THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

East CarolinaPirates

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. East Carolina played 1 such game.

American Athletic, 2019

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2019East Carolina4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (269.0 yds/g · 269 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (6.0 pts/g · 6 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (505.0 yds/g allowed · 505 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-28.0 /g · -28 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 0 taken, 2 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:22 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#36 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 468.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.027 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.430 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20190 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#59 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range #25–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range #9–#125. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#28 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range #6–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#71 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range #54–#119. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2019Cincinnati11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (345.0 yds/g · 690 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (12.0 pts/g · 24 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (363.0 yds/g allowed · 726 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g allowed · 56 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-16.0 /g · -32 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:33 /g · 1h 07m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#52 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 576.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.227 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.246 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019SMU10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (406.0 yds/g · 406 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41.0 pts/g · 41 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (424.0 yds/g allowed · 424 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.0 pts/g allowed · 38 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3.0 /g · +3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:55 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#94 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 565.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.199 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.374 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Houston4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (387.5 yds/g · 775 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.5 pts/g · 55 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (587.5 yds/g allowed · 1,175 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40.0 pts/g allowed · 80 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-12.5 /g · -25 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:47 /g · 1h 00m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#28 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 130 teams · 597.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.188 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.486 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (61% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Memphis12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Cincinnati, #21 Cincinnati, #23 Navy)— (364.0 yds/g · 364 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.0 pts/g · 15 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (173.0 yds/g allowed · 173 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g allowed · 10 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+5.0 /g · +5 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 1 taken, 1 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38:41 /g · 0h 39m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#37 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 552.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.020 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Navy11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (360.0 yds/g · 360 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (20.0 pts/g · 20 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (410.0 yds/g allowed · 410 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-32.0 /g · -32 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-4 in these games · 0 taken, 4 given · -4.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:37 /g · 0h 36m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#93 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 335.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.483 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.234 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.407 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019South Florida4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (209.0 yds/g · 418 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (5.0 pts/g · 10 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (346.0 yds/g allowed · 692 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.5 pts/g allowed · 63 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-26.5 /g · -53 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 3 taken, 5 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (26:13 /g · 0h 52m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#63 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 84% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 130 teams · 559.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.051 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.409 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Temple8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Memphis)— (374.5 yds/g · 749 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (22.0 pts/g · 44 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (322.5 yds/g allowed · 645 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (9.5 pts/g allowed · 19 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+12.5 /g · +25 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 4 taken, 4 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:11 /g · 1h 02m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#59 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 130 teams · 489.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.182 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.321 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Tulane7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (223.0 yds/g · 223 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (6.0 pts/g · 6 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (379.0 yds/g allowed · 379 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g allowed · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-18.0 /g · -18 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 2 taken, 1 given · +1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:27 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#81 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 487.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.265 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.203 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019Tulsa4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (238.0 yds/g · 476 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (14.0 pts/g · 28 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (404.5 yds/g allowed · 809 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 68 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-20.0 /g · -40 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29:08 /g · 0h 58m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#73 (of 130 teams · 64% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 130 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 130 teams · 86% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 130 teams · 424.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.398 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019UCF10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (484.0 yds/g · 968 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39.5 pts/g · 79 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (394.0 yds/g allowed · 788 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+8.5 /g · +17 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 2 taken, 3 given · -0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:54 /g · 0h 52m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#25 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 130 teams · 598.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.140 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.573 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2019UConn2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2019. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (215.0 yds/g · 430 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (13.0 pts/g · 26 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (393.5 yds/g allowed · 787 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.5 pts/g allowed · 69 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-21.5 /g · -43 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 5 taken, 4 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:27 /g · 0h 55m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 412.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.120 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20192019 East CarolinaAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offense
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Total defense
Total defense. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defense
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Point margin
Point margin. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UCF #25 of 130; 2019 Houston #28 of 130; 2019 Memphis #37 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #52 of 130; 2019 Temple #59 of 130; 2019 South Florida #63 of 130; 2019 Tulsa #73 of 130; 2019 Tulane #81 of 130; 2019 Navy #93 of 130; 2019 SMU #94 of 130; 2019 UConn #126 of 130. Marked: 2019 East Carolina, ranked 36 of 130. American Athletic median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #46
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: 2019 SMU #9 of 130; 2019 Houston #11 of 130; 2019 UCF #27 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #29 of 130; 2019 Memphis #44 of 130; 2019 Navy #46 of 130; 2019 Tulsa #50 of 130; 2019 Temple #71 of 130; 2019 Tulane #77 of 130; 2019 South Florida #80 of 130; 2019 UConn #125 of 130. Marked: 2019 East Carolina, ranked 100 of 130. American Athletic median rank 46.
Returning rushingmedian #28
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: 2019 Cincinnati #6 of 130; 2019 Tulane #19 of 130; 2019 UCF #23 of 130; 2019 Tulsa #24 of 130; 2019 Houston #26 of 130; 2019 South Florida #28 of 130; 2019 UConn #79 of 130; 2019 SMU #81 of 130; 2019 Memphis #95 of 130; 2019 Navy #96 of 130; 2019 Temple #117 of 130. Marked: 2019 East Carolina, ranked 48 of 130. American Athletic median rank 28.
Team talentmedian #71
Team talent. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: 2019 UCF #54 of 130; 2019 Houston #55 of 130; 2019 Cincinnati #61 of 130; 2019 SMU #64 of 130; 2019 South Florida #69 of 130; 2019 Memphis #71 of 130; 2019 Temple #80 of 130; 2019 Tulane #81 of 130; 2019 Tulsa #96 of 130; 2019 UConn #100 of 130; 2019 Navy #119 of 130. Marked: 2019 East Carolina, ranked 85 of 130. American Athletic median rank 71.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2019, best rank first: . Marked: 2019 East Carolina, which has no value for this metric.