THIRD AND DATA

Charleston Southern game log

2024: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 31vs The Citadel21–22 L573836.732–9320–25–290194–112–204–2527:4947%41%
Sep 7at Furman24–20 W582494.335–10612–23–143135–140–1010–8725:5435%32%
Sep 14at Richmond0–38 L511312.627–3911–24–92104–120–034–2026:1227%52%
Sep 28at Tennessee State9–13 L673254.955–2354–12–90172–133–512–2041:2940%42%
Oct 5vs Western Illinois20–31 L563957.145–3315–11–64195–91–229–6025:3552%44%
Oct 12at Lindenwood14–29 L501973.921–9815–29–9981–121–249–7619:3524%38%
Oct 19vs Southeast Missouri State13–26 L512555.033–10812–18–147123–111–3110–11426:1733%38%
Oct 26at Tennessee Tech23–28 L633355.334–12214–29–213155–140–123–2531:2534%37%
Nov 2vs Gardner-Webb14–17 L512224.424–9413–27–128132–101–126–4822:5636%32%
Nov 9vs UT Martin14–40 L512094.124–9414–27–115124–140–037–6726:2328%41%
Nov 16at Eastern Illinois13–16 L592103.639–12511–20–85113–140–2015–11829:3923%32%
Nov 23at Florida State7–41 L612754.529–5722–32–218184–120–123–3533:0732%50%
Season12 games1–116753,1864.7398–1502153–277–1,68416742–1469–202082–6955:36:2135%39%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Charleston S. on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Charleston S.'s defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Charleston S. offense 35% (235 of 679)Opponent offense / Charleston S. defense 39% (313 of 798)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%The Citadel: opponent offense 41% of 73The Citadel: Charleston S. offense 47% of 57Furman: opponent offense 32% of 68Furman: Charleston S. offense 35% of 57Richmond: opponent offense 52% of 62Richmond: Charleston S. offense 27% of 51Tennessee State: opponent offense 42% of 48Tennessee State: Charleston S. offense 40% of 67Western Illinois: opponent offense 44% of 52Western Illinois: Charleston S. offense 52% of 56Lindenwood: opponent offense 38% of 87Lindenwood: Charleston S. offense 24% of 51Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 38% of 88Southeast Missouri State: Charleston S. offense 33% of 51Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 37% of 52Tennessee Tech: Charleston S. offense 34% of 61Gardner-Webb: opponent offense 32% of 81Gardner-Webb: Charleston S. offense 36% of 53UT Martin: opponent offense 41% of 59UT Martin: Charleston S. offense 28% of 53Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 32% of 72Eastern Illinois: Charleston S. offense 23% of 60Florida State: opponent offense 50% of 56Florida State: Charleston S. offense 32% of 62
The Citadel@ Furman@ Richmond@ Tennessee StateWestern Illinois@ LindenwoodSoutheast Missouri State@ Tennessee TechGardner-WebbUT Martin@ Eastern Illinois@ Florida State
Charleston S. offenseOpponent offense (Charleston S. defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs The Citadel

21–22 L · 57 plays to 73
Charleston S. offense 47% (27/57)The Citadel offense 41% (30/73)

at Furman

24–20 W · 57 plays to 68
Charleston S. offense 35% (20/57)Furman offense 32% (22/68)

at Richmond

0–38 L · 51 plays to 62
Charleston S. offense 27% (14/51)Richmond offense 52% (32/62)

at Tennessee State

9–13 L · 67 plays to 48
Charleston S. offense 40% (27/67)Tennessee State offense 42% (20/48)

vs Western Illinois

20–31 L · 56 plays to 52
Charleston S. offense 52% (29/56)Western Illinois offense 44% (23/52)

at Lindenwood

14–29 L · 51 plays to 87
Charleston S. offense 24% (12/51)Lindenwood offense 38% (33/87)

vs Southeast Missouri State

13–26 L · 51 plays to 88
Charleston S. offense 33% (17/51)SE. Missouri St. offense 38% (33/88)

at Tennessee Tech

23–28 L · 61 plays to 52
Charleston S. offense 34% (21/61)Tennessee Tech offense 37% (19/52)

vs Gardner-Webb

14–17 L · 53 plays to 81
Charleston S. offense 36% (19/53)Gardner-Webb offense 32% (26/81)

vs UT Martin

14–40 L · 53 plays to 59
Charleston S. offense 28% (15/53)UT Martin offense 41% (24/59)

at Eastern Illinois

13–16 L · 60 plays to 72
Charleston S. offense 23% (14/60)Eastern Illinois offense 32% (23/72)

at Florida State

7–41 L · 62 plays to 56
Charleston S. offense 32% (20/62)Florida State offense 50% (28/56)