Metrics

Arkansas StateRed Wolves

Season
Current

Sun Belt

Sun Belt, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Arkansas State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 120 teams · 403.4 yds/g · 4,841 yards)#42 (of 120 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points)#105 (of 120 teams · 437.1 yds/g allowed · 5,245 yards)#91 (of 120 teams · 30.8 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#69 (of 120 teams · -0.8 /g · -9 on the season)#51 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#119 (of 120 teams · 16:18 /g · 3h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.084 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#101 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Sun Belt teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#69 (Total offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #17–#108. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#87 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #20–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Total defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #61–#105. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#84 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #65–#112. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#87 (Point margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #53–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #36–#120. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#53 (Possession: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #9–#120. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#78 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #34–#107. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#66 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #21–#111. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #32–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #22–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#74 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #2–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#37 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range #11–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2010Florida Atlantic480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 120 teams · 302.3 yds/g · 3,627 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 16.8 pts/g · 202 points)#85 (of 120 teams · 401.3 yds/g allowed · 4,816 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#106 (of 120 teams · -12.4 /g · -149 on the season)#109 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 17 taken, 27 given · -0.83 /g)#85 (of 120 teams · 17:53 /g · 3h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 120 teams · -0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#92 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.910 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.879 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Florida International760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 120 teams · 395.1 yds/g · 5,136 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g · 374 points)#61 (of 120 teams · 368.9 yds/g allowed · 4,796 yards)#65 (of 120 teams · 27.3 pts/g allowed · 355 points)#62 (of 120 teams · +1.5 /g · +19 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.31 /g)#27 (of 120 teams · 19:27 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#22 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.874 average PPA on successful plays)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.942 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Louisiana390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 120 teams · 350.6 yds/g · 4,207 yards)#92 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 268 points)#82 (of 120 teams · 399.4 yds/g allowed · 4,793 yards)#112 (of 120 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 444 points)#110 (of 120 teams · -14.7 /g · -176 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 22 taken, 25 given · -0.25 /g)#53 (of 120 teams · 18:50 /g · 3h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 120 teams · -0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.046 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#95 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.057 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.865 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Middle Tennessee670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 (of 120 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,835 yards)#62 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 344 points)#72 (of 120 teams · 386.6 yds/g allowed · 5,026 yards)#69 (of 120 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 365 points)#76 (of 120 teams · -1.6 /g · -21 on the season)#120 (of 120 teams · -19 on the season · 19 taken, 38 given · -1.46 /g)#120 (of 120 teams · 15:33 /g · 3h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#30 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.847 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010North Texas390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 (of 120 teams · 375.3 yds/g · 4,503 yards)#87 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 287 points)#77 (of 120 teams · 394.4 yds/g allowed · 4,733 yards)#82 (of 120 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#87 (of 120 teams · -5.8 /g · -69 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g)#38 (of 120 teams · 19:10 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#78 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Troy850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#17 (of 120 teams · 453.5 yds/g · 5,895 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 34.1 pts/g · 443 points)#89 (of 120 teams · 409.9 yds/g allowed · 5,328 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#53 (of 120 teams · +3.9 /g · +50 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 30 taken, 30 given · +0.00 /g)#90 (of 120 teams · 17:43 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#25 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.812 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 120 teams · 1.082 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010UL Monroe570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 120 teams · 347.0 yds/g · 4,164 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 250 points)#68 (of 120 teams · 380.3 yds/g allowed · 4,564 yards)#97 (of 120 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 389 points)#102 (of 120 teams · -11.6 /g · -139 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 19 taken, 25 given · -0.50 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:13 /g · 4h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 120 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#68 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.834 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Western Kentucky2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Sun Belt teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 120 teams · 319.0 yds/g · 3,828 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 274 points)#67 (of 120 teams · 380.2 yds/g allowed · 4,562 yards)#99 (of 120 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 398 points)#100 (of 120 teams · -10.3 /g · -124 on the season)#36 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.33 /g)#16 (of 120 teams · 19:53 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.023 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#115 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.877 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Sun Belt, 20102010 Arkansas StateSun Belt medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #69
Total offense. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Troy #17 of 120; 2010 Florida International #46 of 120; 2010 North Texas #64 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #83 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #85 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #98 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 40 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 69.
Scoring offensemedian #87
Scoring offense. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Troy #20 of 120; 2010 Florida International #51 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #62 of 120; 2010 North Texas #87 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #90 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #92 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #101 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 42 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 87.
Total defensemedian #77
Total defense. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida International #61 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #67 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #68 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #72 of 120; 2010 North Texas #77 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #82 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #85 of 120; 2010 Troy #89 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 105 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 77.
Scoring defensemedian #84
Scoring defense. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida International #65 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #79 of 120; 2010 North Texas #82 of 120; 2010 Troy #84 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #97 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #99 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 91 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 84.
Point marginmedian #87
Point margin. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Troy #53 of 120; 2010 Florida International #62 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #76 of 120; 2010 North Texas #87 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #100 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #102 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #106 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 69 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 87.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Western Kentucky #36 of 120; 2010 Florida International #38 of 120; 2010 Troy #55 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #70 of 120; 2010 North Texas #70 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #90 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #109 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 51 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #53
Possession. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UL Monroe #9 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #16 of 120; 2010 Florida International #27 of 120; 2010 North Texas #38 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #53 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #85 of 120; 2010 Troy #90 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 119 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 53.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #78
Offensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Troy #61 of 120; 2010 Florida International #71 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #75 of 120; 2010 North Texas #78 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #79 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #85 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #96 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 34 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 78.
Defensive EPAmedian #66
Defensive EPA. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UL Monroe #21 of 120; 2010 Florida International #22 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #41 of 120; 2010 Troy #64 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #66 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #67 of 120; 2010 North Texas #70 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 76 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 66.
Offensive success ratemedian #78
Offensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Troy #32 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #54 of 120; 2010 Florida International #72 of 120; 2010 North Texas #78 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #89 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #101 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #106 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #116 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 33 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 78.
Defensive success ratemedian #68
Defensive success rate. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida International #22 of 120; 2010 Troy #25 of 120; 2010 North Texas #29 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #30 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #68 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #92 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #95 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 101 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 68.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #74
Offensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Louisiana #2 of 120; 2010 North Texas #56 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #60 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #69 of 120; 2010 UL Monroe #74 of 120; 2010 Florida International #92 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #104 of 120; 2010 Troy #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 80 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 74.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #37
Defensive explosiveness. Sun Belt, 2010, best rank first: 2010 UL Monroe #11 of 120; 2010 Louisiana #22 of 120; 2010 Western Kentucky #33 of 120; 2010 Florida Atlantic #37 of 120; 2010 Middle Tennessee #53 of 120; 2010 Florida International #73 of 120; 2010 North Texas #91 of 120; 2010 Troy #119 of 120. Marked: 2010 Arkansas State, ranked 21 of 120. Sun Belt median rank 37.