THIRD AND DATA

Gardner-Webb game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 30at Western Carolina52–45 W906277.057–33513–33–292254–162–428–6435:3836%46%
Sep 6at Georgia Tech12–59 L773264.247–11720–30–209204–181–215–2037:2332%56%
Sep 13vs The Citadel23–13 W583345.833–11815–25–216164–131–104–1828:2337%37%
Sep 20at Ohio35–52 L604828.030–19319–30–289162–135–514–3126:0138%57%
Oct 4vs Charleston Southern30–27 W764906.445–24319–31–247294–121–415–4028:1345%43%
Oct 11at Eastern Illinois21–10 W574467.835–25114–22–195205–100–024–5026:4942%33%
Oct 18vs UT Martin7–37 L623195.129–8318–33–236174–111–344–5520:1936%44%
Oct 25at Lindenwood48–20 W705097.348–24519–22–264247–131–105–5033:5764%45%
Nov 1at Tennessee Tech21–27 L832953.654–12816–29–167239–211–316–4539:0141%38%
Nov 8vs Southeast Missouri State27–24 W734676.441–18815–32–279204–150–017–6631:2932%28%
Nov 15at Tennessee State30–14 W602724.540–16413–20–108193–131–1010–11429:3737%33%
Nov 22vs Western Illinois24–29 L744486.129–9229–45–356254–152–326–6525:5238%41%
Season12 games7–58405,0156.0488–2157210–352–2,85825454–17016–271568–6186:02:4240%42%

Success rate

Gardner-Webb on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game39.8% · 41.9%
36
46
32
56
37
37
38
57
45
43
42
33
36
44
64
45
41
38
32
28
37
33
38
41
@ Western Carolina
@ Georgia Tech
The Citadel
@ Ohio
Charleston Southern
@ Eastern Illinois
UT Martin
@ Lindenwood
@ Tennessee Tech
Southeast Missouri State
@ Tennessee State
Western Illinois

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 32.4%, defense allows 56.4%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Gardner-Webb on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Gardner-Webb's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Gardner-Webb offense 40% (330 of 830)Opponent offense / Gardner-Webb defense 42% (324 of 774)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Western Carolina: opponent offense 46% of 78Western Carolina: Gardner-Webb offense 36% of 90Georgia Tech: opponent offense 56% of 55Georgia Tech: Gardner-Webb offense 32% of 68The Citadel: opponent offense 37% of 59The Citadel: Gardner-Webb offense 37% of 57Ohio: opponent offense 57% of 74Ohio: Gardner-Webb offense 38% of 61Charleston Southern: opponent offense 43% of 56Charleston Southern: Gardner-Webb offense 45% of 75Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 33% of 72Eastern Illinois: Gardner-Webb offense 42% of 59UT Martin: opponent offense 44% of 61UT Martin: Gardner-Webb offense 36% of 61Lindenwood: opponent offense 45% of 66Lindenwood: Gardner-Webb offense 64% of 69Tennessee Tech: opponent offense 38% of 45Tennessee Tech: Gardner-Webb offense 41% of 83Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 28% of 72Southeast Missouri State: Gardner-Webb offense 32% of 73Tennessee State: opponent offense 33% of 66Tennessee State: Gardner-Webb offense 37% of 60Western Illinois: opponent offense 41% of 70Western Illinois: Gardner-Webb offense 38% of 74
@ Western Carolina@ Georgia TechThe Citadel@ OhioCharleston Southern@ Eastern IllinoisUT Martin@ Lindenwood@ Tennessee TechSoutheast Missouri State@ Tennessee StateWestern Illinois
Gardner-Webb offenseOpponent offense (Gardner-Webb defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Western Carolina

52–45 W · 90 plays to 78
Gardner-Webb offense 36% (32/90)Western Carolina offense 46% (36/78)

at Georgia Tech

12–59 L · 68 plays to 55
Gardner-Webb offense 32% (22/68)Georgia Tech offense 56% (31/55)

vs The Citadel

23–13 W · 57 plays to 59
Gardner-Webb offense 37% (21/57)The Citadel offense 37% (22/59)

at Ohio

35–52 L · 61 plays to 74
Gardner-Webb offense 38% (23/61)Ohio offense 57% (42/74)

vs Charleston Southern

30–27 W · 75 plays to 56
Gardner-Webb offense 45% (34/75)Charleston S. offense 43% (24/56)

at Eastern Illinois

21–10 W · 59 plays to 72
Gardner-Webb offense 42% (25/59)Eastern Illinois offense 33% (24/72)

vs UT Martin

7–37 L · 61 plays to 61
Gardner-Webb offense 36% (22/61)UT Martin offense 44% (27/61)

at Lindenwood

48–20 W · 69 plays to 66
Gardner-Webb offense 64% (44/69)Lindenwood offense 45% (30/66)

at Tennessee Tech

21–27 L · 83 plays to 45
Gardner-Webb offense 41% (34/83)Tennessee Tech offense 38% (17/45)

vs Southeast Missouri State

27–24 W · 73 plays to 72
Gardner-Webb offense 32% (23/73)SE. Missouri St. offense 28% (20/72)

at Tennessee State

30–14 W · 60 plays to 66
Gardner-Webb offense 37% (22/60)Tennessee State offense 33% (22/66)

vs Western Illinois

24–29 L · 74 plays to 70
Gardner-Webb offense 38% (28/74)Western Illinois offense 41% (29/70)