Metrics

Florida StateSeminoles

Season
Current

ACC

ACC, 2012

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Florida State1222 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#19 (of 124 teams · 470.8 yds/g · 6,591 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 39.3 pts/g · 550 points)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 253.8 yds/g allowed · 3,553 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 14.7 pts/g allowed · 206 points)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +24.6 /g · +344 on the season)#96 (of 124 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.57 /g)#13 (of 124 teams · 33:06 /g · 7h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.166 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 50% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.882 average PPA on successful plays)#26 (of 124 teams · 0.881 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 ACC teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#48 (Total offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #9–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Scoring offense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #6–#116. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#59 (Total defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Scoring defense: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #6–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #3–#114. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Turnover margin: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #26–#114. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Possession: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #4–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #4–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#109. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #2–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#52 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range #8–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2012Boston College2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 124 teams · 349.0 yds/g · 4,188 yards)#111 (of 124 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 238 points)#103 (of 124 teams · 455.6 yds/g allowed · 5,467 yards)#76 (of 124 teams · 29.7 pts/g allowed · 356 points)#105 (of 124 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#90 (of 124 teams · -5 on the season · 19 taken, 24 given · -0.42 /g)#121 (of 124 teams · 26:50 /g · 5h 22m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#97 (of 124 teams · 0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 124 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#109 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 124 teams · 0.997 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.831 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Clemson1122 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 512.7 yds/g · 6,665 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 533 points)#64 (of 124 teams · 396.5 yds/g allowed · 5,154 yards)#48 (of 124 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16.1 /g · +210 on the season)#58 (of 124 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#99 (of 124 teams · 28:50 /g · 6h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 124 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 124 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#32 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#20 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 124 teams · 1.110 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Duke670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 124 teams · 409.1 yds/g · 5,319 yards)#44 (of 124 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 410 points)#109 (of 124 teams · 469.1 yds/g allowed · 6,099 yards)#110 (of 124 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 468 points)#86 (of 124 teams · -4.5 /g · -58 on the season)#52 (of 124 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.15 /g)#46 (of 124 teams · 31:16 /g · 6h 46m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 124 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#103 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 124 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 124 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Georgia Tech770 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 124 teams · 441.1 yds/g · 6,175 yards)#34 (of 124 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 470 points)#44 (of 124 teams · 374.0 yds/g allowed · 5,236 yards)#65 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#51 (of 124 teams · +5.3 /g · +74 on the season)#47 (of 124 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.29 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34:04 /g · 7h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 124 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#60 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.878 average PPA on successful plays)#86 (of 124 teams · 0.963 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Maryland480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#123 (of 124 teams · 284.8 yds/g · 3,417 yards)#109 (of 124 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 241 points)#22 (of 124 teams · 336.8 yds/g allowed · 4,042 yards)#56 (of 124 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#98 (of 124 teams · -7.1 /g · -85 on the season)#100 (of 124 teams · -8 on the season · 21 taken, 29 given · -0.67 /g)#30 (of 124 teams · 31:59 /g · 6h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 124 teams · -0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 124 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#124 (of 124 teams · 33% of plays successful)#38 (of 124 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.054 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 124 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Miami751 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 124 teams · 440.2 yds/g · 5,282 yards)#49 (of 124 teams · 31.4 pts/g · 377 points)#120 (of 124 teams · 486.4 yds/g allowed · 5,837 yards)#84 (of 124 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#68 (of 124 teams · +0.9 /g · +11 on the season)#31 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 22 taken, 15 given · +0.58 /g)#109 (of 124 teams · 28:02 /g · 5h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 124 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 124 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 124 teams · 41% of plays successful)#112 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 124 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 124 teams · 0.886 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012NC State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 124 teams · 421.1 yds/g · 5,475 yards)#71 (of 124 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 365 points)#70 (of 124 teams · 404.7 yds/g allowed · 5,261 yards)#52 (of 124 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#61 (of 124 teams · +2.5 /g · +32 on the season)#102 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 24 taken, 33 given · -0.69 /g)#65 (of 124 teams · 30:28 /g · 6h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.018 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 124 teams · -0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#15 (of 124 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#41 (of 124 teams · 0.954 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 124 teams · 0.978 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012North Carolina841 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 124 teams · 485.6 yds/g · 5,827 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 40.6 pts/g · 487 points)#59 (of 124 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 4,675 yards)#53 (of 124 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#11 (of 124 teams · +14.9 /g · +179 on the season)#31 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.58 /g)#112 (of 124 teams · 27:50 /g · 5h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 124 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 124 teams · 0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#21 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 124 teams · 0.894 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 124 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Virginia480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 124 teams · 396.5 yds/g · 4,758 yards)#95 (of 124 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#29 (of 124 teams · 353.3 yds/g allowed · 4,240 yards)#71 (of 124 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#91 (of 124 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#114 (of 124 teams · -14 on the season · 12 taken, 26 given · -1.17 /g)#12 (of 124 teams · 33:06 /g · 6h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 124 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 124 teams · 0.000 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#29 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 124 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#29 (of 124 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Virginia Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#83 (of 124 teams · 376.8 yds/g · 4,898 yards)#83 (of 124 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 326 points)#19 (of 124 teams · 332.8 yds/g allowed · 4,326 yards)#32 (of 124 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points)#63 (of 124 teams · +2.2 /g · +29 on the season)#82 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.31 /g)#70 (of 124 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 124 teams · -0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 124 teams · 37% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 124 teams · 0.918 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 124 teams · 1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Wake Forest570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 ACC teams in 2012. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#120 (of 124 teams · 301.3 yds/g · 3,616 yards)#116 (of 124 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 222 points)#91 (of 124 teams · 432.8 yds/g allowed · 5,194 yards)#93 (of 124 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#114 (of 124 teams · -13.3 /g · -160 on the season)#26 (of 124 teams · +8 on the season · 23 taken, 15 given · +0.67 /g)#75 (of 124 teams · 30:05 /g · 6h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 124 teams · -0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 124 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 124 teams · 36% of plays successful)#71 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.898 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 124 teams · 0.993 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20122012 Florida StateACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #48
Total offense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Clemson #9 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #14 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #35 of 124; 2012 Miami #37 of 124; 2012 NC State #48 of 124; 2012 Duke #55 of 124; 2012 Virginia #62 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #83 of 124; 2012 Boston College #101 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #120 of 124; 2012 Maryland #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 19 of 124. ACC median rank 48.
Scoring offensemedian #49
Scoring offense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Clemson #6 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #8 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #34 of 124; 2012 Duke #44 of 124; 2012 Miami #49 of 124; 2012 NC State #71 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #83 of 124; 2012 Virginia #95 of 124; 2012 Maryland #109 of 124; 2012 Boston College #111 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #116 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 10 of 124. ACC median rank 49.
Total defensemedian #59
Total defense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Virginia Tech #19 of 124; 2012 Maryland #22 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #44 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #59 of 124; 2012 Clemson #64 of 124; 2012 NC State #70 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #91 of 124; 2012 Boston College #103 of 124; 2012 Duke #109 of 124; 2012 Miami #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 2 of 124. ACC median rank 59.
Scoring defensemedian #56
Scoring defense. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Virginia Tech #32 of 124; 2012 Clemson #48 of 124; 2012 NC State #52 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #53 of 124; 2012 Maryland #56 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #65 of 124; 2012 Virginia #71 of 124; 2012 Boston College #76 of 124; 2012 Miami #84 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #93 of 124; 2012 Duke #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 6 of 124. ACC median rank 56.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Clemson #10 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #11 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #51 of 124; 2012 NC State #61 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #63 of 124; 2012 Miami #68 of 124; 2012 Duke #86 of 124; 2012 Virginia #91 of 124; 2012 Maryland #98 of 124; 2012 Boston College #105 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #114 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 3 of 124. ACC median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #58
Turnover margin. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Wake Forest #26 of 124; 2012 Miami #31 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #31 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #47 of 124; 2012 Duke #52 of 124; 2012 Clemson #58 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #82 of 124; 2012 Boston College #90 of 124; 2012 Maryland #100 of 124; 2012 NC State #102 of 124; 2012 Virginia #114 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 96 of 124. ACC median rank 58.
Possessionmedian #65
Possession. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Georgia Tech #4 of 124; 2012 Virginia #12 of 124; 2012 Maryland #30 of 124; 2012 Duke #46 of 124; 2012 NC State #65 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #70 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #75 of 124; 2012 Clemson #99 of 124; 2012 Miami #109 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #112 of 124; 2012 Boston College #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 13 of 124. ACC median rank 65.
Returning passing
Returning passing. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. ACC, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Florida State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Carolina #11 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #18 of 124; 2012 Clemson #22 of 124; 2012 Virginia #66 of 124; 2012 Miami #77 of 124; 2012 Duke #84 of 124; 2012 NC State #96 of 124; 2012 Boston College #97 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #119 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #120 of 124; 2012 Maryland #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 4 of 124. ACC median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #35
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Virginia Tech #3 of 124; 2012 NC State #20 of 124; 2012 Virginia #23 of 124; 2012 Maryland #25 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #35 of 124; 2012 Clemson #39 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #68 of 124; 2012 Boston College #73 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #87 of 124; 2012 Duke #105 of 124; 2012 Miami #109 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 2 of 124. ACC median rank 35.
Offensive success ratemedian #77
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 North Carolina #19 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #20 of 124; 2012 Clemson #32 of 124; 2012 Miami #70 of 124; 2012 Duke #77 of 124; 2012 NC State #79 of 124; 2012 Virginia #90 of 124; 2012 Boston College #104 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #113 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #119 of 124; 2012 Maryland #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 2 of 124. ACC median rank 77.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Virginia Tech #4 of 124; 2012 NC State #15 of 124; 2012 Clemson #20 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #21 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Maryland #38 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #60 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #71 of 124; 2012 Duke #103 of 124; 2012 Boston College #109 of 124; 2012 Miami #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 2 of 124. ACC median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Maryland #2 of 124; 2012 Boston College #15 of 124; 2012 Miami #32 of 124; 2012 Virginia #33 of 124; 2012 Clemson #40 of 124; 2012 NC State #41 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #69 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #88 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #91 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #105 of 124; 2012 Duke #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 102 of 124. ACC median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #52
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Boston College #8 of 124; 2012 Virginia #29 of 124; 2012 Miami #30 of 124; 2012 Maryland #38 of 124; 2012 Duke #52 of 124; 2012 Georgia Tech #86 of 124; 2012 NC State #96 of 124; 2012 Wake Forest #105 of 124; 2012 North Carolina #106 of 124; 2012 Virginia Tech #117 of 124; 2012 Clemson #124 of 124. Marked: 2012 Florida State, ranked 26 of 124. ACC median rank 52.