| 2015 | Clemson14–1 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma) | 3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #9 Florida State, #10 North Carolina · postseason: #4 Oklahoma) | #11 (of 128 teams · 514.5 yds/g · 7,718 yards) | #16 (of 128 teams · 38.5 pts/g · 577 points) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 313.0 yds/g allowed · 4,695 yards) | #24 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 325 points) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +16.8 /g · +252 on the season) | #83 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 25 taken, 27 given · -0.13 /g) | #26 (of 128 teams · 31:56 /g · 7h 59m on the season) | #84 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing production returning) | #13 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning) | #52 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning) | #13 (of 128 teams · 807.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #18 (of 128 teams · 0.268 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #15 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #95 (of 128 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays) | #123 (of 128 teams · 1.401 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2015 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #68 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #11–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #63 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #9–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #38 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#99. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #47 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #4–#96. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #10–#100. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #66 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #10–#120. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #42 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #11–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #47 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #7–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #77 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #12–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #56 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #4–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #63 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #3–#120. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #60 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#94. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #66 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #7–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #44 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #1–#117. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #8–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #66 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range #5–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2015 | Boston College3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #126 (of 128 teams · 275.6 yds/g · 3,307 yards) | #121 (of 128 teams · 17.2 pts/g · 206 points) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 254.3 yds/g allowed · 3,052 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 15.3 pts/g allowed · 183 points) | #66 (of 128 teams · +1.9 /g · +23 on the season) | #46 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.25 /g) | #62 (of 128 teams · 29:55 /g · 5h 59m on the season) | #118 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning) | #108 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's receiving production returning) | #59 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning) | #58 (of 128 teams · 534.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #120 (of 128 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #125 (of 128 teams · 34% of plays successful) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #74 (of 128 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays) | #60 (of 128 teams · 1.188 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Duke8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #36 (of 128 teams · 439.4 yds/g · 5,712 yards) | #48 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points) | #60 (of 128 teams · 394.7 yds/g allowed · 5,131 yards) | #47 (of 128 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 330 points) | #49 (of 128 teams · +6.2 /g · +80 on the season) | #75 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 20 taken, 21 given · -0.08 /g) | #89 (of 128 teams · 28:41 /g · 6h 13m on the season) | #116 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning) | #96 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning) | #70 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's rushing production returning) | #53 (of 128 teams · 563.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #95 (of 128 teams · 0.112 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #65 (of 128 teams · 0.143 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #62 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #44 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #111 (of 128 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays) | #97 (of 128 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Florida State10–3 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Florida) | #51 (of 128 teams · 424.0 yds/g · 5,512 yards) | #47 (of 128 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 412 points) | #19 (of 128 teams · 336.9 yds/g allowed · 4,380 yards) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.5 pts/g allowed · 227 points) | #20 (of 128 teams · +14.2 /g · +185 on the season) | #66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g) | #74 (of 128 teams · 29:25 /g · 6h 22m on the season) | #103 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning) | #69 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning) | #85 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning) | #4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #35 (of 128 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #34 (of 128 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #39 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #23 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #34 (of 128 teams · 1.253 average PPA on successful plays) | #40 (of 128 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Georgia Tech3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Florida State) | #80 (of 128 teams · 378.0 yds/g · 4,536 yards) | #63 (of 128 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 351 points) | #42 (of 128 teams · 368.0 yds/g allowed · 4,416 yards) | #51 (of 128 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 309 points) | #58 (of 128 teams · +3.5 /g · +42 on the season) | #105 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 17 taken, 24 given · -0.58 /g) | #42 (of 128 teams · 31:08 /g · 6h 14m on the season) | #43 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning) | #127 (of 128 teams · 6% of last season's receiving production returning) | #115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning) | #49 (of 128 teams · 590.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #42 (of 128 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #60 (of 128 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #35 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #93 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #55 (of 128 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays) | #23 (of 128 teams · 1.112 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Louisville8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #53 (of 128 teams · 416.1 yds/g · 5,409 yards) | #65 (of 128 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 373 points) | #18 (of 128 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 4,326 yards) | #39 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 313 points) | #55 (of 128 teams · +4.6 /g · +60 on the season) | #75 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g) | #73 (of 128 teams · 29:29 /g · 6h 23m on the season) | #44 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's passing production returning) | #116 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's receiving production returning) | #89 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning) | #36 (of 128 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #66 (of 128 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #38 (of 128 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #72 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #26 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #12 (of 128 teams · 1.298 average PPA on successful plays) | #81 (of 128 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Miami8–5 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #68 (of 128 teams · 396.1 yds/g · 5,150 yards) | #71 (of 128 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 361 points) | #69 (of 128 teams · 404.9 yds/g allowed · 5,263 yards) | #77 (of 128 teams · 28.1 pts/g allowed · 366 points) | #77 (of 128 teams · -0.4 /g · -5 on the season) | #10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 25 taken, 14 given · +0.85 /g) | #68 (of 128 teams · 29:33 /g · 6h 24m on the season) | #47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning) | #66 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning) | #12 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing production returning) | #17 (of 128 teams · 773.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 128 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #86 (of 128 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #78 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #107 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #61 (of 128 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays) | #5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.050 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | NC State7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #57 (of 128 teams · 412.9 yds/g · 5,367 yards) | #42 (of 128 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points) | #29 (of 128 teams · 350.7 yds/g allowed · 4,559 yards) | #52 (of 128 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 336 points) | #45 (of 128 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season) | #15 (of 128 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.69 /g) | #11 (of 128 teams · 33:03 /g · 7h 10m on the season) | #40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning) | #85 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning) | #39 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning) | #43 (of 128 teams · 610.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #41 (of 128 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #55 (of 128 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #69 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #34 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #17 (of 128 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays) | #107 (of 128 teams · 1.284 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | North Carolina11–3 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #18 (of 128 teams · 486.9 yds/g · 6,817 yards) | #9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 40.7 pts/g · 570 points) | #96 (of 128 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 6,103 yards) | #42 (of 128 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 343 points) | #11 (of 128 teams · +16.2 /g · +227 on the season) | #30 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g) | #127 (of 128 teams · 25:16 /g · 5h 54m on the season) | #7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #12 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning) | #26 (of 128 teams · 683.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.341 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #87 (of 128 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #109 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.313 average PPA on successful plays) | #13 (of 128 teams · 1.077 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Pittsburgh8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #81 (of 128 teams · 377.5 yds/g · 4,908 yards) | #68 (of 128 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points) | #37 (of 128 teams · 363.1 yds/g allowed · 4,721 yards) | #57 (of 128 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 339 points) | #65 (of 128 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season) | #66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 16 taken, 16 given · +0.00 /g) | #29 (of 128 teams · 31:43 /g · 6h 52m on the season) | #50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning) | #43 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning) | #25 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning) | #42 (of 128 teams · 611.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #53 (of 128 teams · 0.168 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #90 (of 128 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #31 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #49 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #108 (of 128 teams · 1.118 average PPA on successful plays) | #113 (of 128 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Syracuse4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #119 (of 128 teams · 319.9 yds/g · 3,839 yards) | #77 (of 128 teams · 27.3 pts/g · 327 points) | #99 (of 128 teams · 438.5 yds/g allowed · 5,262 yards) | #90 (of 128 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 372 points) | #90 (of 128 teams · -3.8 /g · -45 on the season) | #32 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 23 taken, 18 given · +0.42 /g) | #75 (of 128 teams · 29:18 /g · 5h 52m on the season) | #53 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning) | #91 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning) | #97 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning) | #66 (of 128 teams · 508.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #103 (of 128 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #93 (of 128 teams · 0.182 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #103 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #117 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #82 (of 128 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays) | #28 (of 128 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Virginia4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #75 (of 128 teams · 383.0 yds/g · 4,596 yards) | #89 (of 128 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 309 points) | #79 (of 128 teams · 411.5 yds/g allowed · 4,938 yards) | #96 (of 128 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points) | #99 (of 128 teams · -6.4 /g · -77 on the season) | #110 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 15 taken, 24 given · -0.75 /g) | #18 (of 128 teams · 32:42 /g · 6h 32m on the season) | #81 (of 128 teams · 38% of last season's passing production returning) | #77 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning) | #121 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's rushing production returning) | #30 (of 128 teams · 667.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #70 (of 128 teams · 0.147 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #94 (of 128 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #81 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #101 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #49 (of 128 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays) | #83 (of 128 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Virginia Tech7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #74 (of 128 teams · 385.1 yds/g · 5,006 yards) | #53 (of 128 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 403 points) | #44 (of 128 teams · 369.9 yds/g allowed · 4,808 yards) | #59 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g allowed · 342 points) | #54 (of 128 teams · +4.7 /g · +61 on the season) | #39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.31 /g) | #28 (of 128 teams · 31:51 /g · 6h 54m on the season) | #39 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning) | #20 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning) | #7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) | #32 (of 128 teams · 658.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #81 (of 128 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #56 (of 128 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #66 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful) | #19 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #105 (of 128 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays) | #120 (of 128 teams · 1.375 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2015 | Wake Forest3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2015. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #114 (of 128 teams · 333.4 yds/g · 4,001 yards) | #120 (of 128 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 209 points) | #38 (of 128 teams · 363.8 yds/g allowed · 4,365 yards) | #43 (of 128 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 295 points) | #100 (of 128 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season) | #120 (of 128 teams · -13 on the season · 11 taken, 24 given · -1.08 /g) | #40 (of 128 teams · 31:09 /g · 6h 14m on the season) | #47 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning) | #93 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving production returning) | #56 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing production returning) | #69 (of 128 teams · 497.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #118 (of 128 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #68 (of 128 teams · 0.147 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #119 (of 128 teams · 36% of plays successful) | #45 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #47 (of 128 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays) | #66 (of 128 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |