #24 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #26 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #27 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 LSU #29 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #30 of 75; 2015 Florida State #32 of 75; 2015 Virginia #33 of 75; 2015 Iowa #34 of 75; 2015 Duke #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Miami #38 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #39 of 75; 2015 Michigan #40 of 75; 2015 Utah #41 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 75; 2015 Texas #43 of 75; 2015 NC State #44 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Georgia #48 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Illinois #51 of 75; 2015 Colorado #52 of 75; 2015 Auburn #53 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #54 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #55 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #57 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #58 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #59 of 75; 2015 Purdue #60 of 75; 2015 Florida #61 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #65 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #67 of 75; 2015 Kansas #68 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #69 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #70 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 23 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring offensemedian #34
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #2 of 75; 2015 Baylor #3 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Oregon #6 of 75; 2015 Stanford #8 of 75; 2015 TCU #9 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Indiana #12 of 75; 2015 Washington State #13 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #14 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #15 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #15 of 75; 2015 California #17 of 75; 2015 UCLA #18 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 75; 2015 USC #22 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #23 of 75; 2015 Iowa #24 of 75; 2015 Arizona #25 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #25 of 75; 2015 Michigan #27 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #28 of 75; 2015 Utah #29 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #30 of 75; 2015 Washington #31 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 75; 2015 NC State #33 of 75; 2015 LSU #34 of 75; 2015 Florida State #35 of 75; 2015 Louisville #35 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #35 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #38 of 75; 2015 Miami #39 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #43 of 75; 2015 Texas #44 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #45 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #47 of 75; 2015 Auburn #49 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Purdue #52 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #53 of 75; 2015 Georgia #54 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Florida #56 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #57 of 75; 2015 Maryland #58 of 75; 2015 Colorado #59 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #60 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #61 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Illinois #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #68 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #72 of 75; 2015 Boston College #73 of 75; 2015 Missouri #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 21 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Total defensemedian #37
Total defense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #1 of 75; 2015 Florida #2 of 75; 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Boston College #6 of 75; 2015 Georgia #7 of 75; 2015 Louisville #8 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #10 of 75; 2015 Missouri #11 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #12 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #13 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 LSU #15 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #21 of 75; 2015 Utah #23 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #24 of 75; 2015 Washington #25 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #26 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #27 of 75; 2015 Illinois #28 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #31 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 75; 2015 Stanford #33 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #36 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #37 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #38 of 75; 2015 UCLA #39 of 75; 2015 TCU #40 of 75; 2015 USC #41 of 75; 2015 Virginia #42 of 75; 2015 Baylor #43 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #44 of 75; 2015 Auburn #45 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #46 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #48 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #50 of 75; 2015 Duke #51 of 75; 2015 Washington State #53 of 75; 2015 Miami #54 of 75; 2015 Colorado #57 of 75; 2015 Texas #58 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #59 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #63 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #64 of 75; 2015 Oregon #65 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #66 of 75; 2015 California #67 of 75; 2015 Arizona #68 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #69 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #70 of 75; 2015 Indiana #71 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #73 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #74 of 75; 2015 Kansas #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 4 of 75. Power 5 median rank 37.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Florida #1 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 Florida State #3 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #6 of 75; 2015 Boston College #7 of 75; 2015 Georgia #7 of 75; 2015 Missouri #9 of 75; 2015 Iowa #10 of 75; 2015 Michigan #11 of 75; 2015 Washington #12 of 75; 2015 Clemson #13 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #14 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #15 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #16 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #18 of 75; 2015 Utah #19 of 75; 2015 Penn State #20 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #20 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #22 of 75; 2015 Stanford #23 of 75; 2015 LSU #24 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Louisville #27 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #29 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 75; 2015 TCU #32 of 75; 2015 UCLA #34 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #35 of 75; 2015 Illinois #36 of 75; 2015 USC #39 of 75; 2015 Auburn #40 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #42 of 75; 2015 Baylor #43 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #45 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #46 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #46 of 75; 2015 NC State #48 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 Texas #50 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #51 of 75; 2015 Washington State #52 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Colorado #55 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75; 2015 California #59 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #60 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #61 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #62 of 75; 2015 Maryland #63 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #64 of 75; 2015 Oregon #65 of 75; 2015 Indiana #66 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Purdue #69 of 75; 2015 Arizona #70 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #72 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #73 of 75; 2015 Kansas #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 5 of 75. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma #1 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #3 of 75; 2015 Clemson #4 of 75; 2015 Baylor #6 of 75; 2015 Stanford #7 of 75; 2015 Iowa #8 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #9 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Florida State #11 of 75; 2015 TCU #12 of 75; 2015 Washington #14 of 75; 2015 Utah #15 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #16 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #17 of 75; 2015 Florida #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #18 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #20 of 75; 2015 UCLA #21 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #22 of 75; 2015 USC #23 of 75; 2015 Georgia #24 of 75; 2015 Washington State #25 of 75; 2015 LSU #26 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #28 of 75; 2015 Oregon #29 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #30 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #31 of 75; 2015 Louisville #32 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 75; 2015 Penn State #34 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #35 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #36 of 75; 2015 California #38 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #39 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #40 of 75; 2015 NC State #41 of 75; 2015 Indiana #42 of 75; 2015 Virginia #43 of 75; 2015 Auburn #44 of 75; 2015 Duke #45 of 75; 2015 Texas #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Miami #49 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #50 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #51 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #54 of 75; 2015 Boston College #55 of 75; 2015 Arizona #56 of 75; 2015 Missouri #57 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #59 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #60 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #61 of 75; 2015 Illinois #63 of 75; 2015 Colorado #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #66 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Maryland #69 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #72 of 75; 2015 Kansas #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 5 of 75. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #34
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Iowa #1 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #2 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #3 of 75; 2015 USC #4 of 75; 2015 Florida #5 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #6 of 75; 2015 NC State #7 of 75; 2015 Miami #9 of 75; 2015 Washington #9 of 75; 2015 Texas #12 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #13 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 75; 2015 Utah #13 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #13 of 75; 2015 Georgia #17 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #18 of 75; 2015 UCLA #18 of 75; 2015 Indiana #21 of 75; 2015 LSU #21 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #21 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #25 of 75; 2015 Florida State #25 of 75; 2015 Illinois #25 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #25 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #30 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #32 of 75; 2015 Oregon #33 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #34 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #34 of 75; 2015 California #37 of 75; 2015 TCU #37 of 75; 2015 Auburn #39 of 75; 2015 Baylor #39 of 75; 2015 Boston College #39 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #39 of 75; 2015 Missouri #43 of 75; 2015 Penn State #43 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 Virginia #45 of 75; 2015 Washington State #45 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #48 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #48 of 75; 2015 Stanford #50 of 75; 2015 Clemson #51 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #51 of 75; 2015 Duke #53 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #54 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Colorado #56 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #56 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #58 of 75; 2015 Purdue #59 of 75; 2015 Michigan #62 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #63 of 75; 2015 Kansas #64 of 75; 2015 Arizona #65 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #65 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #65 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #70 of 75; 2015 Maryland #72 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #72 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 25 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Possessionmedian #37
Possession. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #2 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #5 of 75; 2015 Virginia #6 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #7 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #8 of 75; 2015 Florida #9 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #11 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #12 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #13 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 Utah #15 of 75; 2015 LSU #16 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #17 of 75; 2015 Clemson #18 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #20 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #21 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #22 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #23 of 75; 2015 TCU #24 of 75; 2015 USC #25 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #28 of 75; 2015 Colorado #30 of 75; 2015 Georgia #31 of 75; 2015 Washington State #33 of 75; 2015 Washington #34 of 75; 2015 NC State #35 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #36 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #37 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #38 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #39 of 75; 2015 Penn State #40 of 75; 2015 Louisville #42 of 75; 2015 Florida State #43 of 75; 2015 Miami #44 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #45 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #46 of 75; 2015 California #47 of 75; 2015 Illinois #48 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #50 of 75; 2015 Auburn #51 of 75; 2015 Boston College #52 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Texas #55 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #56 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #57 of 75; 2015 Indiana #58 of 75; 2015 Baylor #59 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #60 of 75; 2015 Kansas #61 of 75; 2015 Maryland #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon #64 of 75; 2015 Arizona #65 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #66 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #67 of 75; 2015 Duke #68 of 75; 2015 UCLA #69 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #72 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #73 of 75; 2015 Missouri #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 4 of 75. Power 5 median rank 37.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arizona #1 of 128; 2015 Colorado #7 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #7 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #7 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #15 of 128; 2015 Indiana #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 128; 2015 California #21 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #25 of 128; 2015 Kansas #26 of 128; 2015 LSU #26 of 128; 2015 Missouri #30 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 128; 2015 USC #33 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #39 of 128; 2015 NC State #40 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #41 of 128; 2015 Penn State #41 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #43 of 128; 2015 Louisville #44 of 128; 2015 Miami #47 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #47 of 128; 2015 TCU #49 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #53 of 128; 2015 Stanford #54 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #54 of 128; 2015 Texas #58 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #72 of 128; 2015 Purdue #73 of 128; 2015 Illinois #78 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #79 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #80 of 128; 2015 Virginia #81 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Clemson #84 of 128; 2015 Washington State #85 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #87 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #88 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #91 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Baylor #94 of 128; 2015 Georgia #96 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 UCLA #99 of 128; 2015 Auburn #101 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Florida State #103 of 128; 2015 Maryland #104 of 128; 2015 Oregon #106 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #108 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #109 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #115 of 128; 2015 Duke #116 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #116 of 128; 2015 Boston College #118 of 128; 2015 Washington #120 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 97 of 128. Power 5 median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #73
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tennessee #7 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #10 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #11 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 Oregon #14 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #16 of 128; 2015 UCLA #17 of 128; 2015 California #18 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2015 Arizona #21 of 128; 2015 LSU #22 of 128; 2015 Penn State #24 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 128; 2015 TCU #28 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #31 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #32 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 128; 2015 Illinois #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #38 of 128; 2015 Washington #40 of 128; 2015 Colorado #41 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 128; 2015 Stanford #52 of 128; 2015 Baylor #55 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #56 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #58 of 128; 2015 Miami #66 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #67 of 128; 2015 Florida State #69 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #73 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2015 Virginia #77 of 128; 2015 Georgia #78 of 128; 2015 Utah #79 of 128; 2015 Florida #82 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #83 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 NC State #85 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Washington State #88 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #91 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #93 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Duke #96 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #102 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #105 of 128; 2015 Boston College #108 of 128; 2015 Maryland #111 of 128; 2015 Texas #114 of 128; 2015 Louisville #116 of 128; 2015 Auburn #117 of 128; 2015 Indiana #119 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #120 of 128; 2015 Missouri #122 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #123 of 128; 2015 USC #124 of 128; 2015 Kansas #126 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 121 of 128. Power 5 median rank 73.
Returning rushingmedian #70
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 128; 2015 Utah #6 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #7 of 128; 2015 California #9 of 128; 2015 Miami #12 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #15 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #20 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #21 of 128; 2015 Georgia #24 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #33 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #36 of 128; 2015 Baylor #37 of 128; 2015 Washington State #37 of 128; 2015 NC State #39 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #43 of 128; 2015 TCU #45 of 128; 2015 Oregon #46 of 128; 2015 Colorado #49 of 128; 2015 Clemson #52 of 128; 2015 Arizona #53 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #54 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #56 of 128; 2015 UCLA #57 of 128; 2015 Stanford #58 of 128; 2015 Boston College #59 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #63 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #66 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Duke #70 of 128; 2015 LSU #71 of 128; 2015 Missouri #73 of 128; 2015 Washington #74 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #76 of 128; 2015 Maryland #80 of 128; 2015 Texas #81 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #83 of 128; 2015 Florida State #85 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #86 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #87 of 128; 2015 Penn State #88 of 128; 2015 Louisville #89 of 128; 2015 Kansas #96 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #97 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #99 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #100 of 128; 2015 Florida #103 of 128; 2015 Illinois #104 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #107 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #109 of 128; 2015 USC #110 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #114 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #115 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #120 of 128; 2015 Virginia #121 of 128; 2015 Indiana #122 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #124 of 128; 2015 Purdue #125 of 128; 2015 Auburn #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 111 of 128. Power 5 median rank 70.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 USC #2 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Florida State #4 of 128; 2015 LSU #5 of 128; 2015 Georgia #6 of 128; 2015 Auburn #7 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Texas A&M #10 of 128; 2015 Texas #11 of 128; 2015 Tennessee #12 of 128; 2015 Clemson #13 of 128; 2015 UCLA #14 of 128; 2015 Florida #15 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma #16 of 128; 2015 Miami #17 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Ole Miss #19 of 128; 2015 Oregon #20 of 128; 2015 Penn State #21 of 128; 2015 South Carolina #22 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #24 of 128; 2015 Arkansas #25 of 128; 2015 North Carolina #26 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #27 of 128; 2015 Mississippi State #28 of 128; 2015 Washington #29 of 128; 2015 Virginia #30 of 128; 2015 Baylor #31 of 128; 2015 Virginia Tech #32 of 128; 2015 Oklahoma State #33 of 128; 2015 Missouri #34 of 128; 2015 Texas Tech #35 of 128; 2015 Louisville #36 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2015 Kentucky #38 of 128; 2015 TCU #39 of 128; 2015 California #40 of 128; 2015 West Virginia #41 of 128; 2015 Pittsburgh #42 of 128; 2015 NC State #43 of 128; 2015 Vanderbilt #44 of 128; 2015 Arizona #45 of 128; 2015 Maryland #46 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 128; 2015 Utah #50 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Duke #53 of 128; 2015 Indiana #54 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #55 of 128; 2015 Colorado #56 of 128; 2015 Washington State #57 of 128; 2015 Boston College #58 of 128; 2015 Purdue #59 of 128; 2015 Illinois #60 of 128; 2015 Iowa State #62 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #64 of 128; 2015 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2015 Kansas State #67 of 128; 2015 Kansas #68 of 128; 2015 Wake Forest #69 of 128. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 1 of 128. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #36
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 North Carolina #1 of 75; 2015 Stanford #2 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #3 of 75; 2015 Baylor #4 of 75; 2015 Oregon #5 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #7 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #8 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #9 of 75; 2015 Clemson #10 of 75; 2015 UCLA #11 of 75; 2015 California #13 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #14 of 75; 2015 LSU #15 of 75; 2015 TCU #16 of 75; 2015 USC #17 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #18 of 75; 2015 Washington State #19 of 75; 2015 Indiana #20 of 75; 2015 Florida State #21 of 75; 2015 Iowa #23 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #25 of 75; 2015 Michigan #26 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #27 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 Virginia #29 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #30 of 75; 2015 Arizona #32 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #33 of 75; 2015 Auburn #34 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #35 of 75; 2015 Miami #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Texas #38 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #40 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #41 of 75; 2015 Utah #43 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #44 of 75; 2015 Louisville #45 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #47 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #48 of 75; 2015 NC State #49 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #50 of 75; 2015 Florida #51 of 75; 2015 Georgia #52 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Colorado #54 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #55 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Duke #60 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #64 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #68 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #69 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #72 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 22 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Boston College #1 of 75; 2015 Clemson #3 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #4 of 75; 2015 Florida #5 of 75; 2015 Georgia #6 of 75; 2015 Michigan #7 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #8 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #9 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Utah #12 of 75; 2015 Iowa #13 of 75; 2015 Missouri #14 of 75; 2015 Washington #15 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #16 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #18 of 75; 2015 Illinois #20 of 75; 2015 TCU #21 of 75; 2015 Louisville #22 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #24 of 75; 2015 Baylor #25 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #26 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #27 of 75; 2015 UCLA #28 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #29 of 75; 2015 NC State #30 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #31 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #32 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #34 of 75; 2015 USC #35 of 75; 2015 Maryland #36 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #37 of 75; 2015 LSU #38 of 75; 2015 Washington State #39 of 75; 2015 Duke #41 of 75; 2015 Auburn #42 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #43 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #44 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #45 of 75; 2015 Texas #46 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #47 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #49 of 75; 2015 Virginia #51 of 75; 2015 Colorado #52 of 75; 2015 Oregon #53 of 75; 2015 Stanford #54 of 75; 2015 Miami #56 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #58 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #59 of 75; 2015 Indiana #60 of 75; 2015 Purdue #61 of 75; 2015 California #62 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #64 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #65 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #67 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #68 of 75; 2015 Arizona #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #74 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 2 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #36
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 75; 2015 Washington State #2 of 75; 2015 California #3 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #6 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #7 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #10 of 75; 2015 TCU #11 of 75; 2015 Clemson #12 of 75; 2015 Oregon #13 of 75; 2015 Baylor #14 of 75; 2015 UCLA #15 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #16 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #19 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #20 of 75; 2015 Michigan #22 of 75; 2015 Florida State #23 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #24 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #25 of 75; 2015 Arizona #26 of 75; 2015 Utah #27 of 75; 2015 USC #28 of 75; 2015 Iowa #29 of 75; 2015 LSU #30 of 75; 2015 Virginia #31 of 75; 2015 Washington #33 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #34 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #35 of 75; 2015 Indiana #36 of 75; 2015 Auburn #37 of 75; 2015 Georgia #38 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #41 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #42 of 75; 2015 Colorado #43 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #44 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #46 of 75; 2015 Penn State #47 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #48 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #49 of 75; 2015 Duke #50 of 75; 2015 Louisville #51 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #52 of 75; 2015 Florida #53 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #55 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Miami #57 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #58 of 75; 2015 NC State #59 of 75; 2015 Texas #60 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #61 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #63 of 75; 2015 Purdue #64 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #65 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #67 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #68 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #70 of 75; 2015 Kansas #71 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #72 of 75; 2015 Missouri #73 of 75; 2015 Boston College #74 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 32 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive success ratemedian #34
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Clemson #1 of 75; 2015 Boston College #2 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Florida #6 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #7 of 75; 2015 Georgia #8 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #10 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 TCU #12 of 75; 2015 Louisville #13 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #14 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #15 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #16 of 75; 2015 Florida State #17 of 75; 2015 Penn State #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #19 of 75; 2015 Utah #20 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #21 of 75; 2015 Iowa #22 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #23 of 75; 2015 Missouri #24 of 75; 2015 Baylor #25 of 75; 2015 NC State #26 of 75; 2015 LSU #27 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #28 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 75; 2015 Washington #32 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #33 of 75; 2015 Duke #34 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #36 of 75; 2015 Indiana #37 of 75; 2015 Illinois #38 of 75; 2015 Stanford #39 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #40 of 75; 2015 Maryland #41 of 75; 2015 Purdue #42 of 75; 2015 Washington State #43 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #44 of 75; 2015 UCLA #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 USC #48 of 75; 2015 Virginia #49 of 75; 2015 Oregon #53 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #54 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #55 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #56 of 75; 2015 Colorado #57 of 75; 2015 Texas #58 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #59 of 75; 2015 Auburn #60 of 75; 2015 California #61 of 75; 2015 Arizona #62 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #63 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #64 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #66 of 75; 2015 Miami #68 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #69 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #70 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #71 of 75; 2015 Kansas #72 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 3 of 75. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Oklahoma State #2 of 75; 2015 Oregon #4 of 75; 2015 Maryland #5 of 75; 2015 Louisville #6 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #7 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #8 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #9 of 75; 2015 Baylor #10 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #11 of 75; 2015 NC State #12 of 75; 2015 Miami #13 of 75; 2015 UCLA #14 of 75; 2015 Penn State #15 of 75; 2015 Florida State #16 of 75; 2015 LSU #17 of 75; 2015 USC #18 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #19 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #20 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #21 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #22 of 75; 2015 Indiana #23 of 75; 2015 Arizona #24 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #25 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #27 of 75; 2015 Boston College #28 of 75; 2015 Illinois #29 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #30 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #31 of 75; 2015 Texas #32 of 75; 2015 Iowa #33 of 75; 2015 Kansas #34 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 75; 2015 Washington #37 of 75; 2015 Florida #38 of 75; 2015 California #39 of 75; 2015 Virginia #40 of 75; 2015 Clemson #41 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #42 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #45 of 75; 2015 TCU #46 of 75; 2015 Duke #47 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #49 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #51 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #52 of 75; 2015 Michigan #53 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #55 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #56 of 75; 2015 Purdue #57 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #58 of 75; 2015 Washington State #59 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #60 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #61 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #63 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #64 of 75; 2015 Stanford #65 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #66 of 75; 2015 Colorado #68 of 75; 2015 Utah #69 of 75; 2015 Auburn #70 of 75; 2015 Missouri #72 of 75; 2015 Georgia #73 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 48 of 75. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #38
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UCLA #2 of 75; 2015 Texas A&M #4 of 75; 2015 North Carolina #5 of 75; 2015 Mississippi State #6 of 75; 2015 Miami #7 of 75; 2015 Oregon State #8 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #9 of 75; 2015 Auburn #10 of 75; 2015 Missouri #12 of 75; 2015 Washington #14 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma #15 of 75; 2015 Arkansas #17 of 75; 2015 Texas #18 of 75; 2015 Illinois #19 of 75; 2015 Florida State #20 of 75; 2015 Iowa #21 of 75; 2015 Penn State #22 of 75; 2015 Iowa State #23 of 75; 2015 Kansas #24 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #25 of 75; 2015 Florida #26 of 75; 2015 Georgia Tech #27 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #28 of 75; 2015 Syracuse #29 of 75; 2015 Kentucky #30 of 75; 2015 California #31 of 75; 2015 Colorado #33 of 75; 2015 South Carolina #34 of 75; 2015 Georgia #35 of 75; 2015 Washington State #36 of 75; 2015 Oregon #37 of 75; 2015 Vanderbilt #38 of 75; 2015 Arizona #39 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #40 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #42 of 75; 2015 Kansas State #43 of 75; 2015 Ole Miss #45 of 75; 2015 Stanford #46 of 75; 2015 Maryland #47 of 75; 2015 Wake Forest #48 of 75; 2015 LSU #49 of 75; 2015 USC #50 of 75; 2015 Oklahoma State #51 of 75; 2015 TCU #52 of 75; 2015 Texas Tech #53 of 75; 2015 Tennessee #54 of 75; 2015 Duke #55 of 75; 2015 Utah #56 of 75; 2015 Baylor #57 of 75; 2015 Michigan #60 of 75; 2015 Louisville #61 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 NC State #63 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #64 of 75; 2015 Virginia #65 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75; 2015 Boston College #67 of 75; 2015 West Virginia #69 of 75; 2015 Pittsburgh #70 of 75; 2015 Virginia Tech #71 of 75; 2015 Indiana #72 of 75; 2015 Clemson #74 of 75; 2015 Arizona State #75 of 75. Marked: 2015 Alabama, ranked 73 of 75. Power 5 median rank 38.