Metrics

Eastern MichiganEagles

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2004

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2004Eastern Michigan470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 119 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 4,368 yards)#33 (of 119 teams · 29.8 pts/g · 328 points)#111 (of 119 teams · 433.4 yds/g allowed · 4,767 yards)#118 (of 119 teams · 41.6 pts/g allowed · 458 points)#103 (of 119 teams · -11.8 /g · -130 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 14 taken, 22 given · -0.73 /g)#114 (of 119 teams · 15:44 /g · 2h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 119 teams · -0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 119 teams · -0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 119 teams · 25% of plays successful)#101 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.861 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Mid-American teams in 20040 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #2–#117. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#63 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #4–#115. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#76 (Total defense: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #14–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#87 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #38–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#80 (Point margin: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #5–#116. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #4–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#56 (Possession: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #32–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#95 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #3–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #4–#117. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#100 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #10–#118. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #18–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #2–#118. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range #4–#76. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)
2004Akron650 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 119 teams · 336.8 yds/g · 3,705 yards)#63 (of 119 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 271 points)#105 (of 119 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 4,685 yards)#92 (of 119 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#90 (of 119 teams · -6.9 /g · -76 on the season)#15 (of 119 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.82 /g)#81 (of 119 teams · 17:40 /g · 3h 14m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 119 teams · -0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#118 (of 119 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 119 teams · 0.633 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.858 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Ball State290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 119 teams · 323.3 yds/g · 3,556 yards)#100 (of 119 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 225 points)#115 (of 119 teams · 458.0 yds/g allowed · 5,038 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 36.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#112 (of 119 teams · -16.4 /g · -180 on the season)#24 (of 119 teams · +7 on the season · 14 taken, 7 given · +0.64 /g)#46 (of 119 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#105 (of 119 teams · -0.174 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 119 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 119 teams · 24% of plays successful)#91 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 119 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 119 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Bowling Green930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 506.3 yds/g · 6,076 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 44.3 pts/g · 532 points)#76 (of 119 teams · 391.9 yds/g allowed · 4,703 yards)#44 (of 119 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +20.8 /g · +250 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +16 on the season · 26 taken, 10 given · +1.33 /g)#53 (of 119 teams · 18:12 /g · 3h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#75 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#66 (of 119 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Buffalo290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#117 (of 119 teams · 212.2 yds/g · 2,334 yards)#110 (of 119 teams · 17.9 pts/g · 197 points)#37 (of 119 teams · 338.0 yds/g allowed · 3,718 yards)#95 (of 119 teams · 31.9 pts/g allowed · 351 points)#107 (of 119 teams · -14.0 /g · -154 on the season)#40 (of 119 teams · +4 on the season · 17 taken, 13 given · +0.36 /g)#117 (of 119 teams · 13:21 /g · 2h 27m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 119 teams · -0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.151 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 119 teams · 21% of plays successful)#35 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 119 teams · 0.792 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Central Michigan470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 395.6 yds/g · 4,351 yards)#80 (of 119 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 260 points)#109 (of 119 teams · 431.7 yds/g allowed · 4,749 yards)#106 (of 119 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#99 (of 119 teams · -10.7 /g · -118 on the season)#92 (of 119 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.55 /g)#58 (of 119 teams · 18:07 /g · 3h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 119 teams · -0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 119 teams · -0.033 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 119 teams · 34% of plays successful)#78 (of 119 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#39 (of 119 teams · 1.032 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.818 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Kent State560 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 119 teams · 378.9 yds/g · 4,168 yards)#26 (of 119 teams · 30.4 pts/g · 335 points)#21 (of 119 teams · 312.4 yds/g allowed · 3,437 yards)#45 (of 119 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 264 points)#34 (of 119 teams · +6.5 /g · +71 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.36 /g)#71 (of 119 teams · 17:54 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 119 teams · -0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 119 teams · 24% of plays successful)#36 (of 119 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.389 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.848 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Marshall660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 119 teams · 321.5 yds/g · 3,858 yards)#71 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 291 points)#35 (of 119 teams · 334.7 yds/g allowed · 4,016 yards)#38 (of 119 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#52 (of 119 teams · +2.1 /g · +25 on the season)#51 (of 119 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.17 /g)#47 (of 119 teams · 18:20 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 119 teams · -0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 119 teams · -0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#114 (of 119 teams · 25% of plays successful)#67 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 119 teams · 0.949 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Miami (OH)850 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#32 (of 119 teams · 399.7 yds/g · 5,196 yards)#22 (of 119 teams · 31.3 pts/g · 407 points)#38 (of 119 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 4,404 yards)#41 (of 119 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#26 (of 119 teams · +8.4 /g · +109 on the season)#106 (of 119 teams · -11 on the season · 23 taken, 34 given · -0.85 /g)#36 (of 119 teams · 18:38 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 119 teams · -0.202 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 119 teams · -0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#44 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 119 teams · 0.733 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 119 teams · 0.982 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Northern Illinois930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 119 teams · 438.8 yds/g · 5,265 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 421 points)#63 (of 119 teams · 376.1 yds/g allowed · 4,513 yards)#60 (of 119 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#21 (of 119 teams · +9.8 /g · +117 on the season)#13 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 22 taken, 12 given · +0.83 /g)#63 (of 119 teams · 18:02 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 119 teams · -0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 119 teams · -0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 119 teams · 32% of plays successful)#39 (of 119 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 119 teams · 0.989 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 119 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Ohio470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 119 teams · 275.2 yds/g · 3,027 yards)#104 (of 119 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 221 points)#14 (of 119 teams · 298.6 yds/g allowed · 3,284 yards)#52 (of 119 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#80 (of 119 teams · -4.5 /g · -50 on the season)#77 (of 119 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.27 /g)#98 (of 119 teams · 17:00 /g · 3h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 119 teams · -0.308 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 119 teams · 27% of plays successful)#18 (of 119 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 119 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#15 (of 119 teams · 0.890 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Toledo940 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 459.5 yds/g · 5,974 yards)#15 (of 119 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#97 (of 119 teams · 417.5 yds/g allowed · 5,428 yards)#87 (of 119 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#51 (of 119 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season)#70 (of 119 teams · -2 on the season · 25 taken, 27 given · -0.15 /g)#32 (of 119 teams · 18:47 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 119 teams · -0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 119 teams · 0.054 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 119 teams · 30% of plays successful)#97 (of 119 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 119 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004UCF0110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 119 teams · 280.0 yds/g · 3,080 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 15.9 pts/g · 175 points)#92 (of 119 teams · 403.9 yds/g allowed · 4,443 yards)#101 (of 119 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 362 points)#115 (of 119 teams · -17.0 /g · -187 on the season)#100 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 22 taken, 30 given · -0.73 /g)#56 (of 119 teams · 18:11 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 119 teams · -0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 119 teams · -0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 119 teams · 26% of plays successful)#86 (of 119 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 119 teams · 0.994 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 119 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2004Western Michigan1100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Mid-American teams in 2004. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 119 teams · 364.4 yds/g · 4,008 yards)#85 (of 119 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 248 points)#117 (of 119 teams · 480.6 yds/g allowed · 5,286 yards)#116 (of 119 teams · 39.6 pts/g allowed · 436 points)#116 (of 119 teams · -17.1 /g · -188 on the season)#111 (of 119 teams · -12 on the season · 18 taken, 30 given · -1.09 /g)#48 (of 119 teams · 18:19 /g · 3h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 119 teams · -0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 119 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 119 teams · 38% of plays successful)#105 (of 119 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 119 teams · 0.871 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 119 teams · 1.009 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20042004 Eastern MichiganMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #2 of 119; 2004 Toledo #10 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #13 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #32 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #38 of 119; 2004 Kent State #53 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #65 of 119; 2004 Akron #85 of 119; 2004 Ball State #93 of 119; 2004 Marshall #94 of 119; 2004 UCF #112 of 119; 2004 Ohio #114 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 35 of 119. Mid-American median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #63
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #4 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #13 of 119; 2004 Toledo #15 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #22 of 119; 2004 Kent State #26 of 119; 2004 Akron #63 of 119; 2004 Marshall #71 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #80 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #85 of 119; 2004 Ball State #100 of 119; 2004 Ohio #104 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #110 of 119; 2004 UCF #115 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 33 of 119. Mid-American median rank 63.
Total defensemedian #76
Total defense. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Ohio #14 of 119; 2004 Kent State #21 of 119; 2004 Marshall #35 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #37 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #38 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #63 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #76 of 119; 2004 UCF #92 of 119; 2004 Toledo #97 of 119; 2004 Akron #105 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #109 of 119; 2004 Ball State #115 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 111 of 119. Mid-American median rank 76.
Scoring defensemedian #87
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Marshall #38 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #41 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #44 of 119; 2004 Kent State #45 of 119; 2004 Ohio #52 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #60 of 119; 2004 Toledo #87 of 119; 2004 Akron #92 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #95 of 119; 2004 UCF #101 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #106 of 119; 2004 Ball State #110 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #116 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 118 of 119. Mid-American median rank 87.
Point marginmedian #80
Point margin. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #5 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #21 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #26 of 119; 2004 Kent State #34 of 119; 2004 Toledo #51 of 119; 2004 Marshall #52 of 119; 2004 Ohio #80 of 119; 2004 Akron #90 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #99 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #107 of 119; 2004 Ball State #112 of 119; 2004 UCF #115 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #116 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 103 of 119. Mid-American median rank 80.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #4 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #13 of 119; 2004 Akron #15 of 119; 2004 Ball State #24 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #40 of 119; 2004 Marshall #51 of 119; 2004 Toledo #70 of 119; 2004 Ohio #77 of 119; 2004 Kent State #82 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #92 of 119; 2004 UCF #100 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #106 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #111 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 100 of 119. Mid-American median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #56
Possession. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Toledo #32 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #36 of 119; 2004 Ball State #46 of 119; 2004 Marshall #47 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #48 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #53 of 119; 2004 UCF #56 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #58 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #63 of 119; 2004 Kent State #71 of 119; 2004 Akron #81 of 119; 2004 Ohio #98 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 114 of 119. Mid-American median rank 56.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: . Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #95
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #3 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #59 of 119; 2004 Toledo #84 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #85 of 119; 2004 Akron #90 of 119; 2004 UCF #95 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #97 of 119; 2004 Ball State #105 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #113 of 119; 2004 Marshall #114 of 119; 2004 Kent State #115 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #117 of 119; 2004 Ohio #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 56 of 119. Mid-American median rank 95.
Defensive EPAmedian #57
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Ohio #4 of 119; 2004 Kent State #5 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #6 of 119; 2004 UCF #42 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #46 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #48 of 119; 2004 Marshall #57 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #65 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #89 of 119; 2004 Toledo #99 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #102 of 119; 2004 Ball State #107 of 119; 2004 Akron #117 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 58 of 119. Mid-American median rank 57.
Offensive success ratemedian #100
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Bowling Green #10 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #32 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #35 of 119; 2004 Akron #64 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #70 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #91 of 119; 2004 Toledo #100 of 119; 2004 Ohio #110 of 119; 2004 UCF #112 of 119; 2004 Marshall #114 of 119; 2004 Kent State #116 of 119; 2004 Ball State #117 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 115 of 119. Mid-American median rank 100.
Defensive success ratemedian #75
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Ohio #18 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #35 of 119; 2004 Kent State #36 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #39 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #44 of 119; 2004 Marshall #67 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #75 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #78 of 119; 2004 UCF #86 of 119; 2004 Ball State #91 of 119; 2004 Toledo #97 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #105 of 119; 2004 Akron #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 101 of 119. Mid-American median rank 75.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Kent State #2 of 119; 2004 Marshall #9 of 119; 2004 Toledo #12 of 119; 2004 Ball State #15 of 119; 2004 Central Michigan #39 of 119; 2004 UCF #60 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #63 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #66 of 119; 2004 Ohio #91 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #110 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #116 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #117 of 119; 2004 Akron #118 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 4 of 119. Mid-American median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #20
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2004, best rank first: 2004 Central Michigan #4 of 119; 2004 Kent State #6 of 119; 2004 Akron #7 of 119; 2004 Ohio #15 of 119; 2004 Ball State #18 of 119; 2004 Bowling Green #20 of 119; 2004 Buffalo #21 of 119; 2004 Marshall #40 of 119; 2004 Miami (OH) #58 of 119; 2004 Toledo #59 of 119; 2004 Northern Illinois #67 of 119; 2004 Western Michigan #71 of 119; 2004 UCF #76 of 119. Marked: 2004 Eastern Michigan, ranked 8 of 119. Mid-American median rank 20.