THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. East Carolina played 3 such games.

American Athletic, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016East Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 71 teams · 469.0 yds/g · 1,407 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 65 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 425.3 yds/g allowed · 1,276 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 104 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · -13.0 /g · -39 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 1 taken, 7 given · -2.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:24 /g · 1h 40m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 442.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 71 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 0.268 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 1.317 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#15 (Total offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #15–#69. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #56–#68. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #26–#40. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#25 (Scoring defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #25–#55. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Point margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #57–#61. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Turnover margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #69–#69. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#6 — top 10 (Possession: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #6–#41. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #22–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #10–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #11–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#75 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #52–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #42–#71. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #34–#60. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #37–#69. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #19–#43. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #24–#37. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range #54–#64. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2016South Florida11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)— (452.0 yds/g · 904 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.0 pts/g · 80 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (598.0 yds/g allowed · 1,196 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37.5 pts/g allowed · 75 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2.5 /g · +5 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 4 taken, 2 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20:57 /g · 0h 42m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#49 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.339 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.269 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.611 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.279 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Houston9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Oklahoma)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Oklahoma, #13 Louisville)— (386.0 yds/g · 772 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.5 pts/g · 69 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (352.5 yds/g allowed · 705 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (16.5 pts/g allowed · 33 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+18.0 /g · +36 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+4 in these games · 5 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:48 /g · 1h 04m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#43 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 572.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.535 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016SMU5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (362.5 yds/g · 725 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (8.0 pts/g · 16 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (562.5 yds/g allowed · 1,125 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36.5 pts/g allowed · 73 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-28.5 /g · -57 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 4 taken, 6 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:03 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 474.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.207 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.268 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)— (324.0 yds/g · 324 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (403.0 yds/g allowed · 403 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-7.0 /g · -7 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:27 /g · 0h 31m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 492.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.528 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.484 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Tulsa10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (188.0 yds/g · 188 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (417.0 yds/g allowed · 417 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48.0 pts/g allowed · 48 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-45.0 /g · -45 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-5 in these games · 1 taken, 6 given · -5.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:07 /g · 0h 26m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 128 teams · 409.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.409 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.981 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.083 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016UCF6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (393.0 yds/g · 786 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (19.0 pts/g · 38 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (410.0 yds/g allowed · 820 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.5 pts/g allowed · 81 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-21.5 /g · -43 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-6 in these games · 0 taken, 6 given · -3.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:23 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#76 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 128 teams · 510.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.060 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.144 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.395 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Cincinnati4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (512.0 yds/g · 512 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.0 pts/g · 38 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (504.0 yds/g allowed · 504 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g allowed · 20 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+18.0 /g · +18 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+5 in these games · 5 taken, 0 given · +5.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:17 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#40 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 541.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.360 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.611 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.380 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Memphis8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Temple)— (434.0 yds/g · 868 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35.5 pts/g · 71 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (469.0 yds/g allowed · 938 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.5 pts/g allowed · 55 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+8.0 /g · +16 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 7 taken, 4 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:12 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 451.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.223 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Navy9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (368.0 yds/g · 368 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (370.0 yds/g allowed · 370 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g allowed · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1.0 /g · +1 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 0 taken, 0 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:53 /g · 0h 34m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 342.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.424 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.373 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Tulane4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (280.0 yds/g · 280 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (3.0 pts/g · 3 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (175.0 yds/g allowed · 175 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (7.0 pts/g allowed · 7 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-4.0 /g · -4 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:56 /g · 0h 35m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 388.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.104 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.183 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.930 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016UConn3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 274.3 yds/g · 823 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 12.3 pts/g · 37 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 395.7 yds/g allowed · 1,187 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 71 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -11.3 /g · -34 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 1 taken, 7 given · -2.00 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 29:59 /g · 1h 30m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 423.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.087 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 32% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 1.285 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.332 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20162016 East CarolinaAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #15
Total offense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 15 of 71. American Athletic median rank 15.
Scoring offensemedian #56
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #68 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 56 of 71. American Athletic median rank 56.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #26 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 40 of 71. American Athletic median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #25
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #25 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 55 of 71. American Athletic median rank 25.
Point marginmedian #57
Point margin. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #57 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 61 of 71. American Athletic median rank 57.
Turnover marginmedian #69
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 69 of 71. American Athletic median rank 69.
Possessionmedian #6
Possession. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #41 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 6 of 71. American Athletic median rank 6.
Returning passingmedian #49
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 SMU #22 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #25 of 128; 2016 Temple #34 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #40 of 128; 2016 Houston #43 of 128; 2016 South Florida #49 of 128; 2016 UConn #60 of 128; 2016 UCF #76 of 128; 2016 Navy #115 of 128; 2016 Tulane #124 of 128; 2016 Memphis #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 91 of 128. American Athletic median rank 49.
Returning receivingmedian #62
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #10 of 128; 2016 UConn #12 of 128; 2016 UCF #14 of 128; 2016 SMU #26 of 128; 2016 Navy #55 of 128; 2016 Tulane #62 of 128; 2016 Houston #82 of 128; 2016 Memphis #87 of 128; 2016 Temple #104 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #118 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 67 of 128. American Athletic median rank 62.
Returning rushingmedian #56
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 South Florida #11 of 128; 2016 Temple #13 of 128; 2016 UCF #21 of 128; 2016 UConn #22 of 128; 2016 SMU #38 of 128; 2016 Tulane #56 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #66 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #83 of 128; 2016 Memphis #100 of 128; 2016 Houston #111 of 128; 2016 Navy #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 104 of 128. American Athletic median rank 56.
Team talentmedian #75
Team talent. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Houston #52 of 128; 2016 South Florida #54 of 128; 2016 Cincinnati #58 of 128; 2016 UCF #69 of 128; 2016 Temple #71 of 128; 2016 SMU #75 of 128; 2016 Memphis #79 of 128; 2016 UConn #87 of 128; 2016 Tulsa #91 of 128; 2016 Tulane #103 of 128; 2016 Navy #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 82 of 128. American Athletic median rank 75.
Offensive EPAmedian #42
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 42 of 71. American Athletic median rank 42.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #34 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 60 of 71. American Athletic median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #37
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 37 of 71. American Athletic median rank 37.
Defensive success ratemedian #19
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #19 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 43 of 71. American Athletic median rank 19.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #24
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #37 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 24 of 71. American Athletic median rank 24.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #54
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UConn #54 of 71. Marked: 2016 East Carolina, ranked 64 of 71. American Athletic median rank 54.