THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. East Carolina played 2 such games.

American Athletic, 2018

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018East Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (307.0 yds/g · 614 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 44 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (525.0 yds/g allowed · 1,050 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.5 pts/g allowed · 77 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.5 /g · -33 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:53 /g · 0h 58m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 434.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.269 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.670 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.399 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#45 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #12–#125. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #5–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #18–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range #51–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2018Tulane7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (346.0 yds/g · 692 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (11.5 pts/g · 23 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (559.0 yds/g allowed · 1,118 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36.0 pts/g allowed · 72 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-24.5 /g · -49 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:55 /g · 1h 06m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#44 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 130 teams · 445.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.293 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.466 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.186 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Cincinnati11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (303.0 yds/g · 303 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26.0 pts/g · 26 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (306.0 yds/g allowed · 306 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g allowed · 17 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+9.0 /g · +9 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34:21 /g · 0h 34m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#30 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.938 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.268 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Memphis8–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (398.0 yds/g · 398 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33.0 pts/g · 33 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (646.0 yds/g allowed · 646 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (65.0 pts/g allowed · 65 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-32.0 /g · -32 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 0 taken, 2 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:36 /g · 0h 27m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#120 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 480.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.545 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (56% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.069 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Navy3–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (345.0 yds/g · 345 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 22 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (584.0 yds/g allowed · 584 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44.0 pts/g allowed · 44 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-22.0 /g · -22 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:03 /g · 0h 28m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#32 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 349.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.476 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.480 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.507 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Temple8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (440.5 yds/g · 881 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35.0 pts/g · 70 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (309.0 yds/g allowed · 618 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29.5 pts/g allowed · 59 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+5.5 /g · +11 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:18 /g · 1h 03m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#80 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 478.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.335 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Tulsa3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (306.5 yds/g · 613 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.5 pts/g · 21 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (402.5 yds/g allowed · 805 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25.5 pts/g allowed · 51 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-15.0 /g · -30 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 3 taken, 4 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:03 /g · 0h 50m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 368.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.157 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.013 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018UCF12–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (568.0 yds/g · 568 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45.0 pts/g · 45 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (272.0 yds/g allowed · 272 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g allowed · 14 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+31.0 /g · +31 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 1 taken, 0 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:31 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#45 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 568.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.403 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.760 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018UConn1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (395.0 yds/g · 395 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (21.0 pts/g · 21 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (636.0 yds/g allowed · 636 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (51.0 pts/g allowed · 51 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-30.0 /g · -30 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:29 /g · 0h 32m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#89 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 130 teams · 48% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 389.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.383 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.182 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018Houston8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (593.0 yds/g · 1,186 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47.0 pts/g · 94 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (617.5 yds/g allowed · 1,235 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.5 pts/g allowed · 81 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+6.5 /g · +13 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24:31 /g · 0h 49m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 577.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.337 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.715 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.297 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018SMU5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (280.5 yds/g · 561 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (16.0 pts/g · 32 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (410.5 yds/g allowed · 821 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43.5 pts/g allowed · 87 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-27.5 /g · -55 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:24 /g · 0h 53m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#31 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 130 teams · 485.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.230 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (55% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.125 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2018South Florida7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2018. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (523.5 yds/g · 1,047 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37.0 pts/g · 74 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (491.0 yds/g allowed · 982 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.5 pts/g allowed · 57 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+8.5 /g · +17 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 4 taken, 3 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:54 /g · 0h 52m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#109 (of 130 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 8% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 548.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.288 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (53% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.174 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.201 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20182018 East CarolinaAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offense
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Total defense
Total defense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defense
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Point margin
Point margin. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passingmedian #45
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Tulsa #12 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #30 of 130; 2018 SMU #31 of 130; 2018 Navy #32 of 130; 2018 Tulane #44 of 130; 2018 UCF #45 of 130; 2018 Temple #80 of 130; 2018 UConn #89 of 130; 2018 Houston #91 of 130; 2018 South Florida #109 of 130; 2018 Memphis #120 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 125 of 130. American Athletic median rank 45.
Returning receivingmedian #80
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Tulane #5 of 130; 2018 UConn #13 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #22 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #61 of 130; 2018 UCF #64 of 130; 2018 Temple #80 of 130; 2018 Memphis #93 of 130; 2018 South Florida #102 of 130; 2018 Navy #112 of 130; 2018 SMU #122 of 130; 2018 Houston #125 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 105 of 130. American Athletic median rank 80.
Returning rushingmedian #74
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 SMU #18 of 130; 2018 UCF #36 of 130; 2018 Memphis #39 of 130; 2018 Navy #56 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #69 of 130; 2018 Temple #74 of 130; 2018 UConn #90 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #96 of 130; 2018 Tulane #101 of 130; 2018 Houston #113 of 130; 2018 South Florida #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 92 of 130. American Athletic median rank 74.
Team talentmedian #74
Team talent. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Houston #51 of 130; 2018 UCF #55 of 130; 2018 South Florida #62 of 130; 2018 Cincinnati #64 of 130; 2018 SMU #73 of 130; 2018 Memphis #74 of 130; 2018 Temple #76 of 130; 2018 Tulane #83 of 130; 2018 UConn #98 of 130; 2018 Tulsa #108 of 130; 2018 Navy #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 East Carolina, ranked 85 of 130. American Athletic median rank 74.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2018, best rank first: . Marked: 2018 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.