Metrics

ClemsonTigers

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2007

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2007Clemson940 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 119 teams · 403.2 yds/g · 5,242 yards)#29 (of 119 teams · 33.1 pts/g · 430 points)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 306.1 yds/g allowed · 3,980 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 18.7 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#14 (of 119 teams · +14.4 /g · +187 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 26 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g)#52 (of 119 teams · 18:32 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#43 (of 119 teams · 0.016 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#44 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.884 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 119 teams · 0.962 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20070 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#90 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #26–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #29–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#32 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #7–#96. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #3–#98. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #14–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #10–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #13–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#70 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #35–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #15–#88. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #33–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #3–#73. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #22–#104. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range #2–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2007Boston College1130 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#26 (of 119 teams · 425.1 yds/g · 5,951 yards)#55 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 396 points)#23 (of 119 teams · 329.4 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yards)#20 (of 119 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#28 (of 119 teams · +7.9 /g · +111 on the season)#28 (of 119 teams · +6 on the season · 35 taken, 29 given · +0.43 /g)#33 (of 119 teams · 18:55 /g · 4h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 119 teams · -0.023 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 119 teams · 43% of plays successful)#22 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#81 (of 119 teams · 0.889 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Duke1110 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#116 (of 119 teams · 271.1 yds/g · 3,253 yards)#114 (of 119 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 215 points)#96 (of 119 teams · 424.3 yds/g allowed · 5,092 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g allowed · 398 points)#113 (of 119 teams · -15.3 /g · -183 on the season)#89 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 18 taken, 23 given · -0.42 /g)#109 (of 119 teams · 16:47 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 119 teams · -0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#88 (of 119 teams · 0.071 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#70 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 119 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 119 teams · 1.017 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Florida State763 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#76 (of 119 teams · 369.2 yds/g · 4,800 yards)#90 (of 119 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 303 points)#45 (of 119 teams · 362.0 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#34 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#63 (of 119 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season)#33 (of 119 teams · +5 on the season · 29 taken, 24 given · +0.38 /g)#63 (of 119 teams · 18:18 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 119 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 119 teams · 0.968 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 119 teams · 1.098 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Georgia Tech760 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 119 teams · 384.9 yds/g · 5,004 yards)#68 (of 119 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 341 points)#24 (of 119 teams · 330.4 yds/g allowed · 4,295 yards)#21 (of 119 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#42 (of 119 teams · +5.4 /g · +70 on the season)#69 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.15 /g)#38 (of 119 teams · 18:51 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 119 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 119 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 119 teams · 1.010 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Maryland670 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#89 (of 119 teams · 340.9 yds/g · 4,431 yards)#86 (of 119 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 313 points)#44 (of 119 teams · 358.0 yds/g allowed · 4,654 yards)#24 (of 119 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#56 (of 119 teams · +2.5 /g · +33 on the season)#14 (of 119 teams · +12 on the season · 29 taken, 17 given · +0.92 /g)#29 (of 119 teams · 18:59 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 119 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 119 teams · 0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#73 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 119 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Miami572 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 119 teams · 315.1 yds/g · 3,781 yards)#101 (of 119 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 247 points)#37 (of 119 teams · 345.9 yds/g allowed · 4,151 yards)#52 (of 119 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 312 points)#84 (of 119 teams · -5.4 /g · -65 on the season)#89 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 27 taken, 32 given · -0.42 /g)#80 (of 119 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 119 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 119 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#29 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007NC State570 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 119 teams · 334.9 yds/g · 4,019 yards)#99 (of 119 teams · 20.8 pts/g · 249 points)#75 (of 119 teams · 393.9 yds/g allowed · 4,727 yards)#65 (of 119 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#92 (of 119 teams · -7.5 /g · -90 on the season)#117 (of 119 teams · -19 on the season · 16 taken, 35 given · -1.58 /g)#104 (of 119 teams · 17:05 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 119 teams · -0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#37 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.920 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 119 teams · 0.836 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007North Carolina480 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#103 (of 119 teams · 325.3 yds/g · 3,904 yards)#97 (of 119 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 254 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 349.8 yds/g allowed · 4,197 yards)#43 (of 119 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#77 (of 119 teams · -3.3 /g · -40 on the season)#89 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 24 taken, 29 given · -0.42 /g)#78 (of 119 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 119 teams · -0.025 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 119 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#66 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 119 teams · 0.859 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.768 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Virginia940 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 119 teams · 330.4 yds/g · 4,295 yards)#81 (of 119 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 317 points)#28 (of 119 teams · 332.5 yds/g allowed · 4,322 yards)#16 (of 119 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 256 points)#48 (of 119 teams · +4.7 /g · +61 on the season)#40 (of 119 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.23 /g)#55 (of 119 teams · 18:29 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 119 teams · 0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.011 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#83 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#23 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.919 average PPA on successful plays)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Virginia Tech1130 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#99 (of 119 teams · 329.9 yds/g · 4,618 yards)#53 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 402 points)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 296.9 yds/g allowed · 4,157 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 225 points)#16 (of 119 teams · +12.6 /g · +177 on the season)#18 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 33 taken, 22 given · +0.79 /g)#71 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 4h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#87 (of 119 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 119 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2007Wake Forest940 / 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2007. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#90 (of 119 teams · 340.5 yds/g · 4,426 yards)#58 (of 119 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points)#32 (of 119 teams · 340.4 yds/g allowed · 4,425 yards)#28 (of 119 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#41 (of 119 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +11 on the season · 37 taken, 26 given · +0.85 /g)#13 (of 119 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 119 teams · -0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 119 teams · -0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 119 teams · 40% of plays successful)#31 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 119 teams · 0.848 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20072007 ClemsonACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #90
Total offense. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Boston College #26 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #63 of 119; 2007 Florida State #76 of 119; 2007 Maryland #89 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #90 of 119; 2007 NC State #95 of 119; 2007 Virginia #98 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #99 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #103 of 119; 2007 Miami #108 of 119; 2007 Duke #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 45 of 119. ACC median rank 90.
Scoring offensemedian #81
Scoring offense. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #53 of 119; 2007 Boston College #55 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #58 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #68 of 119; 2007 Virginia #81 of 119; 2007 Maryland #86 of 119; 2007 Florida State #90 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #97 of 119; 2007 NC State #99 of 119; 2007 Miami #101 of 119; 2007 Duke #114 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 29 of 119. ACC median rank 81.
Total defensemedian #32
Total defense. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #7 of 119; 2007 Boston College #23 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #24 of 119; 2007 Virginia #28 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #32 of 119; 2007 Miami #37 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #38 of 119; 2007 Maryland #44 of 119; 2007 Florida State #45 of 119; 2007 NC State #75 of 119; 2007 Duke #96 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 10 of 119. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring defensemedian #24
Scoring defense. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2007 Virginia #16 of 119; 2007 Boston College #20 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #21 of 119; 2007 Maryland #24 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #28 of 119; 2007 Florida State #34 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #43 of 119; 2007 Miami #52 of 119; 2007 NC State #65 of 119; 2007 Duke #98 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 10 of 119. ACC median rank 24.
Point marginmedian #48
Point margin. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #16 of 119; 2007 Boston College #28 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #41 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #42 of 119; 2007 Virginia #48 of 119; 2007 Maryland #56 of 119; 2007 Florida State #63 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #77 of 119; 2007 Miami #84 of 119; 2007 NC State #92 of 119; 2007 Duke #113 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 14 of 119. ACC median rank 48.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Maryland #14 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #17 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #18 of 119; 2007 Boston College #28 of 119; 2007 Florida State #33 of 119; 2007 Virginia #40 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #69 of 119; 2007 Duke #89 of 119; 2007 Miami #89 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #89 of 119; 2007 NC State #117 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 10 of 119. ACC median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #55
Possession. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Wake Forest #13 of 119; 2007 Maryland #29 of 119; 2007 Boston College #33 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #38 of 119; 2007 Virginia #55 of 119; 2007 Florida State #63 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #71 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #78 of 119; 2007 Miami #80 of 119; 2007 NC State #104 of 119; 2007 Duke #109 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 52 of 119. ACC median rank 55.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Clemson, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Clemson, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Clemson, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2007, best rank first: . Marked: 2007 Clemson, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #70
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Boston College #41 of 119; 2007 Maryland #64 of 119; 2007 Florida State #65 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #68 of 119; 2007 Virginia #70 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #87 of 119; 2007 Miami #90 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #92 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #99 of 119; 2007 NC State #100 of 119; 2007 Duke #116 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 35 of 119. ACC median rank 70.
Defensive EPAmedian #38
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #15 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #18 of 119; 2007 Boston College #20 of 119; 2007 Florida State #25 of 119; 2007 NC State #34 of 119; 2007 Miami #38 of 119; 2007 Virginia #40 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #61 of 119; 2007 Maryland #65 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #66 of 119; 2007 Duke #88 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 43 of 119. ACC median rank 38.
Offensive success ratemedian #75
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Boston College #33 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #59 of 119; 2007 Maryland #63 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #65 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #75 of 119; 2007 Virginia #83 of 119; 2007 Florida State #89 of 119; 2007 NC State #105 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #106 of 119; 2007 Miami #111 of 119; 2007 Duke #117 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 34 of 119. ACC median rank 75.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Virginia Tech #3 of 119; 2007 Florida State #10 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #18 of 119; 2007 Boston College #22 of 119; 2007 Virginia #23 of 119; 2007 Miami #29 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #31 of 119; 2007 NC State #37 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #66 of 119; 2007 Duke #70 of 119; 2007 Maryland #73 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 44 of 119. ACC median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #62
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 Florida State #22 of 119; 2007 Duke #25 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #32 of 119; 2007 NC State #59 of 119; 2007 Virginia #60 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #62 of 119; 2007 Maryland #74 of 119; 2007 Miami #79 of 119; 2007 Boston College #81 of 119; 2007 North Carolina #95 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #104 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 83 of 119. ACC median rank 62.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #79
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2007, best rank first: 2007 North Carolina #2 of 119; 2007 NC State #19 of 119; 2007 Wake Forest #41 of 119; 2007 Maryland #44 of 119; 2007 Virginia #60 of 119; 2007 Boston College #79 of 119; 2007 Virginia Tech #80 of 119; 2007 Miami #97 of 119; 2007 Georgia Tech #106 of 119; 2007 Duke #112 of 119; 2007 Florida State #119 of 119. Marked: 2007 Clemson, ranked 83 of 119. ACC median rank 79.