Metrics

Florida StateSeminoles

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Florida State1042 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 381.3 yds/g · 5,338 yards)#33 (of 120 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 439 points)#42 (of 120 teams · 353.7 yds/g allowed · 4,952 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 275 points)#22 (of 120 teams · +11.7 /g · +164 on the season)#42 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 27 taken, 23 given · +0.29 /g)#57 (of 120 teams · 18:49 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#49 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#37 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.899 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#51 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #31–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#71 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #21–#109. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #13–#108. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #13–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #17–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #2–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #7–#108. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#46 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #26–#112. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #12–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #26–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #5–#103. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #26–#107. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range #1–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010Boston College760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 120 teams · 299.1 yds/g · 3,888 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 240 points)#13 (of 120 teams · 309.7 yds/g allowed · 4,026 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 19.5 pts/g allowed · 254 points)#72 (of 120 teams · -1.1 /g · -14 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 33 taken, 25 given · +0.62 /g)#92 (of 120 teams · 17:39 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#112 (of 120 teams · -0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#62 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.845 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.751 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Clemson671 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 120 teams · 334.6 yds/g · 4,350 yards)#86 (of 120 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 312 points)#19 (of 120 teams · 320.3 yds/g allowed · 4,164 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#47 (of 120 teams · +5.2 /g · +68 on the season)#69 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.23 /g)#93 (of 120 teams · 17:39 /g · 3h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 120 teams · -0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 120 teams · -0.021 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#12 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Duke390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 120 teams · 381.3 yds/g · 4,576 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 303 points)#108 (of 120 teams · 450.1 yds/g allowed · 5,401 yards)#109 (of 120 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#98 (of 120 teams · -10.2 /g · -122 on the season)#112 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 17 taken, 28 given · -0.92 /g)#98 (of 120 teams · 17:31 /g · 3h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 120 teams · 0.129 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#66 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 120 teams · 1.029 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Georgia Tech670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 120 teams · 407.2 yds/g · 5,294 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 338 points)#64 (of 120 teams · 371.6 yds/g allowed · 4,831 yards)#57 (of 120 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 328 points)#64 (of 120 teams · +0.8 /g · +10 on the season)#89 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 21 taken, 27 given · -0.46 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:15 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#75 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.940 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.890 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Maryland940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#80 (of 120 teams · 352.9 yds/g · 4,587 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points)#39 (of 120 teams · 352.3 yds/g allowed · 4,580 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#27 (of 120 teams · +10.1 /g · +131 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 29 taken, 14 given · +1.15 /g)#83 (of 120 teams · 17:59 /g · 3h 54m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 120 teams · -0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#21 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.950 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Miami762 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 120 teams · 421.3 yds/g · 5,477 yards)#67 (of 120 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 323.3 yds/g allowed · 4,203 yards)#27 (of 120 teams · 20.7 pts/g allowed · 269 points)#44 (of 120 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#102 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 28 taken, 36 given · -0.62 /g)#108 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.038 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 120 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 120 teams · 1.029 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010NC State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 120 teams · 404.5 yds/g · 5,258 yards)#32 (of 120 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#31 (of 120 teams · 339.4 yds/g allowed · 4,412 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#26 (of 120 teams · +10.5 /g · +137 on the season)#27 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.54 /g)#23 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#50 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.953 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.955 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010North Carolina851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 120 teams · 389.7 yds/g · 5,066 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 329 points)#30 (of 120 teams · 338.5 yds/g allowed · 4,401 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points)#60 (of 120 teams · +2.1 /g · +27 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#31 (of 120 teams · 19:22 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#49 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.925 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.878 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Virginia480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 120 teams · 404.8 yds/g · 4,858 yards)#75 (of 120 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 304 points)#78 (of 120 teams · 396.1 yds/g allowed · 4,753 yards)#70 (of 120 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 339 points)#82 (of 120 teams · -2.9 /g · -35 on the season)#99 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 16 taken, 23 given · -0.58 /g)#65 (of 120 teams · 18:40 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#53 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.936 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Virginia Tech1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 120 teams · 402.3 yds/g · 5,632 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 474 points)#52 (of 120 teams · 361.5 yds/g allowed · 5,061 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 20.6 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#17 (of 120 teams · +13.3 /g · +186 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19 on the season · 32 taken, 13 given · +1.36 /g)#24 (of 120 teams · 19:37 /g · 4h 35m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#11 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.932 average PPA on successful plays)#120 (of 120 teams · 1.140 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Wake Forest390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2010. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 120 teams · 302.3 yds/g · 3,628 yards)#91 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#101 (of 120 teams · 430.7 yds/g allowed · 5,168 yards)#110 (of 120 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 430 points)#107 (of 120 teams · -13.1 /g · -157 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#102 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 120 teams · -0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#103 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 120 teams · 0.841 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20102010 Florida StateACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #51
Total offense. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Miami #31 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #36 of 120; 2010 Virginia #37 of 120; 2010 NC State #39 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #41 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #51 of 120; 2010 Duke #59 of 120; 2010 Maryland #80 of 120; 2010 Clemson #88 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #107 of 120; 2010 Boston College #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 60 of 120. ACC median rank 51.
Scoring offensemedian #71
Scoring offense. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Virginia Tech #21 of 120; 2010 Maryland #29 of 120; 2010 NC State #32 of 120; 2010 Miami #67 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #71 of 120; 2010 Virginia #75 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #76 of 120; 2010 Duke #77 of 120; 2010 Clemson #86 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #91 of 120; 2010 Boston College #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 33 of 120. ACC median rank 71.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boston College #13 of 120; 2010 Clemson #19 of 120; 2010 Miami #21 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #30 of 120; 2010 NC State #31 of 120; 2010 Maryland #39 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #52 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #64 of 120; 2010 Virginia #78 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #101 of 120; 2010 Duke #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 42 of 120. ACC median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #29
Scoring defense. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Clemson #13 of 120; 2010 Boston College #19 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #26 of 120; 2010 Miami #27 of 120; 2010 NC State #29 of 120; 2010 Maryland #38 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #45 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #57 of 120; 2010 Virginia #70 of 120; 2010 Duke #109 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 20 of 120. ACC median rank 29.
Point marginmedian #47
Point margin. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Virginia Tech #17 of 120; 2010 NC State #26 of 120; 2010 Maryland #27 of 120; 2010 Miami #44 of 120; 2010 Clemson #47 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #60 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #64 of 120; 2010 Boston College #72 of 120; 2010 Virginia #82 of 120; 2010 Duke #98 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 22 of 120. ACC median rank 47.
Turnover marginmedian #52
Turnover margin. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Virginia Tech #2 of 120; 2010 Maryland #4 of 120; 2010 Boston College #22 of 120; 2010 NC State #27 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #52 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #55 of 120; 2010 Clemson #69 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #89 of 120; 2010 Virginia #99 of 120; 2010 Miami #102 of 120; 2010 Duke #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 42 of 120. ACC median rank 52.
Possessionmedian #65
Possession. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Georgia Tech #7 of 120; 2010 NC State #23 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #24 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #31 of 120; 2010 Virginia #65 of 120; 2010 Maryland #83 of 120; 2010 Boston College #92 of 120; 2010 Clemson #93 of 120; 2010 Duke #98 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #102 of 120; 2010 Miami #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 57 of 120. ACC median rank 65.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #46
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Virginia Tech #26 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #27 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #42 of 120; 2010 NC State #44 of 120; 2010 Virginia #46 of 120; 2010 Miami #63 of 120; 2010 Duke #81 of 120; 2010 Maryland #97 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #101 of 120; 2010 Clemson #103 of 120; 2010 Boston College #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 30 of 120. ACC median rank 46.
Defensive EPAmedian #45
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boston College #12 of 120; 2010 Clemson #15 of 120; 2010 Miami #17 of 120; 2010 Maryland #24 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #36 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #45 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #59 of 120; 2010 NC State #65 of 120; 2010 Virginia #78 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #93 of 120; 2010 Duke #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 50 of 120. ACC median rank 45.
Offensive success ratemedian #49
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Virginia Tech #26 of 120; 2010 Virginia #40 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #43 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #46 of 120; 2010 Miami #47 of 120; 2010 NC State #69 of 120; 2010 Duke #70 of 120; 2010 Maryland #96 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #97 of 120; 2010 Clemson #102 of 120; 2010 Boston College #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 49 of 120. ACC median rank 49.
Defensive success ratemedian #49
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Miami #5 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #11 of 120; 2010 Clemson #12 of 120; 2010 Maryland #21 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #49 of 120; 2010 NC State #50 of 120; 2010 Virginia #53 of 120; 2010 Boston College #62 of 120; 2010 Duke #66 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #75 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #103 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 37 of 120. ACC median rank 49.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #52
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 NC State #31 of 120; 2010 Maryland #33 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #42 of 120; 2010 Virginia #48 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #52 of 120; 2010 Duke #55 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #58 of 120; 2010 Miami #78 of 120; 2010 Clemson #82 of 120; 2010 Boston College #106 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 26 of 120. ACC median rank 52.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #81
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boston College #1 of 120; 2010 North Carolina #36 of 120; 2010 Georgia Tech #43 of 120; 2010 Wake Forest #55 of 120; 2010 NC State #81 of 120; 2010 Maryland #92 of 120; 2010 Clemson #95 of 120; 2010 Virginia #108 of 120; 2010 Duke #113 of 120; 2010 Miami #114 of 120; 2010 Virginia Tech #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Florida State, ranked 47 of 120. ACC median rank 81.