Metrics

Boston CollegeEagles

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Boston College480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 298.8 yds/g · 3,585 yards)#112 (of 120 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 218 points)#71 (of 120 teams · 394.3 yds/g allowed · 4,732 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#86 (of 120 teams · -5.3 /g · -64 on the season)#93 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g)#50 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 3h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 120 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#99 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#85 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.978 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.844 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#63 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #16–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #21–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #4–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #4–#102. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #14–#104. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #15–#106. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #6–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #8–#107. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #10–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #33–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #5–#110. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #6–#106. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range #7–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Clemson1041 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#24 (of 120 teams · 440.8 yds/g · 6,171 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 470 points)#72 (of 120 teams · 394.4 yds/g allowed · 5,521 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 410 points)#52 (of 120 teams · +4.3 /g · +60 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.14 /g)#101 (of 120 teams · 17:19 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#74 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Duke390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 366.3 yds/g · 4,395 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 270 points)#95 (of 120 teams · 425.4 yds/g allowed · 5,105 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#97 (of 120 teams · -8.7 /g · -104 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 12 taken, 21 given · -0.75 /g)#48 (of 120 teams · 18:43 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#110 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.019 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Florida State942 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 120 teams · 369.1 yds/g · 4,799 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 275.1 yds/g allowed · 3,577 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 15.1 pts/g allowed · 196 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +15.5 /g · +202 on the season)#26 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.856 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.958 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Georgia Tech850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 458.8 yds/g · 5,964 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 446 points)#44 (of 120 teams · 359.3 yds/g allowed · 4,671 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +8.2 /g · +107 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#24 (of 120 teams · 19:34 /g · 4h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#50 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.985 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 120 teams · 1.015 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Maryland2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 120 teams · 379.7 yds/g · 4,556 yards)#87 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 277 points)#109 (of 120 teams · 457.2 yds/g allowed · 5,486 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 34.3 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#104 (of 120 teams · -11.2 /g · -134 on the season)#35 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 26 taken, 23 given · +0.25 /g)#117 (of 120 teams · 15:36 /g · 3h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.115 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#106 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.913 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Miami661 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 377.8 yds/g · 4,533 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 318 points)#45 (of 120 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 4,319 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 241 points)#40 (of 120 teams · +6.4 /g · +77 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.67 /g)#66 (of 120 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#97 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.838 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011NC State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 4,483 yards)#54 (of 120 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#41 (of 120 teams · 355.1 yds/g allowed · 4,616 yards)#54 (of 120 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +46 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 35 taken, 27 given · +0.62 /g)#30 (of 120 teams · 19:11 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#60 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011North Carolina761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 120 teams · 393.2 yds/g · 5,112 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 28.0 pts/g · 364 points)#50 (of 120 teams · 365.2 yds/g allowed · 4,748 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#58 (of 120 teams · +3.1 /g · +41 on the season)#72 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 24 taken, 26 given · -0.15 /g)#86 (of 120 teams · 17:41 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#55 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Virginia850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 399.8 yds/g · 5,197 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 302 points)#40 (of 120 teams · 351.7 yds/g allowed · 4,572 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#70 (of 120 teams · -0.6 /g · -8 on the season)#100 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.62 /g)#12 (of 120 teams · 20:26 /g · 4h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.962 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 120 teams · 1.049 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Virginia Tech1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#34 (of 120 teams · 413.0 yds/g · 5,782 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 391 points)#14 (of 120 teams · 304.6 yds/g allowed · 4,265 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 247 points)#25 (of 120 teams · +10.3 /g · +144 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.29 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:37 /g · 4h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 120 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#110 (of 120 teams · 1.040 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Wake Forest670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 120 teams · 367.8 yds/g · 4,781 yards)#68 (of 120 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 397.9 yds/g allowed · 5,172 yards)#65 (of 120 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#72 (of 120 teams · -1.4 /g · -18 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 21 taken, 12 given · +0.69 /g)#61 (of 120 teams · 18:20 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.031 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.914 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20112011 Boston CollegeACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #63
Total offense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Georgia Tech #16 of 120; 2011 Clemson #24 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #34 of 120; 2011 Virginia #44 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #51 of 120; 2011 Maryland #63 of 120; 2011 Miami #65 of 120; 2011 Florida State #72 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #74 of 120; 2011 Duke #75 of 120; 2011 NC State #92 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 112 of 120. ACC median rank 63.
Scoring offensemedian #57
Scoring offense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Georgia Tech #21 of 120; 2011 Clemson #24 of 120; 2011 Florida State #39 of 120; 2011 NC State #54 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #56 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #57 of 120; 2011 Miami #63 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #68 of 120; 2011 Virginia #86 of 120; 2011 Maryland #87 of 120; 2011 Duke #93 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 112 of 120. ACC median rank 57.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #4 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #14 of 120; 2011 Virginia #40 of 120; 2011 NC State #41 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #44 of 120; 2011 Miami #45 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #50 of 120; 2011 Clemson #72 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #76 of 120; 2011 Duke #95 of 120; 2011 Maryland #109 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 71 of 120. ACC median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #4 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #7 of 120; 2011 Miami #18 of 120; 2011 Virginia #46 of 120; 2011 NC State #54 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #56 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #60 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #65 of 120; 2011 Clemson #81 of 120; 2011 Duke #90 of 120; 2011 Maryland #102 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 43 of 120. ACC median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #56
Point margin. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #14 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #25 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #31 of 120; 2011 Miami #40 of 120; 2011 Clemson #52 of 120; 2011 NC State #56 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #58 of 120; 2011 Virginia #70 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #72 of 120; 2011 Duke #97 of 120; 2011 Maryland #104 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 86 of 120. ACC median rank 56.
Turnover marginmedian #53
Turnover margin. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wake Forest #15 of 120; 2011 NC State #21 of 120; 2011 Florida State #26 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #34 of 120; 2011 Maryland #35 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #53 of 120; 2011 Clemson #71 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #72 of 120; 2011 Virginia #100 of 120; 2011 Miami #101 of 120; 2011 Duke #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 93 of 120. ACC median rank 53.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Virginia Tech #6 of 120; 2011 Virginia #12 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #24 of 120; 2011 NC State #30 of 120; 2011 Duke #48 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #61 of 120; 2011 Miami #66 of 120; 2011 Florida State #70 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #86 of 120; 2011 Clemson #101 of 120; 2011 Maryland #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 50 of 120. ACC median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Boston College, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Boston College, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Boston College, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Boston College, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Georgia Tech #8 of 120; 2011 Miami #31 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #36 of 120; 2011 Florida State #49 of 120; 2011 Virginia #50 of 120; 2011 Clemson #60 of 120; 2011 Duke #65 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #71 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #78 of 120; 2011 Maryland #94 of 120; 2011 NC State #107 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 102 of 120. ACC median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #41
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #10 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #15 of 120; 2011 Virginia #24 of 120; 2011 NC State #33 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #36 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #41 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #59 of 120; 2011 Clemson #63 of 120; 2011 Miami #71 of 120; 2011 Maryland #104 of 120; 2011 Duke #115 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 75 of 120. ACC median rank 41.
Offensive success ratemedian #47
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #33 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #37 of 120; 2011 Clemson #42 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #43 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #44 of 120; 2011 Miami #47 of 120; 2011 Virginia #54 of 120; 2011 Maryland #64 of 120; 2011 Duke #86 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #98 of 120; 2011 NC State #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 99 of 120. ACC median rank 47.
Defensive success ratemedian #55
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Florida State #5 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #6 of 120; 2011 Virginia #8 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #50 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #52 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #55 of 120; 2011 NC State #60 of 120; 2011 Clemson #74 of 120; 2011 Miami #97 of 120; 2011 Maryland #106 of 120; 2011 Duke #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 85 of 120. ACC median rank 55.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #39
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wake Forest #6 of 120; 2011 Duke #7 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #22 of 120; 2011 Miami #23 of 120; 2011 Virginia #39 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #40 of 120; 2011 Clemson #46 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #61 of 120; 2011 Maryland #69 of 120; 2011 NC State #76 of 120; 2011 Florida State #106 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 28 of 120. ACC median rank 39.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Miami #7 of 120; 2011 Clemson #30 of 120; 2011 Wake Forest #51 of 120; 2011 North Carolina #61 of 120; 2011 Maryland #62 of 120; 2011 NC State #82 of 120; 2011 Florida State #84 of 120; 2011 Duke #90 of 120; 2011 Georgia Tech #106 of 120; 2011 Virginia Tech #110 of 120; 2011 Virginia #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Boston College, ranked 11 of 120. ACC median rank 62.