| 2009 | Arkansas State4–8 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #95 (of 120 teams · 328.8 yds/g · 3,946 yds) | #90 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 272 points) | #41 (of 120 teams · 340.5 yds/g allowed · 4,086 yds) | #45 (of 120 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 279 points) | #72 (of 120 teams · -0.6 /g · -7 on the season) | #87 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 19 taken, 24 given · -0.42 /g) | #57 (of 120 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #75 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #62 (of 120 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #69 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #45 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #85 (of 120 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays) | #48 (of 120 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #48 (Total offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #3–#101. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #72 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #16–#104. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #97 (Total defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #41–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #97 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #45–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #91 (Point margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #30–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #87 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #8–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #57 (Possession: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #9–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | #75 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #18–#108. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #84 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #14–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #69 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #18–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #84 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #13–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) | #57 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #5–#85. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) | #68 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range #17–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) |
| 2009 | UL Monroe6–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #48 (of 120 teams · 392.3 yds/g · 4,708 yds) | #72 (of 120 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 307 points) | #44 (of 120 teams · 347.0 yds/g allowed · 4,164 yds) | #74 (of 120 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 328 points) | #79 (of 120 teams · -1.8 /g · -21 on the season) | #102 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 22 taken, 29 given · -0.58 /g) | #9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:18 /g · 4h 04m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #77 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #48 (of 120 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #54 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #61 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #57 (of 120 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays) | #56 (of 120 teams · 0.913 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Louisiana6–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #76 (of 120 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 4,341 yds) | #93 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g · 266 points) | #92 (of 120 teams · 404.3 yds/g allowed · 4,852 yds) | #97 (of 120 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 364 points) | #102 (of 120 teams · -8.2 /g · -98 on the season) | #29 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 27 taken, 22 given · +0.42 /g) | #67 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 40m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 120 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #81 (of 120 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #84 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #84 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #69 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays) | #88 (of 120 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Middle Tennessee10–3 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #27 (of 120 teams · 421.7 yds/g · 5,482 yds) | #23 (of 120 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 416 points) | #50 (of 120 teams · 354.9 yds/g allowed · 4,613 yds) | #49 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points) | #30 (of 120 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season) | #8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 33 taken, 21 given · +0.92 /g) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:46 /g · 3h 38m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #104 (of 120 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #14 (of 120 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #83 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #13 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #68 (of 120 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays) | #68 (of 120 teams · 0.934 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Troy9–4 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 485.7 yds/g · 6,314 yds) | #16 (of 120 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 438 points) | #104 (of 120 teams · 424.5 yds/g allowed · 5,519 yds) | #92 (of 120 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 387 points) | #49 (of 120 teams · +3.9 /g · +51 on the season) | #93 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 21 taken, 27 given · -0.46 /g) | #94 (of 120 teams · 17:42 /g · 3h 50m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #18 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #88 (of 120 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #18 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #53 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #23 (of 120 teams · 0.977 average PPA on successful plays) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Florida Atlantic5–7 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #15 (of 120 teams · 432.1 yds/g · 5,185 yds) | #60 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 329 points) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 453.2 yds/g allowed · 5,438 yds) | #106 (of 120 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points) | #91 (of 120 teams · -6.3 /g · -76 on the season) | #58 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.08 /g) | #25 (of 120 teams · 19:25 /g · 3h 53m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #20 (of 120 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #38 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.047 average PPA on successful plays) | #100 (of 120 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | North Texas2–10 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #36 (of 120 teams · 408.7 yds/g · 4,904 yds) | #63 (of 120 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 319 points) | #97 (of 120 teams · 412.3 yds/g allowed · 4,948 yds) | #112 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 427 points) | #105 (of 120 teams · -9.0 /g · -108 on the season) | #117 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -14 on the season · 15 taken, 29 given · -1.17 /g) | #53 (of 120 teams · 18:45 /g · 3h 45m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #61 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #84 (of 120 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #29 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #97 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #78 (of 120 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays) | #31 (of 120 teams · 0.883 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Florida International3–9 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #100 (of 120 teams · 320.9 yds/g · 3,851 yds) | #88 (of 120 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 275 points) | #119 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 491.6 yds/g allowed · 5,899 yds) | #111 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 424 points) | #110 (of 120 teams · -12.4 /g · -149 on the season) | #83 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.33 /g) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 16:31 /g · 3h 18m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #108 (of 120 teams · -0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #100 (of 120 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #110 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful) | #100 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #32 (of 120 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays) | #81 (of 120 teams · 0.946 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2009 | Western Kentucky0–12 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2009. Range 0–0.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #101 (of 120 teams · 320.8 yds/g · 3,849 yds) | #104 (of 120 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 245 points) | #118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 478.3 yds/g allowed · 5,739 yds) | #119 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 39.6 pts/g allowed · 475 points) | #113 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -19.2 /g · -230 on the season) | #115 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · -12 on the season · 16 taken, 28 given · -1.00 /g) | #44 (of 120 teams · 19:01 /g · 3h 48m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #76 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #117 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #91 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #118 — bottom 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #24 (of 120 teams · 0.976 average PPA on successful plays) | #17 (of 120 teams · 0.846 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |