THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2018, released in week 15.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. East Carolina played 2 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018East Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (307.0 yds/g · 614 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 44 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (525.0 yds/g allowed · 1,050 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.5 pts/g allowed · 77 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.5 /g · -33 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:53 /g · 0h 58m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 434.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.269 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.670 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)2 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#19 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#59. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#58. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#36. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#22 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #2–#65. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)#27 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#52 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#123. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)#77 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #19–#116. 0 of 25 in the top 10.)#60 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#127. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#18 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#81. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#67. 5 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#60. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#17 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#39 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #4–#74. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range #1–#72. 3 of 25 in the top 10.)
2018Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State, #19 Texas A&M, #23 Missouri · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 520.7 yds/g · 4,686 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 47.2 pts/g · 425 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 270.1 yds/g allowed · 2,431 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 14.1 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +33.1 /g · +298 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +8 in these games · 17 taken, 9 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 31:03 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 978.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.375 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.327 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.342 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Clemson15–01 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #19 Texas A&M, #20 Syracuse · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Notre Dame)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 534.2 yds/g · 5,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 46.2 pts/g · 462 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 310.1 yds/g allowed · 3,101 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.4 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +30.8 /g · +308 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:04 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 893.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.362 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.354 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 1.282 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Georgia11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida, #14 Kentucky, #23 Missouri)#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 453.0 yds/g · 4,077 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 312.4 yds/g allowed · 2,812 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 172 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.6 /g · +149 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 11 taken, 10 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 32:17 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 964.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.087 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.080 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Michigan10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#21 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34.8 pts/g · 348 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,621 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.0 /g · +160 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:43 /g · 5h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 74 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.454 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Notre Dame12–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Michigan, #20 Syracuse, #22 Northwestern)#11 (of 74 teams · 447.5 yds/g · 4,475 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 3,285 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 169 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +16.8 /g · +168 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 29:16 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#97 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 847.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.246 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 1.339 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.171 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018West Virginia8–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 509.5 yds/g · 5,095 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.3 pts/g · 413 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 414.0 yds/g allowed · 4,140 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13.8 /g · +138 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 28:42 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#82 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 646.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 0.192 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Ohio State13–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 539.9 yds/g · 5,939 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 42.8 pts/g · 471 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 411.9 yds/g allowed · 4,531 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 304 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.2 /g · +167 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 30:45 /g · 5h 38m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.282 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Mississippi State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Texas A&M)#56 (of 74 teams · 341.2 yds/g · 3,071 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 185 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 268.9 yds/g allowed · 2,420 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 13.9 pts/g allowed · 125 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 15 taken, 9 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 730.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 74 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.131 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.099 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Oklahoma12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas, #16 West Virginia, #24 Iowa State)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 600.7 yds/g · 6,007 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 51.3 pts/g · 513 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 468.9 yds/g allowed · 4,689 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 35.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +15.4 /g · +154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 7 taken, 10 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 843.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.516 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.322 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 54% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Washington State, #17 Utah, #17 Utah)#35 (of 74 teams · 396.3 yds/g · 3,963 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 256 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 327.9 yds/g allowed · 3,279 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +68 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 31:41 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 772.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 74 teams · 0.205 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.135 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Washington State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Utah · postseason: #24 Iowa State)#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 4,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 329 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 381.0 yds/g allowed · 3,429 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +10.6 /g · +95 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 14 taken, 9 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 32:03 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 554.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.286 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 1.263 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.340 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Kentucky10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Florida, #18 Mississippi State, #23 Missouri · postseason: #12 Penn State)#55 (of 74 teams · 344.9 yds/g · 3,104 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 330.9 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 142 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#119 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 130 teams · 670.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 74 teams · 0.115 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.300 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Syracuse10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #16 West Virginia)#15 (of 74 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 3,962 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 321 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 3,818 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 260 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · +6.8 /g · +61 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 22 taken, 13 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 30:56 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 130 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 570.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 74 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018LSU10–35 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #8 UCF)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #8 UCF)#40 (of 74 teams · 375.1 yds/g · 3,376 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 270 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 364.9 yds/g allowed · 3,284 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 220 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +5.6 /g · +50 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31:52 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#103 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#52 (of 74 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 1.249 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.190 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Penn State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 74 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 4,012 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 30.7 pts/g · 307 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +11.5 /g · +115 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2 in these games · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:17 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Texas10–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma · postseason: #5 Georgia)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Oklahoma, #24 Iowa State · postseason: #5 Georgia)#30 (of 74 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 4,481 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 352 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,362 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · +6.5 /g · +71 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 14 taken, 8 given · +0.55 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 31:58 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 861.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Fresno State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)— (359.5 yds/g · 719 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26.0 pts/g · 52 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (288.5 yds/g allowed · 577 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.5 pts/g allowed · 35 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+8.5 /g · +17 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 5 taken, 4 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:38 /g · 1h 03m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#54 (of 130 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 459.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.238 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.215 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018UCF12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (568.0 yds/g · 568 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (272.0 yds/g allowed · 272 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g allowed · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+31.0 /g · +31 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:31 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#45 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 568.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.403 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.760 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Florida10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Michigan)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #7 Michigan)#26 (of 74 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 3,733 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 250 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 3,305 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +3.4 /g · +31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 16 taken, 12 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 31:08 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 831.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 74 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 0.167 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Utah9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#27 (of 74 teams · 413.2 yds/g · 3,719 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 277 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 350.7 yds/g allowed · 3,156 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 188 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.9 /g · +89 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 30:41 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 594.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 74 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.165 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Northwestern9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#59 (of 74 teams · 339.1 yds/g · 3,730 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 250 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · +2.6 /g · +29 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +5 in these games · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.45 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 30:22 /g · 5h 34m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 39% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.170 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Iowa State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 West Virginia)#47 (of 74 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 3,638 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 367.5 yds/g allowed · 3,675 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 28:00 /g · 4h 40m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 575.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 1.230 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Boise State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)— (414.0 yds/g · 414 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (424.0 yds/g allowed · 424 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44.0 pts/g allowed · 44 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-23.0 /g · -23 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:39 /g · 0h 35m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#56 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 543.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.171 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.347 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Texas A&M9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 LSU, #14 Kentucky)#16 (of 74 teams · 428.4 yds/g · 3,856 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 268 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 362.2 yds/g allowed · 3,260 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 279 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · -1.2 /g · -11 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -9 in these games · 5 taken, 14 given · -1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35:20 /g · 5h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#78 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 130 teams · 805.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 0.208 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 1.209 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.458 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2018Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2018's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)#19 (of 74 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 3,821 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 401.4 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +6.0 /g · +54 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 74 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 595.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 74 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.088 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.388 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20182018 East CarolinaCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #19
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Alabama #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Georgia #9 of 74; 2018 Washington State #10 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 Missouri #19 of 74; 2018 Michigan #21 of 74; 2018 Florida #26 of 74; 2018 Utah #27 of 74; 2018 Texas #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #32 of 74; 2018 Washington #35 of 74; 2018 LSU #40 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #47 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #55 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #56 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 19.
Scoring offensemedian #15
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #7 of 74; 2018 Michigan #9 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Texas #15 of 74; 2018 Missouri #16 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Penn State #20 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #33 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #35 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #53 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #54 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #58 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Total defensemedian #16
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #3 of 74; 2018 Clemson #6 of 74; 2018 Georgia #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #10 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #11 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #12 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Penn State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #18 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Missouri #33 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Scoring defensemedian #14
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #4 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #6 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Washington #7 of 74; 2018 Georgia #10 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 74; 2018 Utah #14 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #19 of 74; 2018 LSU #20 of 74; 2018 Texas #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #22 of 74; 2018 Washington State #23 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #30 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #32 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #38 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #61 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Point marginmedian #12
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #3 of 74; 2018 Georgia #4 of 74; 2018 Michigan #5 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #8 of 74; 2018 Penn State #10 of 74; 2018 Washington State #11 of 74; 2018 Utah #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #15 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #15 of 74; 2018 Texas #17 of 74; 2018 Missouri #18 of 74; 2018 LSU #19 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #23 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Turnover marginmedian #22
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 LSU #2 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #2 of 74; 2018 Alabama #7 of 74; 2018 Utah #11 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #11 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #14 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Washington State #17 of 74; 2018 Texas #19 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #20 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #22 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2018 Florida #24 of 74; 2018 Penn State #28 of 74; 2018 Georgia #32 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Clemson #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #37 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #47 of 74; 2018 Missouri #48 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 22.
Possessionmedian #27
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #1 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #11 of 74; 2018 Washington State #13 of 74; 2018 Texas #14 of 74; 2018 LSU #16 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 Alabama #23 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #26 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #27 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #29 of 74; 2018 Utah #29 of 74; 2018 Missouri #32 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #34 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #35 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #46 of 74; 2018 Clemson #49 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #60 of 74; 2018 Penn State #65 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 27.
Returning passingmedian #52
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Missouri #1 of 130; 2018 Texas #14 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #25 of 130; 2018 Alabama #26 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Washington #35 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Georgia #42 of 130; 2018 UCF #45 of 130; 2018 Clemson #49 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #52 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #54 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #55 of 130; 2018 Boise State #56 of 130; 2018 Utah #58 of 130; 2018 Florida #60 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #66 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 LSU #103 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #106 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #119 of 130; 2018 Washington State #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 125 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 52.
Returning receivingmedian #77
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #26 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Washington State #45 of 130; 2018 Georgia #50 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #59 of 130; 2018 Texas #63 of 130; 2018 UCF #64 of 130; 2018 Florida #65 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Clemson #70 of 130; 2018 Missouri #74 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #77 of 130; 2018 Washington #77 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #84 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #94 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Boise State #104 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #105 of 130; 2018 Alabama #108 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #109 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #114 of 130; 2018 LSU #115 of 130; 2018 Utah #116 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 105 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 77.
Returning rushingmedian #60
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #6 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #14 of 130; 2018 Utah #24 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #24 of 130; 2018 Clemson #27 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Texas #35 of 130; 2018 UCF #36 of 130; 2018 Florida #38 of 130; 2018 Washington #39 of 130; 2018 Alabama #42 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #60 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Missouri #77 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #78 of 130; 2018 Boise State #80 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #82 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #97 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Georgia #108 of 130; 2018 Washington State #109 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 LSU #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 92 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 60.
Team talentmedian #18
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #3 of 130; 2018 Clemson #5 of 130; 2018 LSU #6 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Texas #9 of 130; 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 130; 2018 Oklahoma #11 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #13 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 130; 2018 Washington #18 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 Missouri #46 of 130; 2018 Utah #47 of 130; 2018 Iowa State #52 of 130; 2018 Syracuse #54 of 130; 2018 UCF #55 of 130; 2018 Washington State #61 of 130; 2018 Boise State #65 of 130; 2018 Fresno State #81 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 85 of 130. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Offensive EPAmedian #20
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #3 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #4 of 74; 2018 Georgia #5 of 74; 2018 Washington State #6 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #10 of 74; 2018 Texas #16 of 74; 2018 Michigan #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #20 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #22 of 74; 2018 Utah #24 of 74; 2018 Washington #25 of 74; 2018 Missouri #29 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #34 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #40 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #42 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #47 of 74; 2018 LSU #52 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #56 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Defensive EPAmedian #16
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Clemson #5 of 74; 2018 Michigan #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #9 of 74; 2018 Penn State #11 of 74; 2018 Georgia #12 of 74; 2018 Washington #13 of 74; 2018 LSU #14 of 74; 2018 Utah #15 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #16 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #19 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #20 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #21 of 74; 2018 Missouri #23 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #28 of 74; 2018 Texas #31 of 74; 2018 Florida #35 of 74; 2018 Washington State #38 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #40 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #67 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Offensive success ratemedian #17
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #1 of 74; 2018 Alabama #2 of 74; 2018 Georgia #3 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #5 of 74; 2018 Clemson #7 of 74; 2018 Washington State #8 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Michigan #14 of 74; 2018 Missouri #15 of 74; 2018 Washington #16 of 74; 2018 Florida #17 of 74; 2018 Utah #19 of 74; 2018 Texas #20 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #23 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #24 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #30 of 74; 2018 Penn State #31 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #37 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #41 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #50 of 74; 2018 LSU #60 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Defensive success ratemedian #17
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #1 of 74; 2018 Clemson #2 of 74; 2018 Michigan #3 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #6 of 74; 2018 Utah #7 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #8 of 74; 2018 Penn State #9 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #10 of 74; 2018 Missouri #11 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #13 of 74; 2018 Washington #17 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #19 of 74; 2018 Florida #22 of 74; 2018 LSU #23 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2018 Washington State #31 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #32 of 74; 2018 Georgia #35 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #37 of 74; 2018 Texas #44 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #50 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #56 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 17.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #39
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Oklahoma #4 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #9 of 74; 2018 Clemson #15 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #17 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #19 of 74; 2018 Alabama #21 of 74; 2018 Washington State #33 of 74; 2018 LSU #35 of 74; 2018 Penn State #37 of 74; 2018 Washington #38 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #39 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #46 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #48 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #50 of 74; 2018 Georgia #51 of 74; 2018 Texas #58 of 74; 2018 Florida #59 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #60 of 74; 2018 Michigan #62 of 74; 2018 Utah #64 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #68 of 74; 2018 Missouri #74 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 39.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #36
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Georgia #1 of 74; 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 74; 2018 Washington #6 of 74; 2018 Northwestern #11 of 74; 2018 Notre Dame #12 of 74; 2018 LSU #17 of 74; 2018 Penn State #18 of 74; 2018 Syracuse #21 of 74; 2018 Iowa State #25 of 74; 2018 Florida #30 of 74; 2018 West Virginia #36 of 74; 2018 Texas #38 of 74; 2018 Clemson #40 of 74; 2018 Kentucky #45 of 74; 2018 Oklahoma #51 of 74; 2018 Washington State #56 of 74; 2018 Alabama #59 of 74; 2018 Missouri #65 of 74; 2018 Utah #66 of 74; 2018 Ohio State #69 of 74; 2018 Michigan #71 of 74; 2018 Texas A&M #72 of 74. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 36.