THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

AlabamaCrimson Tide

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

Peers are the 64 teams in 2016’s 5 power conferences: ACC, Big 12, Big Ten, Pac-12, SEC. Each figure is a team’s national rank.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Alabama played 9 such games.

Power 5, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC · postseason: #4 Washington)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC, #14 Auburn, #17 Florida, #20 LSU, #21 Tennessee · postseason: #4 Washington)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 494.0 yds/g · 4,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 356 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 263.6 yds/g allowed · 2,372 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.8 pts/g allowed · 124 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +25.8 /g · +232 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 31:59 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 982.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.290 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.369 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 64 Power 5 teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#33 (Total offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Scoring offense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Total defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#35 (Scoring defense: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#67. 12 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Possession: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning passing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#123. 5 of 64 in the top 10.)#60 (Returning receiving: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#125. 6 of 64 in the top 10.)#57 (Returning rushing: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#127. 6 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Team talent: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#72. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#32 (Offensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive EPA: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#33 (Offensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#71. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive success rate: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #1–#70. 10 of 64 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #2–#70. 9 of 64 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 7 of 64 in the top 10.)
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado, #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 493.1 yds/g · 4,931 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 344.3 yds/g allowed · 3,443 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.0 /g · +240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13 in these games · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31:21 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.380 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016LSU8–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Louisville)#31 (of 71 teams · 428.1 yds/g · 3,853 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 232 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 327.0 yds/g allowed · 2,943 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +75 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 32:07 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 917.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 71 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #12 Oklahoma State, #16 West Virginia · postseason: #14 Auburn)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 565.5 yds/g · 5,655 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.4 pts/g · 454 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,517 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:04 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 777.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford)#12 (of 71 teams · 491.9 yds/g · 4,427 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.8 pts/g · 358 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 412.8 yds/g allowed · 3,715 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.7 /g · +114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 16 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 32:09 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 522.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 1.320 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Colorado)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #16 West Virginia, #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #10 Colorado)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 517.0 yds/g · 5,170 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 376 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 486.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · +7.6 /g · +76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 28:43 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 631.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 0.218 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Colorado10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#23 (of 71 teams · 446.4 yds/g · 4,464 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 3,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · +10.6 /g · +106 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 31:17 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 526.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 71 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Auburn)#45 (of 71 teams · 381.6 yds/g · 3,816 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 227 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 323.5 yds/g allowed · 3,235 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · -1.7 /g · -17 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:46 /g · 5h 48m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 872.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 71 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.152 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Auburn8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#48 (of 71 teams · 377.7 yds/g · 3,399 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 3,474 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 71 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#47 (of 71 teams · 378.2 yds/g · 3,782 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 30:28 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 582.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 71 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.432 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)#61 (of 71 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 344.7 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +8.4 /g · +84 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 31:02 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 558.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 71 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kansas State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#44 (of 71 teams · 387.6 yds/g · 3,876 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 432.1 yds/g allowed · 4,321 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +3.3 /g · +33 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 17 taken, 11 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:57 /g · 5h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 505.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 71 teams · 0.182 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.140 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Miami9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #16 West Virginia)#39 (of 71 teams · 403.6 yds/g · 3,632 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 3,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · +6.4 /g · +58 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 28:13 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 745.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 71 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016North Carolina8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State, #23 Pittsburgh)#28 (of 71 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 4,318 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 415.6 yds/g allowed · 4,156 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 24:40 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 669.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #23 Pittsburgh)#38 (of 71 teams · 411.9 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 279 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 4,031 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +4.5 /g · +45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 613.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016USC10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)#14 (of 71 teams · 473.2 yds/g · 5,205 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 350 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +91 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 49m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 936.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 71 teams · 0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.259 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016West Virginia10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 497.8 yds/g · 4,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 424.8 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 228 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · +9.0 /g · +90 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 654.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 71 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida9–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#60 (of 71 teams · 338.4 yds/g · 3,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 209 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 330.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +6.1 /g · +55 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 798.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Minnesota9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 335.5 yds/g · 3,355 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 3,506 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 31:05 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 71 teams · 393.8 yds/g · 3,544 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 370.9 yds/g allowed · 3,338 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 32:15 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 71 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oregon State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 71 teams · 368.1 yds/g · 3,681 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 253 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 427.5 yds/g allowed · 4,275 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 32.1 pts/g allowed · 321 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · -6.8 /g · -68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 31:08 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 128 teams · 524.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 71 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.168 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas5–73 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 498.1 yds/g · 5,479 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 342 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 470.1 yds/g allowed · 5,171 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 371 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -2.6 /g · -29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.27 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 28:28 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 839.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 71 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 0.216 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.120 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kentucky7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Louisville)#40 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g · 3,628 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 3,970 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31:37 /g · 4h 45m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 128 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 652.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 71 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.328 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 71 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 4,173 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 375.4 yds/g allowed · 3,754 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -4.2 /g · -42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 32:26 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 719.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 71 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 71 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 3,677 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 226 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -2.0 /g · -20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 691.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Stanford10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#54 (of 71 teams · 359.6 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 276 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 4,096 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · +4.6 /g · +51 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 32:51 /g · 6h 01m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 778.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 71 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016TCU6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 71 teams · 444.9 yds/g · 4,449 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 435.4 yds/g allowed · 4,354 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · -0.1 /g · -1 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 27:54 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#107 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 28% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 128 teams · 665.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 71 teams · 0.176 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.271 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#30 (of 71 teams · 430.4 yds/g · 3,874 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 284 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 427.1 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +3.7 /g · +33 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:02 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 580.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 71 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 71 teams · 425.8 yds/g · 4,258 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 376.9 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -48 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -12 in these games · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 27:39 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 565.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 71 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 71 teams · 424.9 yds/g · 4,249 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 268 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 473.6 yds/g allowed · 4,736 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · -7.3 /g · -73 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 30:38 /g · 5h 06m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 552.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 71 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 0.286 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Maryland6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 71 teams · 353.9 yds/g · 3,185 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 182 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,108 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 297 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · -12.8 /g · -115 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -10 in these games · 5 taken, 15 given · -1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 27:32 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 652.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 71 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Mississippi State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 71 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 3,353 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 234 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 475.9 yds/g allowed · 3,807 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 272 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -38 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.38 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 29:31 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 679.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.314 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.402 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida, #22 Virginia Tech)#21 (of 71 teams · 450.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 520.9 yds/g allowed · 4,688 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · +1.4 /g · +13 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 27:46 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 813.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 71 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.374 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas A&M8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Auburn, #21 Tennessee)#25 (of 71 teams · 444.3 yds/g · 3,999 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 283 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 506.3 yds/g allowed · 4,557 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 29.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1.9 /g · +17 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +7 in these games · 22 taken, 15 given · +0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:35 /g · 3h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#93 (of 128 teams · 18% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 814.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 71 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 0.158 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.474 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Texas Tech5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 537.5 yds/g · 5,375 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 396 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 571.0 yds/g allowed · 5,710 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 46.0 pts/g allowed · 460 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · -6.4 /g · -64 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 10 taken, 16 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 30:54 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 604.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.333 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.381 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 1.306 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016UCLA4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 71 teams · 370.2 yds/g · 3,702 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 240 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 398.3 yds/g allowed · 3,983 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · -5.5 /g · -55 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:31 /g · 4h 15m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 819.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 71 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 1.393 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.084 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Vanderbilt6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Tennessee)#59 (of 71 teams · 341.8 yds/g · 3,076 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 18.8 pts/g · 169 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 392.1 yds/g allowed · 3,529 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 200 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · -3.4 /g · -31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 128 teams · 619.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 71 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arkansas7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida)#27 (of 71 teams · 436.9 yds/g · 3,932 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 255 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 492.8 yds/g allowed · 4,435 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · -9.0 /g · -81 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35:40 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 689.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 71 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.312 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 1.385 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.462 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Baylor7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Oklahoma State)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 512.0 yds/g · 4,608 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 286 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 496.1 yds/g allowed · 4,465 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 335 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · -5.4 /g · -49 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:54 /g · 3h 53m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 619.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 71 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 0.224 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 1.289 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.293 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Duke4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 71 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 3,996 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 465.0 yds/g allowed · 4,650 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · -10.8 /g · -108 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 30:53 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 599.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 71 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Missouri4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 71 teams · 448.0 yds/g · 4,032 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 192 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 510.3 yds/g allowed · 4,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -12.7 /g · -114 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · -5 in these games · 14 taken, 19 given · -0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 23:03 /g · 3h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 633.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 0.221 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.340 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 1.235 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 331.4 yds/g · 2,983 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 451.4 yds/g allowed · 4,063 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -14.3 /g · -129 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 618.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple)#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 298.0 yds/g · 2,682 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 173 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 3,684 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · -4.9 /g · -44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31:24 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 517.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 32% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ole Miss5–71 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#19 (of 71 teams · 454.6 yds/g · 4,091 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 483.9 yds/g allowed · 4,355 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g allowed · 340 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · -8.0 /g · -72 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 10 taken, 16 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:37 /g · 3h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 808.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 71 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.288 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 1.378 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.421 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oregon4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#13 (of 71 teams · 488.9 yds/g · 5,378 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 372 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 529.9 yds/g allowed · 5,829 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 469 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · -8.8 /g · -97 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 26:00 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 738.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 71 teams · 0.255 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.331 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.410 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016South Carolina6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Tennessee)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 304.7 yds/g · 2,742 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 14.8 pts/g · 133 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 401.2 yds/g allowed · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 29:44 /g · 4h 28m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 706.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 71 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.242 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 1.185 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arizona3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#41 (of 71 teams · 400.2 yds/g · 3,602 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 203 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 480.7 yds/g allowed · 4,326 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -21.1 /g · -190 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -13 in these games · 6 taken, 19 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:48 /g · 3h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 71 teams · 0.124 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 1.351 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016California5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#11 (of 71 teams · 492.4 yds/g · 4,924 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 354 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 527.5 yds/g allowed · 5,275 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.5 pts/g allowed · 435 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 28:22 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 601.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 71 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.316 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.247 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.221 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Illinois3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 2,951 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 174 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -17.2 /g · -172 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:21 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 523.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Purdue3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 71 teams · 356.8 yds/g · 3,211 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 206 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 465.2 yds/g allowed · 4,187 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 383 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -19.7 /g · -177 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -11 in these games · 12 taken, 23 given · -1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 512.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#37 (of 71 teams · 413.1 yds/g · 3,718 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 554.6 yds/g allowed · 4,991 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 387 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -18.1 /g · -163 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 28:16 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 520.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Arizona State5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 71 teams · 376.4 yds/g · 3,764 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 549.9 yds/g allowed · 5,499 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g allowed · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · -11.3 /g · -113 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 30:43 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 694.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 71 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.339 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.452 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 236.0 yds/g · 1,888 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 12.0 pts/g · 96 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 413.8 yds/g allowed · 3,310 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -179 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.422 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Kansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 71 teams · 355.3 yds/g · 3,198 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.8 pts/g · 160 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 485.0 yds/g allowed · 4,365 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.2 pts/g allowed · 362 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -202 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -7 in these games · 18 taken, 25 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 28:44 /g · 4h 19m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 491.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 0.234 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 64 Power 5 teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 253.6 yds/g · 2,536 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 99 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 469.3 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.8 pts/g allowed · 408 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -30.9 /g · -309 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 27:47 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 585.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.225 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Power 5, 20162016 AlabamaPower 5 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #33
Total offense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Baylor #6 of 71; 2016 Texas #7 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #8 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 California #11 of 71; 2016 Washington State #12 of 71; 2016 Oregon #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #21 of 71; 2016 Missouri #22 of 71; 2016 Colorado #23 of 71; 2016 TCU #24 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #25 of 71; 2016 Penn State #26 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #27 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #28 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Utah #30 of 71; 2016 LSU #31 of 71; 2016 Indiana #32 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #33 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #34 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #37 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #38 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #40 of 71; 2016 Arizona #41 of 71; 2016 Duke #42 of 71; 2016 NC State #43 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #44 of 71; 2016 Georgia #45 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Auburn #48 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #49 of 71; 2016 UCLA #51 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #52 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Stanford #54 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Purdue #56 of 71; 2016 Kansas #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #58 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #59 of 71; 2016 Florida #60 of 71; 2016 Iowa #61 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #65 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #66 of 71; 2016 Illinois #67 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 9 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Scoring offensemedian #33
Scoring offense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Washington State #5 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #6 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #11 of 71; 2016 Penn State #12 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #13 of 71; 2016 California #14 of 71; 2016 Oregon #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #17 of 71; 2016 USC #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Baylor #20 of 71; 2016 Colorado #21 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #23 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #24 of 71; 2016 Texas #25 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #26 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #27 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #28 of 71; 2016 Miami #29 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #31 of 71; 2016 TCU #31 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #34 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #35 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #36 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 LSU #39 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #41 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #42 of 71; 2016 Stanford #43 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #44 of 71; 2016 Auburn #45 of 71; 2016 Indiana #46 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #46 of 71; 2016 UCLA #48 of 71; 2016 Florida #50 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Georgia #52 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Arizona #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Missouri #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 NC State #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #63 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #64 of 71; 2016 Kansas #65 of 71; 2016 Illinois #66 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #67 of 71; 2016 Boston College #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 7 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Total defensemedian #36
Total defense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Georgia #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Florida #8 of 71; 2016 Louisville #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Washington #11 of 71; 2016 Iowa #12 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Colorado #17 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #18 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 NC State #20 of 71; 2016 Stanford #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 71; 2016 Indiana #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #25 of 71; 2016 UCLA #27 of 71; 2016 Miami #28 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #32 of 71; 2016 Washington State #34 of 71; 2016 Boston College #35 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #36 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #37 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 71; 2016 Illinois #41 of 71; 2016 Utah #42 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #43 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #44 of 71; 2016 TCU #45 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #46 of 71; 2016 Virginia #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Maryland #49 of 71; 2016 Duke #50 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #52 of 71; 2016 Texas #53 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #54 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #55 of 71; 2016 Arizona #56 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #57 of 71; 2016 Kansas #58 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #59 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #61 of 71; 2016 Baylor #62 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #63 of 71; 2016 Missouri #64 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #65 of 71; 2016 California #66 of 71; 2016 Oregon #67 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #68 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #69 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 2 of 71. Power 5 median rank 36.
Scoring defensemedian #35
Scoring defense. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #5 of 71; 2016 Florida #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Auburn #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #13 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #14 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Louisville #17 of 71; 2016 Miami #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Penn State #20 of 71; 2016 NC State #21 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #23 of 71; 2016 USC #24 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Georgia #27 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #28 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #29 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #31 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #32 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Washington State #34 of 71; 2016 Utah #35 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 TCU #36 of 71; 2016 Indiana #38 of 71; 2016 UCLA #38 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #40 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #41 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #42 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #43 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #46 of 71; 2016 Maryland #48 of 71; 2016 Texas #49 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #50 of 71; 2016 Missouri #50 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #52 of 71; 2016 Boston College #53 of 71; 2016 Illinois #54 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia #57 of 71; 2016 Baylor #58 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #59 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #60 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #63 of 71; 2016 Purdue #64 of 71; 2016 Oregon #65 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 71; 2016 California #67 of 71; 2016 Arizona #68 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #69 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 3 of 71. Power 5 median rank 35.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #7 of 71; 2016 Penn State #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Washington State #10 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #12 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 LSU #15 of 71; 2016 USC #16 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Miami #19 of 71; 2016 Auburn #20 of 71; 2016 Florida #21 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #22 of 71; 2016 Stanford #23 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #24 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 Utah #26 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #27 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #28 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #30 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #31 of 71; 2016 TCU #32 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Georgia #34 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #35 of 71; 2016 Texas #36 of 71; 2016 NC State #37 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #39 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #40 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #41 of 71; 2016 Indiana #42 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #43 of 71; 2016 Baylor #44 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #44 of 71; 2016 UCLA #46 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #48 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #49 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #50 of 71; 2016 California #51 of 71; 2016 Oregon #52 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #53 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #56 of 71; 2016 Missouri #59 of 71; 2016 Maryland #60 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Arizona #67 of 71; 2016 Boston College #68 of 71; 2016 Kansas #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 1 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Miami #5 of 71; 2016 Utah #5 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #8 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #10 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #10 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #10 of 71; 2016 Georgia #14 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #14 of 71; 2016 Florida #18 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #18 of 71; 2016 Iowa #20 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #21 of 71; 2016 Auburn #22 of 71; 2016 Washington State #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #24 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #26 of 71; 2016 California #27 of 71; 2016 LSU #28 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #28 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #30 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #33 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #33 of 71; 2016 Stanford #35 of 71; 2016 Louisville #36 of 71; 2016 NC State #36 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #36 of 71; 2016 Oregon #40 of 71; 2016 USC #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #42 of 71; 2016 Texas #44 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Illinois #45 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #45 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #45 of 71; 2016 TCU #45 of 71; 2016 UCLA #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #53 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #54 of 71; 2016 Missouri #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #57 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #59 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #59 of 71; 2016 Virginia #59 of 71; 2016 Baylor #62 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Maryland #64 of 71; 2016 Indiana #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Arizona #67 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 36 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #36
Possession. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Arkansas #1 of 71; 2016 Georgia #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #4 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #9 of 71; 2016 Utah #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #13 of 71; 2016 NC State #14 of 71; 2016 Washington State #15 of 71; 2016 LSU #16 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #18 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #21 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #24 of 71; 2016 Washington #25 of 71; 2016 Colorado #26 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #27 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #28 of 71; 2016 Iowa #29 of 71; 2016 Boston College #31 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #32 of 71; 2016 Duke #33 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #35 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #36 of 71; 2016 Virginia #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Florida #39 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #42 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #43 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #44 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 71; 2016 Kansas #46 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Purdue #48 of 71; 2016 Louisville #49 of 71; 2016 Texas #50 of 71; 2016 Penn State #51 of 71; 2016 California #52 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #53 of 71; 2016 Miami #54 of 71; 2016 Auburn #56 of 71; 2016 TCU #57 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #58 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #59 of 71; 2016 Indiana #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Oregon #63 of 71; 2016 Baylor #64 of 71; 2016 Arizona #65 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #66 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #67 of 71; 2016 UCLA #68 of 71; 2016 Illinois #69 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #70 of 71; 2016 Missouri #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 17 of 71. Power 5 median rank 36.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Auburn #1 of 128; 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #1 of 128; 2016 Texas #1 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #1 of 128; 2016 Kansas #12 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 128; 2016 Virginia #12 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #12 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 128; 2016 Boston College #19 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #22 of 128; 2016 Iowa #22 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Illinois #25 of 128; 2016 Miami #25 of 128; 2016 LSU #30 of 128; 2016 Washington #30 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Duke #36 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #37 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #42 of 128; 2016 UCLA #44 of 128; 2016 Maryland #46 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #51 of 128; 2016 Georgia #52 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #53 of 128; 2016 Washington State #55 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #58 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #59 of 128; 2016 Arizona #64 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #65 of 128; 2016 Colorado #67 of 128; 2016 Missouri #69 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #74 of 128; 2016 Purdue #77 of 128; 2016 Baylor #78 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #81 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #89 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #93 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #93 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #97 of 128; 2016 Indiana #99 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Penn State #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #106 of 128; 2016 TCU #107 of 128; 2016 Stanford #109 of 128; 2016 Oregon #111 of 128; 2016 NC State #112 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #113 of 128; 2016 USC #114 of 128; 2016 California #115 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #118 of 128; 2016 Florida #121 of 128; 2016 Utah #122 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 101 of 128. Power 5 median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #60
Returning receiving. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #2 of 128; 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 NC State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #6 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #8 of 128; 2016 USC #11 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #15 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #18 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #19 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 Maryland #22 of 128; 2016 LSU #23 of 128; 2016 Penn State #28 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #29 of 128; 2016 Indiana #31 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #33 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #34 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Washington State #38 of 128; 2016 Purdue #44 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 128; 2016 Missouri #47 of 128; 2016 Boston College #49 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #51 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #56 of 128; 2016 Colorado #58 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Georgia #63 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #64 of 128; 2016 Virginia #65 of 128; 2016 Stanford #66 of 128; 2016 Kansas #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Miami #71 of 128; 2016 Oregon #72 of 128; 2016 Iowa #74 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #74 of 128; 2016 Texas #78 of 128; 2016 TCU #79 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #88 of 128; 2016 Utah #88 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #92 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #93 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #94 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Florida #101 of 128; 2016 Illinois #102 of 128; 2016 Duke #103 of 128; 2016 Baylor #105 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128; 2016 Auburn #110 of 128; 2016 Washington #111 of 128; 2016 Arizona #113 of 128; 2016 UCLA #114 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #115 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #121 of 128; 2016 California #124 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 54 of 128. Power 5 median rank 60.
Returning rushingmedian #57
Returning rushing. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #1 of 128; 2016 LSU #2 of 128; 2016 Washington State #5 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #6 of 128; 2016 Miami #9 of 128; 2016 Virginia #10 of 128; 2016 Louisville #12 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #23 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #25 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #27 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #29 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #30 of 128; 2016 Purdue #31 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #33 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Boston College #39 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Georgia #42 of 128; 2016 Washington #43 of 128; 2016 Oregon #44 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #48 of 128; 2016 Penn State #49 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 USC #51 of 128; 2016 Duke #52 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #55 of 128; 2016 Texas #57 of 128; 2016 NC State #58 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #64 of 128; 2016 California #65 of 128; 2016 Baylor #67 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #74 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #75 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #75 of 128; 2016 Stanford #77 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #78 of 128; 2016 Iowa #79 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #80 of 128; 2016 Maryland #85 of 128; 2016 Kansas #86 of 128; 2016 Illinois #93 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #94 of 128; 2016 Arizona #95 of 128; 2016 Indiana #96 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #103 of 128; 2016 Missouri #106 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #108 of 128; 2016 UCLA #110 of 128; 2016 TCU #117 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #119 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128; 2016 Auburn #122 of 128; 2016 Utah #123 of 128; 2016 Florida #124 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 127 of 128. Power 5 median rank 57.
Team talentmedian #33
Team talent. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 USC #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #3 of 128; 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia #6 of 128; 2016 Auburn #7 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Texas #11 of 128; 2016 UCLA #12 of 128; 2016 Texas A&M #13 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2016 Ole Miss #15 of 128; 2016 Florida #16 of 128; 2016 Stanford #17 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2016 Miami #19 of 128; 2016 Penn State #20 of 128; 2016 Oregon #21 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 128; 2016 South Carolina #23 of 128; 2016 Washington #24 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #25 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #26 of 128; 2016 Arkansas #27 of 128; 2016 Mississippi State #28 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #29 of 128; 2016 TCU #30 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #31 of 128; 2016 Louisville #32 of 128; 2016 Kentucky #33 of 128; 2016 Maryland #34 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Missouri #38 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #39 of 128; 2016 Baylor #40 of 128; 2016 Vanderbilt #41 of 128; 2016 Virginia #42 of 128; 2016 Arizona #43 of 128; 2016 NC State #44 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 128; 2016 Texas Tech #46 of 128; 2016 California #47 of 128; 2016 Duke #48 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #49 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #50 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Indiana #53 of 128; 2016 Iowa #55 of 128; 2016 Iowa State #56 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #59 of 128; 2016 Boston College #60 of 128; 2016 Colorado #62 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #63 of 128; 2016 Illinois #64 of 128; 2016 Washington State #65 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #67 of 128; 2016 Purdue #68 of 128; 2016 Kansas State #70 of 128; 2016 Kansas #72 of 128. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 1 of 128. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive EPAmedian #32
Offensive EPA. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Washington #2 of 71; 2016 Louisville #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #5 of 71; 2016 Washington State #7 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #10 of 71; 2016 Oregon #11 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 California #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 LSU #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #18 of 71; 2016 Baylor #19 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Miami #23 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #24 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #26 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #27 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #28 of 71; 2016 TCU #29 of 71; 2016 Texas #30 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #31 of 71; 2016 Colorado #32 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #36 of 71; 2016 Utah #37 of 71; 2016 Stanford #38 of 71; 2016 Auburn #39 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #40 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Arizona #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Iowa #46 of 71; 2016 UCLA #47 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #48 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Georgia #50 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #51 of 71; 2016 Missouri #52 of 71; 2016 NC State #53 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #54 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #55 of 71; 2016 Indiana #56 of 71; 2016 Florida #57 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #58 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #60 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Virginia #65 of 71; 2016 Kansas #67 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #69 of 71; 2016 Boston College #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 6 of 71. Power 5 median rank 32.
Defensive EPAmedian #33
Defensive EPA. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Louisville #7 of 71; 2016 Colorado #8 of 71; 2016 LSU #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 UCLA #12 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #17 of 71; 2016 Auburn #18 of 71; 2016 Indiana #19 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #20 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #21 of 71; 2016 Penn State #22 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 Georgia #24 of 71; 2016 USC #25 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Miami #27 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #28 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #29 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #30 of 71; 2016 TCU #31 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #32 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #33 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Washington State #38 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #39 of 71; 2016 Illinois #40 of 71; 2016 Stanford #41 of 71; 2016 Boston College #42 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Utah #44 of 71; 2016 Texas #45 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Missouri #49 of 71; 2016 Baylor #51 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 Kansas #53 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #59 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #61 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #62 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Arizona #64 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #66 of 71; 2016 California #67 of 71; 2016 Oregon #68 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #69 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 1 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Offensive success ratemedian #33
Offensive success rate. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Washington State #5 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 USC #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #10 of 71; 2016 Texas #11 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #12 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #16 of 71; 2016 California #17 of 71; 2016 LSU #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Oregon #20 of 71; 2016 Baylor #21 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #22 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #23 of 71; 2016 Duke #24 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #25 of 71; 2016 TCU #27 of 71; 2016 Utah #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #29 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #30 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Georgia #32 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #33 of 71; 2016 Penn State #34 of 71; 2016 Stanford #36 of 71; 2016 Auburn #38 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #39 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Miami #43 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Missouri #45 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #46 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #47 of 71; 2016 Florida #48 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #49 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #50 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #52 of 71; 2016 Arizona #53 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #55 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #56 of 71; 2016 NC State #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Purdue #59 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #62 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #63 of 71; 2016 UCLA #64 of 71; 2016 Illinois #65 of 71; 2016 Kansas #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #67 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 6 of 71. Power 5 median rank 33.
Defensive success ratemedian #34
Defensive success rate. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #6 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #9 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Florida #11 of 71; 2016 Washington #12 of 71; 2016 Indiana #13 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 USC #17 of 71; 2016 Iowa #18 of 71; 2016 TCU #20 of 71; 2016 Georgia #21 of 71; 2016 UCLA #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #25 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #26 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #27 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #28 of 71; 2016 Utah #29 of 71; 2016 Miami #30 of 71; 2016 Stanford #31 of 71; 2016 Boston College #32 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #33 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #34 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #35 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #37 of 71; 2016 Washington State #38 of 71; 2016 Texas #39 of 71; 2016 Duke #41 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #42 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #45 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #46 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #47 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #48 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #49 of 71; 2016 Baylor #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #53 of 71; 2016 Purdue #54 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #55 of 71; 2016 Illinois #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #58 of 71; 2016 Arizona #59 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Missouri #61 of 71; 2016 Kansas #62 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #63 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #64 of 71; 2016 Maryland #65 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #66 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #67 of 71; 2016 California #68 of 71; 2016 Oregon #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 1 of 71. Power 5 median rank 34.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Texas A&M #2 of 71; 2016 Penn State #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #5 of 71; 2016 Louisville #6 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #8 of 71; 2016 Oregon #9 of 71; 2016 Maryland #10 of 71; 2016 UCLA #11 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #12 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #13 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #15 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 71; 2016 Indiana #18 of 71; 2016 Arizona #19 of 71; 2016 Miami #20 of 71; 2016 Missouri #21 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #23 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #25 of 71; 2016 Purdue #26 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #27 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #31 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #33 of 71; 2016 Washington #34 of 71; 2016 NC State #35 of 71; 2016 Baylor #36 of 71; 2016 Illinois #39 of 71; 2016 TCU #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #41 of 71; 2016 Stanford #42 of 71; 2016 USC #43 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #45 of 71; 2016 Washington State #46 of 71; 2016 California #47 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #48 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #49 of 71; 2016 Boston College #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Colorado #52 of 71; 2016 Florida #53 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Utah #55 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Kansas #57 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #58 of 71; 2016 Iowa #59 of 71; 2016 Georgia #60 of 71; 2016 Auburn #61 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #63 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Duke #66 of 71; 2016 Texas #67 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #68 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 38 of 71. Power 5 median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #37
Defensive explosiveness. Power 5, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCLA #2 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #6 of 71; 2016 Illinois #7 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Oregon State #10 of 71; 2016 South Carolina #12 of 71; 2016 Maryland #13 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #14 of 71; 2016 Oregon #15 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #16 of 71; 2016 Kentucky #17 of 71; 2016 California #18 of 71; 2016 Texas A&M #19 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #20 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #21 of 71; 2016 Iowa State #22 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #25 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Missouri #27 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Washington #30 of 71; 2016 Vanderbilt #31 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Georgia #34 of 71; 2016 TCU #35 of 71; 2016 Texas #36 of 71; 2016 Kansas #37 of 71; 2016 Florida #38 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Kansas State #40 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #41 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Baylor #43 of 71; 2016 Colorado #44 of 71; 2016 Texas Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #46 of 71; 2016 Stanford #47 of 71; 2016 Penn State #48 of 71; 2016 Washington State #49 of 71; 2016 Arizona #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #52 of 71; 2016 Indiana #53 of 71; 2016 NC State #55 of 71; 2016 USC #56 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Purdue #58 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #59 of 71; 2016 Utah #61 of 71; 2016 Louisville #62 of 71; 2016 Mississippi State #63 of 71; 2016 Duke #65 of 71; 2016 Ole Miss #66 of 71; 2016 Boston College #67 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #68 of 71; 2016 Arizona State #69 of 71; 2016 Arkansas #70 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Alabama, ranked 60 of 71. Power 5 median rank 37.